Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

48
SCIENTIFIC METHOD – CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION

Transcript of Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

Page 1: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

SCIENTIFIC METHOD –

CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION

Page 2: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ESSENTIAL QUESTION

Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

Page 3: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OBSERVATIONS Scientist use observations during an

investigation to gauge how the process is going but they also make many observations to design their investigations.

How do we make observations? Are some observations more important that

others?

Activity: Candle ObservationsOn a piece of paper, you will make as many

observations has you can about the candles that I show you. You may organize your paper how ever you would like.

Page 4: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

STEPS IN THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD

Observation Hypothesis Experiment Data Collection Conclusion Retest

Page 5: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OBSERVATIONS

Gathered through your senses

A scientist notices

something in their natural

world

Page 6: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

EXPERIMENT

A procedure to test the hypothesis.

Page 7: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

EXPERIMENT

Variable – factor in

the experiment

that is being tested

Page 8: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

EXPERIMENT

A good or “valid”

experiment will only

have ONE variable!

Page 9: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS FOLLOW RULES

An experimenter changes one factor and observes or measures what happens.

Page 10: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

THE CONTROL VARIABLE The experimenter makes a special effort to keep other factors constant so that they will not effect the outcome.

Those factors are called control variables.

Page 11: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A CONTROL?

Controls are NOT being tested

Controls are used for COMPARISON

Page 12: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OTHER VARIABLES The factor that is changed is known as the independent variable.

The factor that is measured or observed is called the dependent variable.

Page 13: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

EXAMPLE OF CONTROLS & VARIABLES

For example, suppose you want to figure out the fastest route to walk home from school. You will try several different routes and time

how long it takes you to get home by each one.

Since you are only interested in finding a route that is fastest for you, you will do the walking yourself.

Page 14: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

WHAT ARE THE VARIABLES IN YOUR EXPERIMENT?

Varying the route is the independent variable

The time it takes is the dependent variable

Keeping the same walker throughout makes the walker a control variable.

Page 15: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ONE MORE THING… IT IS BEST TO MAKE SEVERAL TRIALS WITH EACH INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.

Page 16: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

REMEMBER: TO BE A VALID EXPERIMENT:

Two groups are required --- the control & experimental groups

There should be only one variable

Page 17: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

HYPOTHESIS A suggested

solution to the problem.

Must be testable Sometimes written

as If…Then… statements

Predicts an outcome

Page 18: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

HYPOTHESIS

An example of a hypothesis might be that the salamanders have curved tails due to a pollutant in the moist soil where they live.

Page 19: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

RULES IN CONSTRUCTING A HYPOTHESIS

1. Do not use I, me, my, they – no possessive pronouns.

2. If possible needs to be in a independent – dependent variable format. (IF this happens, THEN this will happen. )

3. It is a statement not a question.

Example: If salt is added to fresh water, then the water will

take longer to freeze.

Page 20: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

The If statement explains how the manipulated variable is going to be changed.

The then statement explains how the responding variable is affected by changing the manipulated variable.

If the mass of a paper helicopter is increased, then the time it takes to drop to the ground will decrease.

If fertilizer is given to a plant, then the growth of the plant will increase.

If a ball is hit with a wooden bat, then the ball will travel farther than an aluminum bat.

Page 21: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

WHAT IS WRONG Hypothesis 1: If plants are given fertilizer, then the

height of the plant will change. *In hypothesis 1 the then statement is not specific enough.

Hypothesis 2: If a plants height increases, then it was because of the fertilizer.

* In hypothesis 2 the dependent variable was talked about in the If statement and the independent variable was talked about in the then statement.

Hypothesis 3: If the height of plant that is given fertilizer increases, then it is because the fertilizer gave the plant added nutrients.

* Hypothesis 3 has two problems. The first problem is like hypothesis 2, the if and then statements are mixed up. The second problem is this hypothesis does not give a prediction for the scientific question stated above. It gives a prediction on why fertilizers make plants grow more.

Page 22: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

PRACTICE 1

Amy wants to see how the amount of water in a pot affects the time that it takes for water to reach boiling point. She boils 100, 200, 300 ml of water. The time it takes for the water to reach boiling point increases as the amount of water increases.

List the independent variable, dependent variable, and the needed controls

Construct a possible Hypothesis

Page 23: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ANSWER TO PRACTICE 1 Independent: Amount of Water Dependent: Boiling Time Controls: Type of water, heating apparatus

Constructing a Hypothesis: If water amounts increase, then the time

needed for water to reach the boiling point will also increase.

Page 24: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

PRACTICE 2 A study was done to see if leaves added to soil had

an effect on tomato production. Tomato plants were grown in four large tubs. Each tub had the same kind and amount of soil. The 1st tub had 15 kg of rotted leaves mixed in the soil and 2nd had 10 kg. The 3rd tub had 5 kg and 4th tub had no leaves added. Each tub was kept in the sun and watered the same amount. The number of kilograms of tomatoes produced in each tub were recorded

What is the independent variable? Dependent variable?

What are the controls? Write a possible hypothesis for this

experiment.

Page 25: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ANSWERS PRACTICE 3 Independent Variable: Music being played Dependent Variable: Growth of plant

Hypothesis: If music is played to plant over a period of time,

then the growth of the plant will increase. If music is played to plant over a period of time,

then the growth of the plant will decrease. If music is played to plant over a period of time,

then the growth of the plant will have no effect.

Page 26: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ANSWER PRACTICE 2 Independent: Amount of Leaves Dependent: Kilograms of tomatoes

produced Controls: Soil type and amount, Sun and

water amount. Hypothesis:

The larger amount of leaves added to soil will produce larger amounts of tomatoes.

It is hypothesized that changing the amount of decomposing leaves in soil will not effect tomato growth.

Page 27: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

PRACTICE 3 James wondered if music had an effect on

plant growth. He set up an experiment where 25 bean plants were placed in a chamber where music was played and 25 bean plants were placed in an identical chamber where music was not played. The growth chambers were kept at the same temp and all plants received the same amount of sunlight, fertilizer, and water. At the end of 2 weeks plant height was measured.

What is the purpose? What is the independent variable?

Dependent variable? Write a possible hypothesis for this

experiment.

Page 28: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

DATA Results of the experiment

May be quantitative (numbers) or qualitative

Page 29: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

DATA Must be organized

Can be organized into charts, tables, or graphs

Page 30: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

DATA – OBSERVATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS MADE DURING A INVESTIGATION.

Qualitative Data - describes the situation and reaction in descriptive terms.  For example, qualitative involves the senses including sight, taste, hearing, touch, and smell.  This would include color and shape

Quantitative - includes those things that can be measured (length, time, mass, temp. etc.)

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data - http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/math/ALGEBRA/AD1/qualquant.htm

http://regentsprep.org/regents/math/algebra/ad1/dataprac.htm

Page 31: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

DO WE NEED BOTH? A well-designed investigation must have

some type of MEASUREABLE data, quantitative, but qualitative gives the measurable data more description and accuracy.

Scientist use qualitative data to record observations that are difficult to measure or to give clarification to measured data.

Page 32: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

CONCLUSION

The answer to the hypothesis based on the data obtained from the experiment

Page 33: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

RETEST

In order to verify the results,

experiments must be retested.

Page 34: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

SOLVING A PROBLEM

1)Identify a Problem2) State Observations

about the problem3) Form a Hypothesis about

the problem (if…then…)4) Design an Experiment to

test the hypothesis5) Collect Data6) Form a Conclusion7) Retest

Page 35: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OA #3 A team of scientists wonder if the amount of

Vitamin A given to laboratory white mice would affect the number of offspring born. An experiment is set up using the same species of white mice. Each mouse in the study gets the same amount of food, daily exercise, and is kept at the same temperature. Once group of mice gets extra vitamin A supplements added to their food. The number of offspring are counted and recorded.

Which of the following is the best Hypothesis – Explain why the wrong ones are incorrect.

1. Mice will have more offspring if they are given Vitamin A.

2. If the mice are exposed to Vitamin A, then the amount of offspring will increase.

3. If you give mice Vitamin A, then they will have more offspring

4. I think the offspring number will increase if the mice are exposed to Vitamin A.

Page 36: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ON YOUR OWN – A scientist wonders how acid might effect

salamander’s hatching and growth. A scientist places 100 salamander eggs (Group X) in a pond that is exposed to acid rain. He places another 100 eggs (Group Y) in a pond where acid rain has not been detected. The conditions such as temperature, mineral content of the water, amount of sunlight are as similar as possible in both areas.

1. Determine Independent Variable? (2pts each)2. What are some possible Dependent

variables?3. Construct an Hypothesis for this experiment.

Page 37: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OWN YOUR OWN Candy wondered if caffeine would affect the

breathing rate of goldfish. She went to the store and purchased 10 goldfish of approximately the same age and size, identical containers, food, and caffeine tablets. In one container she placed 5 goldfish with no caffeine. In the other container she placed 5 goldfish with caffeine tablets dissolved in the water. She observed the goldfish behavior and counted the operculum (plate that covers gills) movements in both containers of fish.

1. Determine Independent Variable?2. What are some possible Dependent

variables?3. Construct an Hypothesis for this

experiment.

Page 38: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

MEASUREMENT English System – we’re the only

industrialized nation that uses this system as it’s standard measurement. (pounds, ounces/cups, miles, Fahrenheit, etc.)

History – was based off of body parts and commonly used objects.

Drawbacks: complex converting and same names for different measurements such as ounce for both weight and liquid capacity.

Page 39: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

MEASUREMENT Metric (International System of Units SI)

universally used in scientific work, and widely used around the world for personal and commercial purposes.

A standard set of prefixes in powers of ten may be used to derive larger and smaller units from the base units.

Page 40: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

METRIC IS USED IN SCIENCE Mass – unit is grams (g), used for

measure how much matter makes up an object.Tools used: triple beam balance, digital

balance

Page 41: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

VOLUME OF A LIQUID Unit – liter (L) (in

class use mainly mL)

Used to measure how much space a liquid takes up.

Tools: graduated cylinders (most accurate), beakers, Flasks

Page 42: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

SOLID VOLUME Solid Volume – cm3

or m3is the unit, used for measuring the amount of space an object takes up. To find the volume of a

solid measure the length, width, and height. Multiply all 3 numbers together.

Measuring Irregular solids – use the water displacement method but you will still record the volume using cm3

Ruler, graduated cylinder and water

Page 43: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

LENGTH Unit – meters (m) Used for measuring the distance

between two points. Tools - rulers

Page 44: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

TEMPERATURE Unit – Celsius, C Used to measure the movement of

molecules in a substance. The more movement the higher the temperature.

Tool: Thermometer Celsius is based on the freezing and

boiling point of water. 0 degrees for freezing and 100 degrees for boiling.

Fahrenheit is less accurate.

Page 45: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

OA: WHAT TOOL AND UNIT WOULD YOU USE TO MEASURE THE FOLLOWING?(REMEMBER METRIC)

1. How much matter in a calculator?2. How much space dr. pepper takes up

in your drinking cup?3. How much space a textbook takes up

in your book bag?4. The distance from Main Hall to Math

Hall?5. How much space a paper clip takes

up?6. The height of your desk?

Page 46: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

ANSWERS TO OA – KEEP IN OA SECTION

1. How much matter in a calculator?use a balance and measure in grams

2. How much space dr. pepper takes up in your drinking cup?

use a graduated cylinder and measure in milliliters (mL)

3. How much space a textbook takes up in your book bag?

use a ruler, LxWxH, unit cm3

4. The distance from Main Hall to Math Hall?ruler, meters

5. How much space a paper clip takes up?water displacement method, cm3

6. The height of the your desk?ruler, centimeters (cm)

Page 47: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

DENSITY The amount of matter in a given volume Mass (g)/ volume (mL3) = Density

(g/mL3) Practice Problems:

1. You have a rock with a volume of 15cm3 and a mass of 45 g. What is its density?

2. You have a different rock with a volume of 30cm3 and a mass of 60g. What is its density?

3. Which rock is heavier? Which rock is more dense?

Page 48: Why do we trust that Scientists have correct explanations for how “things” work?

APPLICATION A golden-colored cube is handed to you.

The person wants you to buy it for $100, saying that is a gold nugget. You pull out your old geology text and look up gold in the mineral table, and read that its density is 19.3 g/cm3. You measure the cube and find that it is 2 cm on each side, and weighs 40 g. What is its density? Is it gold? Should you buy it?