WHO COURSE FOR THE CARs MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
-
Upload
wendy-terry -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of WHO COURSE FOR THE CARs MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
WHO COURSE FOR THE WHO COURSE FOR THE CARsCARs
MONITORING AND AUDITING MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE
AND ENFORCEMENTAND ENFORCEMENT
AUDITING BODIES:INDUSTRYAUDITING BODIES:INDUSTRY
Importers and retailers: checking foreign Importers and retailers: checking foreign supplierssuppliers
Manufacturers: checking suppliers of Manufacturers: checking suppliers of ingredients and raw materialsingredients and raw materials
Independent third party auditors acting for Independent third party auditors acting for the above eg British Retail Consortium the above eg British Retail Consortium Technical Standard for Companies Technical Standard for Companies Supplying Retailer Branded Food ProductsSupplying Retailer Branded Food Products
OFFICIAL AUDITING BODIESOFFICIAL AUDITING BODIES
National Government AuditorsNational Government Auditors EU Food and Veterinary OfficeEU Food and Veterinary Office
THE UK FOOD THE UK FOOD STANDARDS AGENCYSTANDARDS AGENCY
LOCAL AUTHORITY LOCAL AUTHORITY ENFORCEMENTENFORCEMENT
FSA White Paper ‘A Force FSA White Paper ‘A Force For Change’ - January 1998For Change’ - January 1998
“ “ The Government agrees the general The Government agrees the general food law environment benefits from food law environment benefits from inspectors’ local knowledge and that inspectors’ local knowledge and that there are therefore good reasons why there are therefore good reasons why local authorities should retain their local authorities should retain their current enforcement responsibilities.”current enforcement responsibilities.”
FSA White Paper ‘A Force FSA White Paper ‘A Force For Change’ - January 1998 For Change’ - January 1998
“… “… the agency needs to be in a the agency needs to be in a position to exercise influence over position to exercise influence over individual authorities enforcement individual authorities enforcement activity and that it should have a activity and that it should have a proactive role in encouraging proactive role in encouraging consistency across the UK.” consistency across the UK.”
UK EnforcementUK Enforcement
L A C O TS
D is tric t C ou n c ilsfood h yg ien e
C ou n ty C ou n c ilfood s tan d ard s
U n ita ry A u th orit iesfood s tan d ard s an d h yg ien e
B IP S
P ort H ea lth A u th orit iesim p orted food
F ood S tan d ard s A g en cy M A F F
EnforcementEnforcement OfficersOfficers
Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) - Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) - Public HealthPublic Health
Trading Standards Officers (TSOs)- Fair Trading Standards Officers (TSOs)- Fair Trading Trading
Official Veterinary Surgeons (OVSs) - Red Official Veterinary Surgeons (OVSs) - Red meat, poultrymeat, and BIPS meat, poultrymeat, and BIPS
Local Authority Local Authority EnforcementEnforcement
Approx. 400 local authorities (England)Approx. 400 local authorities (England)
Approx. 80 local authorities (Scotland, Wales and Approx. 80 local authorities (Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland)N.Ireland)
6,000 EHOs and 1,500 TSOs plus support staff - 6,000 EHOs and 1,500 TSOs plus support staff - proportion of which are involved in food enforcement.proportion of which are involved in food enforcement.
£120 -£150 million annual cost£120 -£150 million annual cost
612,203 food premises612,203 food premises
532,452 inspection of food premises532,452 inspection of food premises
Food Standards Act Food Standards Act 19991999
Agency has powers to:Agency has powers to:
monitor, set standards for and audit the monitor, set standards for and audit the performance of enforcement authoritiesperformance of enforcement authorities
enter premises and require informationenter premises and require information
direct local authorities to publish FSA direct local authorities to publish FSA Audit report and provide an action planAudit report and provide an action plan
carry out works in defaultcarry out works in default
Working with local authoritiesWorking with local authorities
Local authorities have a key roleLocal authorities have a key role• inspecting premises / assessing practicesinspecting premises / assessing practices• checking composition / labellingchecking composition / labelling• giving advice / investigating complaintsgiving advice / investigating complaints
Effective local enforcement will protect Effective local enforcement will protect consumers and raise standardsconsumers and raise standards
Agency will need to work with local Agency will need to work with local authorities deliver food agendaauthorities deliver food agenda
Local EnforcementLocal Enforcement
The Authority must have and implement a The Authority must have and implement a documented enforcement policy, in documented enforcement policy, in accordance with relevant guidance, approved accordance with relevant guidance, approved by the “relevant Council forum”by the “relevant Council forum”
Decisions on enforcement action to be made Decisions on enforcement action to be made following consideration of the policy. The following consideration of the policy. The reasons for any departure from the criteria set reasons for any departure from the criteria set out in the policy should be documentedout in the policy should be documented
The enforcement policy or an accurate The enforcement policy or an accurate summary should be readily available to the summary should be readily available to the public and food businessespublic and food businesses
Support for local Support for local enforcementenforcement
Central government adviceCentral government advice Food Standards Agency - Support/ Policy Food Standards Agency - Support/ Policy
DivisionDivision
Issue official enforcement Codes of Issue official enforcement Codes of Practice / Industry GuidesPractice / Industry Guides
Range control guidance/publicationsRange control guidance/publications Enforcers have wide powers -closures, Enforcers have wide powers -closures,
prosecutions notices, seizures/detentionprosecutions notices, seizures/detention
Framework Framework AgreementAgreement
The Standard The Standard Monitoring InformationMonitoring Information Service Planning Service Planning
ArrangementsArrangements AuditAudit
The Framework AgreementThe Framework AgreementThe StandardAgreed Scope /
Performance Standards
Service PlanningGuidance on format covering all elements of the Standard
AuditQualitative
assessmentagainst Standard
Monitoring Quantitative assessment
against StandardInforms selection process
Informs Agency policy
4 key components of 4 key components of “Framework “Framework Agreement”Agreement”
Service (Business) plansService (Business) plans Food law enforcement standardsFood law enforcement standards MonitoringMonitoring AuditAudit
Framework Agreement:Framework Agreement:
PrinciplesPrinciples
Transparent to all partiesTransparent to all parties Consistent / verifiable / credible to interested Consistent / verifiable / credible to interested
partiesparties Consistent with other schemesConsistent with other schemes Clearly defined scope / standardsClearly defined scope / standards Identifies / disseminates good practiceIdentifies / disseminates good practice Identifies / poor performance / non Identifies / poor performance / non
conformanceconformance Findings in the public domainFindings in the public domain
Key IssuesKey Issues
Standard, basis of monitoring and auditStandard, basis of monitoring and audit Covers food standards, safety, feeding stuffCovers food standards, safety, feeding stuff Includes the key components of food law Includes the key components of food law
enforcement servicesenforcement services Allows for local priorities / approaches / flexibilityAllows for local priorities / approaches / flexibility Consistent with Best Value arrangementsConsistent with Best Value arrangements
Components (1)Components (1)
Documented management arrangementsDocumented management arrangements Policies / proceduresPolicies / procedures Competence of authorised officersCompetence of authorised officers Necessary facilities and equipmentNecessary facilities and equipment Inspection programmes and proceduresInspection programmes and procedures Complaints proceduresComplaints procedures Home Authority arrangementsHome Authority arrangements
Components (2)Components (2)
Sampling arrangements / activitiesSampling arrangements / activities Outbreak investigation arrangementsOutbreak investigation arrangements Arrangements for dealing with Food Hazard Arrangements for dealing with Food Hazard
warningwarning Enforcement policyEnforcement policy Keeping of recordsKeeping of records Advice and promotionAdvice and promotion Complaints (about Service)Complaints (about Service) Self audit arrangementsSelf audit arrangements
Local Authority - AuditLocal Authority - Audit
AimsAims
Agency arrangementsAgency arrangements
Selection/notification of LAsSelection/notification of LAs
Audit processAudit process
Audit - aimsAudit - aims
Aims includeAims include
qualitative assessment of local servicesqualitative assessment of local services
promote conformance with Standardpromote conformance with Standard
identify and improve under performanceidentify and improve under performance
help identify and disseminate good practicehelp identify and disseminate good practice
maintain and improve consumer confidencemaintain and improve consumer confidence
ProcessProcess
Pre-visit Questionnaire 3 months prior to auditPre-visit Questionnaire 3 months prior to audit
completed and returned by Local Authority (LA) within 30 completed and returned by Local Authority (LA) within 30 working daysworking days
2-4 days prior - confirm audit arrangements and file 2-4 days prior - confirm audit arrangements and file requirementsrequirements
On site auditOn site audit
2-4 auditors depending on LA2-4 auditors depending on LA
2-3 days on site2-3 days on site
Audit protocols available to LAsAudit protocols available to LAs
ProcessProcess
20 working days after audit - draft report and 20 working days after audit - draft report and summary to Chief Executive & Head of Servicesummary to Chief Executive & Head of Service
20 working days of receipt - LA supply factual 20 working days of receipt - LA supply factual corrections and proposed action plancorrections and proposed action plan
within 10 working days (subject to discussions) within 10 working days (subject to discussions) Agency issue Final Report and Agreed Action Agency issue Final Report and Agreed Action PlanPlan
ProcessProcess
Expecting Reports and Action Plans will be presented to Expecting Reports and Action Plans will be presented to Members within appropriate local public forumMembers within appropriate local public forum
Copies (Reports and Action Plans) on Agency websiteCopies (Reports and Action Plans) on Agency website
Annual food control report - national summary of Annual food control report - national summary of monitoring and auditmonitoring and audit
In year review of scheme and formal review after 1st In year review of scheme and formal review after 1st year - FA Sub Groupyear - FA Sub Group
Parallel arrangements in Scotland, Wales and NIParallel arrangements in Scotland, Wales and NI
Audit processAudit process
General findings/feedback at closing General findings/feedback at closing meetingmeeting
Draft report to Head of Service- within 20 Draft report to Head of Service- within 20 working daysworking days
LA to return with factual corrections & LA to return with factual corrections & Action Plan - within 20 working daysAction Plan - within 20 working days
Final report to Chief Executive - within 15 Final report to Chief Executive - within 15 days days
Published on website (press release)Published on website (press release)
Feedback on the audit processFeedback on the audit process
Customer satisfaction surveys returned Customer satisfaction surveys returned from 23 LAs in the first yearfrom 23 LAs in the first year
Generally positiveGenerally positive 17% totally, 78% mostly, 4% partially agreed 17% totally, 78% mostly, 4% partially agreed
with audit findingswith audit findings 87% felt the process had helped make 87% felt the process had helped make
improvements in level, quality or consistencyimprovements in level, quality or consistency