Workgroup on the Assessment and Funding of School ...

Workgroup on the Assessment and Funding of School Facilities

Delegate Maggie McIntosh, Chair

Agenda

September 22, 2021

3:00 pm

Virtual Meeting

I. Call to Order and Opening Remarks

II. Gross Area Baselines in Public School Construction

Michael Rubenstein, Principal Analyst, DLS

III. Facilities Assessment and Educational Facilities Sufficiency

Standards

Bob Gorrell, Executive Director, IAC

Alex Donahue, Deputy Director of Field Operations, IAC

Tom Bart, Bureau Veritas

Bill Champion, Bureau Veritas

IV. Closing Remarks and Adjournment

September 22, 2021

Gross Area Baseline in Public School Construction

Presentation to theWorkgroup on the Assessment and Funding of

School Facilities

• “Consider and make recommendationsregarding the methods used to establish aGross Area Baseline and the MaximumState Construction Allocation for eachpublic school construction projectapproved for State funding.”

– SB 551 (Chapter 698 of 2021, also knownas Built to Learn 2.0)

Workgroup Charge

1

• Major factor in determining how much theState will pay for a new or renovated publicschool building

• Formula-based calculation that establishesthe square footage of a new or renovatedbuilding that is eligible for State funding

• Any square footage that exceeds the GrossArea Baseline (GAB) is entirely theresponsibility of the local government

What Is Gross Area Baseline?

2

• 21st Century School Facilities Act of 2018(Knott Commission bill) required a review ofthe per student square foot allocations used bythe Interagency Commission on SchoolConstruction (IAC)

• IAC approved the new GABs in May 2019based on recommendations by the Workgroupon Educational Development Specifications

• GABs replaced maximum Gross AreaAllowance

Origin of GABs

3

How Is GAB Calculated?

PER STUDENTALLOWABLE

SQUAREFOOTAGE

GROSS AREA BASELINE

4

• For a Capital Improvement Program project, localeducation agencies (LEAs) submit a seven-yearenrollment projection for the school, including therationale and basis for the projection– State does not do enrollment projections for individual

schools

• LEAs also submit enrollment projections for adjacentschools– Allows IAC to assess if there is excess capacity in nearby

facilities

• IAC reviews LEA’s enrollment projection and makesa final determination regarding projected enrollment

Enrollment Projections

5

• Regular Education Students– 105 sq. ft. to 160 sq. ft.– Varies by level and size of school

• Special Education Students (Categories C/S/W)– 180 sq. ft. (elementary and middle schools)– 200 sq. ft. (high school)

• Career and Technical Education Students– 210 sq. ft. (high school only)

What Are Allowable Square Feet?

6

Elementary School Square Feet

7

Middle School Square Feet

MIDDLE SCHOOLSGSF/Stu Total GSF

Projected Capacity

of Students*

Max. Gross Area

Allow.Gross Area Baselines

≤600 145 145

650 135 144 93,600

700 135 142 99,400

750 135 141 105,750

800 135 140 112,000

850 130 138 117,300

900 130 136 122,400

950 130 135 128,250

1000 130 134 134,000

1050 130 133 139,650

1100 130 132 145,200

1150 130 131 150,650

1200 130 130 156,000

1250 130 129 161,250 ≥1300 130 128

125

130

135

140

145

150

Previous Max. Gross Area Allowance Gross Area Baselines

8

High School Square Feet

HIGH SCHOOLS

GSF/Stu. Total GSF

Projected Capacity of Students* **

Existing Max. Gross

Area Allowance

Proposed Gross Area Baselines

≤ 800 160 160850 160 160 136,000 900 160 159 143,100 950 160 159 151,050

1,000 160 158 158,000 1,050 160 158 165,900 1,100 160 157 172,700 1,150 160 157 180,550 1,200 156 157 188,400 1,250 150 156 195,000 1,300 150 156 202,800 1,350 150 156 210,600 1,400 150 155 217,000 1,450 150 155 224,750 1,500 150 154 231,000 1,550 150 154 238,700 1,600 150 154 246,400 1,650 147 154 254,100 1,700 145 153 260,100 1,750 145 153 267,750 1,800 145 153 275,400 1,850 145 153 283,050 1,900 145 152 288,800 1,950 145 152 296,400 2,000 145 152 304,000 2,050 145 151 309,550 2,100 145 151 317,100 2,150 145 151 324,650 2,200 145 150 330,000 2,250 145 150 337,500 2,300 145 150 345,000 2,350 145 149 350,150 ≥2400 145 149

140

145

150

155

160

165

≤ 80

085

090

095

01,

000

1,05

01,

100

1,15

01,

200

1,25

01,

300

1,35

01,

400

1,45

01,

500

1,55

01,

600

1,65

01,

700

1,75

01,

800

1,85

01,

900

1,95

02,

000

2,05

02,

100

2,15

02,

200

2,25

02,

300

2,35

0≥2

400

Previous Max. Gross Area Allowance Gross Area Baselines

9

Role of GABs in Determining State Funding

TOTAL PROJECT

COSTGROSS AREA BASELINE

10

• Better alignment between educational specificationsand funding– State funding supports more square feet

• Enrollment projections are the foundation of GABcalculations– School-level enrollment projections are only available

from the LEAs

• New variance process allows IAC to approve largerdesigns based on demonstrated programmatic needs– On a case-by-case basis

Take Aways about GABs

11

September 22, 2021

IAC Staff and Bureau Veritas (SFA Vendor)

Presentation to the Workgroup on the

Assessment and Funding of School

Facilities

1

The Data Set

2

● Huge and very complex

○ >250,000 asset records with millions of data points

○ Data on spaces, building-system components, and student enrollments

● Sources

○ Provided by LEA

○ Collected by BV’s assessors on site

○ Calculated by BV based upon starting assumptions fitting most schools

● Living data set, not fixed

○ Starts with the 2020-2021 assessment data as the baseline

○ To be updated annually through

■ On-site assessments of 25% of schools statewide and

■ Mathematical aging of data of other 75% of schools by one year

The Initial Data Process

3

State LEA Review/Input

1) IAC provides starter school inventory

and enrollment data from MSDE records

1) LEA confirms inventory and provides

starting data set to the extent possible

a) List of assets with attributes (install

date, size, condition data, etc.)

b) List of spaces and their use

assignments, floor plans

2) BV assessors visit sites

a) Measure/confirm spaces

b) Confirm or log attributes of spaces

c) Assess condition of each building-

system component

2) QA/QC phase

a) LEA reviews collected data live

onscreen and can request changes

and offer corrections on

● Condition

● Space sufficiency

The Initial Data Process, cont’d.

4

State LEA Review/Input

3) BV reviews LEA suggestions and agree

or disagree with explanation to LEA

3) LEA can request QA/QC meetings as

desired to discuss any concerns or data

questions

4) IAC shares FCI data with LEAs 4) LEA can request further meetings with BV

and/or IAC staff at any time

Future Annual Reviews of Data● Process to take approximately six to nine months during which

○ IAC updates data on 25% via on-site assessments and 75% mathematically

○ LEAs provide updates resulting from locally funded/implemented changes

○ IAC presents draft data

○ LEAs review and comment/question/request changes

Physical Condition

Physical Condition

Facility Condition Index (FCI)

Educational Sufficiency

The usability of the space for supporting delivery of education

Combined Facility Score

Complete score

5

Calculating a Facility

Condition Index

Building-System Level

FCI 75%Amount Depleted

Lower is Better

=

Facility Level

FCI % =HVAC (FCI %) + Roof (FCI %) + Foundation (FCI %) + etc.

HVAC + Roof + Foundation + etc.

Depleted Value

Replacement Value6

Amount Depleted

Remaining Life

Remaining

Life

Facility Condition Index | FCI

7

HIGHER FCI● means less remaining useful lifespan (RUL)

LOWER FCI● means more remaining useful lifespan (RUL)

LOWER FCI = BETTER RELATIVE CONDITION

Average Facility FCI by LEA

8

Low

er

is B

ett

er

9

Statewide Facility Condition Distribution by Band

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

10

Average Depletion Level of Each Major Building SystemL

ow

er

is B

ett

er

Low

er

is B

ett

er


Physical Condition





Complete score

11

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

12

Educational Facilities Sufficiency Standards

https://iac.mdschoolconstruction.org/?page_id=908

● Bare-minimum standards

● For existing PK-12

facilities

● For doing triage and for

comparability

● Not for use in designing

facilities

● Remediation not

mandatory

https://iac.mdschoolconstruction.org/?page_id=908

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

13

Sufficiency Deficiencies

The most significant deficiencies can be grouped into two categories:

Deficiency Type Method of Accounting

1) SPACE: Insufficient square

footage within a space type

Multiply missing square footage by the replacement

value of square footage ($400/SF).

2) SPACE ATTRIBUTES

a) Lighting

b) Temperature and relative

humidity

c) Acoustics

d) Air quality

● Where the deficiency is substantial and

widespread throughout the facility, adjust the

Remaining Useful Lifespan (RUL) of the

relevant building system to reflect its

insufficiency.

● Deficiencies posing a threat to facility usability

are placed into a special category for extra

emphasis.

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

14

Spaces Measured for Sufficiency


1) Administrative

2) Auditorium

3) Cafeteria

4) Career Development

5) Custodial & Maintenance

6) Dining

7) Fine Arts

8) General Classroom

9) Gymnasium

10) Health Services

11) Kitchen

12) Library/Media Center

13) Locker Room

14) Pupil Services

15) Science

16) Special Education

17) Storage (non-classroom)

18) Technology & Computer Science

19) Teacher Workspace/Lounge

Items Checked for Presence

and/or Number as Appropriate

1) Play Field

2) Unpaved Recreation Area

3) Hard-Surface Court

4) Parking Spaces

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

15

Square-Footage-Related Space Standards


● Multiply Projected Enrollment by

minimum square feet per student in

the Standards

Example:

General-Use Classrooms

Projected Enrollment of 1,500

X

25 NSF per student

=

37,500 NSF for 1,500 students

Step 1: Calculate Minimum Required space.

● Project fifth-year future enrollment using straight-line projection from current and

previous four years’ enrollments.

16

Calculating Space Deficiencies

Example:

Declining enrollment trends receive a growth factor of 1.0 (= flat).

17

Calculating Space Deficiencies

Step 2: Subtract actual square footage from the minimum required space to determine

the space deficiency.

● Deduct 20% of the actual space for those general classrooms that are open-plan-type

spaces

Step 3: Add up all the space deficiencies into a total space deficiency figure for the

facility.

● NOTE: Space deficiencies are only “netted” against any extra space found in that space

type, not against any extra space found in other types of space in the facility.

Step 1 (cont’d): Calculate minimum required space for the selected space type.

● Multiply projected enrollment by minimum square feet per student in the Standards.

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

18

Space Deficiencies

19

Relocatables and Modulars

● Relocatables: Free-standing structure that can be

relatively easily moved to another site. Expected

Useful Life Remaining = 15.

● Modulars: More than 24 feet wide and installed

upon a foundation or not easily moved to another

site. Expected Useful Life Remaining = 20.

● BOTH: Each one is assessed as a building system

and assigned a remaining useful life span

(Remaining Useful Life) figure and an FCI figure.

● When RUL = zero, the square footage also gets

counted as a space deficiency in the general-

classroom category.

○ 116,077 SF (11%) of relocatables have an RUL

of zero.

○ 199,189 SF (10%) of modulars have an RUL

of zero.

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

20

Space Deficiencies by Type -- Statewide L

ow

er

is B

ett

er

*Data for these categories is small enough that it is not visible at current chart scale

Main Building(s)

Additional Space Required to Meet Minimum Standard


Physical Condition





Complete score

21

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

22

Proposed Categories in the Combined Facility Score

# Category Title Description1 Threat to Life/Safety/Health or Facility

Usability

Issues that pose immediate or potential threats to the life, health, or

safety of persons within the facility or to the usability of the facility

(i.e., results in the facility having to be closed to educational uses).

2 Space Deficiency Space(s) insufficient as measured against the Standard(s) for that

space type.

3 Damaging Other Systems Systems or deficiencies that require repairs to in order to prevent or

mitigate damage occurring to other building systems.

4 Degraded w/ Potential Mission Impact Systems that are mission critical and are beyond expected lifespan

OR systems that are at 200% or more of expected lifespan.

5 Beyond Expected Lifespan Systems that are at 100% to 200% of expected lifespan but show no

signs of required repairs.

6 Grandfathered Deficiencies Deficiencies that are “grandfathered” violations of State or locally

adopted codes, regulations, or standards.

7 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Facility Deficiencies related to sufficiency standards for fixed equipment

and inherent parts of the facility.

8 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Equipment Deficiencies related to sufficiency standards for non-fixed

equipment.

9 Functioning & Within Expected Lifespan Systems that are within their expected lifespan and do not require

replacement.

FCI

Space Data

Facility Data

Maryland Educational

Facilities Sufficiency Standards

Facility Data


23

Categorizing the Issues Found

# Proposed Category

1Threat to Life/Safety/Health or

Facility Usability

2 Space Deficiency

3 Damaging Other Systems

4Degraded w/ Potential Mission

Impact

5 Beyond Expected Lifespan

6 Grandfathered Deficiencies

7 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Facility

8Sufficiency Deficiencies—

Equipment

9Functioning & Within Expected

Lifespan

Value to Replace

Effective Age of System

System Expected Life

Percent Degraded

FCI

Population Year 1

Population Year 2

Population Year 4

Population Year 5

Population Year 3Growth Factor

Space Data

Facility Data

Maryland Educational

Facilities Sufficiency Standards

24



# Proposed Category

1Threat to Life/Safety/Health or Facility

Usability

2 Space Deficiency


4 Degraded w/ Potential Mission Impact



7 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Facility

8 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Equipment

9 Functioning & Within Expected Lifespan

Space Data

Building System

Lifespan Data

> 200% EUL?

Beyond EUL?

No

Yes

No

YesCritical?Yes

No

25



# Proposed Category


Facility Usability

2 Space Deficiency



Impact




Facility


Equipment

9Functioning & Within

Expected Lifespan

Yes

Space Data

Building System

CriticalCode IssuePrevent Damage

Critical Safety/ Threat

?

Yes

3-Prevent DamageNo

Deficiencies

6-Grandfathered

7-Facility Sufficiency

8-Equipment Sufficiency

26



# Proposed Category


Facility Usability

2 Space Deficiency



Impact




Facility


Equipment

9Functioning & Within Expected

Lifespan

Issues by Category

Category Share

1 - Threat to Life/Safety/Health or Facility

Usability 0.14%

2 - Space Deficiency 6.20%

3 - Damaging Other Systems 0.08%

4 - Degraded w/ Potential Mission Impact 0.52%

5 - Beyond Expected Lifespan 18.40%

6 - Grandfathered Deficiencies 1.00%

7 - Sufficiency Deficiencies - Facility 0.11%

9 - Functioning & Within Expected

Lifespan 73.54%

Total 100.00%

27

28

Issues that pose immediate or

potential threats to

● The life, safety, or health of

persons within the facility;

OR

● The usability of the facility

(i.e., results in the facility

having to be closed to

educational uses)

Category 1: Threats to Life, Safety,

Health, or Facility Usability (71)

● Air Conditioning Absent in 20%-plus of Classrooms (32)● Asphalt Pavement - Pedestrian (2)● Asphalt Pavement - Vehicular (3)● Athletic Surface - Lawn Area (2)● Brick (1)● Concrete Pavement - Pedestrian (1)● Fire Alarm System (14)● Gypsum Board/Plaster Ceiling● Modular Building - Classroom/Office - Standard (1)● Quarry Tile (2)● Relocatable Building - Classroom/Office - Standard (2)● Sports Courts (1)● Sprinkler System (2)● Switchgear/board w/Sub Panels - Medium Density (1)● Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT) (4)● Window (1)● Wood Sports Floor (1)

Lo

we

r is

be

tte

r

29

Proposed Categories in the Combined Facility Score

# Category Title Description1 Threat to Life/Safety/Health or Facility

Usability

Issues that pose immediate or potential threats to the life, health, or

safety of persons within the facility or to the usability of the facility

(i.e., results in the facility having to be closed to educational uses).

2 Space Deficiency Space(s) insufficient as measured against the Standard(s) for that

space type.

3 Damaging Other Systems Systems or deficiencies that require repairs to in order to prevent or

mitigate damage occurring to other building systems.

4 Degraded w/ Potential Mission Impact Systems that are mission critical and are beyond expected lifespan

OR systems that are at 200% or more of expected lifespan.

5 Beyond Expected Lifespan Systems that are at 100% to 200% of expected lifespan but show no

signs of required repairs.

6 Grandfathered Deficiencies Deficiencies that are “grandfathered” violations of State or locally

adopted codes, regulations, or standards.

7 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Facility Deficiencies related to sufficiency standards for fixed equipment

and inherent parts of the facility.

8 Sufficiency Deficiencies—Equipment Deficiencies related to sufficiency standards for non-fixed

equipment.

9 Functioning & Within Expected Lifespan Systems that are within their expected lifespan and do not require

replacement.

We’d loveto hear your questions

30

Workgroup on the Assessment and Funding of School Facilities

Delegate Maggie McIntosh, Chair

Wednesday, October 20 at 3:00 p.m.

Wednesday, November 3rd at 3:00 p.m.

Wednesday, November 17th at 3:00 p.m.

Wednesday, December 1st at 3:00 p.m.

Wednesday, December 15th at 3:00 p.m.

Low

er is

bet

ter

Statewide Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 1,383•Arithmetic Mean of 48.4%•Std Deviation of 14.9%

Low

er is

Bet

ter

FCI # Buildings Percentage of Buildings

Band1 (0.80-0.89) 2 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 12 1%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 237 17%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 551 40%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 308 22%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 117 8%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 53 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 47 3%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 54 4%

Total 1,383 100%

2 12

238

551

308

117

53 47 55

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

1

Low

er is

bet

ter

Statewide Average FCI by Major Building System

57%54%

50%53% 54%

47%51% 51%

63%

54% 57%

69%

50%45%

50%

37%

51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Average FCI by Major Building System

2

Low

er is

bet

ter

Low

er is

Bet

ter


0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000

Workspace/LoungePupil ServicesAdministrative

Career DevelopmentKitchen

Special EducationStorage (Non-Classroom)

Health ServicesMaintenance / Janitorial Space

Library/Media CenterScience

DiningFine Arts

Technology and Computer ScienceGymnasium / Cafeteria / Auditorium

General Classroom

Main Building(s) Relocatable Modular

Space Deficiencies by Type – StatewideAdditional Space Required to Meet Minimum Standard

**

3

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Allegany Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 22•Arithmetic Mean of 60.6%•Std Deviation of 13.4%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 2 9%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 17 77%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 1 5%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 0 0%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 5%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 5%

Total 22 100%

0

2

17

10

10 0

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

4

Low

er is

bet

ter

Allegany Average FCI by Major Building System

69% 69%

59%65% 65%

49%

67%63% 65% 65%

50% 52%

60%

49%

62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


5

Space Deficiencies by Type – Allegany

0 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

Dining

Pupil Services

Maintenance / Janitorial Space

Storage (Non-Classroom)

Special Education

Library/Media Center

Health Services

Fine Arts

Technology and Computer Science

500 1,000 1,500

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

6

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Anne Arundel Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 121•Arithmetic Mean of 42.7%•Std Deviation of 14.1%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 5 4%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 38 31%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 38 31%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 21 17%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 8 7%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 6 35%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 5 4%

Total 121 100%

0 0

5

38 38

21

86 5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

8

Low

er is

bet

ter

Anne Arundel Average FCI by Major Building System

50%

44% 46%

59%

47%43%

37%

48%

28%

53% 52%

40%

50%

38%

45%

30%

40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


7

Space Deficiencies by Type – Anne Arundel

- 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000

Pupil Services

Administrative

Kitchen

Career Development

Special Education



Health Services


Science

Dining

Fine Arts

Gymnasium / Cafeteria / Auditorium


General Classroom

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

*

*Data for these categories is small enough that it is not visible at current chart scale 9

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Balitmore City Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 149•Arithmetic Mean of 47.9%•Std Deviation of 21.0%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 2 1%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 4 3%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 44 30%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 43 29%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 24 16%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 3 2%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 1%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 12 8%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 16 11%

Total 149 100%2

4

44 43

24

31

12

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

10

Low

er is

bet

ter

Balitmore City Average FCI by Major Building System

52%46% 46%

64%

46%49%

54%

38%

47%53% 53%

72%

46%42%

50%

43%46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


11

Space Deficiencies by Type – Baltimore City

0 150,000 200,000 250,000

Pupil Services

Administrative

Special Education

Career Development

Kitchen



Health Services



Science

Fine Arts

Dining


General Classroom

50,000 100,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**

*Data for these categories is small enough that it is not visible at current chart scale12

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Balitimore County Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 165•Arithmetic Mean of 45.9%•Std Deviation of 12.9%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 7 4%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 62 38%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 68 41%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 13 8%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 3 2%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 5 3%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 7 4%

Total 165 100%

0 0

7

62

68

13

35

7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

13

Low

er is

bet

ter

Balitimore County Average FCI by Major Building System

55%

45%39%

64%

47% 49%52%

47%

33%

56% 58%

38%

46%

55%51%

33%

60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


14

Space Deficiencies by Type – Baltimore County

0 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000

Pupil Services

Kitchen

Career Development

Administrative

Special Education


Health Services


Science


Dining



Fine Arts

General Classroom

50,000 100,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Calvert Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 68•Arithmetic Mean of 47.3%•Std Deviation of 16.0%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 5 9%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 13 53%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 3 19%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 6%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 2 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 1%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 7%

Total 25 100%

0 0

6

36

13

43

1

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

16

Low

er is

bet

ter

Calvert Average FCI by Major Building System

55%61%

54%

43%

57%

41%48% 52%

95%

52%46%

66%58%

41%49%

26%

40%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%


17

Space Deficiencies by Type – Calvert

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

Kitchen

Career Development




Health Services

General Classroom

Fine Arts


Dining




18

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Caroline Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 10•Arithmetic Mean of 45.5%•Std Deviation of 17.9%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 1 10%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 6 60%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 0 0%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 10%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 10%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 10%

Total 10 100%

0 0

1

6

0

1 1

0

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

19

Low

er is

bet

ter

Caroline Average FCI by Major Building System

51%

41% 41% 42%

53%46%

40% 38%

85%

39%45%

60%

43%39%

49%

39%

56%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%


20

Space Deficiencies by Type – Caroline

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000


Health Services

Special Education

Kitchen

Dining

Science



Fine Arts

General Classroom




21

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Carroll Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 40•Arithmetic Mean of 51.2%•Std Deviation of 9.2%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 1 3%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 3 8%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 21 53%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 11 28%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 3 8%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 3%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 40 100%

01

3

21

11

3

10 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

22

Low

er is

bet

ter

Carroll Average FCI by Major Building System

61%

69%

55% 56%62%

50%

59% 62%

81%

56%

64%

85%

41%45%

54%

36%

64%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%


23

Space Deficiencies by Type – Carroll

0 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

Administrative

Pupil Services

Kitchen

Special Education

Dining



Health Services

Science

Fine Arts



General Classroom

20,000 40,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Cecil Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 29•Arithmetic Mean of 50.2%•Std Deviation of 11.8%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 6 21%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 11 38%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 8 28%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 3 10%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 3%

Total 29 100%

0 0

6

11

8

3

0 0

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

25

Low

er is

bet

ter

Cecil Average FCI by Major Building System

67% 66%

53%

62% 61%

51%

60%55%

37%

58%63%

55%48% 51%

34%

57%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


26

Space Deficiencies by Type – Cecil

15,000 20,000 25,000

Pupil Services

Administrative

Science

Special Education


General Classroom


Health Services

Dining

Fine Arts



0 5,000 10,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

*


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Charles Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 39•Arithmetic Mean of 49.8%•Std Deviation of 15.7%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 8 21%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 22 56%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 2 5%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 2 5%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 3%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 3 8%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 3%

Total 39 100%

0 0

8

22

2 21

3

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

28

Low

er is

bet

ter

Charles Average FCI by Major Building System

54%

44%

53%47%

54%47% 49%

54%

80%

56% 53%

91%

60%

45% 46%

30%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


29

Space Deficiencies by Type – Charles

60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

Special Education



Health Services


Science

Fine Arts

Dining



General Classroom

0 20,000 40,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

30

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Dorchester Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 14•Arithmetic Mean of 47.2%•Std Deviation of 15.9%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 3 21%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 5 36%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 3 21%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 7%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 7%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 7%

Total 14 100%

0 0

3

5

3

1 1

0

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

31

Low

er is

bet

ter

Dorchester Average FCI by Major Building System

56%

42% 44%49%

57%

28%

48%53%

79%

56% 54%

86%

32%

44%38%

30%

61%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%


32

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000


Special Education

Kitchen


Health Services

Fine Arts

Dining


General Classroom



Space Deficiencies by Type – DorchesterAdditional Space Required to Meet Minimum Standard

33

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Frederick Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 68•Arithmetic Mean of 47.3%•Std Deviation of 16.0%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 6 9%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 36 53%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 13 19%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 4 6%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 3 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 1 1%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 5 7%

Total 68 100%

0 0

6

36

13

43

1

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

34

Low

er is

bet

ter

Frederick Average FCI by Major Building System

57%

49% 47%51%

54%

46%

54%48%

58%

46%

54%

67%

57%

43%47%

32%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


35

Space Deficiencies by Type – Frederick

150,000 200,000 250,000

Pupil Services

Kitchen

Administrative


Special Education


Science

Health Services


Dining

Fine Arts



General Classroom

0 50,000 100,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

*


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Garrett Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 13•Arithmetic Mean of 54.0•Std Deviation of 6.7%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 3 23%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 6 46%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 4 31%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 0 0%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 13 100%

0 0

3

6

4

0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

37

Low

er is

bet

ter

Garrett Average FCI by Major Building System

65%58%

64%

50%56% 58%

64%56%

90%

69%

54%

40%

60%

41%

51%44% 43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


38

Space Deficiencies by Type – Garrett

0 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000


Pupil Services


Kitchen

General Classroom


Special Education

Health Services

Fine Arts


1,000 2,000 3,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

39

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Harford Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 52•Arithmetic Mean of 49.4%•Std Deviation of 14.4%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 11 21%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 21 40%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 9 17%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 5 10%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 3 6%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 2 4%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 2%

Total 52 100%

0 0

11

21

9

5

32

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

40

Low

er is

bet

ter

Harford Average FCI by Major Building System

48%

55%

43%

60%

52%47%

55% 55%

35%

59% 60% 62%

54%

44%47%

34%

63%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


41

- 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000

Pupil Services

Career Development

Kitchen

Special Education



Health Services


Dining

Fine Arts



General Classroom


Space Deficiencies by Type – HarfordAdditional Space Required to Meet Minimum Standard


*

42

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Howard Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 76•Arithmetic Mean of 44.9%•Std Deviation of 10.6%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 1%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 4 5%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 23 30%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 31 41%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 10 13%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 6 8%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 1 1%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 1%

Total 76 100%

0 0

4

23

31

10

6

1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

43

Low

er is

bet

ter

Howard Average FCI by Major Building System

50%53%

40%

48%

54%

47% 46% 45%

18%

49%

56%

65%

51%46%

49%

34%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


44

Space Deficiencies by Type – Howard

150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000

Workspace/Lounge

Kitchen

Special Education

Career Development

Science

Administrative

Health Services




Dining

Fine Arts



General Classroom

0 50,000 100,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Kent Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 5•Arithmetic Mean of 53.9%•Std Deviation of 8.9%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 1 20%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 3 60%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 0 0%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 20%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 5 100%

0 0

1

3

0

1

0 0 00

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

46

Low

er is

bet

ter

Kent Average FCI by Major Building System

66%

80%

48%

59%51%

60%54% 54%

66% 66% 64%

45%

61%55%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%


47

Space Deficiencies by Type – Kent

8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

Science

Health Services

Special Education



Dining

Fine Arts

General Classroom

0 2,000 4,000 6,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

48

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Montgomery Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 213•Arithmetic Mean of 47.5%•Std Deviation of 15.1%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 2 1%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 33 15%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 92 43%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 38 18%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 20 9%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 11 45%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 9 4%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 8 4%

Total 213 100%

0 2

33

92

38

20

11 9 8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

49

Low

er is

bet

ter

Montgomery Average FCI by Major Building System

60%54% 52%

63%

50%44%

51% 48%

26%

49%

59%

36%

44% 46% 49%

30%

55%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


50

Space Deficiencies by Type – Montgomery

200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000

Pupil Services

Administrative

Career Development

Special Education

Kitchen


Health Services

Science



Dining

Fine Arts



General Classroom

0 50,000 100,000 150,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Prince George’s Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 198•Arithmetic Mean of 52.1%•Std Deviation of 10.8%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 2 1%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 40 20%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 93 47%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 37 19%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 15 8%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 7 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 4 2%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 198 100%

0 2

40

93

37

15

74

00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

52

Low

er is

bet

ter

Prince George’s Average FCI by Major Building System

61%

50%

57% 58%

51% 52%

62%59%

35%

60% 60%57% 56%

50%54%

37%

45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


53

Space Deficiencies by Type – Prince George’s

200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000

Workspace/LoungePupil Services

KitchenCareer Development

AdministrativeSpecial Education

Storage (Non-Classroom)Health Services

Maintenance / Janitorial SpaceScience

Library/Media CenterDining

Technology and Computer ScienceFine Arts

Gymnasium / Cafeteria / AuditoriumGeneral Classroom

0 50,000 100,000 150,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Queen Anne’s Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 14•Arithmetic Mean of 46.8%•Std Deviation of 9.3%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 0 0%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 7 50%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 4 29%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 2 14%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 7%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 14 100%

0 0 0

7

4

2

1

0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

55

Low

er is

bet

ter

Queen Anne’s Average FCI by Major Building System

61%57%

45% 49%

59%

44% 45%49%

95%

46%53%

78%

60%

46%52%

35%

55%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


56

Space Deficiencies by Type – Queen Anne’s

0 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000

Special Education


Health Services

General Classroom

Fine Arts



1,000 2,000 3,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

57

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Somerset Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 11•Arithmetic Mean of 49.2%•Std Deviation of 16.3%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 1 9%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 7 64%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 1 9%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 1 9%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 9%

Total 11 100%0 0

1

7

1 1

0 0

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

58

Low

er is

bet

ter

Somerset Average FCI by Major Building System

45%40%

46% 45%40%

47%40% 39%

100%

42%50%

75%

31%

49% 48%

34%

51%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%


59

Space Deficiencies by Type – Somerset

0 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Pupil Services

Administrative

Workspace/Lounge

Science

Dining

Kitchen

Career Development


Health Services


Fine Arts


General Classroom


2,000 4,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

60

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

St. Mary’s Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 26•Arithmetic Mean of 51.4%•Std Deviation of 10.8%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 4 15%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 15 58%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 3 12%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 3 12%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 1 4%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 0 0%

Total 26 100%

0 0

4

15

3 3

0

1

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

61

Low

er is

bet

ter

St. Mary’s Average FCI by Major Building System

55%59% 57%

35%

62%

47% 50% 49%

59% 59%54%

81%

46% 45%

56%

42%48%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%


62

Space Deficiencies by Type – St. Mary’s

0 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000

Pupil Services

Special Education


Administrative


Dining


Health Services


Science

Fine Arts


General Classroom

10,000 20,000 30,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

*


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Talbot Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 8•Arithmetic Mean of 46.0%•Std Deviation of 17.7%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 1 13%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 4 50%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 2 25%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 0 0%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 0 0%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 13%

Total 8 100%

0 0

1

4

2

0 0 0

1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

64

Low

er is

bet

ter

Talbot Average FCI by Major Building System

59% 58%

42%35%

50% 47%39%

46%

100%

37%

49%

37%46%

52%43%

23%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%


65

Space Deficiencies by Type – Talbot

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

General Classroom *

Kitchen




Health Services

Special Education




*Data for main buildings and relocatables is small enough that it is not visible at current chart scale 66

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Washington Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 46•Arithmetic Mean of 52.4%•Std Deviation of 16.0%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 18 39%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 16 35%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 3 7%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 3 7%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 2 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 3 7%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 2%

Total 45 100%

0 0

18

16

3 32

3

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

67

Low

er is

bet

ter

Washington Average FCI by Major Building System

63%

49%

57% 55%62%

50%

63% 66%58%

67% 68%

93%

48% 48% 50%45%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


68

Space Deficiencies by Type – Washington

60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

Administrative

Kitchen

Special Education



Science

Health Services


Dining


Fine Arts


General Classroom

0 20,000 40,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)69

square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Wicomico Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 25•Arithmetic Mean of 50.3%•Std Deviation of 18.0%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 1 4%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 10 40%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 4 16%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 5 20%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 2 8%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 4%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 2 8%

Total 24 100%

0

1

10

4

5

2

1

0

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

70

Low

er is

bet

ter

Wicomico Average FCI by Major Building System

54%

40%

52%56% 54%

38%

48% 49%

61%56%

68%

88%

41% 41%

52%

39%

81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


71

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000


Pupil Services

Special Education


Science

Health Services


Dining


Fine Arts


General Classroom


Space Deficiencies by Type – WicomicoAdditional Space Required to Meet Minimum Standard

**


square feet

Low

er is

bet

ter

Worcester Facility Condition Distribution by Band•Facility Population of 14•Arithmetic Mean of 50.1%•Std Deviation of 18.7%

Low

er is

Bet

ter


Band1 (0.80-0.89) 0 0%

Band2 (0.70-0.79) 0 0%

Band3 (0.60-0.69) 7 50%

Band4 (0.50-0.59) 2 14%

Band5 (0.40-0.49) 1 7%

Band6 (0.30-0.39) 2 14%

Band7 (0.20-0.29) 1 7%

Band8 (0.10-0.19) 0 0%

Band9 (0.00-0.09) 1 7%

Total 14 100%

0 0

7

2

1

2

1

0

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Band1(0.80-0.89)

Band2(0.70-0.79)

Band3(0.60-0.69)

Band4(0.50-0.59)

Band5(0.40-0.49)

Band6(0.30-0.39)

Band7(0.20-0.29)

Band8(0.10-0.19)

Band9(0.00-0.09)

73

Low

er is

bet

ter

Worcester Average FCI by Major Building System

57% 55%49% 47%

56%

42%

52% 54%

88%

57% 59%

94%

61%

43%50%

36%

60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


74

Space Deficiencies by Type – Worcester

4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000

General Classroom *

Pupil Services

Kitchen

Special Education

Dining



Health Services

Fine Arts

Science



0 1,000 2,000 3,000

Relocatable Modular


Main Building(s)

*Data for main buildings is small enough that it is not visible at current chart scale 75

square feet

Workgroup on the Assessment and Funding of School ...

Documents

Transcript of Workgroup on the Assessment and Funding of School ...