Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

43
Housing Compactness Single Family Homes (4-10 du/ac) Townhomes (20-40 du/ac) Multifamily Housing (50-100 du/ac)

description

 

Transcript of Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Page 1: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Housing Compactness

Single Family Homes(4-10 du/ac)

Townhomes(20-40 du/ac)

Multifamily Housing(50-100 du/ac)

Page 2: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Open SpaceParking10 DU/AC 25-30 DU/AC

Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with NatureIllustration by John Ellis, WRT/Soloman E.T.C.

Housing Compactness

Page 3: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

50-150 DU/AC 100 DU/AC

Housing Compactness

Open SpaceParking

Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with NatureIllustration by John Ellis, WRT/Soloman E.T.C.

Page 4: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

150 DU/AC 150 DU/AC

Housing Compactness

Open SpaceParking

Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with NatureIllustration by John Ellis, WRT/Soloman E.T.C.

Page 5: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 2-3 Units per Building: 1 12 Units/Acres

Diversey and Hermitage, Chicago, IL

Aerial, Chicago, IL

Diversey and Hermitage, Chicago, IL

Aerial, Chicago, IL

Townhome Single Family

Page 6: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 2 Units per Building: 2 16 Units/Acres

Pat terns of Densi ty 3

2819 Clybourn, Chicago, IL

Aerial, Chicago, IL1846 Nelson, Chicago, IL

2 Flats

Page 7: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 3 Units per Building: 3 24 Units/Acres

Diversey and Clybourn, Chicago, IL

3 Flats

Aerial, Chicago, IL3045 Clybourn, Chicago, IL

Page 8: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 3 Units per Building: 6 26.4 Units/Acres

3059 Clybourn, Chicago, IL

6 Flats

Aerial, Chicago, IL1929 Potomac, Chicago, IL

Page 9: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 3 Units per Building: 15-30 36+ Units/Acres

1704 Humboldt Park, Chicago, IL

Courtyard Building

Aerial, Chicago, IL2330 W. Armitage, Chicago, IL

Page 10: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 2-8 Units per Building: 20-52 31-83 Units/Acres

2900 Clybourn, Chicago, IL

Low-rise Multi Residential over Retail

Aerial, Chicago, ILLow-rise 4+1, Chicago, IL

Page 11: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 6+ Units per Building: 36+ 62+ Units/Acres

Parkhomes, Lakeshore East, Chicago, IL

Aerial, Chicago, IL

Mid-rise

Page 12: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: Varies Units per Building: Varies

Chicago River

Riverfront Development

Page 13: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Stories: 2-8 50-80 Units/Acres

Chicago Mixed Density Block

Mixed Density Block

Page 14: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Support for transit, walking and bicycling

•Range of housing options

•Healthy environment

•Access to green space

•Design, aesthetics and local historic character

A Neighborhood For Everyone

Page 15: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

HistoricPreservationVincent L. Michael, PhD

WORK-SHOP3

LIVABLECOMMUNITIES

Page 16: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

"Preservation" is an overarching term: to save buildings

"Restoration" is the very RARE act of restoring buildings to their historic appearance

Wrigley Building, Graham Anderson Probst White Robie House, Frank Lloyd Wright

Page 17: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

"Rehabilitation" is the standard for 95% of historic buildings

"Adaptive Re-use" is another common term

The Goal: To make buildings function in the future while retaining historic qualities

Shaw Technology School, Farr Associates

Page 18: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Created by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

•National list was the first to include buildings, sites and structures with local significance

National Register of Historic Places

Page 19: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Most common form of landmark status

•Includes both individual buildings and districts

National Register of Historic Places

Page 20: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Significance and Context

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Page 21: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Significance and Context

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Page 22: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Site Plan

Page 23: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Buildings

Page 24: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Buildings

Page 25: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Columbus Park Jens Jensen

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Landscape

Page 26: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Jens Jensen, Lathrop Homes

Julia C. Lathrop Homes

Landscape

Page 27: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Protection: Section 106 Process

•SHPO (State Historic Preservation Office) is responsible for the review

•Only protects against Federal action or funding

National Register of Historic Places

Page 28: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Protection: Section 106 Process at Lathrop triggered by HUD funding Review process is already underway

1. Identify / Evaluate Historic Properties

2. Assess Effects

3. Consultation

4. Council Comment

5. Proceed

National Register of Historic Places

Page 29: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Federal Investment Tax Credit (20% of total rehabilitation cost)

•Illinois Property Tax freeze

•Easements

National Register of Historic Places

Page 30: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•National Register listing helped prevent Federal Government from demolishing old Goldblatt's Building on State Street, 1989 (left)

•National Register listing helped preserve Tri-Taylor District from state Medical Center expansion, 1981 (below)

Section 106: How It Works

Page 31: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Postal Service planned demolition of Burnham designed Marshall Field River warehouse for new post office

•Followed Section 106 but proceeded with demolition anyway, 1991

Section 106: How It Works

Page 32: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•80 buildings and landscapes at Fort Sheridan are a National Historic Landmark

•Complex is preserved as it is sold to private owners - new infill and additions permitted with design review

Fort Sheridan, Related Midwest

Section 106: Examples

Page 33: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•939 W. Armitage: CTA Brown Line Rehabilitation, 2006-2008

Section 106: Examples

Page 34: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•939 W. Armitage: CTA Brown Line Rehabilitation, 2006-2008

Section 106: Examples

Page 35: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Schoenhofen Brewery: allows demolition for 9 of 11 buildings in historic complex

•City starts to demolish 10th building, 1902 Power House by Schmidt, Garden, Martin

Section 106: Examples

Page 36: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Schoenhofen Brewery: Renegotiated MOA requires marketing (1985)

•New user rehabilitates building

Section 106: Examples

Page 37: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•American Brewery, Baltimore Revitalization of challenged East Baltimore neighborhood by Humanim, non-profit 2011 National Trust Honor Award Winner

Rehabilitation Examples

Page 38: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•American Brewery, Baltimore Interior Views

Rehabilitation Examples

Page 39: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

•Manvilla Manor, former blight on Knoxville community

•Now 57-unit supportive living center, 2011 National Trust Honor Award Winner

Rehabilitation Examples

Page 40: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Determine what can be preserved• Physical viability• E• conomic viability No set formula•

1 MI

Wes

tern

Ave

.

Calif

orni

a Av

e.

Ash

land

Ave

.

Dam

en A

ve.

Schneider Elementary

Green Exchange

ndustrial Corridor

BUCKTOWN

WESTDEPAUL

Lane Tech High School

LATHROP HOMES

HAMLIN PARK

SOUTH LAKEVIEW

ROSCOE VILLAGE

SQUARE

WARD 1

WARD 32WARD 47

WARD 35

DALE

IRVING PARK

What's Next For Lathrop?

Page 41: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

WORK-SHOP3

LIVABLECOMMUNITIES

WORK-SHOP1GREENINGOFLATHROP WORK

-SHOP2EDUCATION

&COMMUNITYBUILDING

Next steps...

What's Next For Lathrop? The Framework:

•The CHA and Working Group have given us guidelines, how do we meet them?

•Where do we get the funds for development? How much/when is it available?

•Given the market environment, what makes sense at this site?

Page 42: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

Question &Answer

WORK-SHOP3

LIVABLECOMMUNITIES

Page 43: Workshop 3 Presentation: Livable Communities, Part 2

312.595.7240www.lathropcommunity.org

TEXT LCP TO 83936