Why demolition of Babri Masjid is justified ?

Disclaimer

• I am not against any religion I love them ,I respect them but I seek the same respect from them for my religion also .If they don’t do so then there will be a problem

• All religions should be open to criticism .If your religion cant satisfy a person’s doubt or answer his question then what's the use of following that religion

Was the Masjid built over a temple?

• Yes Archaeological survey and digging of the disputed sites have revealed the existence of a older structure below the Babri Masjid

• Its quite evident from the history of ISLAM that they are quite fond of conquering or destroying the places of worship of other religions

E.g. 1

• Yes don’t be shocked the Holiest place in ISLAM is itself built over the Hebrew holy place of worship

• Before the rise of Islam the Ka'aba, and Mecca (previously known as Bakkah), were revered as a sacred sanctuary and was a site of pilgrimage.[1] Some identify it with the Biblical "valley of Baca" from Psalms 84 (Hebrew: בך‎).[2][‎[3At the time of Muhammad (AD 570–632), his tribe the Quraysh was in charge of the Kaaba, which was at that time a shrine containing hundreds of idols representing Arabian tribal gods and other religious figures. Muhammad earned the enmity of his tribe by claiming the shrine for the new religion of Islam that he preached. He wanted the Kaaba to be dedicated to the worship of the one God alone, and all the idols were evicted. The Black Stone (al-Hajar-ul-Aswad), still present at the Kaaba was a special object of veneration at the site. According to tradition the text of seven especially honoured poems were suspended around the Ka'aba.

• According to Islam, Muhammad's actions were not strictly a conversion but rather a restoration of the mosque established on that site by Abraham, who is considered to be a prophet in Islam. The Ka'aba thus became known as the Masjid al-Haram, or Sacred Mosque, the holiest site in Islam.[4]

E.g. 2 Al-Aqsa Mosque

• Al-Aqsa Mosque (Arabic: ‎المسجد االقصى al-Masjid al-Aqṣā, IPA: [ʔælˈmæsdʒɪd ælˈʔɑqsˤɑ] ( listen), "the Farthest Mosque") also known as Al-Aqsa and Bayt al-Muqaddas, is the third holiest site in Islam and is located in the Old City of Jerusalem. The site on which the silver domed mosque sits, along with the Dome of the Rock, also referred to as al-Haram ash-Sharif or "Noble Sanctuary,"[2] is the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism, the place where the Temple is generally accepted to have stood. Muslims believe that Muhammad was transported from the Sacred Mosque in Mecca to al-Aqsa during the Night Journey. Islamic tradition holds that Muhammad led prayers towards this site until the seventeenth month after the emigration, when God directed him to turn towards the Ka'aba.

• The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by the Rashidun caliph Umar, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. After an earthquake in 746, the mosque was completely destroyed and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754, and again rebuilt by his successor al-Mahdi in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present-day. During the periodic renovations undertaken, the various ruling dynasties of the Islamic Caliphate constructed additions to the mosque and its precincts, such as its dome, facade, its minbar, minarets and the interior structure. When the Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099, they used the mosque as a palace and church, but its function as a mosque was restored after its recapture by Saladin in 1187. More renovations, repairs and additions were undertaken in the later centuries by the Ayyubids, Mamluks, Ottomans, the Supreme Muslim Council, and Jordan. Today, the Old City is under Israeli control, but the mosque remains under the administration of the Jordanian/Palestinian-led Islamicwaqf.

E.g. 3 Church of the Holy Sepulchre

• The Church of the Holy Sepulchre, also called the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre, or the Church of the Resurrection by Eastern Christians, is a church within the Christian Quarter of the walled Old City of Jerusalem. It is a few steps away from the Muristan.

• The site is venerated as Golgotha[1] (the Hill of Calvary), where Jesus was crucified,[2] and is said also to contain the place where Jesus was buried (the Sepulchre). The church has been a paramount – and for many Christians the most important – pilgrimage destination since at least the 4th century, as the purported site of the resurrection of Jesus. Today it also serves as the headquarters of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, while control of the building is shared between several Christian churches and secular entities in complicated arrangements essentially unchanged for centuries. Today, the church is home to branches of Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy as well as to Roman Catholicism. Anglican and Protestant Christians have no permanent presence in the Church[3] – and some have regarded the alternative Garden Tomb, elsewhere in Jerusalem, as the true place of Jesus's crucifixion and resurrection

• On October 18, 1009, Fatimid caliph Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah ordered the complete destruction of the church. The measures against the church were part of a more general campaign against Christian places of worship in Palestine and Egypt, which involved a great deal of damage: Adémar de Chabannes recorded that the church of St George at Lydda 'with many other churches of the saints' had been attacked, and the 'basilica of the Lord's Sepulchre destroyed down to the ground'. ...The Christian writer Yahya ibn Sa'id reported that everything was razed 'except those parts which were impossible to destroy or would have been too difficult to carry away'."[13] The Church's foundations were hacked down to bedrock. The Edicule and the east and west walls and the roof of the cut-rock tomb it encased were destroyed or damaged (contemporary accounts vary), but the north and south walls were likely protected by rubble from further damage. The "mighty pillars resisted destruction up to the height of the gallery pavement, and are now effectively the only remnant of the fourth-century buildings."[13] Some minor repairs were done to the section believed to be the tomb of Jesus almost immediately after 1009, but a true attempt at restoration would have to wait for decades.[13].European reaction was of shock and dismay, with far-reaching and intense consequences. For example, Cluniac monk Rodulfus Glaber blamed the Jews, with the result that Jews were expelled from Limoges and other French towns. Ultimately, this destruction provided an impetus to the later Crusades.[14]

E.g. 3 Cave of the Patriarchs

• The Herodian shrine of Cave of the Patriarchs, the second most holy site in Judaism

• The Cave of the Patriarchs or the Cave of Machpelah (Hebrew: מערת ‎ Me'arat ha-Machpela (help·info),trans. "cave of the double tombs"), is,המכפלה

known by Muslims as the Sanctuary of Abraham or Ibrahimi Mosque (Arabic: الحرم‎اإلبراهيمي ,‎ Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi (help·info)).

• Situated beneath a Saladin-era mosque converted from a large rectangular Herodian-era structure, the series of subterranean chambers is located in the heart of Hebron (Al-Khalil)'s old city in the Hebron Hills. According to tradition that has been associated with both the Book of Genesis and the Quran, the cave and adjoining field were purchased by Abraham, and Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, considered the Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the Jewish people, are all believed to be buried there. The only matriarch missing is Rachel, who is believed to be buried near Bethlehem where she died in childbirth.[1] The Arabic name of the complex reflects the prominence given to Abraham, revered by Muslims as a Quranic prophet and patriarch through Ishmael. Outside biblical and Quranic sources there are a number of legends and traditions associated with the cave.

E.g. 4 Somnath Temple

• The first temple of Somnath existed before the beginning of the Christian era.

• The second temple, built by the Maitraka kings of Vallabhi in Gujarat, replaced the first one on the same site around 649. In 725 Junayad, the Arab governor of Sind, sent his armies to destroy the second temple.

• The Pratihara king Nagabhata II constructed the third temple in 815, a large structure of red sandstone. Mahmud of Ghazni attacked this temple in 1026, looted its gems and precious stones, massacred the worshippers and burned it. It was then that the famous Shivalinga of the temple was entirely destroyed.

• The fourth temple was built by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and the Solanki king Bhimdev I of Gujarat (Anhilwara) between 1026 and 1042. The temple was razed in 1297 when the Sultanate of Delhi conquered Gujarat, and again in 1394. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the temple again in 1706.

• A century later the third temple was constructed in red sandstone by the Pratihara king, Nagabhata II. Soon the temple regained its old glory and wealth, the descriptions of which were carried to the Middle East. In particular, the accounts of the Arab Al Biruni impressed Mahmud of Ghazni. In AD 1025, Mahmud destroyed and looted the temple, killing over 50,000 people who tried to defend it.[16] The defenders included the 90-year-old clan leader Ghogha Rana. Mahmud personally broke the gilded lingam to pieces and took them back to his homeland and placed them in the steps leading to the newly built Jamiah Masjid, so that they would be stepped upon by those going to the mosque to pray.[16][17] Work on the fourth temple was started immediately by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and the Solanki king Bhima of Patan and the temple was ready by AD 1042. This temple was destroyed in AD 1300. At that time Allaudin Khilji occupied the throne of Delhi and he sent his general, Alaf Khan, to pillage Somnath. The fifth temple was built by King Mahipala of the Chudasama dynasty.[17]

• Converted structure at the site of Somnath temple, 1869 • Somnath was repeatedly attacked in the succeeding centuries. The last of these attacks was by the Mughal

emperor Aurangazeb in AD 1701. A mosque was built at the site of the temple.[17] In AD 1783 queen Ahilyabhai Holkar built the sixth temple at an adjacent site. The temple still stands and worship is carried out there. After independence, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel pledged on 13 November 1947, that the seventh temple would be reconstructed. According to prescribed Hindu rituals, pledges are made by taking holy water in one's fist. Leaders like Morarji Desai, Dr. Rajendra Prasad (the first president) and Kanhaiyalal Munshi joined in and the work was entrusted to the Sompura Shilpakars, whose ancestors rebuilt each new temple through the ages. The mosque built by Aurangazeb was not destroyed but carefully relocated. In 1951 Dr. Rajendra Prasad performed the consecration ceremony with the words “The Somnath Temple signifies that the power of creation is always greater than the power of destruction.” The temple construction was completed on 1 December 1995, long after the demise of Sardar Patel. The then President of India, Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma, dedicated it to the nation.

E.g. 5 Qutub Complex

• The Qutub complex (Hindi: क़ु त़ुब, Urdu: قطب‎ )‎,also spelled Qutab or Qutub, is an array of monuments and buildings at Mehrauli in Delhi, India. The best-known structure in the complex is the Qutub Minar, built to celebrate the victory of Mohammed Ghori over Rajput king Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192 AD, by his then viceroy, Qutub-ud-din Aibak, who later became the first Sultan of Delhi of the Mamluk dynasty

Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque (Located inside the Qutub Complex)

• Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque (Dome of Islam) (also known as the Qutub Mosque or the Great Mosque of Delhi) was built by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, founder of the Mamluk or Slave dynasty.[20] It was the first mosque built in Delhi after the Islamic conquest of India and the oldest surviving example of Ghurids architecture in Indian subcontinent.[21] The construction of this Jami Masjid (Friday Mosque), started in the year 1193 AD, when Aibak was the commander of Muhammad Ghori's garrison that occupied Delhi. TheQutub Minar was built simultaneously with the mosque but appears to be a stand alone structure, built as the 'Minar of Jami Masjid', for the muezzin to perform adhan, call for prayer, and also as a qutub, an Axis or Pole of Islam.[22] It is reminiscent in style and design of the Adhai-din-ka Jhonpra or Ajmer mosque at Ajmer, Rajasthan, also built by Aibak during the same time, also constructed by demolishing earlier temples and a Sanskrit school, at the site.[23]

• Intricate stone carvings on the cloister columns at Quwwat ul-Islam Mosque, Qutb complex, Delhi .According to a Persian inscription still on the inner eastern gateway, the mosque was built by the parts taken by destruction of twenty-seven Hindu and Jain temples[3][4][5] built previously during Tomars and Prithvi Raj Chauhan, and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper.[24] Historical records compiled by Muslim historian Maulana Hakim Saiyid Abdul Hai attest to the iconoclasm of Qutb-ud-din Aybak. This pattern of iconoclasm was common during his reign, although an argument goes that such iconoclasm was motivated more by politics than by religion

E.g. 6 Iron Pillar of Delhi

• The first location of the pillar has been debated.[4] • While the pillar was certainly used as a trophy in the building the Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque and

the Qutb complex, its original location, whether on the site itself or from elsewhere, has frequented discussion. A summary of views on this subject and related matters was collected in volume edited by M. C. Joshi and published in 1989.[5] More recently, opinions have been summarised again by Upinder Singh in her book Delhi: Ancient History.[6]

• R. Balasubramaniam explored the metallurgy of the pillar and the iconography based on analysis of archer-type Gupta gold coins.[7]In his view, the pillar, with a wheel or discus at the top, was originally located at the Udayagiri caves, situated near Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh.[8] This conclusion was partly based on the fact that the inscription mentions Viṣṇupadagiri (meaning "hill with footprint of Viṣṇu"). This conclusion was endorsed and elaborated by Michael Willis in his Archaeology of Hindu Ritual, published in 2009.[9] The key point in favour of placing the iron pillar at Udayagiri is that this site was closely associated with Chandragupta and the worship of Viṣṇu in the Gupta period. In addition, there are well-established traditions of mining and working iron in central India, documented particularly by the iron pillar at Dhar and local place names like Lohapura and Lohangī Pīr (see Vidisha). The king of Delhi, Iltutmish, is known to have attacked and sacked Vidisha in the thirteenth century and this would have given him an opportunity to remove the pillar as a trophy to Delhi, just as the Tughluq rulers brought Asokan pillars to Delhi in the 1300s.

• For More info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_of_non-Muslim_places_of_worship_into_mosques

• So I think I have removed the first possible argument that Muslims don’t demolish the holy places of other religions as ISLAM is Falsely claimed to be a religion of Peace.

• You might think why do they do so (If they)

• The Only Possible reason is that THEY WANTED TO SHOW WHO WAS THE BOSS THERE. If your so called god cant even protect himself how can he protect you .

What is a Temple/ Mandir?

• By definition • A temple (from the Latin word templum) is a structure

reserved for religious or spiritual activities • A Hindu Temple is build according to the Shastras and the

Deities are installed through a process called Pranaprathista. Once it is a Temple, it is always a temple. Even if it is removed from the place, it can be built at the place since Pranaprathista was done for the Murthies in that place

• The owner of the temple is the Lord Himself(E.g. the owner of a Ram Mandir will be Lord Ram) ,No person can claim ownership of a temple they can only act as a care taker or a Trustee

What is a Masjid

• It is only a facilitator to conduct namaz in other words only a place to read namaz that’s it.

• A mosque is not an essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam and namaz (prayer) by Muslims can be offered anywhere, even in open. Accordingly, its acquisition is not prohibited by the provisions in the Constitution of India( The Supreme Court of India in the Faruqui vs. Union of India case [(1994)6 SCC360])

• A Masjid can be owned by an individual

• If Muslims argue that it’s a masjid(which it isn’t ) then also a masjid can be demolished as in their religion it is said that no idol worship should be done (source the HOLY QURAN http://www.submission.info/perspectives/monotheism/idolworship.html). And if they are looking for Allah in the mosque then they are committing a sin (according to ISLAM)

E.g. – The Bilal Masjid ,the masjid where the prophet mohd used to read namaz was demolished by the Saudi govt (Source http://oppressedpeoplesonlineword.ning.com/forum/topics/saudi-regime-demolishes-masjid-al-haram-holy-sites-in-mecca)

• So by now I have “demolished ” the possible arguments that masjid is a religious place and masjid cant be demolished

• Oh did I forget that in Babri masjid no one used to read namaz .Yes my friends since 1932 no one used to read namaz there, it was an abandoned place .

Is India Really Secular??

• According to the constitution of India ,India is a secular state ,where the religious sentiments of an individual is protected and has freedom to follow any religion. And everyone is equal under law(My interpretation)

• If it is so then why is there a different laws for Muslims. • E.g. For a Muslim he could have many wives but for a Hindu it is a

crime why?? • You might remember many film stars who change their religion just

to marry some other girl while already married • E.g. An old Muslim woman was denied alimony from her husband

after divorce even after supreme court ruled in the favour of granting alimony to the lady but the then govt reversed after the pressure of the Islamic organisations stating that it is not mandatory in their religion (Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shah_Bano_case)

• For the Hindus the cow is a sacred animal then why is there cow slaughter factories in India. The funny thing is govt provide subsidy to people for transporting Cow flesh

• For Hindus the Ram setu is a sacred site then why was the govt trying to demolish it ?

• Why was there no action taken when 5,00,000 Hindus from Kashmir where forced to leave their place and run ?

• Why was Adi Shankarchaya (the supreme Hindu guru) was arrested like a common criminal in a case which was later proved a false case ?

• And to add to all this the Govt is presenting a Communal Violence bill ,which protects only the minority from violence thereby assuming that only the majority are the reason for the violence .

3 Stages of Jihad

• Stage 1 Stealth Jihad • STAGE ONE—When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t

possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g. “You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) called for religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a worldly punishment) for unbelievers. - Islamists feel powerless and too few in numbers to impact real change. - This time is used to adopt the status of "Victim-hood" by the majority and the state, and affect the conversation about peaceful Islam, via deception. - Islamists use propaganda and politics.

• Stage 2 DEFENSIVE JIHAD • STAGE TWO—When there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic

community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Qur’an 22:39-40: Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah. . . .Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting, later revelations show otherwise.

• - Muslims are gaining in number (Population Jihad, ghettos, district level majority), influence politics and power. - Islamists have built relationships, infiltrated organizations, and begin making demands - Islamists may use financing, propaganda and politics. - In Democracy they effect the final outcome of the elections.(That’s why every party thinks about the HUGE MUSLIM VOTEBANK)

• When you have enough number to influence then keep asking for more • E.g. Different set of laws , Reservations for Muslims etc • INDIA IS IN THE SECOND STAGE OF JIHAD

• Stage 3 The Offensive Jihad • STAGE THREE—When Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are

commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammad’s control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. Notice that this verse doesn’t order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who don’t believe in Islam (including the “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians).Not surprisingly, we find similar commands in Islam’s most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammad’s teachings). Sahih al-Bukhari 6924—Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illallah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.” Sahih Muslim 30—Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.” Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam It’s clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Qur’an were abrogated by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islam’s greatest scholars acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islam’s greatest commentator on the Qur’an) sums up Stage Three as follows: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”

• - Islamists are empowered and “take over” the state/Govt via wars and genocide. - Kashmir, WB, Hyderabad, Assam, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Gaza, Tunisia, Egypt, Iran are all recent examples.

• 700 years ago 100% Hindus in Kashmir and today 99% Muslims in Kashmir. 1947 19% Hindus in Pakistan today hardly 1%. 1947 7% Muslims in India and in 2001 it was 13.4%, 2011 ??

The Current Situation of Hindus

• Neither they are seeing what is the big picture nor are the ready to hear those who saw the picture

• The people who know what's happening are too reluctant to speak as when you speak about Hindu unity people declare you are communal but if you speak about Muslim unity then its appreciated, why is there this double standard.

• The Current situations the due to the “Arjuna Virus” The late Swami Chinmayananda once pointed out, referring to Arjuna’s initially declining to fight at Kurukshetra because he could recognize his duty in the hour of crisis, as the Arjuna virus.

• While the foreigners are looking up to Hinduism the Indian Hindus are running away from it , it’s a pity state as they don’t even know about there own religion .

What is Hindutva?

• Hindutva (Devanagari: हिन्द़ुत्व, "Hinduness", a word coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his 1923 pamphlet entitled Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? ) is the set of movements advocating Hindu nationalism. Members of the movement are called Hindutvavadis.[1]According to a 1995 Supreme Court of India judgement the word Hindutva could be used to mean "the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos"

• In a 1995 judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled that "Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a state of mind and is not to be equated with or understood as religious Hindu fundamentalism ... it is a fallacy and an error of law to proceed on the assumption ... that the use of words Hindutva or Hinduism per se depicts an attitude hostile to all persons practising any religion other than the Hindu religion ... It may well be that these words are used in a speech to promote secularism or to emphasise the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos, or to criticise the policy of any political party as discriminatory or intolerant.[2]

• The concept of "'Hindutva" is continued to be espoused by the organisations like the RSS and political parties like the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). But the definition does not have the same rigidity with respect to the concept of "holy land" laid down by Savarkar, and stresses on inclusivism and patriotism. BJP leader and the then leader of opposition, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, in 1998, articulated the concept of "holy land" in Hindutva as follows: "Mecca can continue to be holy for the Muslims but India should be holier than the holy for them. You can go to a mosque and offer namaz, you can keep the roza. We have no problem. But if you have to choose between Mecca or Islam and India you must choose India. All the Muslims should have this feeling: we will live and die only for this country."[61]

• In a 1995 landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India observed that "Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a state of mind and is not to be equated with or understood as religious Hindu fundamentalism. A Hindu may embrace a non-Hindu religion without ceasing to be a Hindu and since the Hindu is disposed to think synthetically and to regard other forms of worship, strange gods and divergent doctrines as inadequate rather than wrong or objectionable, he tends to believe that the highest divine powers complement each other for the well-being of the world and mankind."[62]

• In Layman terms Hindutva means to believe that the motherland has the supreme place for an individual/citizen .A citizen has to be ready to make many sacrifice for it .

• So can anyone tell me what is wrong in HINDUTVA or HINDU NATIONLISM ?

• Why wouldn’t anyone want to become a HINDU NATIONALIST ?

• The only reason that people don’t want to connect to it is just because of the false propaganda that it relates to a particular religion .That is just because of the ignorant mindset of the people who make a assumption about something without even finding about it .

Common Misconceptions about Hinduism

• Idol Worship- It is scientifically proved fact that human mind concentrates easier and better when he has something to concentrate at .Our Rishi didn’t need these idols to concentrate and connect to Lord but a random person will not have the necessary mental and will power to do so therefore to simplify his efforts idols were introduced.

• Why so many Gods ?? • A Religion has to cater for all and every individual

.Every person has different way of thinking ,different approach to god .Supposing if there is a party and in that party only one dish is served then the person who doesn't like that dish will not be satisfied so in a party there should to different dishes to satisfy the needs of different people. Similarly to benefit all and satisfy the spiritual needs of all there are any gods in Hinduism .One just has to find the god whom he connects with.

• All the gods are the same as it is just a different version of the same god

• AND The most Stupid of all misconceptions

• THE CASTE SYSTEM

• According to VEDAS , the society was divided into 4 sects BUT it was NO WHERE WRITTEN that the sects was based on BIRTH . It was only based on what an individual pursues .

• If KNOWLEDGE (Brahmin)- those who has knowledge will not have wealth, will not have weapons and will not have lands

• If WEAPONS(Kshatriya)- Those who will have weapons will rule the country but they will not make policy. They need to go to people having knowledge to seek their permission and advice

• If WEALTH(Vaishya)-Those who are having wealth, their social status will be decided by the how much philanthropy they do not by their wealth.

• If LAND(Shudras)- Those who has lands have to produce for the society.

• E.g. to prove this • "Ved Vyasa" who was a Maharishi, who wrote the

"Mahabharat". His mother was a fisher women(Shudras).

• Maharishi "Valmiki" who wrote the "Ramayan" was considered as child of a Dalit women(Shudras).

• 'Kalidasa" who is the greatest poet our country has produced, was a Hunter(again Shudras).

• "Rishi Vishwamitra" (the teacher of Lord Rama) who was considered as Rishi of Rishi was born in "Kshatriya" family, that’s why he takes Lord Ram to protect him as he himself is not supposed to take up weapons

• The Ravana was a "Brahmin" whom no Hindu worship.

• It proves that Hindu Dharma does not have "varna" or "caste' on the basis of Birth.

• Thanking you to those who understood my point of view and FUCK OFF to those who still don’t understand it.

Sources

• The Real RAM MANDIR ISSUE - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnVQw31xPrU

• 3 Stages of Jihad- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERou_Q5l9Gw

• Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOTgiImVpbs

• Are Hindus Idol Worshippers? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acM5L-SWNfU

• Why so many paths? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOorY8g3v0w

• Why are there so many Gods in Hinduism? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg8L4-wv4Vg