World Class Standards Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC CEN DSRC / ITS-G5 coexistence RTTT / CEN DSRC...
-
Upload
sybil-charles -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Transcript of World Class Standards Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC CEN DSRC / ITS-G5 coexistence RTTT / CEN DSRC...
World Class Standards
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
CEN DSRC / ITS-G5 coexistence
RTTT / CEN DSRC
Coexistence plugtest
Ispra, Italy
4 July 2011Anders Hjelmare
© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved
World Class Standards
2
Electronic Fee Collection, EFC Electronic Toll Collection, ETC road tolls road user charges …
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
using RTTT CEN DSRC 5,8 GHz CEN TC278 ...
World Class Standards
4
European history of RTTT / CEN DSRCStandardisation
Deployment
1990 2000 2010
1987 Worlds first ETC system in Aalesund, Norway
1991 Start of DSRC standardisation in CEN, Vienna agreement between CEN and ETSI
Deployment of proprietary DSRC systems
1997 – First versions of the CEN DSRC standards
Start deployment of systems based on CEN standard and closing down proprietary systems
2004 – Updated versions
CEN standard systems currently deployed in 13 European Countries
Complete set of ETSI test standards
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
World Class Standards
5
Relevant documents
ERC Report 3: Frequency bands for RTTT ERC Recommendation T/R 22-04 ERC Recommendation 70-03, Annex 5 ERC Decision (92)02: Frequency bands for RTTT ECC Decision (02)01: Frequency bands for RTTT EN 12253 RTTT DSRC Physical layer EN 12795 RTTT DSRC Data Link Layer EN 12834 RTTT DSRC Application Layer EN 13372 RTTT DSRC Profiles EN 300 674 RTTT DSRC in 5,8 GHz ISM band
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
World Class Standards
6
A small part of the radio frequency spectrum
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
5000 MHz 6000 MHz
5800 MHz 5900 MHz
RTTT ITS G5
5850 MHz 5850 MHz
World Class Standards
7
EFC station side viewRoad Side Unit, RSU
On Board Unit, OBU
Downlink
Uplink
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
Half duplex
Backscatter
RSU = masterOBU = slave
World Class Standards
8
RTTT power levels (approx)
OBU is semi-passive!
RSU transmit power +33 dBm 2 W
Downlink attenuation - 70 dB
OBU incident power - 47 dBm 20 nW
OBU transmit power - 38 dBm 160 nW
Uplink attenuation - 70 dB
RSU incident power - 108 dBm 0,015 nW
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
World Class Standards
9
OBU wake-up
Specified in EN 12253
Sensitivity - 43 dBm or better
On any RTTT frame
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
No specification for wake-up immunity
Vendor specific implementation and properties
World Class Standards
10
EFC, initialization
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
VST Vehicle Service Table
OBU
Beacon Service Table
RSU
BST
BST
BST
BST
BST
BST
World Class Standards
11
EFC, transaction (example)
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
Read data
RSU OBUGET.rq
GET.rs
SET.rq
SET.rs Write data
ACTION.rqRelease
World Class Standards
12
EFC, frame timing (example)
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
Downlink = RSU modulatedUplink = RSU carrier only (OBU modulates carrier)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Downlink Uplink Uplink Uplink DownlinkBST Public Uplink
Downlink Uplink DownlinkGET.rq Private Uplink
ms
World Class Standards
13
EFC, transaction timing
• In high speed stations, RSU ‘thinking’ time is minimized (≈ 1 - 2 ms)
Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink
• In free flow stations, exact transmission scheme is station specific
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink
• In low speed stations, RSU ‘thinking’ time may be long (10 - 100 ms ?)
World Class Standards
14
EFC, retransmission
• Exact retransmission scheme is station specific
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
• If no uplink is received, RSU normally retransmits
Frame 12 Frame 12 Uplink Frame 13 Frame 13 Uplink Frame 14 Uplink
World Class Standards
15
EFC, transaction duration
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
50%
ms
Time available, good case
Time available, worst case?
World Class Standards
16
EFC, transaction duration (2)
Coexistence plugtest: CEN DSRC
Transaction times are statistically distributed
Longer transaction times > more transaction failures
Road operators: <0,5% … <0,1% … 0%
Max Transaction Error Ratio?