Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy
description
Transcript of Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy
![Page 1: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy
Steven O. Link, PhD (Botany)
Native Plant Landscaping and Restoration LLC
4604 E. Robin Ct.
West Richland, WA 99353
509-948-0054
![Page 2: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Westside and Eastside - Invasives contribute to fuel loads. Learn ways to mitigate the impacts and have healthier
range and forest lands!
![Page 3: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
I will discuss two invasive species and a disease.
• Bromus tectorum – Cheatgrass
• Cytisus scoparius – Scotch Broom
• Phytophthora ramorum - Sudden oak death
![Page 4: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Bromus tectorum – Cheatgrass
![Page 5: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by the Joint Fire Science Program. The work was done in cooperation with the Mid-Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex. Special thanks are given to Randy Hill for help defining the questions and for continued technical support.
![Page 6: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bromus tectorum cover mapping and fire risk
Effect of herbicide and herbicide concentration on Elymus wawawaiensis establishment in the shrub-steppe
Management of fuel loading in the shrub-steppe: Responses six, seven, and eight years after treatments
Fire risk in replanted bunchgrass communities
![Page 7: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Bromus tectorum cover mapping and fire risk
![Page 9: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Bromus tectorum infestation at the Saddle Mountain element of the Hanford Reach National Monument
![Page 10: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
High Bromus tectorum fuel load
![Page 11: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Low Bromus tectorum fuel load
![Page 12: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lack of continuous fuel limits fire
![Page 13: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Experimental DesignThe fire risk experiment was in plant communities that spanned the range of B. tectorum cover. Bromus tectorum cover was grouped into five classes. Each replicate is comprised of 8 to 18 plots in the three lowest B. tectorum cover classes and 2 to 6 plots at the two highest cover classes. A replicate is a collection of plots where the risk of fire was determined as the proportion of plots that burned. Each class has four replicates. We used 176 square plots, 10 m on a side.
Two hundred twenty six plots, 10 m on a side, were used to related B. tectorum cover to color band intensity.
![Page 14: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Conclusions
• Bromus tectorum cover can be mapped using aerial color band reflectance photos taken in late summer.
• Based on the B. tectorum cover map and the relationship between B. tectorum cover and fire risk, fire risk can now
be mapped.
![Page 18: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Maps showing risk areas in Washington
![Page 19: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
There are none.
![Page 20: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Effect of herbicide and herbicide concentration on
Elymus wawawaiensis establishment in the
shrubsteppe
![Page 23: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Field site at the Columbia National Wildlife Refuge
![Page 24: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Prescribed Burn
![Page 25: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Herbicide Application
![Page 26: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Bunchgrass Drill SeedingElymus wawawaiensis (Snake River wheatgrass, Secar cultivar) was drill seeded at a rate of about 7 lb. acre-1 on Feb. 19, 2003. Drill rows were 0.3 m apart.
![Page 27: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Roundup - 2 oz/acre
![Page 28: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Plateau - 2 oz/acre
![Page 29: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Plateau - 4 oz/acre
![Page 30: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Plateau - 8 oz/acre
![Page 31: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Management of fuel loading in the shrub-steppe: Responses six,
seven, and eight years after treatments
![Page 33: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Our objective was to determine if our strategy to reduce Bromus tectorum cover and thus fire risk is sustainable after implementation. We tested three hypotheses reporting results for 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Hypothesis 1: Bunchgrasses established in 2003 will show an increasing degree of B. tectorum control over three years (2008, 2009, 2010).Hypothesis 2: Native species richness and cover in Plateau plots will not be different from controls 6, 7, and 8 years after treatment. Hypothesis 3: Alien species cover in Plateau plots will not be different from controls 6, 7, and 8 years after treatment.
We monitored populations, flowering, and size of established bunchgrasses. We documented new E. wawawaiensis arising from self-seeding.
![Page 34: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Figure 1. Eighteen years after drill seeding, E. wawawaiensis, results in near elimination of B. tectorum.
![Page 35: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
![Page 39: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Figure 4. Alien species cover from 2004 through 2010. The slope of the linear regression over time was significantly (p = 0.0005) greater than zero.
![Page 40: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Figure 10. The relationship between E. wawawaiensis canopy volume and the interference distance with B. tectorum.
![Page 42: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Figure 7. Elymus wawawaiensis 8 years after seeding showing senescence (gray tillers) with remaining green tillers mostly near the edge.
![Page 46: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Figure 8. Mean and predicted % senescent plants (± 1 sem) in the imazapic seeded plots.
![Page 47: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Figure 9. Gray colored senescing E. wawawaiensis seeded in 1986 near the study area in 2009.
![Page 48: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Figure 11. Relation between planted bunchgrass density and B. tectorum cover.
![Page 49: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Fire risk in replanted bunchgrass communities
![Page 50: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Management Implications and Conclusion
We conclude that B. tectorum cover can be significantly and sustainably reduced by burning and applying Plateau herbicide at 4 or 8 oz acre-1 in the fall and then drill seeding E. wawawaiensis in the late winter.
Seven years after treatment application the density of drill seeded E. wawawaiensis was 1.23 ± 0.24 plants m-2. Doubling the seeding rate may increase density enough to further reduce B. tectorum cover to be closer to the minimal value of 2.8% achieved with E. wawawaiensis density of 2.77 plants m-2.
![Page 54: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Research Questions
Examine viability of bunchgrass cultivars that arose from small initial populations leading to population bottlenecks that may reduce viability. Are locally sourced native plants more likely to sustain themselves.
Examine the fire risk of more restored plant communities. What combination of species leads to significant reductions of fuel cover and increases in bare soil and soil cryptogams. Can Poa secunda provide sufficient interference to reduce Bromus tectorum cover?
![Page 55: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Cytisus scoparius – Scotch Broom
Zouhar, Kris. 2005. Cytisus scoparius, C. striatus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2013, June 16].
![Page 56: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Fire Risk and Effects on Native Species
Scotch broom invasions are also said to increase fire intensity and frequency in invaded Oregon white oak communities. Scotch broom's frequent location on steep slopes adds to its fire hazard potential.
Where Scotch broom has invaded prairie and Oregon white oak woodlands on Fort Lewis, it forms dense stands and increases fire hazard by creating extensive areas with large amounts of dead wood.
Mature Oregon white oaks appear to have been killed by severe fire that was fueled by Scotch broom at Fort Lewis.
Dense stands of Scotch broom negatively affect native plant communities. At Fort Lewis study plots indicate that no native prairie species remained after 12 years of closed Scotch broom cover.
In Oregon and Washington, there have been complete stand failures of Douglas-fir regeneration because of Scotch broom infestations
![Page 57: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Scotch broom control
Fall burning is recommended to remove Douglas-fir and Scotch broom from heavily infested areas, along with follow-up fires to kill dense Scotch broom postfire seedling establishment.
When prescribed fire is used to stimulate Scotch broom germination from the seed bank, follow-up treatments such as subsequent controlled burns, spot burning, revegetation with fast growing native species, herbicide treatments, grazing, and hand-pulling can be used to kill seedlings and thus reduce the seed bank.
Scotch broom is best controlled by an integrated vegetation management program including monitoring, prevention, biological control, uprooting, cutting, controlled burns, competitive planting, and spot treatments with herbicides as a last resort.
Sowing native plant species may be a preventive method of weed control. Later successional plants may be encouraged to take root among the unwanted vegetation. Broom stands provide a good environment for establishment of some native broadleaved shrubs and trees. These native seedlings should be encouraged. Seeds of taller growing plants should be sown among the broom, as they may eventually shade out the broom.
![Page 58: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Phytophthora ramorum - Sudden oak death
http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/pdf/em/em8877.pdf
http://puyallup.wsu.edu/ppo/sod/
![Page 59: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
![Page 60: Wildfire Prevention - Invasives as the Enemy](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062517/568139c9550346895da178e1/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Sudden Oak Death is the common name for a disease caused by Phytophthora ramorum, a previously unknown and recently introduced non-native pathogen.
Extensive areas of mortality have led to concerns about increased fire hazard.
First recognized in oaks, this pathogen can infect many woody species.
Symptoms include bleeding cankers on the tree's trunk and dieback of the foliage, in many cases eventually leading to the death of the tree.
Very few control mechanisms exist for the disease, and they rely upon early detection and proper disposal of infected plant material.
Phytophthora ramorum has been detected in western Washington nursery sites, but eradication efforts have prevented its spread. The recent detection of P. ramorum in a stream associated with an infested nursery illustrates the risk of spread to Washington's natural and urban landscapes.
A phosphonate fungicide (Agri-fos. Phosphonate) works by stimulating various of kinds of immune responses on the part of the tree.