Which Monitoring Program is Right for Your Lake? Balancing Cost, Needs and Accuracy Stephen J....
-
Upload
irea-mcculloch -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Which Monitoring Program is Right for Your Lake? Balancing Cost, Needs and Accuracy Stephen J....
Which Monitoring Program is Right for Your Lake?
Balancing Cost, Needs and Accuracy
Stephen J. Souza, Ph.D.
And Fred S. Lubnow, Ph.D.Princeton Hydro, LLC
pH
pH
Why Sample In the First Place?
Base lake management and restoration decisions on sound, objective, properly collected data
As with any ecosystem, temporal and spatial variability can be significant in a lake environment
A database must be suitably robust in order to account for this variability
If not, management and restoration decisions could could be faulty
Recipe for failure…wasted time and money
pH
The Key To Successful Lake Management …
Don’t Just Treat The Symptom…
Correct the Cause
pH
Without the Data You Can’t Make the Proper Diagnosis
Watershed Boundaries Soil PropertiesLand Use MorphometrySedimentationDO/ TemperaturePollutant ConcentrationsBiological InteractionsRecreational Needs
Nutrients
Hydrology
Trophic State
Collect Data Analyze Data
pH
In The Good Old Days
To account for spatial and temporal variability, the sampling program recommendations contained in the Section 314 Clean Lakes Program Guidance Manual required: Sampling over multiple seasons or over two years Sampling of multiple in-lake stations and tributaries Sampling of in-lake stations in profile or at multiple
depths, from surface to bottom Sampling of tributaries under wet and dry weather
conditions
pH
Good News – Bad News…
The resulting database enabled the development of a detailed restoration and management plan
The main problem: these monitoring programs were expensive to conduct
Lab and field labor costs alone were in the range of $40,000 to $50,000, with total costs often exceeding $100,000
pH
“Lite” Lake Sampling Plans
State-funded diagnostic studies often allowed a reduction in sampling intensity
This helped reduce cost, and did not significantly impact the accuracy of the database or decisions made
However, these “lite” monitoring programs still resulted in sampling and laboratory costs in the range of $20,000 to $30,000, with total costs often exceeding $60,000
pH
The Growing Season Approach As State and Federal funding became less
available, monitoring programs became funded primarily through local public and private funding sources
As a result, efforts were further scaled down Sampling was often limited to the “growing
season” or a few carefully selected dates Program lab costs typically in the range of
$10,000 to $20,000, with total costs around $35,000 to $45,000
pH
The Down Side
These “lite” monitoring programs resulted in substantial cost savings
But…with less data comes the potential for increased management decision errors
However, did every single management plan developed from a less than optimally detailed database fail?
The answer is…NO!
pH
Making Due With Less
Why? Because lake scientists made increasing use of: Predictive models In-situ monitoring equipment Information contained in reports and
published results contained in earlier studies available through such sources as NALMS, the U.S. EPA, state lake assessment programs, the USGS, and other agencies
pH
Good Data = Proper Management
As lake practitioners we arm ourselves with ample data before attempting to manage a lake
However, rarely is a monitoring program limited by neither budgetary nor time constraints
As a result, there is a limit on the amount of information that can be collected
If sampling is designed and conducted wisely though, correct management decisions can be made even with a less than optimal amount of data
pH
“One Size Does Not Fit All”
A cost-effective monitoring program provides the correct types and amounts of data needed to properly diagnose problems and guide decisions
A $10,000 program may look very similar a $100,000 program, but the end results will be very different
In determining cost-effectiveness must decide “which program has the least potential risk for error”?
The answer is not always that simple
pH
How Much Data Do I Need? Evaluating Potential Monitoring Options
1. No monitoring
2. Single event sampling
3. Multiple event, growing season
4. Multiple event, single year, year- round monitoring program
5. Multiple event, multiple-year sampling program
pH
The Lake Sampling Plan – The Starting PointThe Lake Sampling Plan – The Starting Point
Define your objectives and goal Identify the parameters of most value Establish an operating budget Develop a sampling plan (what, where, when) Identify fixed, easily located sampling stations Properly train / equip sampling team(s) Establish a quality control plan Setup a data management system Review data on a regular basis
pH
The “No Monitoring” Option
Rely on interviews with lake users, a visual assessment of the lake and its watershed, and an evaluation of any previous management efforts or existing data
Recommendations can deal only with obvious problems
While this approach may not always provide definitive solutions to existing problems, it is often useful as a start to the planning process
pH
Maintenance vs. Management
The “No Monitoring” option results in management decisions that focus on the symptoms of eutrophication and impacted water quality (e.g., algae blooms, infestation by nuisance aquatic macrophytes)
Difficult to identify true causes of a lake’s problems
The resulting recommendations may help alleviate or reduce the severity of these problems, but likely won’t correct the problem
pH
Site Visit Only What to expect: general info on costs and
management options, suggested next steps
What you miss: specific information on your lake or pond
Other considerations: success is almost entirely dependent upon the experience of the person conducting the site visit
Estimated costs: $1,000-$2,000
pH
If I’m Going to Sample…When Should I Sample
Sample frequently enough to meet your testing and monitoring objectives
Sample frequently enough to catch seasonal changes
Comprehensive lake/watershed studies must include storm sampling
Don’t forget about data that address user needs and recreation (e.g. bacteria, weed growth, fish)
pH
Single Sampling Event Program
Use one detailed sampling event to assess what is ailing lake
Timing is critical. Try to sample under WORST water quality conditions
Should depth profile measure dissolved oxygen, temperature, conductivity, and pH
Analyze nutrients, suspended solids, chlorophyll a, and measure Secchi disk transparency
If budget permits, include bacteria, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and macrophyte sampling
pH
Single Sampling Event Program
Examine physical, chemical, and biological properties of the lake
As with “No Monitoring” option, include Watershed assessment Review of any existing or historical data Critical assessment of ongoing management
efforts
Single event program generates a “snapshot” of the lake conditions
pH
Single Sampling Event Program
What to expect: water quality snapshot, general info on management options and costs, suggested next steps
What you miss: information on variability, watershed interactions, stream loading, ecological dynamics
Other considerations: sampling should be conducted under worse case conditions
Estimated costs: $5,000-$15,000
pH
Growing Season Approach Better approach than “Single Event” involves the
collection of data over multiple sampling events thru growing season (typically May - September)
Very cost-effective option for lake associations with limited budgets
Increases the number of sampling events and provides information on seasonal changes in lake water quality and lake dynamics
Addresses some of the data variability concerns associated with “snap shot” approach
pH
Focus on the “Problem” Period
Focus is placed on the collection of data when the worst water quality and lake conditions expected
Can observe trends, study ecological interactions and identify the causes of lake problems
This type of sampling yields insight concerning the applicability of certain restoration measures
Although relatively robust, may still fail to identify or measure important lake characteristics or trends
pH
Multiple Event, Growing Season
What to expect: good water quality data, management options, some info on variability, insight of problems/causes
What you miss: information long-term water quality, ecological dynamics, and fall and winter data, stream/storm data.
Other considerations: sampling should include month(s) when problems occur
Estimated cost: $15,000-$25,000
pH
Multiple Event, Single Year, Year-Round Program
The one-year sampling program most basic sampling approach contained in the Clean Lakes Program Guidance Manual (U.S. EPA, 1980)
Allows for more inclusive assessment, examine or identify problems that arise during non-growing seasons, most often includes stream/storm data
More robust, well suited for validation of data and predications derived from deterministic models
Additional data may not increase overall decisions relative to that developed through the “Growing Season” monitoring plan….However…
pH
Better Insight Gained Through More Frequent Sampling
Measure pollutant loading caused by spring runoff or summer thunderstorms
Monitor dissolved oxygen changes and winter-kill of fish when lake is ice covered
Measure organic and nutrient load from leaf-fall Track changes in the density, growth patterns,
speciation, and composition of macrophyte community
Measure internal phosphorus loading during fall destratification
Correlate storm loading impacts on water quality
pH
Multiple Event, Single Year, Year-Round Program
What to expect: good info on water quality, (including seasonal variation), management options, and costs; suggested next steps
What you miss: Inter-annual variations caused by changes in runoff,rainfall, weather
Other considerations: need to make sure all variables of interest are included, including biological sampling
Estimated cost: $25,000-$100,000
pH
Multiple Event, Multiple Year, Year-Round Programs
These programs decrease erroneous conclusions based on abnormal (excessive rain, drought, excessively hot summer or cold winter, etc.)
Multiple-year programs are also very well suited for tracking water quality improvements and quantifying success of management and restoration activities
Although provide additional information, these programs are obviously more expensive
pH
Multiple Event, Multiple Year, Year-Round Program
What to expect: good info on water quality, trends and variability, greater confidence in management options and costs
What you miss: the uncertainty associated with less intensive sampling
Other considerations: variables can be added as needed
Estimated cost: >$75,000
pH
But Sampling Frequency Is Only Part of the Story
Its not only how often to sample, but how many sampling stations
For a small pond or lake, a single sampling station may likely suffice
Bigger lake = more sampling stations Need to address unique water quality or use
conditions of coves, densely populated stretches of lakefront, deep versus shallow portions of the lake, tributary inlets, etc.
But…more sampling sites lead to increased costs
pH
So…What Should I Do? Ask, “What are we trying to accomplish”? A quick “look-see” of lake, can be
accomplished with a well-designed, suitably detailed one-day sampling program may suffice
However, if goal is to fully understand what is causing the eutrophication of your lake, and how best to channel your restoration and management efforts and funds in the improvement of conditions, a more intense sampling program will be required
pH
Think, Question and Prepare
Typically a seasonal or one-year type program needed to properly investigate lake dynamics or develop data needed to support a given restoration approach or technique
The worst that you can do though is to proceed in the management of your lake without any data collection. Even the simplest program, if properly designed and thought out, can provide good information useful in guidance of management and restoration decisions
pH
Thank You
pH
Questions or More Information
Stephen J. Souza, Ph.D.Stephen J. Souza, Ph.D.Princeton Hydro, LLCPrinceton Hydro, LLC
Suite1, 1108 Old York RdSuite1, 1108 Old York Rd
P.O. Box 720P.O. Box 720
Ringoes, NJ 08551Ringoes, NJ 08551
[email protected]@princetonhydro.com