Wide Area Monitoring

24
Wide Area Monitoring Enabling Wide Area Monitoring, Protection, and Control (WAMPAC) systems with IEC 61850 to improve grid operation and stability Birkir Heimisson, Project manager for Smart-Grid Development

Transcript of Wide Area Monitoring

Page 1: Wide Area Monitoring

Wide Area Monitoring

Enabling Wide Area Monitoring, Protection, and Control (WAMPAC) systems with IEC 61850 to improve grid operation and stability

Birkir Heimisson, Project manager for Smart-Grid Development

Page 2: Wide Area Monitoring

Agenda

• Icelandic transmission system and the operational challenges

• Development of Wide Area Control Methodology

• Testing and Implementation of WACS

• Examples of how WACS have improved system response during disturbances

• What’s next for WACS in Iceland?

Page 3: Wide Area Monitoring

Icelandic Transmission System

Hydro: 846 MWGeo: 150 MW

220 kV

220 kV

132 kV Ring connection

Hydro: 996 MWGeo: 595 MW

220 kV

Load peak: 2400 MW

Total Energy: 17.7 GWh/year

100% Renewable energy:70% Hydro

30% Geothermal

Power intensive users~80% of total load

The grid includes more than 3,000km of transmission lines and about 70 substations

East-icelandCentre of inertia

West-icelandCentre f inertia

Page 4: Wide Area Monitoring

Icelandic Transmission System

East-icelandCentre of inertiaHydro: 846 MWGeo: 150 MW

220 kV

220 kV

West-icelandCentre f inertia

Hydro: 996 MWGeo: 595 MW

220 kV

Load peak: 2400 MW

Total Energy: 17.7 GWh/year

100% Renewable energy:70% Hydro

30% Geothermal

Power intensive users~80% of total load

The grid includes more than 3,000km of transmission lines and about 70 substations

Page 5: Wide Area Monitoring

Extensive WAMS monitoring & records (~60 PMUs)

Good quality communications network

Landsnet & grid-stakeholders willing to trial innovation

New control is measurable on small system

Location with PMU

Wide-Area-Monitoring-System

Page 6: Wide Area Monitoring

WAMS

Real-time

Monitoring

Post-fault

Analysis

Oscillation detection

Commissioning

&Testing

Model validation

WACS

Page 7: Wide Area Monitoring

Effect of Sparse Centres of Inertia• Iceland shows frequency & angle divergence between centres of inertia

49,8

50,2

50,6

51

51,4

-1 0 1 2

Freq

uenc

y [H

z]

Time [sec] KOL BRE BLA-East FLJ

49,8

50,2

50,6

51

51,4

51,8

52,2

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Freq

uenc

y [H

z]

Time [sec] KOL BRE BLA-East FLJ

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-1 0 1 2A

ngle

Diff

eren

ce [

deg]

Time [sec] KOL BRE BLA-East FLJ (ref)

West Frequency

East Frequency

East Angle

West Angle

Δf=0

.25H

z

Δt=0.3s

Δδ

=60°

1.2s to Islanding

4s to Frequency Peak

A T=0s Industrial load #1 reduction (first stage)

B T=0.2s Industrial load #1 reduction (second stage)

C T=0.36s Industrial load #1 trip

D T=1.1s Area angles separated by 60°, result in highE-W power. One route opens by specialprotection

E T=1.2s Areas accelerate away from each other;synchronism is lost and system islands

AB

C

D

E

E

D

Page 8: Wide Area Monitoring

General Method for Locational Fast Response

System Average Angle.

Page 9: Wide Area Monitoring

General Method for Locational Fast Response

● Fast● Locational ● Proportional to disturbance

System Average Angle.

● Response Driven

● Event Driven

Page 10: Wide Area Monitoring
Page 11: Wide Area Monitoring

Test EnvironmentTESTING USING PLAYBACK OF REAL EVENTS

Metadata:-Quality -Time-sync-Test

Page 12: Wide Area Monitoring

Implementation

Page 13: Wide Area Monitoring

Implementation

Page 14: Wide Area Monitoring

FITFI2

Smartgrid Project in Reykjanes – Load Shed Control and Generator Governor Mode by using GOOSE [IEC 61850]

ADCUnit 1

Unit 2

Unit 3

...

ADC Selective Trip

SP140 MVA

SP240 MVA

SP460 MVA

SP560 MVA

MF1 SN1

Protection. Equipment for SP1, SP2, SP4, SP5,

LN - RTAC

ADC - RTAC

REY – HS Orka

HS - RTAC

LN - PhC

WACSSmartgrid Controller

Governor

REY Gen1

Switch to freq-mode

SEL Switch – Software Defined

Implementation

Page 15: Wide Area Monitoring

NETWORK INFRASTRUCTUREPMU+Communication latency <100ms; Overall trigger time <0.5s

Page 16: Wide Area Monitoring

Improved network architecture for WAMS/WACSScalability & robustness with decentralization & redundancy

NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE

Page 17: Wide Area Monitoring

LOAD LOSS EVENT BEFORE WACS IMPLEMENTATION

REAL SYSTEM RESPONSES

Page 18: Wide Area Monitoring

LOAD LOSS EVENT AFTER WACS IMPLEMENTATION

1. Load response in <0.5s, reduces frequency peak.

2. Hydro fast ramp start at 3.5s, replaces fast temporary load response. Rate & volume greater than primary control

1

2

1 1

2

2

REAL SYSTEM RESPONSES

Page 19: Wide Area Monitoring

OVER FREQUENCY AND ISLANDING EVENT

MW div to minG1: 30 MWG2: 22 MW

REAL SYSTEM RESPONSES

Page 20: Wide Area Monitoring

R0: Region 0R5

R3

R4

R1

R2

KRA

G

THR

KR4

BAK

TR1

G

45 MW

56 MW

45 MW

LAX

RAN

TR2/KS1

LA1

KR1KR2RA1

Region 4

Region 3

G2x30 MW

G

Total 27 MW

Rest of system

Region nfn

𝑷𝒏 = 𝑷𝑰𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒍 −𝑯𝒏. 𝑹𝑶𝑪𝑶𝑭𝒏

InstantaneousBoundary Power

Region nPower Imbalancenot directly measurable

Effective Area Inertia

Region nCtr of Inertia ROCOF

Goal: Quickly find the imbalance of load and generation for a region in the presence of dynamic power swings, so that we can re-balance the area.

Latest Development in Wide Area Control for locational frequency response and regional re-balancing

REF: C2-142_2020

Page 21: Wide Area Monitoring

21

Example of Region 3 load loss and oscillations

49,7

49,9

50,1

50,3

50,5

50,7

50,9

51,1

51,3

51,5

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq

uen

cy [

Hz]

Pow

er [

MW

]

Time [sec]

Power and Frequency

P_inst_R4 P_imbal_R4 P_imbal_R3 ΔP_imbal_R3 Freq R4

𝑷 𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒍 𝑹 step 42 → 79 MW

WACS Trigger Islanding triggered by SPSafter unstable oscillation

𝑷 𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒍 𝑹 no change (54MW), no oscillation

𝑷 𝒏 𝑹 oscillates

𝑷 𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒍 𝑹 +37 MW

R0: Region 0R5

R3

R4

R1

R2

KRA

G

THR

KR4

BAK

TR1

G

45 MW

56 MW

45 MW

LAX

RAN

TR2/KS1

LA1

KR1KR2RA1

Region 4

Region 3

G2x30 MW

G

Total 27 MW

Page 22: Wide Area Monitoring

Digital Substation Project Overview

In operation

On-going projects

Oct 2020

2-3-years plan

One bay

Page 23: Wide Area Monitoring

23

Conclusion• WACS have improved the system performance during disturbances:

• The system operators experience less severe disturbances, improving system security• The generator operator experiences fewer plant trips and large frequency excursions which extends the

lifetime of the machines• The load customers in the region experience fewer and shorter interruptions and better power quality

• There are still many promising WACS project proposals, more capacity of regulating units in south west, harnessing the fast response of geothermal units, regulating options with datacenters and wide-area-damping.

• Fast Frequency Response (FFR) ancillary service is in development.

• Digital Substation projects increase the demand of fast and reliable communication between substations. Which opens the option for routable GOOSE,SV [IEC TR 61850-90-5] for enhanced protection and control.

Page 24: Wide Area Monitoring

Thank you for your attention