WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE...

17
WORKING GROUP WORKING GROUP MILITARY MILITARY TERMINOLOGY TERMINOLOGY Based on Based on STUDY GROUP 3 STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE PRAGUE May 2012 May 2012

description

2. Guidelines for national WG Start with ATP Allied Land Tactics (9 Nov 2009) Extract those terms that require definitions from the perspective of a non-military language teacher or translator. Terms contained in ATP but not listed in AAP-6 could primarily be taken from JP Unless listed there, they could be taken from FM Unless listed in AAP-6, JP 1-02, FM 1-02 or similar national documents, terms are quoted with no definition. Terms quoted with no definition in any of the proposed documents are to be defined by the working group in English, considering the context of ATP National working groups must include linguistic and military experts. Continue with AJP-01 (D) dated 21 Dec 2010

Transcript of WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE...

Page 1: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

WORKING WORKING GROUP GROUP

MILITARY MILITARY TERMINOLOGYTERMINOLOGY

Based on Based on STUDY GROUP 3STUDY GROUP 3

BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012

Page 2: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

1.Situation1.Situation•AAP-6 is not satisfying

Many terms that require definitions, e.g. in ATP-3.2.1, are not listed in AAP-6.

• Many dictionaries, wordlists, glossaries ………….,with inconsistencies existing.

• Updating process takes much time!• Cannot rely on NSA only.

Page 3: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

2. Guidelines for national WG2. Guidelines for national WG• Start with ATP-3.2.1 Allied Land Tactics (9 Nov 2009)• Extract those terms that require definitions from the

perspective of a non-military language teacher or translator.

• Terms contained in ATP-3.2.1 but not listed in AAP-6 could primarily be taken from JP 1-02.

• Unless listed there, they could be taken from FM 1-02.• Unless listed in AAP-6, JP 1-02, FM 1-02 or similar national

documents, terms are quoted with no definition.• Terms quoted with no definition in any of the proposed

documents are to be defined by the working group in English, considering the context of ATP 3.2.1

• National working groups must include linguistic and military experts.

• Continue with AJP-01 (D) dated 21 Dec 2010

Page 4: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

3. Evaluation3. Evaluation• WG results are to be posted on the BILC

website.

• Evaluation has to be done by military English native speakers.= Evaluation committee

task: - avoid multiple entries- proofread for plausibility

Page 5: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

5.Way Ahead5.Way Ahead• Evaluated results in English to be published on

BILC website.

• Nations establish equivalencies in their languages on the English basis of ATP-3.2.1 and AAP-6. (only for national training purposes aiming at Interop)

• Benefit for national teachers and translators from a multilingual database.

• Later on: NSA process• Same procedure applies to AJP-01 (D).

Page 6: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

6.WG Meeting PRAGUE 20126.WG Meeting PRAGUE 2012

• After discussion about problems (first results)

Agreed:

• XLS-Template works out for the purpose

Page 7: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.
Page 8: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

• Agreed:

• Term is extracted if civilian teacher/translator does not understand its meaning in a military context

Page 9: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

• Agreed:• In the teams working on the

respective chapters the civilian member designates terms to be extracted, the military expert provides the explanation and the linguist formulates the definition according to ISO 2704 (if not already given in authoritative documents)

Page 10: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

•Agreed:Agreed:Terms occurring in the definition

or explanation supposedly unfamiliar to civilians have to be marked (e.g. mission-type order) and adopted as entries in the term list.

Page 11: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

7. Timelines7. Timelines

Oct 201 1 Oct 201 1MAY 20 111 resu ltsstPresen tation

resu lts resu lt

INPUTMONTE REYBILC-C onf2012 BILC-C onf2013BILC-Prof Sem2012

nat. WG

Terminology liststo be sent to AUTby 21 Oct 2012

AJP-01 (D)

Page 12: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

1. AUT: The Employment of Land Forces2. GBR: Conceptual Frameworks for the

Conduct of Tactical Activities: Battlespace, Functional and

Operational Frameworks3. BEL: Types of Tactical Forces4. POL: Tactical Planning Considerations5. EST: Tactical Offensive Activities6. DNK: Tactical Defensive Activities7. ITA: Tactical Stability Activities8. DNK: Tactical Enabling Activities9. CZE: Operations in Specific Environments

and Circumstances

ATP-3.2.1 SitRep:ATP-3.2.1 SitRep:BLED 2012BLED 2012

Page 13: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

8.Way Ahead with AJP-01 (D)8.Way Ahead with AJP-01 (D)• Evaluated results in English to be published on

BILC website.

• Nations establish equivalencies in their languages on the English basis of ATP-3.2.1 and AAP-6. (only for national training purposes aiming at Interop)

• Benefit for national teachers and translators from a multilingual database.

• Later on: NSA process

• Same procedure applies to AJP-01 (D).

Page 14: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

AJP-01 (D)AJP-01 (D) chapters to be chapters to be allocatedallocated

Chapter 1 The Alliance Doctrine

Chapter 2 NATO´s Position Within the Global Security Environment

Chapter 3 Alliance Structures and Military Forces

Chapter 4 The Strategic Level

Chapter 5 Campaigning

Chapter 6 Command and Control of Operations

Page 15: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

There are only 6 chapters.

Don‘t hesitate - Apply for one!

AJP-01(D)AJP-01(D)

Page 16: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

POCPOCPOC for

WG Terminology and Translation:

[email protected]@bmlvs.gv.at

and CC:[email protected]

Page 17: WORKING GROUP MILITARY TERMINOLOGY Based on STUDY GROUP 3 BILC Conference VILNIUS May 2011 PRAGUE May 2012 PRAGUE May 2012.

„I’m going home“