Worksop-Sebastian Bailey-The Bite-Size Revolution in Learning: Achieving Much More with Much Less
-
Upload
training-industry-conference-expo -
Category
Business
-
view
71 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Worksop-Sebastian Bailey-The Bite-Size Revolution in Learning: Achieving Much More with Much Less
Sebastian Bailey, PhDPresident, Mind Gym Inc@DrSebBailey
The bite-sizerevolution in learning
© Mind Gym 2
The future of learning
Little and often with distributed practice delivers greater personal and business value.
© Mind Gym 3
With great results
12%
20% 13% 25% 23%
“I have stopped smacking my son since I came on this program.”
Prosocial behaviour
Peer problems Hyperactivity
Conduct problems
Emotional symptons
“My husband said to me, ‘you haven’t shouted all week,’ I realized it’s because of what I’ve learnt here.”
“I have found this course fantastic – my child now sleeps in his own bed for the first time in 6 years.”
Positive sustained changes 3-5 months after program
© Mind Gym 4
The bite-size revolution
What works?
Blocks and releases to
bite size
The bites in bite-size
Bite-size: In practice
The bite-size
revolution
© Mind Gym 5
Vilfedo Pareto
© Mind Gym 6
Pareto principle
20%
80%
© Mind Gym 7
Pareto principle applied to learning
What works?
The Trivial Many
80%of time expended
20%of results and transfer
The Vital Few
20%of time expended
80%of results and transfer
© Mind Gym 8
A day’s worth of value in 90 minutes
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Knowledge of the various influencing styles
which can be used in different situations.
Understanding of my own preferred
style and it’s impact on others.
Ability to adopt different influencing styles to suit others’
styles or differing situations.
Mind Gym 90-minute workout Day long Two day
Standardized shifts
© Mind Gym 9
With added distribution
9
Low HighPerformance improvement
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e
Source: Donovan & Radosevich, 1999
½σ
Massed practice
Spaced practice
© Mind Gym 10
Illustrative value proposal
Traditional approach Bite-size approach
Program 1 day’s learning2 x 90 min learning session
1x 30min transfer task1x 30min booster session
Costs
Cost of time of 20 ppt @ $107,410*
$8,913 $4,456
Facilitator/ trainer costs $4,000 $5,500
Travel & Expenses $2,000 $500
TOTAL COSTS $14,913 $10,456
Benefits
Improvement in performance 5% 6%†
Utility value (20 ppt.)** $107,410 $128,892
ROI 620% 1270%
* Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, Management occupations, May 2011 at 241 working days per year.** Utility is calculated by taking salary x performance improvement.† ½ of one standard deviation greater transfer and therefore performance improvement (Donovan & Radosevich, 1999)
© Mind Gym 11
The bottom line… Miniaturization pays
17% Performance improvement 200
%
Greater return on investment33% Cheaper
© Mind Gym 12
Blocks to bite-size in your organization?
© Mind Gym 13
5 reasons why we don’t
Longer = Better The event is the hero
Design for the outlier
We say that people are different, but we treat them all the same
The change isn’t worth the cost
© Mind Gym
Longer = better
14
London
New York
7.5 Hours$1,000
4.5 Days$2,000
© Mind Gym 15
The event is the hero
Contextsetting
Learningevent
On the job application
>40% <20% >40%
Engage
Activate
Participate
Individual transfer is the hero
© Mind Gym 16
Design for the outlier
“A meeting moves at the speed of the slowest mind
in the room. All but one participant will be bored,
all but one mind underused.”
Slowpoke
“All the facts in detail. You end up with bloated
experiences and unnecessary content.”
Skeptic
“Wants a collaborative or facilitative approach to everything. Every avenue
of conversation is explored, every concept generated
by the group.”
Dialogue junkie
© Mind Gym 17
Same problem, different context
What works?
Blocks and releases to
bite size
The bites in bite-size
Proposition no.
Attack-Dispersion story Radiation problem and dispersion solution
1-2 A fortress was located in the center of the country. Many roads radiated out from the fortress. A tumor was located in the interior of a patient’s body.
3-4 A General wanted to capture the fortress with his army. A doctor wanted to destroy the tumor with rays.
5-7 The General wanted to prevent mines on the road from destroying his army and neighboring villages.
The doctor wanted to prevent the rays from destroying healthy tissue.
8 As a result the entire army could not attack the fortress along one road.
As a result, the high-intensity rays could not be applied to the tumor along one path.
9-10 However, the entire army was needed to capture the fortress.
However, high-intensity rays were needed to destroy the tumor.
11 So an attack by one small group would not succeed. So applying one low-intensity ray would not succeed.
12 The General therefore divided his army into several small groups.
The doctor therefore divided the rays into several low-intensity rays.
13 He positioned the small groups at the head of the different roads.
He positioned the low-intensity rays at multiple locations around the patient’s body.
14-15 The small groups simultaneously converged on the fortress.
The low-intensity rays simultaneously converged on the tumor.
16 In this way the army captured the fortress. In this way the rays destroyed the tumor.
© Mind Gym 18
What works?
Blocks and releases to
bite size
The bites in bite-size
10%
20%
92%Failure in
opportunity recognition
Control
% S
ugge
stin
g th
e ‘ri
ght’
solu
tion
No hint Hint
Source: Gick & Holyoak (1980)
Getting to the ‘right’ solution
© Mind Gym 19
Designing for application
Context
• Simulations• Role plays• Case studies• Problem-based learning• Action learning sets• Online forums• Ruthless pragmatism
Hug the context
© Mind Gym 20
Hug the context
Designing for application
Context
• Simulations• Role plays• Case studies• Problem-based learning• Action learning sets• Online forums• Ruthless pragmatism
Context
Context
Context
Context
• Consider use of general principles
• Multiple illustrations
• Seeking multiple contexts for application
• Identify similarities between contexts
• Storytelling and metaphor
© Mind Gym 21
Activate tactics
Activate
Make the transfer problem
explicit
Use management
observations and
coaching
Use after action reviews
Incorporate transfer tasks
into the workflow
© Mind Gym 22
We treat people all the same
© Mind Gym 23
Mass customization
© Mind Gym 24
Mass customization of learning
© Mind Gym 25
The change isn’t worth the cost
© Mind Gym 26
Focus on unmet, unarticulated needs
Participant Business stakeholder CHRO / CLO
‘I’d like something that fits with the way I work – I’m busy enough as it is’.
‘You can’t take them out of the field, but
they need development’.
‘I don’t believe we’re getting the return we need to satisfy our
stakeholders.’
© Mind Gym
Before and after the bite-size revolution
Traditional• Longer = Better
• Design for the participant outliers
• The event is the hero
• We say that people are different, but we treat them all the same
Bite size
• Miniaturize & Distribute
• Design for context of application
• Transfer is the hero
• Mass customization
© Mind Gym
Driving retail business growth
28
© Mind Gym 29
Join the revolution – Your mission
1. Seek ways to miniaturize your learning experiences. In terms of content, what is the vital few?
2. Create engagement. Tap into the self-interest of the participants.
3. Use distributed experiences. Spaced practice delivers much better value than massed practice.
4. Tune the environment to activate participants’ prior learning.
5. Develop value proposals to win over business stakeholders.
1 millionParticipants
1,200Companies
250Coaches
30Languages
40Countries
2013Learning Company
of the Year
New York
London
Dubai
Singapore
© Mind Gym 31
Engaged participants
Welcome!Why are you here…?
‘Because it’s Wednesday and my manager said
I needed to attend.’
A‘I am here because my role
requires influencing customers to buy. This will help me do this
better. I’ll also get better at persuading my teenage daughter.’
C
“Most companies have type ‘A’ learners. Type ‘C’ are the only ones who drive ROI.”
Robert Brinkerhoff
‘Because I want to learn
about influencing people
so that I can persuade my husband and kids.’
B