Work Roles Group Report - Assessment Technologies Group
Transcript of Work Roles Group Report - Assessment Technologies Group
Why is effective team working important?
2© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
New job roles at work generally have a team-oriented component
Organizations are becoming flatter, leaner and more agile
The time spent by managers and employees in collaborative activities has increased by 50% or more (over
the last two decades)
More than three-quarters of an employee’s day is spent communicating
with colleagues
75%
Perf
orm
ance
How Groups Bond Together?
3© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Time
Starting to learn
about others
Forming
Challenging each
other
Storming
Working with each
other
NormingWorking as one
Performing
Perf
orm
ance
Time
Diverse Teams?
4
Do groups benefit from having individuals with different roles?
Teams of individuals with lots of different work roles tend to be more successful at doing
diverse tasks.
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Teams with the same roles
Teams with many different roles
7© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Work Role Strengths
ANALYST
Analysts use their intellect and
expertise to break down and evaluate
information. They seek the right answer.
Key Strengths
• Skilled at evaluating various sources
of information
• Likely to take a logical approach to
problem solving
• Typically inclined to explore all the
available possibilities
INNOVATORInnovators take a creative approach to
problem solving and often develop
long-term strategies
Key Strengths
• Typically provide original solutions
• Tend to offer unconventional and
valuable insights
• Are likely to have a vision for the future
RELATOR
Relators actively communicate with
others and can help improve the social
interaction.
Key Strengths
• Typically communicate information
effectively to others
• Tend to interact confidently with other
people
• Are likely to make a positive
impression upon others
ASSERTOR
Assertors readily take control of
situations and coordinate people well.
They prefer to be the leader.
Key Strengths
• Are likely to give clear direction to
others
• Tend to be purposeful and confident in
their decision-making
• Typically try to encourage and
empower others
8© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Work Role Strengths
9© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Work Role Strengths
OPTIMIST
Optimists tend to be resilient and can
stay calm under pressure. They can
help to keep morale high.
Key Strengths
• Typically remain composed in difficult
circumstances
• Are likely to convey confidence in
themselves and others
• Tend to maintain a positive outlook
SUPPORTER
Supporters attend to the needs of
others and prefer a team-oriented
approach.
Key Strengths
• Are likely to understand the needs
and feelings of other people
• Are typically effective at team working
• Tend to establish rapport with others
easily
10© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Work Role Strengths
FINISHERFinishers focus on getting things
completed to a high standard and pay
attention to detail. They tend to be
meticulous and check things thoroughly.
Key Strengths
• Tend to be meticulous and check
things thoroughly
• Typically adhere to timescales and
meet deadlines
• Are likely to keep tasks moving and
finish off projects
STRIVER
Strivers push hard to achieve ambitious
results. They are often highly
enterprising and competitive.
Key Strengths
• Are likely to pursue goals with
enthusiasm
• Tend to produce a lot of output
• Are typically good at identifying and
seizing opportunities
Too Many or Too Few
12© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
AN
ALY
ST
S
+ Too Many
• Delay action on key issues when there is information to analyse
• Over-analyze at the expense of outcomes
• Under weight the importance of factors that are harder to quantify
- Too Few
• Act without taking full account of the facts
• Give insufficient time and resource to evaluation
• Are unlikely to conduct a thorough assessment of the key risks
INN
OV
AT
OR
S
+ Too Many
• Focus on long-term solutions at the expense of immediate concerns
• Spend time considering new approaches which are not delivered
• Introduce new ideas that distract from delivering the core service
- Too Few
• Don’t keep up with new ideas and opportunities for improvement
• Favor tried and tested methods even when better new methods are
available
• Focus on immediate operational issues rather than setting future
strategy
Too Many or Too Few
13© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
RE
LA
TO
RS
AS
SE
RT
OR
S
+ Too Many
• Spend too much time talking
• Over-promote the achievements of the group
• Introduce distraction with too many unnecessary interactions
- Too Few
• Don‘t engage enough with other groups or teams
• Get less recognition for all their hard work
• Are less inclined to get external resources to help the group
+ Too Many
• More than one leader can lead to a struggle for power
• Make decisions without sufficient consultation or buy-in
• Stand by decisions which prove to be less effective
- Too Few
• Lack leadership and clarity of direction
• Become easily dominated by other teams or groups
• Take too much time to make key decisions
Too Many or Too Few
14© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
OP
TIM
IST
SU
PP
OR
TE
R
+ Too Many
• Are over-confident about the chance of group success
• Underestimate problems and concerns
• Portray a lack of concern for the severity of a problem
- Too Few
• Over react to pressure
• Find it difficult to see the positives
• Lack confidence in the group’s ability
+ Too Many
• Allow personal issues to comprise work output
• Tolerate poor performance too easily
• Avoid making business critical decisions that negatively impact people
- Too Few
• Lack of focus on group goals
• Show less consideration for personal problems
• Less willing to help out other areas of the business
Too Many or Too Few
15© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
FIN
ISH
ER
ST
RIV
ER
+ Too Many
• Start work before it is properly thought through
• Miss opportunities for last minute major change and improvement
• Are too narrowly focused on deadlines
- Too Few
• Move on to new tasks before things are completed
• Less concerned with meeting deadlines
• Give insufficient time for checking
+ Too Many
• Pursue goals which may be of limited value
• Drive the group too hard at times
• Relationships can be affected by high levels of competition
- Too Few
• Lack of enthusiasm in the pursuit of difficult goals
• Miss new business opportunities
• Are less productive as a group
A Diverse Group but Weighted Towards…?
16© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Finance & Accounting / Research & Development /
Technology & EngineeringAnalyst
Finance & Accounting / Research & Development /
Technology & Engineering
Creative, Design and Advertising Innovator
Communications & Public Relations / Sales, Marketing &
Business Development Relator
Consulting & Business Management Assertor
Business, Leadership, Commercial, SalesStriver
Work Role Career Area Examples
Administration, Quality Control & Data Processing /
Operations, Logistics & Production Finisher
Trading, Telesales, Call Centre, Emergency ServicesOptimist
Human Resources, Training & Coaching / Health &
Customer Service Supporter
Most Preferred Roles
17
Primary Roles
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Most Preferred Roles
18© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Secondary Roles
Most Preferred Roles
19
Primary and Secondary Roles
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Least Preferred Roles
20
Least Preferred Roles
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Least Preferred Roles
21
Second Least Preferred Roles
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
Least Preferred Roles
22
Least and Second Least Preferred Roles
© 2016 Saville Consulting, Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.