Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

67
Improving academic Improving academic primary care primary care Tom Bodenheimer MD Tom Bodenheimer MD Department of Family and Community Medicine Department of Family and Community Medicine University of California at San Francisco University of California at San Francisco [email protected] [email protected]

Transcript of Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Page 1: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Improving academic Improving academic primary careprimary care

Tom Bodenheimer MDTom Bodenheimer MDDepartment of Family and Community MedicineDepartment of Family and Community Medicine

University of California at San FranciscoUniversity of California at San Francisco

[email protected]@fcm.ucsf.edu

Page 2: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Goals for this presentationGoals for this presentation

• The crisis in primary care accessThe crisis in primary care access• Reasons for the crisisReasons for the crisis

– How academic primary care aggravates How academic primary care aggravates the crisisthe crisis

• Can we improve academic primary Can we improve academic primary care practices?care practices?

Page 3: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Dwindling NumbersDwindling Numbers

1132113220052005

2340234019971997

# US grads entering # US grads entering family medicine family medicine

residencyresidency

Pugno, Fam Med 2005;37:555Pugno, Fam Med 2005;37:555

Page 4: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Bodenheimer T. N Engl J Med 2006;355:861-864Bodenheimer T. N Engl J Med 2006;355:861-864

Dwindling Numbers: Dwindling Numbers: Career Choices of Third-Year Internal Medical ResidentsCareer Choices of Third-Year Internal Medical Residents

Page 5: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Dwindling NumbersDwindling Numbers

• 2005 survey of internal medicine physicians who 2005 survey of internal medicine physicians who received board certification in early 1990s (in received board certification in early 1990s (in practice 10-15 years ):practice 10-15 years ):

• Had left practice entirelyHad left practice entirely– Primary care internistsPrimary care internists 21%21%– Medical specialistsMedical specialists 5% 5%

Sox. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:57Sox. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:57

Page 6: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Number of graduates

Total

Family Medicine

Internal Medicine

SOURCE: Colwill, unpublished manuscriptNOTES: Figures include Allopathic and Osteopathic physicians, US graduates and IMGs. Total includes pediatricians.

EXHIBIT 2Generalist physician graduates, 1995 to 2005

Page 7: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

NP/PAs to the rescue?NP/PAs to the rescue?

• Nurse practitioner graduates have fallen from a Nurse practitioner graduates have fallen from a peak of 8,200 in 1998 to 5,900 in 2005. peak of 8,200 in 1998 to 5,900 in 2005.

• Physician Assistant graduate numbers have Physician Assistant graduate numbers have remained stable at about 4,200 for several remained stable at about 4,200 for several years. years.

• Probably fewer than half of NP/PAs are in Probably fewer than half of NP/PAs are in primary care as they are increasingly employed primary care as they are increasingly employed in specialist offices, emergency rooms, and in specialist offices, emergency rooms, and inpatient settings. inpatient settings.

Colwill et al. Will generalist physician supply be adequate to meet Colwill et al. Will generalist physician supply be adequate to meet

tomorrow’s demand? Unpublished manuscript.tomorrow’s demand? Unpublished manuscript.

Page 8: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

SOURCE: Colwill, unpublished manuscriptNOTES: “Adjusted supply” - adjusted for age and gender and extends the 2001-2004 rate of decline of graduates through 2007.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Percent change relative to 2001 .

Adult Care: Projected Generalist Supply and Demand for patient visits

DemandDemand

AdjustedAdjustedsupplysupply

Page 9: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Access to primary careAccess to primary care

• A 2006 national survey: 24% of Medicare A 2006 national survey: 24% of Medicare beneficiaries (10 million people) and 25% of beneficiaries (10 million people) and 25% of privately insured patients reported having a privately insured patients reported having a problem obtaining a new primary care physician. problem obtaining a new primary care physician. A Data Book: Healthcare Spending and the Medicare Program. A Data Book: Healthcare Spending and the Medicare Program. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, June 2007Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, June 2007

• A 2006 California survey: 46% of patients visiting A 2006 California survey: 46% of patients visiting the ED said that they went to the ED because they the ED said that they went to the ED because they could not access their primary care physician.could not access their primary care physician.

Emergency Department Utilization in California. California Emergency Department Utilization in California. California Healthcare Foundation, Harris Interactive Inc, October 2006Healthcare Foundation, Harris Interactive Inc, October 2006

Page 10: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Access to primary careAccess to primary care

• 49% of Massachusetts internists were not 49% of Massachusetts internists were not accepting new patients in 2007, up from 36% in accepting new patients in 2007, up from 36% in 2006. 2006.

• The average wait time for an appointment to see The average wait time for an appointment to see an internist was 52 days in 2007, up from 33 days an internist was 52 days in 2007, up from 33 days in 2006.in 2006.

Massachusetts Medical Society Physician Workforce Study, 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society Physician Workforce Study, 2007

Page 11: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Access to primary careAccess to primary care

• In the U.S. the average time a patient In the U.S. the average time a patient spent with a primary care physician spent with a primary care physician over the course of a year (2001-2002) over the course of a year (2001-2002) was 29.7 minutes, compared to 55.5 was 29.7 minutes, compared to 55.5 minutes in New Zealand and 83.4 minutes in New Zealand and 83.4 minutes in Australia.minutes in Australia.

Bindman et al. BMJ 2007;334:1261Bindman et al. BMJ 2007;334:1261

Page 12: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Access to primary careAccess to primary care

• A 2006 international survey found that the A 2006 international survey found that the US has the smallest proportion of primary US has the smallest proportion of primary care practices that provide after-hours care practices that provide after-hours care if needed (not ED): care if needed (not ED): – US US 40% 40%– Canada 47%Canada 47%– Germany 76%Germany 76%– Australia 81%Australia 81%– UK 87%UK 87%

Schoen et al.Health Affairs, November 2, 2006Schoen et al.Health Affairs, November 2, 2006

Page 13: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

The crisis in primary careThe crisis in primary care

• Patients are already having difficulty Patients are already having difficulty accessing primary careaccessing primary care

• The primary care workforce -- especially The primary care workforce -- especially general internal medicine -- is expected to general internal medicine -- is expected to shrink while the population is aging and shrink while the population is aging and demand increasingdemand increasing

• Patient access to primary care will get Patient access to primary care will get worse unless more primary care clinicians worse unless more primary care clinicians enter the workforceenter the workforce

Page 14: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Goals for this presentationGoals for this presentation

• The crisis in primary care accessThe crisis in primary care access The reasons for the crisisThe reasons for the crisis

Primary care-specialty income gapPrimary care-specialty income gapUncontrollable worklifeUncontrollable worklifeHow academic primary care practices How academic primary care practices

aggravate the crisisaggravate the crisis

• Can we fix academic primary care Can we fix academic primary care practices?practices?

Page 15: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Median compensation, 1995-2004 -- MGMA dataMedian compensation, 1995-2004 -- MGMA dataIn thousands of dollars, before taxesIn thousands of dollars, before taxes

19951995 20042004 10-yr increase 10-yr increaseAll primary careAll primary care 133133 162162 21%21%Family practiceFamily practice 129129 156156 21%21%Internal medicineInternal medicine 139139 169169 21%21%All specialistsAll specialists 216216 297297 38%38%Invasive cardiologyInvasive cardiology 337337 428428 27%27%Noninvasive cardiologyNoninvasive cardiology 239239 352352 47%47%DermatologyDermatology 177177 309309 75%75%GastroenterologyGastroenterology 210210 369369 76%76%Heme/OncologyHeme/Oncology 189189 350350 86% 86%OrthopedicsOrthopedics 302302 397397 31% 31%RadiologyRadiology 248248 407407 64% 64%Surgery, generalSurgery, general 217217 283283 30%30%

Page 16: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

2007 Medicare payment for 2007 Medicare payment for 30 minutes physician time30 minutes physician time

94.21 96.28

202.79

670.12

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

99214 99203 45378 66984Complex estComplex est. Intermed newIntermed new ColonoscopyColonoscopy CataractCataract

$$

Assumes geographic index approximately 1.0Assumes geographic index approximately 1.0

Page 17: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

The primary care-specialty income gapThe primary care-specialty income gapand uncontrollable worklifeand uncontrollable worklife

• Average medical student debt is $120,000 for Average medical student debt is $120,000 for public, and $160,000 for private, medical schoolspublic, and $160,000 for private, medical schools

• The primary care pipeline is dwinding in part The primary care pipeline is dwinding in part because of the primary care-specialty income because of the primary care-specialty income income gapincome gap

• An even stronger factor reducing primary care An even stronger factor reducing primary care career choices is uncontrollable worklifecareer choices is uncontrollable worklife

• The income gap and uncontrollable worklife are The income gap and uncontrollable worklife are related: primary care practices cannot survive related: primary care practices cannot survive without very large patient panels, and large without very large patient panels, and large patient panels create the uncontrollable worklifepatient panels create the uncontrollable worklife

Dorsey et al. JAMA 2003;290:1173, Whitcomb and Cohen NEJM Dorsey et al. JAMA 2003;290:1173, Whitcomb and Cohen NEJM 2004;351:710. Bodenheimer NEJM 2006;355:861.2004;351:710. Bodenheimer NEJM 2006;355:861.

Page 18: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Dysfunctional academic practicesDysfunctional academic practices

• Academic primary care practices are Academic primary care practices are thethe models experienced by medical students models experienced by medical students and residentsand residents

• When these practices do not work well, When these practices do not work well, medical students and IM/FP residents hate medical students and IM/FP residents hate working in them working in them

• As a result of these negative experiences, As a result of these negative experiences, medical students and IM/FP residents look medical students and IM/FP residents look for any career except primary carefor any career except primary care

Page 19: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Voices of IM residents and medical Voices of IM residents and medical studentsstudents

• ““I didn’t like the outpatient rotations I didn’t like the outpatient rotations one bit. They were isolating, with one bit. They were isolating, with little social interaction. You went little social interaction. You went from patient to patient and you from patient to patient and you hardly talked with your colleagues. hardly talked with your colleagues. In-patient rotations had teams. Your In-patient rotations had teams. Your colleagues were around. I liked that. colleagues were around. I liked that. Outpatient care was lonely. I hated Outpatient care was lonely. I hated it.”it.”

Page 20: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Voices of IM residents and medical Voices of IM residents and medical studentsstudents

• ““The ambulatory primary care rotation was not a The ambulatory primary care rotation was not a positive experience. I was going to go into primary positive experience. I was going to go into primary care. That made me not want to do it. It was care. That made me not want to do it. It was impossible to have real continuity or longitudinal impossible to have real continuity or longitudinal relationships with patients. It would be better to have relationships with patients. It would be better to have a longitudinal clinical experience over a long period a longitudinal clinical experience over a long period of time.”of time.”

• ““People, especially medical specialists, told me I was People, especially medical specialists, told me I was too smart to go into primary care.”too smart to go into primary care.”

• ““When I worked with a primary care physician for a When I worked with a primary care physician for a year and got to know the patients, I liked working in year and got to know the patients, I liked working in the clinic.”the clinic.”

Page 21: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Voices of IM residents and medical Voices of IM residents and medical studentsstudents

• ““General medical clinic was not satisfying General medical clinic was not satisfying because there was no continuity of care. People because there was no continuity of care. People talked about continuity but I never saw it.”talked about continuity but I never saw it.”

• ““People in internal medicine subspecialties give People in internal medicine subspecialties give you negative comments about primary care. you negative comments about primary care. Cardiology is one of the worst. They say that Cardiology is one of the worst. They say that primary care docs are nice people but not very primary care docs are nice people but not very sharp. It got to the point that I was embarrassed sharp. It got to the point that I was embarrassed to tell people that I was going into primary care.”to tell people that I was going into primary care.”

• ““What sold me on primary care was the What sold me on primary care was the longitudinal clinical experience. You get to know longitudinal clinical experience. You get to know your patients over time.”your patients over time.”

Page 22: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Voices of IM residents and medical Voices of IM residents and medical studentsstudents

• ““The clinic was very disorganized. The patient The clinic was very disorganized. The patient I saw 2 weeks ago got scheduled with another I saw 2 weeks ago got scheduled with another physician. More than half of the time I’m physician. More than half of the time I’m seeing someone else’s patient, which is bad seeing someone else’s patient, which is bad for the patient, bad for me, and bad for the for the patient, bad for me, and bad for the resident who is the patient’s regular doctor. In resident who is the patient’s regular doctor. In a year’s time, patients may see their personal a year’s time, patients may see their personal physician twice and another doctor 6 times.”physician twice and another doctor 6 times.”

Page 23: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Views from the literature on academic Views from the literature on academic primary care practicesprimary care practices

• Weak ambulatory training fails to support the Weak ambulatory training fails to support the formation of continuous healing relationships formation of continuous healing relationships between patients and physicians, undermining between patients and physicians, undermining one of the most cherished aspects of becoming one of the most cherished aspects of becoming an internist. an internist. [IOM. Crossing the Quality Chasm:Washington, [IOM. Crossing the Quality Chasm:Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001]DC: National Academy Press, 2001]

• Exposure to dysfunctional ambulatory settings Exposure to dysfunctional ambulatory settings leads students and residents to choose career leads students and residents to choose career paths other than general internal medicine and/paths other than general internal medicine and/or primary care. or primary care. [Weinberger et al. Ann Intern Med [Weinberger et al. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:927]2006;144:927]

Page 24: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Views from the literature on academic Views from the literature on academic primary care practicesprimary care practices

• Few internal medicine residency graduates Few internal medicine residency graduates have the skills needed to function effectively in have the skills needed to function effectively in the ambulatory setting. If one does not feel the ambulatory setting. If one does not feel confident doing certain work, one avoids that confident doing certain work, one avoids that work. work. [McGlynn et al. NEJM 2003;348:2635][McGlynn et al. NEJM 2003;348:2635]

• Only 13% of internal medicine residency training takes Only 13% of internal medicine residency training takes place in continuity clinic.place in continuity clinic. [Bowen et al. JGIM 2005;20:1181][Bowen et al. JGIM 2005;20:1181]

• Moreover, continuity clinic is often not Moreover, continuity clinic is often not continuity clinic; many residents are seeing continuity clinic; many residents are seeing each other’s patients. each other’s patients.

Page 25: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Views from the literature on academic Views from the literature on academic primary care practicesprimary care practices

• Hospital out-patient medical clinics are often Hospital out-patient medical clinics are often frustrating, chaotic places to practicefrustrating, chaotic places to practice

• Patients often see unfamiliar physiciansPatients often see unfamiliar physicians• Physicians often see unfamiliar patientsPhysicians often see unfamiliar patients• Lack of continuity experiences is a factor Lack of continuity experiences is a factor

turning residents away from primary care turning residents away from primary care careerscareersAssociation of Program Directors in Internal Medicine position Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine position paper. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:920paper. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:920

Page 26: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Academic primary care practicesAcademic primary care practices

• Leaders might respond: “It’s not our fault. Research Leaders might respond: “It’s not our fault. Research shows that 3rd year internal medicine residents are shows that 3rd year internal medicine residents are more likely to choose primary care careers than first more likely to choose primary care careers than first year residents. So we’re doing an excellent job.”year residents. So we’re doing an excellent job.”

• That’s great, but the % of internal medicine residents That’s great, but the % of internal medicine residents going into primary care dropped from 54% to 20% from going into primary care dropped from 54% to 20% from 1998 to 2005 (a 30 percentage point drop), and the 1998 to 2005 (a 30 percentage point drop), and the increase from year 1 to year 3 is 6 percentage points. increase from year 1 to year 3 is 6 percentage points. Moreover, the data came from only 14% of all internal Moreover, the data came from only 14% of all internal medicine residents.medicine residents. [Sox, Ann Intern Med 2006;145:782][Sox, Ann Intern Med 2006;145:782]

Page 27: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Summary: why is primary care in Summary: why is primary care in crisis?crisis?

• Reimbursement is low compared to Reimbursement is low compared to specialist reimbursementspecialist reimbursement

• Uncontrollable lifestyleUncontrollable lifestyle

• Negative experiences in medical Negative experiences in medical school and residencyschool and residency

Page 28: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

So who is falling down So who is falling down on the job?on the job?

Page 29: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Who is falling down on the job?Who is falling down on the job?

• We areWe are• We have met the enemy and it is usWe have met the enemy and it is us• We -- who train the nation’s primary We -- who train the nation’s primary

care physicians -- must assume a care physicians -- must assume a portion of the responsibility for the portion of the responsibility for the crisis in primary care crisis in primary care

Page 30: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Do we care?Do we care?

• Each one of us -- academic leaders -- Each one of us -- academic leaders -- must ask the question to ourselves: must ask the question to ourselves: – Is it one of my personal goals to Is it one of my personal goals to

ameliorate the crisis in primary ameliorate the crisis in primary care?care?

Page 31: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Our vision of the primary Our vision of the primary care academic practicecare academic practice

Page 32: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

The reality of too many academic The reality of too many academic primary care practicesprimary care practices

Page 33: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Definition of specialistsDefinition of specialists• Physicians who know more and more Physicians who know more and more

about less and less about less and less • Until they know everything about nothingUntil they know everything about nothing

Primary care docsPrimary care docs

• Know less and less about more and moreKnow less and less about more and more• Until they know nothing about everythingUntil they know nothing about everything

Page 34: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Goals for this presentationGoals for this presentation

• The crisis in primary care accessThe crisis in primary care access• The reasons for the crisisThe reasons for the crisis

– How academic primary care practices How academic primary care practices aggravate the crisisaggravate the crisis

• Can we fix academic primary care Can we fix academic primary care practices?practices?

Page 35: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

• Would you rather see Would you rather see – Your own patients Your own patients – Patients of another clinician? Patients of another clinician?

• As patients (because we are or will As patients (because we are or will be patients also), be patients also), would you rather would you rather seesee– A clinician you knowA clinician you know– A clinician you don’t know?A clinician you don’t know?

Page 36: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• 2 adult patient surveys in the late 1990s2 adult patient surveys in the late 1990s

• 3/4 of adults place high priority on continuity 3/4 of adults place high priority on continuity of care (seeing their PCP when they need care)of care (seeing their PCP when they need care)

• Only 16% prioritized access and convenient Only 16% prioritized access and convenient appointment times over continuityappointment times over continuity

Safran, Ann Intern Med 2003;138:248. Safran, Ann Intern Med 2003;138:248.

Page 37: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• Continuity of care is associated with Continuity of care is associated with – Improved receipt of preventive services Improved receipt of preventive services

including cancer screening including cancer screening – Decreased frequency of ED visits Decreased frequency of ED visits – Fewer hospital admitsFewer hospital admits

• There is a very strong correlation between There is a very strong correlation between continuity and patient satisfactioncontinuity and patient satisfaction

Koopman et al. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1357; Fan et al. JGIM Koopman et al. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1357; Fan et al. JGIM 2005;20:226. 2005;20:226.

Page 38: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• ““Hand-offs” from one clinician to Hand-offs” from one clinician to another are a necessary feature of another are a necessary feature of discontinuous carediscontinuous care

• Communication failures in hand-offs Communication failures in hand-offs is a major source of medical errorsis a major source of medical errors

• Continuity of care is saferContinuity of care is safer

Philibert and Leach. Qual.Saf.Health Care 2005;14:394Philibert and Leach. Qual.Saf.Health Care 2005;14:394

Page 39: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• Review of 40 studies reporting 81 outcomesReview of 40 studies reporting 81 outcomes• Positive association with continuity of care in Positive association with continuity of care in

51/8151/81• Outcomes includedOutcomes included

– Preventive carePreventive care– Quality of doctor-patient relationshipQuality of doctor-patient relationship– Chronic illness measuresChronic illness measures– Maternity care outcomes Maternity care outcomes

Saultz and Lochner, Ann Fam Med 2005;3:159Saultz and Lochner, Ann Fam Med 2005;3:159

Page 40: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• 2020 studies were reviewed for associations studies were reviewed for associations between continuity of care and between continuity of care and – Reduced hospitalizationsReduced hospitalizations– Reduced emergency department visitsReduced emergency department visits– Declines in overall costs Declines in overall costs

• 19/20 studies: significant association 19/20 studies: significant association between continuity of care and cost between continuity of care and cost measures. Strongest was for reduced measures. Strongest was for reduced hospitalizationshospitalizations

Saultz and Lochner, Ann Fam Med 2005;3:159Saultz and Lochner, Ann Fam Med 2005;3:159

Page 41: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• Danish study of 474 primary care Danish study of 474 primary care physicians and 1136 patients with physicians and 1136 patients with diabetesdiabetes

• Patients who were well known by their Patients who were well known by their physician had lower HbA1c than those not physician had lower HbA1c than those not well known by their physicianwell known by their physician

Drivsholm and Olivarius, Fam Pract 2006;23:192.Drivsholm and Olivarius, Fam Pract 2006;23:192.

Page 42: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• Patients with asthma who have Patients with asthma who have increased continuity of care (seeing increased continuity of care (seeing the same clinician) have a reduced the same clinician) have a reduced use of the ED, fewer hospital use of the ED, fewer hospital admissions and hospital daysadmissions and hospital days

Cree et al. Dis Manag 2006;9:63.Cree et al. Dis Manag 2006;9:63.

Page 43: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• Continuity of care with a primary Continuity of care with a primary care physician for patients with type care physician for patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with 2 diabetes is associated with improved processes of care and improved processes of care and better glycemic control better glycemic control

Parchman et al. Medical Care 2002;40:137; Parchman et al. Parchman et al. Medical Care 2002;40:137; Parchman et al. J Fam Pract 2002;51:619.J Fam Pract 2002;51:619.

Page 44: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care

• According to a 2003 survey, According to a 2003 survey, physicians in the US place great physicians in the US place great value on personal continuity of care. value on personal continuity of care. On a 5 point scale, with 5 points On a 5 point scale, with 5 points indicating that continuity is very indicating that continuity is very important, the mean score was 4.77. important, the mean score was 4.77.

Stokes et al. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:353Stokes et al. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:353

Page 45: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of careContinuity of care• It is unusual for a health system property It is unusual for a health system property

to have so much evidence supporting itto have so much evidence supporting it– Patient satisfactionPatient satisfaction– OutcomesOutcomes– CostsCosts

• Continuity of care is a winnerContinuity of care is a winner

Page 46: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity + TrustContinuity + Trust

• Trust is a patient’s expectation that Trust is a patient’s expectation that the clinician will act to enhance the the clinician will act to enhance the patient’s well-being patient’s well-being

• Trust involves patients’ perceptions Trust involves patients’ perceptions of a clinician’s of a clinician’s – Technical ability Technical ability – Interpersonal skillsInterpersonal skills– Concern for the patient’s welfareConcern for the patient’s welfare

Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124.Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124.

Page 47: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity + TrustContinuity + Trust

• Trust and adherence to physician Trust and adherence to physician recommendationsrecommendations– Highest quartile of trusting the Highest quartile of trusting the

physician: 62% adherencephysician: 62% adherence– Lowest trust quartile: 14% adherenceLowest trust quartile: 14% adherence

Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124

Page 48: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity + TrustContinuity + Trust

• Patients who trust their physician stay Patients who trust their physician stay with their physician; those who don’t are with their physician; those who don’t are far more likely to leave their physician. So far more likely to leave their physician. So trust increases continuitytrust increases continuity

• Continuity (long relationships) can Continuity (long relationships) can increase trustincrease trust

• So, trust and continuity are interrelatedSo, trust and continuity are interrelated

Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124.Thom et al Health Affairs 2004;23:124.

Page 49: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity + TrustContinuity + Trust• Safran et al linked attributes of primary care to Safran et al linked attributes of primary care to

3 outcomes: adherence to physician advice, 3 outcomes: adherence to physician advice, patient satisfaction, and health status. patient satisfaction, and health status.

• The primary care attributes most closely The primary care attributes most closely associated with those outcomes wereassociated with those outcomes were– Physicians’ knowledge of the patient (the Physicians’ knowledge of the patient (the

“whole person”) -- which is related to “whole person”) -- which is related to continuitycontinuity

– Patients’ trust in the physician. Patients’ trust in the physician.

Safran et al. J Fam Pract 1998;47:213.Safran et al. J Fam Pract 1998;47:213.

Page 50: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity + TrustContinuity + Trust

• For elderly Medicare beneficiaries, the For elderly Medicare beneficiaries, the longer the relationship with a physician longer the relationship with a physician the greater the the greater the – Physician knowledge of the patientPhysician knowledge of the patient– Trust Trust – Delivery of preventive servicesDelivery of preventive services

Parchman and Burge. Fam Med 2003;36:22Parchman and Burge. Fam Med 2003;36:22

Page 51: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity and trust: a true storyContinuity and trust: a true story

• Friday was not a good day. Don -- my son with a history of a brain tumor Friday was not a good day. Don -- my son with a history of a brain tumor with swallowing problems and aspiration -- had been admitted for with swallowing problems and aspiration -- had been admitted for pneumonia. The only person with a broad knowledge of Don’s history, pneumonia. The only person with a broad knowledge of Don’s history, whom Don trusted, was Dr. Lisa Goode, his PCP. She was out of town. I whom Don trusted, was Dr. Lisa Goode, his PCP. She was out of town. I suggested to the nurse that Don should get up and start moving around suggested to the nurse that Don should get up and start moving around since copious amounts of phlegm had accumulated in his chest. since copious amounts of phlegm had accumulated in his chest.

• ““I’ll help,” I offerI’ll help,” I offer• ““Sorry, we must call PT for that” said the nurseSorry, we must call PT for that” said the nurse• ““OK,” I say, “can we do that?OK,” I say, “can we do that?• ““No” says the nurse. “PT requires a doctor’s authorization”No” says the nurse. “PT requires a doctor’s authorization”• ““OK, let’s ask a doctor to order it.”OK, let’s ask a doctor to order it.”• ““No” she says, “It has to be the doctor who admitted Don”No” she says, “It has to be the doctor who admitted Don”• ““Fine, let’s call him”Fine, let’s call him”• ““He’s off today,” she saysHe’s off today,” she says• End of the line for getting anything good accomplishedEnd of the line for getting anything good accomplished• The next day Dr. Goode returned. Suddenly everything got better.The next day Dr. Goode returned. Suddenly everything got better.

Page 52: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Continuity of Continuity of care and care and trusttrust

It’s beautifulIt’s beautiful

Page 53: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

How do we fix academic primary care How do we fix academic primary care practices in order to practices in order to

Make them more satisfying for Make them more satisfying for students and residents? students and residents?

Improve care for patients?Improve care for patients?

Page 54: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

• Continuity of care is the fundamental principleContinuity of care is the fundamental principle• Patients, students, residents want continuityPatients, students, residents want continuity• Seeing your patient is 100x more satisfying Seeing your patient is 100x more satisfying

than seeing someone else’s patientthan seeing someone else’s patient• We are not discussing the business case. The We are not discussing the business case. The

overall vision and fundamental principle must overall vision and fundamental principle must come first; second you figure out how to make come first; second you figure out how to make it work financiallyit work financially

• Some residency programs have already Some residency programs have already accepted this as the principle and are working accepted this as the principle and are working to implement itto implement it

Page 55: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

• How do we organize an academic How do we organize an academic primary care practice based on primary care practice based on continuity of care when residents continuity of care when residents necessarily rotate?necessarily rotate?– Change how residents rotate (e.g. the Change how residents rotate (e.g. the

long block)long block)– Establish a team in which someone else Establish a team in which someone else

is the glue creating continuity is the glue creating continuity – BothBoth

Page 56: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

• Full-time NP or PA as the glueFull-time NP or PA as the glue• Patients are panelized to the NP/PA Patients are panelized to the NP/PA • A few residents become a “pod” which cares A few residents become a “pod” which cares

for the panel of one NP/PA. The fewer residents for the panel of one NP/PA. The fewer residents in each pod, the greater the continuityin each pod, the greater the continuity

• Each resident in the pod is responsible, with the Each resident in the pod is responsible, with the NP/PA for a portion of the patients in that panelNP/PA for a portion of the patients in that panel

• The NP/PA communicates frequently with the The NP/PA communicates frequently with the resident while the resident is elsewhereresident while the resident is elsewhere

Page 57: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

Resident sub-panel Resident sub-panel Resident sub-panel

NP/PA panel

Page 58: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

• If NP or PA is not available, the glue If NP or PA is not available, the glue could be a RNcould be a RN

• In that case, the care she/he could In that case, the care she/he could provide would be more limited and provide would be more limited and more consultations would be needed more consultations would be needed with the residentwith the resident

Page 59: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Visions of a new academic Visions of a new academic primary care practiceprimary care practice

• Teams are proposed as the solution to almost anythingTeams are proposed as the solution to almost anything• Research on teams is discouraging; many studies of Research on teams is discouraging; many studies of

teams reveal that they are often dysfunctionalteams reveal that they are often dysfunctional• One uncooperative person can destroy team cohesionOne uncooperative person can destroy team cohesion• Team members must have clear division of labor, Team members must have clear division of labor,

training, and clear modes of communicationtraining, and clear modes of communication• A team of 3-4 people needs to communicate constantly. A team of 3-4 people needs to communicate constantly.

The more the work is divided up, the more handoffs are The more the work is divided up, the more handoffs are needed. More handoffs means more fumbled handoffsneeded. More handoffs means more fumbled handoffs

Bodenheimer and Grumbach. Improving Primary Care: Strategies Bodenheimer and Grumbach. Improving Primary Care: Strategies and Tools for a Better Practice (McGraw-Hill, 2007). and Tools for a Better Practice (McGraw-Hill, 2007).

Page 60: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

TeamletsTeamlets• If the problem with teams is the transaction If the problem with teams is the transaction

costs of handing off work from one team costs of handing off work from one team member to another, perhaps a team of 2 would member to another, perhaps a team of 2 would allow for the advantages of a team while allow for the advantages of a team while minimizing the disadvantagesminimizing the disadvantages

• At SF General Hospital Family Health Center, At SF General Hospital Family Health Center, we have large teams; when we created small we have large teams; when we created small teams of 2 people we called them teamlets (a teams of 2 people we called them teamlets (a subunit of the team or a small team)subunit of the team or a small team)

Page 61: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

TeamletsTeamlets• The teamlet concept is an attempt to address The teamlet concept is an attempt to address

the fundamental pathology of primary care -- the fundamental pathology of primary care -- squeezing everything (preventive, chronic, squeezing everything (preventive, chronic, acute, care coordination, relationship building) acute, care coordination, relationship building) into the 15 minute visitinto the 15 minute visit

• Instead of a doctor seeing a patient in 15 Instead of a doctor seeing a patient in 15 minutes, the teamlet encounter involves a minutes, the teamlet encounter involves a doctor plus another person seeing a patient for doctor plus another person seeing a patient for more time -- previsit, visit, postvisit, between more time -- previsit, visit, postvisit, between visit carevisit care

• We call the other person a coachWe call the other person a coach

Page 62: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

TeamletsTeamlets

Teamlet CoachVital signs

MedRecChronic/preventive

PreVisit

Physician/CoachCoach:documentation

Filling out formsEtc.

Visit

Teamlet CoachClosing the loop

Action plansNavigation

PostVisit

Teamlet CoachPhone/e-mail

Check on medsCheck on action plans

BetweenVisit

Page 63: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

TeamletsTeamlets• Who is the Teamlet Coach? Who is the Teamlet Coach? • It could be RN, health educator, medical It could be RN, health educator, medical

assistant, community health workerassistant, community health worker• Coaching means helping patients and families Coaching means helping patients and families

to learn the skills and knowledge needed to be to learn the skills and knowledge needed to be active, informed participants in their careactive, informed participants in their care

• Good coaches make visits more meaningful for Good coaches make visits more meaningful for patients because they are longer and more patients because they are longer and more things are donethings are done

• Good coaches make worklife better for Good coaches make worklife better for physicians because they offload work that one physicians because they offload work that one doesn’t need an MD degree to dodoesn’t need an MD degree to do

Page 64: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

TeamletsTeamlets• Teamlets can address continuity of careTeamlets can address continuity of care• A patient is panelized to a resident and a A patient is panelized to a resident and a

teamlet coachteamlet coach• If residents are in clinic 3 half-days per week, If residents are in clinic 3 half-days per week,

each coach works with 3 residentseach coach works with 3 residents• The coach is present all clinic hours and is The coach is present all clinic hours and is

available to the patient during clinic hoursavailable to the patient during clinic hours• The coach can contact the resident if the The coach can contact the resident if the

patient needs a physicianpatient needs a physician• The coach can make more or fewer decisions The coach can make more or fewer decisions

depending on whether the coach is RN or MAdepending on whether the coach is RN or MA

Page 65: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Teamlets at SFGH Teamlets at SFGH Family Health CenterFamily Health Center

• Coaches are mainly MA, community health workerCoaches are mainly MA, community health worker• Coaches ethnic/language concordant with patients: Coaches ethnic/language concordant with patients:

Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Burmese, Cambodian, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Burmese, Cambodian, Laotian, Vietnamese, Russian, BosnianLaotian, Vietnamese, Russian, Bosnian

• 11 coaches working with first-year family medicine 11 coaches working with first-year family medicine residents in Thursday afternoon chronic care clinicsresidents in Thursday afternoon chronic care clinics

• Coaches in visit (may translate) plus do post visit and Coaches in visit (may translate) plus do post visit and between visit carebetween visit care

• Patients can call coach if problems develop between Patients can call coach if problems develop between visits, and coaches can contact residentvisits, and coaches can contact resident

• Goal is continuity between patient, resident and coach Goal is continuity between patient, resident and coach -- logistically difficult to achieve-- logistically difficult to achieve

Page 66: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Final thoughtsFinal thoughts

• There is a growing crisis in the primary care There is a growing crisis in the primary care workforce, and in patient access to primary workforce, and in patient access to primary carecare

• Reasons for the crisisReasons for the crisis– Primary care-specialty income gapPrimary care-specialty income gap– Uncontrollable worklifeUncontrollable worklife– Negative training experiences in academic primary Negative training experiences in academic primary

care practicescare practices

• Our responsibility as primary care educators is Our responsibility as primary care educators is to fix academic primary care practices, in to fix academic primary care practices, in particular to re-design curricula and practice particular to re-design curricula and practice organization to maximize continuity of care for organization to maximize continuity of care for patients, residents, and medical studentspatients, residents, and medical students

Page 67: Why We Must Reform Ambulatory Practice

Final thoughtsFinal thoughts

• ““More than half of the time I’m seeing someone More than half of the time I’m seeing someone else’s patient, which is bad for the patient, bad else’s patient, which is bad for the patient, bad for me, and bad for the resident who is the for me, and bad for the resident who is the patient’s regular doctor.”patient’s regular doctor.”

• ““The ambulatory primary care rotation was not a The ambulatory primary care rotation was not a positive experience. I was going to go into positive experience. I was going to go into primary care. That made me not want to do it. It primary care. That made me not want to do it. It was impossible to have real continuity or was impossible to have real continuity or longitudinal relationships with patients.”longitudinal relationships with patients.”

• ““What sold me on primary care was the What sold me on primary care was the longitudinal clinical experience. You get to know longitudinal clinical experience. You get to know your patients over time.”your patients over time.”