Lecture 5 Enzymatic destruction (ESBL) Enzymatic modification ( erm )
Workshop on Innovation in beverage industries: towards more sustainable enzymatic processes
-
Upload
veltha-ivzw -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Workshop on Innovation in beverage industries: towards more sustainable enzymatic processes
Tuscia University and Veltha ivzw, with the support of Lazio Region representative office in Brussels, are
pleased to invite you at the:
Workshop on Innovation in beverage industries:
towards more sustainable enzymatic processes 10
th DECEMBER 2014 - h. 14:00
BRUSSELS - Rond Point Schuman, 14 -(Lazio Region Office)-8th
Floor
Beverage industry needs specific, robust and cost effective enzyme-based catalyst systems that can be
directly implemented into the industrially relevant beverage production and clarification processes.
The development of immobilized systems over the free enzyme systems could led to several advantages,
including multiple reusability, as well as an easy separation from the reaction mixture to avoid the
permanence of residues which could affect food matrices stability.
Implementation of these new solutions should result in novel, techno-economically viable large-scale
bioprocess, which will become a sustainable alternative to the traditional ways of beverage treatment,
ensuring the competitiveness of European industries in the knowledge-based economy in Europe and
world-wide. The main themes of the discussion are:
- Application of enzymes in food and beverage industry
- Sustainable clarifying process in beverage industry: issues & solutions
The workshop is organised as an discussion table where, after some brief presentations of the speakers, the
participants may exchange their points of view and/or questions.
Programme
14,00 - Welcome coffee and registration
14,30 - Welcome speech - MEP Silvia Costa – European Parliament
14,40 - Introduction to the two themes - Marco Esti - Tuscia University
14,50-Speakers:
Tuscia University - (Ilaria Benucci)
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Polymer Research IAP - (Alexandra Latnikova)
European Commission - DG Research and Innovation –Advanced Manufacturing Systems and
Biotechnologies (Carmine Marzano)
Slovak University of Technology - (Martin Rebros)
University Politehnica Bucharest - (Michaela Dina Stanescu)
CLEA Technologies B.V. - (Pieter Koning)
Eaton Technologies GmbH - (Ilona Schneider)
16,45 - Round table (Moderator: Carlo Polidori- Veltha ivzw)
18,00 End of the Workshop
List of attendees:
- Association of Manufacturers and Formulators of Enzyme Products (AMFEP)
- European Technology Platform Food for Life
- Anheuser-Busch InBev nv/sa
- Juice Products Association
- LentiKat´s a.s.
- Vitalgrana Pomegranate S.L.
Workshop on Innovation in beverage industries:
towards more sustainable enzymatic processes
10/12/2014
Lazio Region Representation in Brussels
Rond Point Schuman, 14
Innovation in beverage industries:
towards more sustainable enzymatic processes
Prof. Marco Esti
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems
(DIBAF)
University of Tuscia
Via S. Camillo de Lellis 01100 Viterbo - ITALY
+39 0761 357426 [email protected]
10th DECEMBER 2014 – BRUSSELS Rond Point Schuman, 14 -(Lazio Region Office)
ENVIRONMENT30%
INFRASTRUCTURES33%
KBBE31%
IDEAS-ERC3%
SME2011 1%
EURATOM-FISSION1%
INCO 1%
European projects of Tuscia University
(2009-2013)
Global market for food and beverage enzymes
The Food and beverage enzyme industry global market revenue was
$1.2bn in 2012 and is estimated to reach $2.3bn by 2018
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
1
2
3
2010 2012 2018
G
row
th (
%)
bn
$
Global food and beverage enzyme market: 2010-2018
Billion $ Growth %
2009 2010 2011
Turnover (€ billion) 929 953 1,017
Added value (€ billion) 193 203 206
Number of employees (million) 4.20 4.25 4.25
Europe’s food and everage industry
Global beverage industry: 2008-2017
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2008 2012 2017
G
row
th (
%)
bn
$
Billion $ Growth %
.
Europe accounts for about 40% of the global beverage industry,
expected to rise to 916.5bn liters by the end of 2017
European juice market
2012 2017
Revenue ($ billion) 36 40
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Dairy products
Ready-made meals
Soft drinks
Savory frozen products
Biscuits
Meat, delicatessen, poultry
Appetizer grocery products
Chocolate products
Cheeses2011
2013
The most innovative food sectors in Europe, 2011-2013 (% of total European food innovation)
EU consumer expectations a ording to XTC Trends Tree™
Food innovation trends in Europe: 2009 - 2013
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Variety of sense
Sophistification
Easy to handle
Natural
Medical
Fun
Slimness
Time saving
Exoticism
Nomadism
Energy. Well-being
Vegetal
ecology
Solidarity
Cosmetics
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
2013 2009
%
Conclusions
The two industrial sectors of food enzymes and
beverages have great innovation potential and
considerable economic growth potential
Impact of food and beverages on the senses is the
most important factor in terms of costumer value
expectations.
10th DECEMBER 2014 – BRUSSELS Rond Point Schuman, 14 -(Lazio Region Office)
Dr Ilaria Benucci
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems
(DIBAF)
University of Tuscia
Via S. Camillo de Lellis 01100 Viterbo - ITALY
+39 0761 357426 [email protected]
Enzymes for beverage clarification
Haze development in beverages
Haze is the result of light scattering by colloidal or large
particles suspended in a beverage.
Haze-Active (HA) molecules in beverages
HA Proteins Proline-rich proteins
HA Phenolic compounds Low molecular weight flavans (mainly dimers)
Acidic polysaccharides Pectic substances
Starch
Time course of haze development
in beverages
Protein haze
Pectic substances (Pectin-protein colloidal complexes)
Chill haze
Starch haze
Immediate turbidity
Age-related haze (during storage)
Time course of haze development
in beverages
Protein haze
Pectic substances (Pectin-protein colloidal complexes)
Chill haze
Starch haze
Immediate turbidity
Age-related haze (during storage)
Cloud particles in beverages
Conventional treatments for beverages
stabilization
• Bentonite
• Silica sol
• Tannic Acid
• Gelatin
• Isinglass
• Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone
(PVPP)
Fining agents
addition
• Filter aids (diatomaceous; sludge
frame; kieselguhr)
Filtration
Drawbacks of conventional treatments
• Non-specific treatments
• Overall reduction in sensory quality of
beverages
• High labour input and associated costs
• Disposal of spent fining agents
constitutes a non-negligible source of
waste
• Release of contaminant elements (bentonite)
• High capital costs for regeneration (PVPP)
Fining agents
addition
• Energy consumption;
• Harmful; require
special handling and
disposal procedures (filter aids)
Filtration
• Increase reaction specificity;
• Preserve product quality without altering
organoleptic properties;
• Reduce environmental impact (save raw materials,
energy, chemicals, water).
Enzymes: Advantages
• High cost;
• Low stability;
• After each cycle of operation the enzymes can not
be recovered for further use;
• They are inevitably present in the final product.
Enzymes: Drawbacks
Cloud particle prevention with enzymes
• Increase reaction specificity;
• Preserve product quality without altering
organoleptic properties;
• Reduce environmental impact (save raw materials,
energy, chemicals, water).
Enzymes: Advantages
• High cost;
• Low stability;
• After each cycle of operation the enzymes can not
be recovered for further use;
• They are inevitably present in the final product.
Enzymes: Drawbacks
Sustainability
of conventional and enzymatic treatments
0 20 40 60 80 100
Greenhouse gas emissions
Consumption of energy
Chemical inputs
Waste streams
Conventional treatments Free enzyme Immobilized enzyme
Dr Ilaria Benucci
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF)
University of Tuscia
Via S. Camillo de Lellis 01100 Viterbo - ITALY
+39 0761 357426 [email protected]
Thank you for your attention
© Fraunhofer IAP
Enzyme immobilization
Dr. Alexandra Latnikova,
Fraunhofer institute for applied polymer research
Potsdam, Germany
© Fraunhofer IAP
What has to be considered about enzymes?
Enzymes are relatively expensive
We would like to use them multiple times.
Therefore, we need an easy way to recover them from the reactive mixture and be able to re-use them
Enzymes are sensitive to the processing conditions
Therefore, we would like to stabilize them
Their presence in the final product can cause intolerance by consumers
Therefore, we need an easy way to remove them from the product after they did their job
Possible solution: enzyme immobilization
© Fraunhofer IAP
Enzyme immobilization strategies
Depending on the enzyme type, some methods will improve the performance, while some can even worsen it.
Within one immobilization strategy, the performance will depend on the material used, preparation conditions etc.
© Fraunhofer IAP
Application of immobilized enzymes: continuous process
Potential advantages: Easier reactor operation and control
Easier product recovery and purification
Wider choice of reactors
© Fraunhofer IAP
Design of robust industrial catalysts
The major problem in enzyme immobilization is not how to immobilize enzymes, but how to design the
performance of the immobilized enzyme at will.
Unfortunately, the approaches currently used to design robust industrial immobilized enzymes are, without
exception, labelled as irrational , because they often result from screening of several immobilized enzymes and
are not designed.
As a result, many industrial processes might be operating under suboptimum conditions.
In order to make it rational, the dialog between the fundamental research and industry is needed!
The enzyme type - immobilization strategy combination is specific for each application
© Fraunhofer IAP
Carrier-based approach S
ize
Ma
teria
l P
oro
sity
Su
rface
che
mis
try
All parameters are interconnected The right set of criteria, specific for each application, has to be fulfilled Therefore: one has to be able to vary all this parameters simultaneously in a controlled manner
Expertise of Fraunhofer IAP
© Fraunhofer IAP
Expertize of “Microencapsulation and particle applications” group at Fraunhofer IAP
Available particle size:
100 nm – 1 mm
Possible particle architectures:
Compact, core-shell, multicompartment, porous
Available materials:
Conventional: polyethylene, polypropylene etc.
Synthetic: melamine-(form)aldehyde, polyurethane, polyamide, polystyrenes, polyacrylates, polyacrylonitrile, copolymers of those etc.
Bio-based/friendly: polylactide (stereocomplexes of), modified starch, modified cellulose, lignin-based polymers etc.
Surface chemistry:
— SO3-
—OSO3-
—OH
—COOH
—SH
—NH2
—NR3+
—CONH2
-- CONHR
-- etc.
More than 25 years of experience
© Fraunhofer IAP
Organization of Fraunhofer IAP
© Fraunhofer IAP
Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany
67 institutes and research units
more than 23,000 staff
€2 billion annual research budget
totaling. Of this sum, more than 1.7
billion euros is generated through
contract research
2/3 of this sum is generated through
contract research on behalf of
industry and publicly funded
research projects
1/3 is contributed by the German
federal governments in the form of
base funding
© Fraunhofer IAP
Fraunhofer worldwide
Dubai
Bangalore
Jakarta
Beijing Seoul
Tokyo
Cairo
Ampang
Santiago de Chile
Singapore
Brussels
Porto
Vienna
Bolzano Graz Budapest
Wrocław
Gothenburg
Thessaloniki
Sydney
Salvador
Sendai
Paris
São Paulo Campinas
Jerusalem
Subsidiary Center Project Center ICON / Strategic Cooperation Representative / Marketing Office Senior Advisor
Stellenbosch
Boston
Plymouth
East Lansing San José
Newark Maryland
Cambridge
London
Vancouver
Storrs
Glasgow
Southampton Dublin
© Fraunhofer IAP
Joseph von Fraunhofer
Director and partner in
a glassworks
Discovery of the
“Fraunhofer lines” in the solar spectrum
New methods for
processing lenses
Research volume:
approx. €2 billion
annually
Research and
development on behalf
of industry and state
mp3 music format,
white LED, high-
resolution thermal camera
Researcher
Inventor
Entrepreneur
The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
© Fraunhofer IAP
Thank you for your attention
© Fraunhofer IAP
The story of success
Table sugar intermediate
sweet much sweeter
US, 1950s: Sugar is produced by extraction from sugarcane and sugar beets
A considerable part of table sugar is used in liquid inverted form, e.g. hydrolyzed into GLU and FRU form
Liquid sugar markets is an enticing target for the corn syrup and glucose manufacturers
The problem: glucose is less sweet than fructose
Therefore, a process that would transform glucose into fructose is urgently needed
This transformation takes place at basic conditions, but: too many by-products --> color and off flavors
Therefore, it does not have industrial success
1957, USA: Marshall and Kooi: xylose isomerase, which transforms D-glucose into D-fructose
1960, USA: a process of GLU-FRU transformation using the enzyme isolated from Pseudomonas hydrophilia
1966, Japan: Takasaki described an industrial process of GLU-FRU using the soluble glucose isomerase
1967, USA: Clinton Corn Processing Company produces first commercial high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), contains 15% FRU
1968, USA: Clinton introduces 42% fructose syrup prepared with immobilized enzyme
1969, Japan: A process described, in which enzyme-containing cells were reused either in batch reactors or columns
1972, USA: continuous system using an immobilized enzyme was put into operation by Clinton
© Fraunhofer IAP
The result: Nowadays, HFCS corn syrup is produced from starch and comprises 3 enzyme-mediated stages:
1. liquefaction of starch (by α-amylase)
2. saccharification (by glucoamylase)
3. glucose-fructose transformation
The product, 55% enriched fructose syrup is obtained at a price 10-20 % lower than that of sucrose (based on sweetening power)
Policy Research and Innovation
Biotechnology in Horizon 2020
Carmine Marzano
Directorate "Key Enabling Technologies"
DG Research and Innovation
Workshop on Innovation in beverage industries: towards more sustainable enzymatic processes
Brussels 10th Dec 2014
Policy Research and Innovation
Outline:
- The KETs and Biotechnology
- Biotechnology in Horizon 2020
- Biotechnology KET calls 2014-2015
- Status WP 2016-17
- Conclusion
2
Policy Research and Innovation
Industrial mastering and deployment of Key Enabling Technologies (KETs)
What are KETs?
• Six strategic technologies
• Driving competitiveness and growth opportunities
• Contributions to solving societal challenges
• Knowledge- and Capital- intensive
• Cut across many sectors
• Nanotechnologies
• Advanced Materials
• Micro- and nano- electronics
• Photonics
• Biotechnology
• Advanced Manufacturing
European KET Strategy:
• EC Communications
(2009)512 & (2012)341
• KET High-level Group
3
Policy Research and Innovation
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEIT)
(i) ICT including micro- and nano-electronics and photonics
(ii) Nanotechnologies
(iii) Advanced Materials
(iv) Biotechnology
(v) Advanced Manufacturing & Processing
(vi) Space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for R&I
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
Horizon 2020
• Priority 2: Industrial Leadership
• Priority 1: Excellent Science
• Priority 3: Societal Challenges
This part of the Work Programme
4
FP7 KBBE ~ € 650 mio
Novel sources of biomass and bioproducts
Marine and fresh-water biotechnology
Biorefinery
Pillar 2: Societal challenge
•Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research and the bioeconomy
•Bio-Based Industries JTI
•Marine biotechnology research
Environmental biotechnology
Emerging trends in biotechnology
Industrial biotechnology
Pillar 1: LEIT Biotechnology
•Biotechnology-based industrial processes, including environmental and health biotechnology
• Boosting cutting-edge biotechnologies as future innovation drivers
• Innovative and competitive platform technologies
NEW
Horizon 2020 > € 1500 mio
• Biotechnology-based industrial processes driving competitiveness and sustainability
6
Aim: Maintain European leadership in industrial and environmental biotechnology.
Biocatalysts and bio-processing: bioprospecting, optimization of biocatalysts and biocatalytic process design
Novel and improved microorganisms: understanding gene expression in the light of stress conditions; understanding mixed cultures and the dynamics of microbial communities
Bioreactors and downstream processing: address possible bottlenecks in downstream processing and facilitate the transfer of new developments into operational environments
Environmental biotechnology: focussing on the development and practical use of know-how in terms of bioprospecting; biodetection of environmental pollution; bioremediation
• Cutting-edge biotechnologies as future innovation drivers
Aim: Assuring that the European industry stays at the forefront of
innovation, also in the medium and long term
Synthetic biology: creation of minimal cells, design of robust and sustainable bio-molecular circuits and pathways, biosafety and bioethics
Systems biology: investigating the operations of biological systems in order to optimize industrial applications of biotechnology
Bioinformatics: provision of powerful tools to store, retrieve and analyse biological data, in support of modelling and process design
Nano-biotechnology: combining both fields of research for application development in a wide range of sectors, biosafety and bioethics
Biotechnology in ICT: provision of ICT-devices incorporating biological materials
7
• Innovative and competitive platform technologies
8
Aim: Develop platform biotechnologies for a wide range of sectors to support European industrial leadership.
Platform technologies: Development of platform technologies and their integration across applications in support of the commercial use of biotechnology
Industrial applications of 'omics': Bringing closer to the market 'omics'-derived industrial applications, including prototyping and demonstration
Policy Research and Innovation
• Cutting-edge biotechnologies as future innovation drivers
Calls 2014 Biotechnologies
• Biotechnology-based industrial processes driving competitiveness and sustainability
BIOTEC 1: Synthetic Biology – construction of organisms for new products and processes RIA
BIOTEC 3: Widening industrial application of enzymatic processes IA
BIOTEC 4: Downstream processes unlocking biotechnological transformations IA
BIOTEC 5: SME-boosting biotechnology-based industrial processes driving competitiveness and sustainability
SME-Instrument (70% funding)
Policy Research and Innovation
• Total call budget € 47.9 million
• 26 proposals in second stage evaluation with a total requested EU budget of € 223.515 million
• 5 proposals on main list, currently in grant preparation (EU budget € 37.6 million)
• Possibility to fund 2 additional proposals
• Areas covered by the successful proposals include:
• Recycling of plastic waste for production of PHAs
• Vaccine chassis for livestock industry
• New vaccine/biomolecules purification technologies (DSP, 2 projects)
• Biocatalysts for higher alcohols
10
Results 2014 Biotechnologies
Policy Research and Innovation
• Cutting-edge biotechnologies as future innovation drivers
Calls 2015 Biotechnologies
• Biotechnology-based industrial processes driving competitiveness and sustainability
BIOTEC 2: New bioinformatics approaches in service of biotechnology, RIA
BIOTEC 5: SME-boosting biotechnology based industrial processes
driving competitiveness and sustainability, SME Instrument (70%)
BIOTEC 6: Metagenomics as innovation driver, RIA
• Innovative and competitive platform technologies
Policy Research and Innovation
Calls 2015
• BIOTEC 2 and 6 (2 stage evaluation)
• Deadlines:
• First stage 26/03/2015
• Second stage 08/09/2015
• Total Budget: 28.84 Million Euro
12
Policy Research and Innovation
Status WP 2016-17
• Currently we are in the process of finalising the scoping paper on which the 2016-17 WP will be designed upon
• The work programme 2016-17 will be prepared during the first half of 2015, aiming to publish it in July 2015 (tentative deadline)
13
Policy Research and Innovation
Conclusion
• Biotechnology relevant activities are covered substantially in H2020 (SC2, BBI JTI, BIOTEC KET)
• The Biotechnology KET will support activities to strenghten the competitiveness of the European Biotechnology Industry (including SMEs)
• Bio-catalysis and industrially relevant activities will continue to be supported by the KET in H2020 (one topic already in 2014)
• The scoping paper is being finalised, and the WP 2016-2017 might be available already in July 2015
14
HORIZON 2020
Thank you for your attention!
Find out more: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/
1
Rebros Martin
Institute of Biotechnology and Food Science
Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology
Slovak University of Technology,
e-mail: [email protected]
Immobilized biocatalysis
2
PVA gel
Advantages: - cheap
- non-toxic
- non-biodegradable
- good mechanical stability
- no side effect
- excellent long-term stability
Immobilization
3
LentiKats® technology
Stloukal, R., Rosenberg, M., Rebroš, M.: PCT - WO2007104268, www.lentikats.eu
4
LentiKats® technology
• Enzymes (so far 5 hydrolases)
• Bacteria (10 natural producers, 2 recombinant)
• Yeast (Saccharomyces sp.)
Suitable for:
5
α-L-rhamnosidase
Re o i a t α-L-rhamnosidase of Aspergillus terreus immobilization in polyvinylalcohol
hydrogel and its application in rutin derhamnosylation Rebroš M.,Pilniková A., Ši číková D., Weignerová L., Stloukal R., Kře V., and Rosenberg M.,
Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, accepted
Rutin Isoquercitrin α-L-rhamnosidase
Immobilization of enzymes
6
Rutin Isoquercitrin α-L-rhamnosidase
Wine aroma release
α-L-rhamnosidase
Immobilization of enzymes
7
Background and skills
• immobilization cells/enzymes • biocatalysis/biotransformations • fermentation technology
• process development • scale up
Laboratories of applied biocatalysis
8
Background and skills
Optimalization bioreactors
9
Background and skills
Scale up of fermentation up to 400 l
10
Background and skills
Downstream equipment
11
Rebros Martin
Institute of Biotechnology and Food Science
Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology
Slovak University of Technology,
e-mail: [email protected]
Immobilized biocatalysis
Thank you for
your attention!
LACCASE A VERSATILE ENZYME
AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN FOOD
AND TEXTILE DOMAINS
Michaela Dina Stănescu
U iversity „POLITEHNICA” Bucharest, „C.D. Ne itzescu” Depart e t of Orga ic
Chemistry,Polizu Str. 1, Bucharest, Romania
Sustainable development
• A development that meets the needs of the present,
without compromising the ability of the future
generations to meet their own needs. A development
that provides economic, social, and environmental
benefits in the long term, having regards to the needs
of living of future generations
• The concept was introduced in 1987,
by the World Commission on
Environment and Development
in the report Our Common Future ,
known also as Bruntland Report. Gro Harlem Brundtland
Sustainable development
• New approaches concerning the evaluation of
products and technologies:
– product life cycle;
– ecological footprint;
– blue print;
– sustainability;
– greenness, etc.
• Most resource-efficient and environmentally
friendly products have to be marketed.
Bio-based economy
Fostering a bio-based economy leads to:
• A lower carbon economy and sustainable primary
production —reduction of CO2 emissions, resource
and land-use efficiency;
• Building competitive bio-industries— potential for
value creation through cascading use of biomass and
reuse of waste materials;
E C Bio-based economy in Europe: state of play and future potential 2011
Bio-based economy
• A resilient and sustainable food chain —contribution
to global food security, new agricultural practices to
avoid competition between food and non-food use of
biomass, and improved animal health and welfare;
• Developing the European science base and
stimulating high-skilled jobs as well as research and
innovation excellence in Europe.
E C Bio-based economy in Europe: state of play and future potential 2011
LACCASE
• Classification: Oxydase (EC 1.10.3.2) –
metallo-enzyme (copper)
• Sources: plants (from the latex of Japanese
laquer tree), bacteria and fungi;
• Substrates (unspecific): usually aromatic
compounds having – OH or -NH2;
• Optimum pH values: 2.6-8.0;
• Optimum temperature: 45-55 0C
LACCASE (structure)
• Apo enzyme: protein with ~ 500 aminoacids in a 3 β-
barrel domains + oligocarbohydrates
• Reaction centre : 4 copper ions
600 nm
330 nm
LACCASE (catalysis)
LACCASE (catalysis)
• Advantages:
– Diminish of the spent energy for the substrate
oxidation;
– Water as side product
– Biodegradability;
– Reactions in water.
• Problems:
- Unstable;
- Reaction conditions imposed by the enzyme (pH,
temp.).
LACCASE (immobilization)
Method
Advantages Disadvantages
Physical methods
Adsorption Easy to perform Easy loss of enzyme
Entrapment Enhanced enzyme stability Enzyme loss in time
Chemical methods
Chemical bond with the
carrier
Enhanced enzyme stability May change enzyme
parameters
Cross linking Enhanced enzyme stability May reduce enzyme
activity due to modified
conformation
The carrier
• Matrix cryogel polymer:
1)High-molecular gel precursors; 2) Solvent; 3) Low-molecular gel precursors
or solutes; 4) Crystals of frozen solvent; 5) Unfrozen liquid micro-phase; 6) Polymeric framework of the cryogel; 7) Мacro-pores; 8) Solvent.
• Cryogel properties:
– macroporous texture;
– free of monomers and oligomers (reduced
toxicity);
– good mechanical properties;
– easy available;
– reasonable costs, etc.
The carrier
The carrier
• Cryogel type PVA
LACCASE (immobilization)
• Covalent bond immobilization of Laccase
M.D. Stanescu, M. Fogorasi, B. L. Shaskolskiy, S.Gavrilas, V. I. Lozinsky,
Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2010,160, 1947–1954
Immobilized LACCASE
(commercial)
Content of the Commercial laccase 0.57 mg/g
Immobilized LACCASE
(commercial)
• Stability of the free enzyme (1) and
immobilized enzyme (2)
2
1
M.D. Stanescu, M. Fogorasi, B. L. Shaskolskiy, S.Gavrilas, V. I. Lozinsky,
Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2010,160, 1947–1954
LACCASE (activity)
• 2,2’-azinobis-(3-etylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate),
(ABTS) - λmax (420 = 3.6·104 M-1cm-1)
Commercial
LACCASE (activity) Catalyst pH Specific activity
(µmol min-1 g-1)
Free enzyme
3.8 1301.2
4.7 1017.1
5.8 965.0
Immobilized
enzyme
3.8 196.5
4.7 268.4
5.8 76.7
M.D. Stanescu, M. Fogorasi, B. L. Shaskolskiy, S.Gavrilas, V. I. Lozinsky,
Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2010,160, 1947–1954
Biosynthesized LACCASE
T. Pubescens
Innoculum
Biosynthesis
Centrifugation
Diafiltration Chromatography
a) Ionic - Agarose–OCH2-O-(CH-OH)-CH2O-(CH-OH)-CH2O-N+(CH3)3
b) Gel – Superdex (Agarose + Dextran)
Protein content: 12.51 mg/mL
LACCASE (immobilization)
• Progress of the immobilization process by following the
protein content in enzyme solution
• Biocatalyst: content -5.2 mg /g , activity - 22250 µmol/min g
M. D. Stanescu, S. Gavrilas, R. Ludwig, D. Haltrich, V. I. Lozinsky,
Eur Food Res Technol, 2012, 234, 655–662
APPLICATIONS IN FOOD
DOMAIN
Polyhydroxyphenol oxidation
catalyzed by laccase
LACCASE
(commercial)
• Polyhydroxyphenols:
• catechol (1); quercitine (2), catechin (3),
chlorogenic acid (4) and caffeic acid (5) S. Gavrilaş, F. Dumitru, M. D. Stănescu, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series B, 2012, 74 (4),
4-10.
LACCASE
(commercial)
• Catechin (3) oxidation:
dimer of 3
S. Gavrilaş, F. Dumitru, M. D. Stănescu, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series B, 2012, 74 (4),
4-10.
Covalently
immobilized LACCASE • Polyhydroxyphenols:
catechol (I), chlorogenic acid (II), caffeic acid (III), catechin (IV)
M. D. Stanescu, S. Gavrilas, R. Ludwig, D. Haltrich, V. I. Lozinsky,
Eur Food Res Technol, 2012, 234, 655–662
Covalently immobilized
LACCASE (biosynthesis)
• Oxidation kinetics of the compounds I-IV
M. D. Stanescu, S. Gavrilas, R. Ludwig, D. Haltrich, V. I. Lozinsky,
Eur Food Res Technol, 2012, 234, 655–662
Covalently immobilized
LACCASE (biosynthesis Variation of phenol content in: apple juice (AJ), untreated(UAJ),
treated with free laccase (FLAJ) or immobilized laccase (ILAJ)
a ) Mean value of a triplicate
b) Expressed as CE—catechol
equivalent
c) Expressed as QE—quercitine
equivalent
M. D. Stanescu, S. Gavrilas, R. Ludwig, D. Haltrich, V. I. Lozinsky,
Eur Food Res Technol, 2012, 234, 655–662
Covalently immobilized
LACCASE (biosynthesis • Solid deposits in 10 mL of AJ samples taken after 2 h and
stored 24 h at 5 °C, from: a) untreated apple juice (UAJ);
b) free laccase-treated apple juice (FLAJ); c) immobilized
laccase-treated apple juice (ILAJ)
M. D. Stanescu, S. Gavrilas, R. Ludwig, D. Haltrich, V. I. Lozinsky,
Eur Food Res Technol, 2012, 234, 655–662
CONCLUSIONS
• New biocatalysts have been obtained by covalently
immobilizing commercial and laboratory-prepared
laccases.
• The biocatalyst has higher stability compared with
the free enzyme.
• The PVA-cryogel carrier is macro-porous, allowing the
access of voluminous phenolic compounds to the
reaction center.
• The kinetic parameters of polyphenols oxidation
revealed the influence of the hydrophobicity and
electrochemical potential of the substrates on the
reaction progress.
CONCLUSIONS
• The immobilized laccase proved to be a good catalyst
for stabilizing the phenol content of the apple juice by
fastening oxidative processes and leading to more
soluble products (less polymers).
• Despite its lower activity, the catalyst is appropriate
for the application due to the following
considerations:
– easy separation,
– possibility of reuse,
– improved quality of juice (clarity, colour, smell,
etc.).
APPLICATIONS IN TEXTILE
DOMAIN
Degradation of textile
dyes
The carrier
• N,N-dimethylacrylamide
(DMAAm),
• allyl glycidyl ether
(AGE) ,
• N,N’-methylene-bis acrylamide
(MBAAm),
• N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylene
diamine (TMEDA)
• iminodiacetic acid (IDA)
Properties:
• Macroporous;
• High mechanical
resistance.
LACCASE (immobilization)
• Coordinative bond immobilization of commercial
Laccase Roglyr Lite 1540 :
• Biocatalyst : content: 0.30 mg protein/mL, 24,6 µmol/min mL
M.D. Stanescu , A.Sanislav R.V. Ivanov, A.Hirtopeanu, V. I. Lozinsky, Appl Biochem
Biotechnol, 2011, 165, 1789–1798.
Coordinatively immobilized
LACCASE (commercial)
• Studied compounds: Acid Blue 62 (2) and
bromaminic acid (1),
:
A. Sanislav, F. Dumitru, M. D. Stănescu, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series B, 2013, 75( 4),
91-100.
Coordinatively immobilized
LACCASE (commercial
• Decolorization of anthraquinone compounds: 1 (a)
and 2 (b), with free (FL) and immobilized laccase (IL):
IL
FL
IL
FL
M.D. Stanescu , A.Sanislav R.V. Ivanov, A.Hirtopeanu, V. I. Lozinsky, Appl Biochem
Biotechnol, 2011, 165, 1789–1798.
Coordinatively immobilized
LACCASE (commercial
• Kinetic constants of oxidation reaction of 1
and 2, catalyzed by free and immobilized
laccase
M.D. Stanescu , A.Sanislav R.V. Ivanov, A.Hirtopeanu, V. I. Lozinsky, Appl Biochem
Biotechnol, 2011, 165, 1789–1798.
CONCLUSIONS
• The coordinatively immobilized laccase proved to be a
good catalyst for amino-anthraquinone compounds.
• Despite its lower activity, the catalyst is appropriate
for the application due to the following
considerations:
– easy separation,
– possibility of reuse,
– less polluting procedure.
APPLICATIONS IN TEXTILE
DOMAIN
Improving hemp
quality
Mediators
• Mediators improve the efficiency of the
oxidation process being a electron shuttles
extending the range of substrates:
LACCASE (commercial
Hemp treatment:
LACCASE
• Lignin oxidation
LACCASE (commercial)
• Laccase treatment with or without US (FT-IR -
Vertex 70 )
US
No US
LACCASE (commercial)
• Cristallinity
after treatment
initial
CONCLUSIONS
• Laccase is an ecological solution for lignin
elimination from hemp.
• Laccase treatment improve the hemp fibre
quality.
• Use of mediators enhance the efficiency of
treatment.
• Use of US leads to an advanced degradation of
lignin.
GENERAL
CONCLUSIONS • Laccase is a nonspecific oxidase accepting as
substrate:
– Polyphenols,
– Dyes,
– Lignin.
• Immobilization improve laccase treatments due to:
– easy separation of the catalyst,
– gentle process with less polymers,
– possibility of reuse,
– less polluting procedure.
Financial support
• European Science Foundation for a STMS at Boku University
through COST 928 Programme Control and Exploitation of
Enzymes for Added-Value Food Products”
• Romanian Academy (grant 1R-2008), and the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project # 07-03-91682_RA_a).
Thank you
for attention! • POZE
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 1Brussels
CLEA Technologies
Cross-linked Enzyme Aggregates in food applications
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 2Brussels
Company Overview
• CLEA Technologies B.V.
• Independent SME since 2002
• Situated in Delft, The Netherlands
• Currently 15 employees
• Making enzymatic processes work. Sustainable & profitable
• Proprietary enzyme immobilization technology
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 3Brussels
CLEA Technologies as partner
• Specialist on Biocatalysis– Roots in Delft University, Biocatalysis department
– Founder: Professor Roger Sheldon
• Technology and service provider to a.o.– pharma and specialty chemical manufacturers
– cosmetic ingredients, flavors and fragrances
– oil and fat, starch, biofuel (1st & 2nd generation)
• What we do for our customers:– enzyme screening
– route development
– process optimization
– enzyme immobilization
• Working for major players in each market
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 4Brussels
Cross-linked Enzyme Aggregates
PrecipitationX-linking + Co-
polymerization
• “i ple a d roadly appli a le• Cost-effective (no carrier, no need for pure enzyme)
• Short time-to-market (low development costs)
• Scalable protocols
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 5Brussels
Magnetic CLEAsSynthesis of mCLEA
1. Synthesis of ferromagnetic nanoparticles
2. Functionalisation of the nanoparticles
3. CLEAtion: cross-linking the enzyme- and the nanoparticles
• Magnetic separation
• Magnetic strength can be adjusted
• No change in CLEA activity
• Every CLEA can be made into mCLEA
Characteristics
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 6Brussels
(m)CLEA Properties• Very high enzyme loading
– A tivity per kg o para le to ’free e zy es’
• Particle size typically 5-50 mm
• Mechanically robust
– High resistance to shear, flexible
• Excellent operational and storage stability
– Temperature, pH, organic solvents, long shelf life, hypoallergenic
• (Almost) all enzymes can be made into a mCLEA
• Dedicated CLEA development within weeks
• Short term to market
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 7Brussels
mCLEA Properties in action• Covalent bond: No leaching of enzyme
– No contamination of the product reaction system
• Easy product / enzyme separation
– by permanent magnet, >99% separation efficacy. Low investment.
– reduced down stream processing
– applicable in multi-solid systems (fermentation, crystallization)
• Recyclable
– depending on enzyme and process, > 50 cycles possible. 10 as target.
• No Carrier:
– highly cost effective
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 8Brussels
Separation. Lab scale• Using € 1 permanent magnet
• Separation: 1 minute movie stills
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 9Brussels
Separation: 10 – 1000 liter scale
• Using magnetic rod(s) in flow tube.
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 10Brussels
• Wet drum separation– Proven technology
– Robust
– Low cost
– Standard mining equipment
Separation: large scale
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 11Brussels
in beverage clarification• Fruit Juices
– Just liquid or with solids?
– With (high amounts of) solids: mCLEA only option
• Issues
– Viscosity reduces movement between immobilized enzymes and substrate
– On bead, as with large molecules: only enzymes on surface will be used
– Smaller particles in favor: higher specific surface
– Higher risk of attrition: strong bead or (m)CLEA
• Application
– No solids present -> bead: use column or settling
– Solids present -> mCLEA: magnetic separation
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 12Brussels
Food Status Immobilized Enzymes• In general: from food additive to processing aid
– Enzyme should still be food approved
– In our vision: removal of immobilized enzymes is always advantageous
– Removal of immobilized enzymes to check using activity assay? Leakage?
• Food status ingredients
– Carrier Based: work with food approved (ion exchange) resins
– cross-linked: an ingredient asks for attention: glutaraldehyde
• Food status glutaraldehyde
– EU: Flavour Ingredient FL-nr 05.149
– FDA 173.357 Materials used as fixing agents in the immobilization of enzyme
preparations.
– Standard procedure immobilizing enzymes for (HF)CS production
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 13Brussels
EU Direct and Indirect Legislation
• EU direct legislation:
– EC 1331/2008 regulations on food additives, enzymes and flavourings
– EFSA approval guidelines
– EFSA example on new enzyme http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3778.pdf
– EC 1332/2008 regulation on food enzymes
– EC 1333/2008 regulation on food additives
– EC 1334/2008 regulations on flavourings, Annex 1: substances
– EC 1935/2004 Food contact materials framework
– EC 1130/2011 Union list of approved food additives
– ’ Food Contact Material Dbase
• EU indirect: German legislation
– Use of glutaraldehyde in artificial sausage coatings
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 14Brussels
EU legal situation interpretation• The 1331-1333/2008 describe the use of enzymes in food, either as food enzyme
or as food additive
• The application of enzymes to immobilize, remove and re-use restricts the legal
position to processing aids (EC 1332-1333/2008)
• Alternatively, it may (also) be judged as Food Contact Material, like ion exchange
resins (EC 1935/2004, EC 1130/2011) but
• EC 1130/2011 and DBase do mention but not cover enzyme carriers by any means.
Ergo:
To the best of our knowledge, there is no EU legal base for any immobilized enzyme
for use in food contact yet, only member state regulations.
• Ho e er, the EF“A e a ple o a e e z e e tio s o a i ert carrier , therefor judging the safety as enzyme solely http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3778.pdf
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 15Brussels
Wrap Up• CLEAs
– powerful and costs effective enzyme immobilization method
– no leaching
– much higher activity / ml than any carrier based enzyme
– can be hard to separate
• mCLEA
– slightly more expensive than a CLEA
– easy to separate at high efficacy at very limited investment
– applicable in multi-solid systems (fermentation, crystallization)
• Legal status
10/12/2014 mCLEAs in Food slide | 16Brussels
CLEA Technologies B.V.
Pieter Koning, Business Development [email protected]
Delftechpark 34
2628 XH Delft
The Netherlands
+31 15 76 00 300
www.cleatechnologies.com
Let us show you that it is not only better to use enzymes
but also how to use enzymes better.
© 2010 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Eaton’s Filtration Division
Begerow Product line – Life Science Beverage Treatment Products
2 2 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Begerow Product line – Beverage Treatment Products
Biotechnology (Yeast, Enzymes)
Filter Aids
Beer Stabilization
Fining
Stabilization
Beverage Treatment Product
© 2010 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Eaton’s Filtration Division
Wine Segment
4 4 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Concept total solution provider in Wine
Grape processing
- Pressing
- Fining
Alcoholic Fermentation
Malolactic Fermentation
Clarification
Fining
Bottling
SIHA Enzymes
SIHA/SIHAFERM (Yeast), SIHA
PROFERM (Yeast Nutrients)
SIHALACT Malolactic bacteria,
SIHA bacteria nutrients
Pre - filtration
End - filtration
SIHA Gelatine, SIHA Bentonite, SIHA
Gum arabic ,…
SIHA Active Carbon
BECOGUR (Diatomite), BECOLITE
(Perlite), BECOCEL (Cellulose)
BECO + BECOPAD DFS, Modules
BECO Filter Cartridges (membrane,
depth)
SIHA Gelatine, SIHA Activated
Carbon, SIHA Lime
BECO Integra (Plate & Frame filters),
BECO StepFlow, Housings
Processing flow Products we offer
5 5 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Key technical elements in the wine industry – view from the beverage treatment products…
• Climate impact on flowering and ripening
• Yeast – alcoholic fermentation: small, middle and large scale
• Yeast nutrients
• Enzymes – clarification and maceration of grapes, mash, juice, wine
• Malolactic bacteria – metabolism malic acid to lactic acid + aroma
• Fining, Stabilization & treatment of off-flavours: Gelatine, Bentonite
• Filtration:
• Pre-filtration with filter aids
• Filtration with filter sheets, filter modules
• Filtration with filter cartridges
• We serve complete customer solutions in the wine industry.
6 6 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Market view EMEA –beverage treatment products
• Small, middle and big cooperative
wineries
• Sales resp. well educated and skilled
• Reputation and Image in the wine
industry
• Distribution network via distributor,
reunion of customer, direct sales
• „Consultant“ role • Product price: middle and high price
5%
28%
27%
25%
15%
European Wine Production by Country
2014, in M hl
Germany France
Italy Spain
ROE
7 7 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Competency / Expertise:
• Sales group: skilled and experienced people talk the customer language
• Master, Bachelor – Thesis: Application and R&D products
• Customer contact – Q1/Q2 : filtration and beverage treatment product Q3/Q4 : biotechnology and beverage treatment products
• Customer requirements and our answers: • lab services, specific product documentation
• technical articles, broschure
• recognition on trade shows
• @-newsletter
• customer training
• Enology symposium Germany, Austria
• Microscopy seminar: schools, customer
• Customer seminar: Germany, eastern european countries (crotia, slovenia, moldova, ect.)
Communication strategy to influence decision makers in the wine industry…
© 2010 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Eaton’s Filtration Division
Juice Segment
9 9 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Concept solution provider Fruit Juice
Fruit
-Mashing
Pressing
Juice treatment:
Starch / Pectin Finning
Storage Concentrate
or Storage Juice
Panzym, Panzym XXL
Panzym, Panzym XXL
Pre - filtration
End - filtration
Panzym, Panzym XXL,
SIHA Bentonit, SIHA Bevasil, SIHA
Gelatine, SIHA Activated Carbon
SIHA Puranit UF
BECOGUR (Diatomite), BECOLITE
(Perlite), BECOCEL (Cellulose)
BECO + BECOPAD DFS
Processing flow Products we offer
10 © 2012 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Process Apple/Pear
20-40 ml/1000l. Panzym XXL or
30-50 ml/1000l. Panzym Pro Clear
20-60 ml/1000l. Panzym HT 300
or Panzym AG XXL
Enzyme addition during milling:
40-80 ml/t Panzym Yield Mash or
50-120 ml/t Panzym First Yield
> 30 min. or 1-2 h at 25 – 27 °C,
No stirring
Juice app.. 11,5 ° Bx
Pasteurisation
Centrifuge
Concentration
Direct concentrate with 45-65 °Bx
Storage < 4°C
Juice appr.11,5 ° Bx
Aroma - recovery
Degradation of pectin and starch
Finning and FIltration
Concentration
Juice- concentrate with
70-72° Bx storage <4°C
Apple/Pear
Mill
Enzymzation
Mash holding time
Press / Decanter pomace
Option:
Pomace enzymation
220 ml/t Panzym Second Yield
11 11 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Key technical elements in the fruit juice industry – view from the beverage treatment products…
• climate impact on flowering and ripening
• enzyme treatment mashing, clarification, stabilization
• Beverage treatment (Stabilisation products): Gelatine & Bentonite
& Active carbon
• Filtration:
• Filtration with filter sheets
12 12 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Market view EMEA – beverage treatment products
• High market share
• Sales rep. well educated and
skilled especially in poland
• Increase demand of fruit
processing, selling of fruit
concentrate in new regions
• „Consultant“ role, also for cider
production
• Stable AJC market
EU-28: Apple production
in 1.000 t 2011 2012 2013 2014 * ´13
* Prognose %
Poland 2.500 2.900 3.170 3.540 12
Italie 2.293 1.939 2.122 2.388 13
France 1.701 1.169 1.576 1.487 - 6
Germany 953 972 804 1.036 29
Hungaria 301 750 585 780 33
Spain 507 391 464 446 - 4
Netherland 418 281 314 350 11
Belgium 305 220 220 307 40
Rumania 412 351 367 285 - 22
Protugal 265 221 284 264 - 7
Greece 308 242 236 231 - 2
United Kingdom 226 162 204 225 10
Austria 199 157 155 188 21
Czech Republic 79 118 121 116 - 4
Slovenia 73 45 56 68 21
Danemark 20 18 23 24 4
Sum 10.560 9.936 10.701 11.735 10
13 13 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Growth – PC Fruit juice – EMEA market
• Product related with the partner companies: • Novozymes: production capabilities - surface and solid phase production
• Panzym (traditional) Panzym XXL (GMM)
• Panzym XXL and Panzym Yield Mash XXL (new product formulation)
• Industry trends, utilise these in our product development and
communicate to our customer base
14 14 © 2009 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
PC Juice – EMEA market
Development of a new technology to stabilize cloudy beverages
• Pro`s:
• New Trends development with the SIHA, PANZYM and BECO products
• Development of enzyme & extraction methods to get healthy juices
© 2010 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved.
Eaton’s Filtration Division
Begerow Product line – Life Science Beverage Treatment Products