Workplace+learning+in+hpsr+training
Transcript of Workplace+learning+in+hpsr+training
What are your experiences of WPL? Do you consider WPL relevant to/ in your
program?
Buzz feed your experience with the rest of the group.
Research Projects: Sustaining health system leadership and management development
The Atlantic Philanthropies’
Partnership for Health Leadership and Management
Teaching:
OTF (Postgraduate Diploma)
DrPH-LA
A literature and program Survey Interviews with a range of institutions
responsible for leadership training programs using WPL and other interventions in the UK
Survey using EBSCO Host, Emerald & Google Scholar There is a lot of information yet very limited!
Individual interventions and WPL and WPBI Results of survey
WPL for VET, technicians, industry, and professionals – a lot out there
WPL in health – Focused on nursing and physiotherapist and ltd Med. Practitioners
WPL for Leaders and Managers –Less Info
WPL for L&M in Health – Lesser info
Grey literature search
Very useful through Google search to obtain policy & practice documents on WPL in UK, Australia, New Zealand, USA(very limited)
WPB leadership intervention Programmes
Searched using google for leadership intervention programs in health, WBL intervention programs and added NHS leadership training programs
Focus on leadership, health, and NHS programmes
Identify areas of particular interest on leadership training, support & Development programmes
Workplace learning is learning that is organised in or by the workplace, and that supports employment role and progression (Walmsley et al, 2008).
An informal learning that enable the individual employee to progress and develop, making the most of talents, and the employer to benefit from a more skilled and productive workforce (Cunningham, 2001)
It is “a flexible form of learning which enables employees to engage in the regular processes of up-dating and continuing professional development (Reeve & Gallacher, 1999: 125-6)
Common theme: The ‘learning tasks are influenced by the nature of learners’ work’
(Fuller, 2003)
Broader sets of interests are often promoted in WPL It addresses the shift in thinking about the best ways
people can keep abreast with their jobs and improve performance in a world where change is not only becoming the norm, but is accelerating on an almost daily basis.
The understanding that context is vital for learning and, aligned with this, that performance in a formal training environment is not necessarily a good indicator of performance in a different environment, such as the workplace.
To an extent context is replacing content as the key factor in organisational learning. These realisations are leading to greater focus on workplace learning –learning in the context of work.
An increasing awareness that experiences are critical to learning and performance. Our experiences are vital building-blocks for our development.
Learning how to ‘do’ something is far more important than learning ‘about’ something in terms of improving performance.
Learning and work are merging (C. Jenner, 2011)
Informal learning is central in WPL
Based on interrelationship between the individual learner and the workplace affordances (Rainbird et al. 2004)
WPL is participatory & flexible
WPL it points to the importance of the context of the learning environment (Fuller and Unwin, 202)
Hard to measure and difficult to value adequately with more formal type of learning (Coffey, 2004)
Support at the organizational level
Having structured orientation on the job
Using good teaching strategies to support structured learning
Learning from experience
Use of formative and summative assessment
For Instance -Support at the organizational level: Having dedicated person with the interest and
authority to promote learning in the workplace by creating opportunities that learners could take up as affordances to really learn.
Provision of quality resources, time, and moral support so that learning is not pushed aside when other things appear to be important.
Having a organizational level mechanism to reward learning success.
The Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF): Potential to link training to current or future job roles
Work as Learning Framework (WALF) (Felstead et al, 2009:1) this approach ‘traverse a series
of analytical layers of enquiry’ that necessarily focus on the conditions, strategies, principles and particularities of work tasks, and apply or investigate these within the wider context of work.
Union Learning Representatives (ULR): Supporting WPL for unregistered staff and less
permanent staff.▪ (Industry Training Federation 2011; Walmsley et al, 2008)
A good learning environment is an elusive element of WPL due to the complexity of practice, the limitation on practitioners to time, and to support and guide the learner
Challenge of sustaining preceptors, buddies, mentors and coaches to support learning and assimilation into the team.
Barrier to progression partly due to professional dominance, and partly due to inability to sustain funding because of secondment and job rotation
Lack of capacity in healthcare organization
Inconsistencies in funding WPLs and training regarded as cost rather than an investment
WPL learners are non-traditional students so they need support sensitive to their needs, clear progression routes, and support from line managers and mentors which can be a challenge sometimes.
WPL is seen as just doing the job rather than learning
Time and resource consuming
It requires a culture change to work in partnership with employers
There is also a challenge of timeframes and ensuring the learners have the time necessary to undertake the programme.
Concern about capacity of training institutions to meet demand
The flexibility of interventions
Based on relationship development & networks
Overall program surveyed : 32 L&M Training & 23 Support Interventions mostly (NHS related)
Selected 7 with interesting intervention strategies and contact information
Response and follow-up interviews from 5 inst. Interviews took 90-45mins each via Skype/phone General Findings
Similarities and Difference in Strategies, duration, certification, curriculum design, targeted groups, modes of intervention
What we found was the common strategies
Global Advanced Leadership Programme
(GALP) and the Lancaster Advanced
Leadership Programme. (ALP)
Action Learning Set Facilitators
Development Program
(By: NHS leadership Academy).
Emerging Leaders Programme
(By: East Midlands Leadership Academy)
Entrepreneurial University Leaders Programme (EULP)
Ashbridge Leadership Programme
About the program
Training and Certification
Key strategies
Program Design and Curriculum
Who is involve in training
Targeted Participants and Enrolment
Feedback and Challenges
Lessons and Uniqueness of the programme
Purpose of WPBI for Leaders & Mgt For growth &development; Problem solving; Support &
Capacity building; Networking; Career progression; etc Timing relevant and program widely spread
Programs range between 6months to 2yrs Work with organization involved
By seeking written approval, fund and support of staff
Actual problems used for training project Maintain contact after training
Through networks, informal contacts and light consultation, e-groups and feedback
Common Interventions/ Strategies Action Learning
Reflective practice i.e. using groups of 2-4, friendly consulting, dealing with real company problems, use of action learning, exchange program, etc.
Shadowing/ company visits / Company exchange programs
Fostering Networking
Problem solving oriented
Use of faculty and external facilitators
Follow-ups via the internet from programme organizers
Flexible in planning and delivering interventions and Time frame
Combine both class contact vs. workplace; and individual vs. group devt strategies
Accommodate different clients’ needs Problem-based and reflective strategies Continuous engagement after training
Use it to inform of interventions and curriculum design
WPL as integral part of HPSR training
Team training Support of organization Alumni and practitioners will be trained as
coaches, mentors, ALS facilitators, etc.
Example is the PAHLM Project
Our Training Target Audience: Managers, practitioners, researchers, policy makers, politicians, NGOs
workers, emerging leaders, etc.
Characteristics of Our Audience: Usually very busy, tend to lack the time to study full time, excessive
workload, and in some cases lack the support of top management to pursue a course (so do it in secrete).
Purpose Qualifications only capture certain kinds of learning
Learning opportunities afforded by the workplace affect the quantity and quality of learning (Eraut et al. 1998)
WPL is a growing initiative for organisation to develop HR and adapt to changing environments (Doyles & young, 2007; Crouse et al, 2011).
Health practitioners and managers tend to engage in continuous professional development in the workplace anyway.
“Lessons learned by successful and effective managers are roughly:70% from tough jobs20% from people (mostly their boss)10% from courses and reading”
“Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it
will live its whole life believing that it is stupid”
- Albert Einstein
Well, it may mean using any of these ‘70’
approaches:
Or any of these ‘20’ approaches:
Identifying opportunities to apply new learning and skills in
real situations
Establish a culture of coaching from
manager/colleagues/others
Allocating new work within an existing role Encourage seeking advice, asking opinions, sounding out
ideas
Increasing range of responsibilities or span of control Engage in formal and informal mentoring
Identifying opportunities to reflect and learn from projects Embed informal feedback and work debriefs
Allocating assignments focused on new initiatives Encourage learning through team work
Providing the chance to work as a member of a small team Target building strong internal and external networks
Providing increased decision making authority Build a culture of learning through teams/networks
Providing stretch assignments Support professional and industry association membership
and external networking
Enhancing leadership activities, e.g.; lead a team,
committee membership, executive directorships
Encourage facilitated group discussion as a standard practice
Setting up co-ordinated swaps and secondments Use Action Learning
Arranging assignments to provide cross-divisional or cross-
regional experience
Or any of these ‘20’ approaches:
Providing opportunities to carry out day-to-day research
Providing opportunities to develop a specific expertise niche
Allocating assignments to provide new service experience (Jenning, 2011)
Improve current job performance Improve quality of service provision (and goods) Respond to new technology Develop a more flexible workforce Improve employee safety in the workplace (Smith, 2000) For managers: WPL is a crucial tool to
Achieve higher level of performance
Deliver better results
Be promoted and/ or secure their jobs
Affect work performance, job satisfaction and increase profits
(Longenecker, 2010; Nilsen, 2012)