Wind Resource Analysis · Israeli Air Force Operational Forecasting System Harvard University Air...
Transcript of Wind Resource Analysis · Israeli Air Force Operational Forecasting System Harvard University Air...
1
Wind Resource AnalysisWind Resource Analysis
An Introductory OverviewAn Introductory Overview
MGA/NWCC Midwestern Wind Energy: Moving It to MarketsJuly 30, 2008
Detroit, Michigan
Mark Ahlstrom
2
WindLogics BackgroundWindLogics Background
Founded 1989 - supercomputing background
Atmospheric modeling and visualizationUS Air Force Operational Weather SquadronsIsraeli Air Force Operational Forecasting SystemHarvard University Air Quality ModelingDOE Real-time Wind Field MonitoringNASA Meteorological Data Assimilation
Experience in fine-scale forecasting systems
Applied these advanced modeling and analysis technologies to wind energy since 2002
Subsidiary of FPL Energy since September 2006
3
One Day of WeatherOne Day of Weather
Inner grid from July 4, 2003 - 5 minute resolution at 30 min/secShowing wind vectors (90 m AGL) and cloud water/precipitation isosurface
4
Atmospheric ComplexityAtmospheric ComplexityThe atmosphere is so complexThe atmosphere is so complex…… So how does this work?So how does this work?
Solar Radiation
Moisture Fluxes
Turbulence
Evaporation
Convection
Condensation
SurfaceHeat
5
Gridded 3D Weather DataGridded 3D Weather DataIntegrates all available data sources, from the surface to the upper atmosphere, into a unified and physically consistent state of all grid cells at a given point in time.
Over 160 weather variables collected from:
• Surface / METAR station data• Oceanographic buoys• Ship reports• Aircraft (over 14,000 ACARS/day)• NOAA 405 MHz profilers• Boundary-layer (915 MHz) profilers• Rawinsondes (balloon soundings)• Reconnaissance dropwinsonde• RASS virtual temperatures• SSM/I precipitable water• GPS total precipitable water• GOES precipitable water• GOES cloud-top pressure• GOES high-density vis. cloud drift wind• GOES IR cloud drift winds• GOES cloud drift winds• VAD winds: WSR-88D NEXRAD radars
6
Meteorological ModelsMeteorological ModelsNumerical gridded representation of the laws of physics
Conservation relationsMassEnergyMomentumWater, etc.
Physical processesRadiationTurbulenceSoil/ocean interactions, etc.
Use lots of fast computersPartial differential equationsGridpoint difference valuesStep all points through time using very small steps (a few seconds per step)
7
Nesting Modeling TechniquesNesting Modeling TechniquesModeling Modeling ““fills the gapsfills the gaps”” in both space & timein both space & time
Outer Grids
Inner Grids
8
Averaging of LongAveraging of Long--term Resultsterm Results
9
Variability in the DayVariability in the Day
10
Variability over YearsVariability over Years
(Annual Energy (Annual Energy -- 19721972––2002)2002)
11
Influence of Local TerrainInfluence of Local Terrain
30m Grid (5x6 km)
Example showing wind speed in color, wind direction as streamlines.
Data Sources:Data Sources:• WindLogics Archive• Local Test Towers• Hi-Res. Terrain / Land Cover
Process:Process:• Detailed Windfield Modeling
Result: Result: • 30 meter grid • 50 meter hub height
12
Influence of HeightInfluence of HeightProduction estimate in GWh per year at multiple heightsProduction estimate in GWh per year at multiple heights
50m Height50m Height
30m Grid (5x6 km)
80m Height80m Height
30m Grid (5x6 km)
13
Complexity of Wind EnergyComplexity of Wind Energy
Location & terrain make big differencePower in the wind is proportional to the cube of wind speed, so great value in optimizing location, layout & heightMany characteristics to consider
Shear (speed increase with height)Diurnal & seasonal patternsLong-term interannual variability
Planning, financing & operating issuesA large investment with a 25-year timelineVariability on many time scalesImplications for utility operations
14
ChallengesChallenges
50 m
80 m
100 m
Can’t afford a full gridded array of met
towers – one or two will have to
suffice
Measuring above 50
meters is too expensiveMet Tower Wind Turbine Airport Anemometer
Can’t wait forever – one or two years
measurement will have to
sufficeAnemometers are
never perfect…
Data Gaps, Icing,
Calibration, Spares…
Airport Anemometers are too low, blocked
by trees and vegetation…
Airport Anemometers are
too far away…
7 or 8 years is NOT long-term
data…
Diurnal patterns don’t match hub
height
Challenges of distance, height, time & space
15
Risk Uncovered in Long Term AnalysisRisk Uncovered in Long Term Analysis
Normalized Speed vs. Year
1st Year of Operations
Facility Planning
Phase
16
Avoiding RiskAvoiding Risk
Seek All Available Data
Apply Best Technologies
Invest Today for Future Returns
17
Available DataAvailable Data
On Site “Met Tower” DataNational/Global DataRegional Weather DataRegional Tower DataModel-based Data
18
Data Integration is the KeyData Integration is the KeyTower Data for Point AccuracyModel-based Wind Data for 3D UnderstandingUse Models as a Foundation for Integration
19
The Snapshot Prior to ConstructionThe Snapshot Prior to ConstructionUnderstanding the resource, variability & riskUnderstanding the resource, variability & risk
20
The Continuous Process & TimelineThe Continuous Process & TimelineReg
ional Pro
spec
ting
Met. Tower
Placem
ent
Site A
sses
smen
t
Financia
l Due D
iligen
ce
•Enhan
ced Tower
Data
Projec
t Enginee
ring
Constructi
on
•Hourly
Wea
ther Forec
ast
•Virt
ual Tower™
•Turb
ine Sele
ction
•Micr
o Siting
Operatio
ns
•Long-te
rm Finan
cial F
orecas
t
•Main
tenan
ce Plan
ner
•Plan
ning and W
eather
Forecas
t
Project TimelineWind Maps/GISInitial StudiesSite Visits
Detailed Maps/GISPreliminary Layouts Forecasting
Operational Assessment
Long Term NormalizationMicrositing
Capacity Factor Predictions
Data CollectionData Analysis
21
Questions & DiscussionQuestions & Discussion
Time series showing forecast with wind speed
and cloud cover
Mark Ahlstrom, CEO651.556.4262
www.WindLogics.com