Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

39
Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet: Turning New Customer Satisfaction Metrics into Financial Gain Luke Williams Vice President @ AECOM, Researcher, Author

Transcript of Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Page 1: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet:

Turning New Customer Satisfaction Metrics into Financial Gain

Luke WilliamsVice President @ AECOM, Researcher, Author

Page 2: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

2

Housekeeping©

2015 QUALTRICS LLC.

The recording and slides for today’s presentation will be made available on cxweek.com along with other content and webinars from throughout the week

Please use the chat window to submit questions throughout the webinar, we will have time designated at the end for Q & A

Join the conversation on Twitter by tweeting @Qualtrics using #cxweek

Page 3: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Luke WilliamsVP @ AECOM, Researcher, Author

NY Times Bestselling Author of The Wallet Allocation Rule: Winning the Battle for Share

Nielsen Bookscan Bestselling Author of Why Loyalty Matters

Currently: Vice President, Client Measurement and Analytics, AECOM

Formerly: Head of Research Methods & Consulting, Ipsos Loyalty US

Initially: Younger, much more handsome

©2015 QUALTRICS LLC.

Drag picture to placeholder or click icon to add

Page 4: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

“The aim of marketing is to know and understand the customer so well the

product or service fits him and sells itself.”

Peter DruckerWriter, Professor, and Management Consultant

Drucker, Peter (1973), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, pp. 64-65.

Page 5: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

MARKET SHAREIS A FUNCTION OF

SHAREOF

WALLET

PENETRATIONLEVEL

CUSTOMERUSAGELEVEL

Every CEO is Chasing Growth

Page 6: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

The Next Competitive Battleground

89% of companies plan to compete primarily on the basis of the customer experience by

2016!

McLellan, Laura (2014), “10 Proof Points – Why Customer Experience Is the Next Big Thing,” http://blogs.gartner.com/laura-mclellan/10-proof-points-why-customer-experience-is-the-next-big-thing/

Page 7: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Your Satisfaction Guaranteed!

Page 8: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Bloomberg Businessweek: Worse is Better!

Chemi, E. (2013), “Proof That It Pays to Be America’s Most-Hated Companies,” Bloomberg Businessweek, December 17.

Page 9: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

PurchaseIntention

Satisfaction Recommend Intention(Net Promoter classifications)

Detractor Passive Promoter

Overall Satisfaction Net Promoter classifications Purchase Intention

Timothy L. Keiningham, Bruce Cooil, Lerzan Aksoy, Tor Wallin Andreassen, and Jay Weiner (2007), “The Value of Different Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Metrics in Predicting Customer Retention, Recommendation and Share of Wallet,” Managing Service Quality, vol. 17, no. 4, 361-384. (Winner of the Outstanding Paper (Best Paper) Award)

Scatter diagram showing a customer’s share of wallet (Y Axis) by his/her satisfaction/net promoter/purchase intention level (X Axis)

R2 < .05R2 < .05 R2 < .08

Traditional Metrics Don’t Explain Share

Page 10: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

It’s Easy to ProveA B C

1 Customer ID Satisfaction Share of Wallet

2 1 9 30%3 2 8 60%4 3 7 15%5 4 9 75%

998 997 10 35%999 998 9 45%

1000 999 8 25%1001 1000 8 50%1002 R-square 1.13%

Page 11: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

The Biggest Company on Earth

Page 12: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Walmart Shined During the Recession

0%

5%

10%

15%

5%

10%

15%

Oct

08

Jul 0

8

Apr 0

8

Jan

08

Oct

07

Jul 0

7

Apr 0

7

Jan

07

Oct

06

Jul 0

6

Apr 0

6

Jan

06

Oct

05

Jul 0

5Recession

Target

Walmart

Walmart & Target Year Over Year Change in Same Store Sales

Page 13: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Walmart: Project Impact

Walmart is in the beginning stages of a massive store and strategy remodeling effort, which it has dubbed Project Impact. One goal of Project Impact is cleaner, less cluttered stores that will improve the shopping experience. Another is friendlier customer service.

Page 14: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Walmart: Project Impact

Simon, William, EVP and Chief Operating Officer, Walmart U.S. (2010), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Presentation at Bank of America Merrill Lynch Consumer Conference (March 10).

Page 15: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Customer Satisfaction Soared

Wal-Mart says Project Impact is driving consumer satisfaction to an all-time high.

Page 16: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

But an Historic Same-Store Sales Decline

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

-1%

-2%

3%

1/08 4/08 7/08 10/08 1/09 4/09 7/09 10/09 1/11 4/11 7/11 10/09 1/11

Widespread rollout of Project Impact

Page 17: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

“They loved the experience. They just bought less. And that generally is not a

good long-term strategy.”

William S. SimonPresident and CEO, Walmart USA

Clifford, Stephanie (2011), “Stuff Piled in the Aisle? It’s There to Get You to Spend More,” New York Times. (April 8), A1.

Page 18: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

CUSTOMER UNDERSTANDING

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

ORGANISATIONAL ALIGNMENT

What Do You Want to Achieve?

Page 19: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Your Score Matters!

Your Customer

Satisfaction----Rank

YourBrand

Janet Sat. 9

John Sat. 9

Janet & John both provide the same satisfaction/NPS rating for your brand

ALL firms consider this a good score

Page 20: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Your Rank Matters More!

Different Relative Ranks Result in Different Share of Wallet

Your Customer

Satisfaction----Rank

YourBrand

CompetitorsShare of WalletA B

Janet Sat. 9 9 10 25%Rank 2.5 2.5 1

John Sat. 9 7 8 50%Rank 1 3 2

Tied

Page 21: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

The Wallet Allocation Rule Formula

Where:

Rank = the relative position that a customer assigns to a brand in comparison to other brands also used by the customer in the category

Number of brands = the total number of brands used in the category by the customer

Page 22: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

80%80%

100%Mobile Phone

Wallet AllocationSh

are

of W

alle

t

0% 60%0%

60%Drugstores

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 65%0%

65%Pharmacies

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%Mass Merchants

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%Retail Banks

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 60%0%

60%Asthma Rx

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%Do-It-Yourself

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%Automobiles

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

20% 50%20%

50%Office Supplies

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 80%0%

80%Airlines

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%Computers

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

R=.98 R=.99 R=.99

R=.92 R=.91 R=.96 R=.97

R=.78 R=.96 R=.94 R=.67

0% 100%0%

100%Grocery Stores

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

R=.93

Page 23: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

It Doesn’t Matter Which Metric You Use!

Note: Scatter diagrams show the average share of wallet at the firm/brand level (Y-Axis) by the predicted average share of wallet using the Wallet Allocation Rule (X-Axis).

0% 100%0%

100%

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

0% 100%0%

100%

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

R=.92R=.92R=.92

Average firm/brand Wallet Allocation Rule score and Share of Wallet across industries investigated.

Purchase IntentionSatisfaction Recommend Intention Net Promoter ScoreRecommend Intention

using NPS classifications

0% 100%0%

100%

Wallet Allocation

Shar

e of

Wal

let

R=.92

Performance was virtually identical regardless of the metric used to determine a brand’s relative performance rank

Page 24: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

“Does this really make a difference to my business?”

Page 25: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

“Yep.”--Luke Williams

Page 26: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

What determines a brand’s rank is different

from what drives satisfaction!

Page 27: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet
Page 28: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

How Value is Defined$$

$

Quantity

PRICE

WILLINGNESS TO PAYValue for Customer

COSTValue for Firm

Q*

Page 29: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

But I Do Driver Analysis!

Page 30: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Drivers Affect Firm Strategy!!Using Drivers of

SatisfactionUsing Drivers of Share of Wallet

Page 31: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Diffe

renti

ation

/ M

arke

t Pos

ition

Driver Strength

Use Share-Based Strategy Grids Instead

Differentiation Opportunity

Significant Improvement Opportunity

Tapped Tapped or Adapt

Unmet Minimum Standard

Ownership Opportunity

WildcardW

indow

Dressing

Page 32: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

TotalCustomer

Needs

Gaining share of wallet

requires reducing customers’ need to use

the competition

Page 33: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet
Page 34: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

CHANGEMEASUREMENT

1. Add A>C>U.2. Change driver collection.3. Add barriers and open-ends.

CHANGE ANALYSIS

1. Add 2 new KPI to your scorecard.2. Add 1 new driver model to explain SOW. 3. Understand relative driver performance.

How You Achieve Change!

Page 35: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

RANK MATTERS

more than the specific measure or score level and

relative performance is mandatory for true

understanding

ACTION MATTERS

and broad enterprise involvement is the core of customer centricity and driving customer and employee loyalty

How You Communicate Change!

Page 36: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet
Page 37: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Luke WilliamsResearcher. Author. Good Guy.

@themethodsman

Page 38: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Q&A

Page 39: Winning the Battle for Share of Wallet

Thank You!