Wick Theorem

2
Appendix A Wick’s Theorem The quantum kinetic equations in Chapter 2 for the mean field Eq. (2.70) and fluctuations Eq. (2.71) and Eq. (2.72) were derived from the Born-Markov form of the generalized kinetic equation Eq. (2.60) for a general relevant observable . We do not provide the details in getting from Eq. (2.60) to Eq. (2.70) through Eq. (2.72), however it is important to understand the main steps, which involve evaluating the averages of multiple operator products. Due to the Gaussian structure of our reference distribution in Eq. (2.9), we can utilize Wick’s theorem to simplify the calculation [42]. We are interested in calculating the average of a product of operators (A.1) where we are denoting to represent either a raising or a lowering operator . These averages arise in the kinetic equations. For example, in the kinetic equation for the normal fluctuations, the second order collisional terms involve a product of ten operators due to terms of the form , since the interaction contains a product of four operators and the normal fluctuations have the form . Wick’s theorem is valid for averages taken over a Gaussian distribution that can involve both normal and anomalous pairs in the exponent, as our reference distribution does in Eq. (2.9). We do not derive Wick’s theorem here, but simply state the results. The interested reader can find derivations of Wick’s theorem in Louisell [119] (p. 182) for the case of bosons, and in Zubarev [39] (p. 172) for fermions. Both of these derivations assume a Gaussian form with only normal pairs in the exponent; one can find a more general derivation including anomalous pairs (for a squeezed vacuum) in Vaglica [43]. To include the anomalous pairs in the proof, one can simply make a canonical transformation of the operators and so that only normal pairs appear in the exponent for the new set of operators; doing this allows one to use the standard proof, which treats only normal pairs. Wick’s theorem states that the average value of a product of creation and annihilation operators is equal to the sum of all complete systems of pairings, which can be stated more formally as (A.2) where the sum runs over all distinct permutations of the indices. An alternative way

Transcript of Wick Theorem

Page 1: Wick Theorem

Appendix A

Wick’s Theorem

The quantum kinetic equations in Chapter 2 for the mean field Eq. (2.70) and fluctuationsEq. (2.71) and Eq. (2.72) were derived from the Born-Markov form of the generalizedkinetic equation Eq. (2.60) for a general relevant observable q . We do not provide thedetails in getting from Eq. (2.60) to Eq. (2.70) through Eq. (2.72), however it is importantto understand the main steps, which involve evaluating the averages of multiple operatorproducts. Due to the Gaussian structure of our reference distribution �(0)(t) in Eq. (2.9),we can utilize Wick’s theorem to simplify the calculation [42].

We are interested in calculating the average of a product of s operators

hA1A2 � � � Asit(0) = Trf�(0)(t) A1A2 � � � Asg; (A.1)

where we are denoting Ai to represent either a raising ayi or a lowering operator ai. Theseaverages arise in the kinetic equations. For example, in the kinetic equation for the normalfluctuations, the second order collisional terms involve a product of ten operators due toterms of the form� hV 2 ~fiy

(0), since the interaction V contains a product of four operators

V � ayi ay

j akal and the normal fluctuations have the form ~f � ayj ai.Wick’s theorem is valid for averages taken over a Gaussian distribution that can involve

both normal ayj ai and anomalous pairs aiaj in the exponent, as our reference distributiondoes in Eq. (2.9). We do not derive Wick’s theorem here, but simply state the results. Theinterested reader can find derivations of Wick’s theorem in Louisell [119] (p. 182) for thecase of bosons, and in Zubarev [39] (p. 172) for fermions. Both of these derivations assumea Gaussian form with only normal pairs ayj ai in the exponent; one can find a more generalderivation including anomalous pairs (for a squeezed vacuum) in Vaglica [43]. To includethe anomalous pairs in the proof, one can simply make a canonical transformation of theoperators ai and ayi so that only normal pairs appear in the exponent for the new set ofoperators; doing this allows one to use the standard proof, which treats only normal pairs.

Wick’s theorem states that the average value of a product of creation and annihilationoperators is equal to the sum of all complete systems of pairings, which can be stated moreformally as

hA1A2 � � � Asit(0) =XPd

hA1A2it(0)hA3A4it(0) � � � hAs�1Asit(0); (A.2)

where the sum runs over all Pd distinct permutations of the s indices. An alternative way

Page 2: Wick Theorem

Appendix A Wick’s Theorem

to write Eq. (A.2) is

hA1A2 � � � Asit(0) = hA1A2it(0)hA3A4 � � � Asit(0) + hA1A3it(0)hA2A4 � � � Asit(0)+ hA1Asit(0)hA2A3 � � � As�1it(0); (A.3)

and then applying this relation recursively to all of the multiple operator averages until onlypairs of operators remain. If the number of operators s is odd, Wick’s theorem reduces tothe simple result

hA1A2 � � � Asit(0) = 0 if s is odd: (A.4)

Wick’s theorem is augmented by the further rules for averages of pairs of operators, whichhold for bosons

ha1ay2it(0) = Æ12 + hay1a2it(0);ha1a2it(0) = ha2a1it(0);hay1ay2it(0) = hay2ay1it(0): (A.5)

As an example, we consider the product of four operators hA1A2A3A4it(0), which can bereduced according to Wick’s theorem to

hA1A2A3A4it(0) = hA1A2it(0)hA3A4it(0) + hA1A3it(0)hA2A4it(0) + hA1A4it(0)hA2A3it(0)(A.6)

The application of Wick’s theorem to the kinetic equation Eq. (2.60) for our set ofrelevant operators is complicated by the fact that the operators ai are shifted by the c-number mean-field i. The evaluation of the average of a product of ten shifted operatorsinvolves 210 terms, each of which must be reduced according to Wick’s theorem. Even ademonstration on the example in Eq. (A.6) for the case four operators would involve onthe order of � 3 � 24 = 48 terms. A symbolic algebra package using Mathematica wasdeveloped by Reinhold Walser in our group to carry out all of these steps.

144