WHAT IS A DENTAL IMPLANT? WHAT IS A DENTAL IMPLANT?

Dental implant is an artificial titanium fixture (similar to those used in orthopedics)

which is placed surgically into the jaw bone to substitute for a missing tooth and its root(s).

Dental implant is an artificial titanium fixture (similar to those used in orthopedics)

which is placed surgically into the jaw bone to substitute for a missing tooth and its root(s).

Alternative Solutions

Partial and Full Dentures

Crowns

Bridges

History of Dental Implants

In 1952, Professor Per-Ingvar Branemark, a Swedish surgeon, while conducting research

into the healing patterns of bone tissue, accidentally discovered that when pure titanium comes into direct contact with the living bone

tissue, the two literally grow together to form a permanent biological adhesion. He named this

phenomenon "osseointegration".

Biocompatibility of Material

Desired MechanicalDesired MechanicalPropertiesProperties

High yield strengthHigh yield strength Modulus close to that Modulus close to that

of bone’sof bone’s Built-in margin of Built-in margin of

safety: Changes in safety: Changes in environment around environment around implantimplant

SurfacesSurfaces CompositionComposition Ion releaseIon release Surface Surface

modificationsmodifications

Metallic Implant SurfaceMetallic Implant Surface

Problem:Problem:

Implant surface change with time due to oxidation, Implant surface change with time due to oxidation, precipitation…precipitation…

Possible solutions:Possible solutions: Oxide layers ( minimize ion release)Oxide layers ( minimize ion release) Prosthetic component from noble alloys Prosthetic component from noble alloys Phase stabilizers other than Al & V (eg. Ti-13Nb-Phase stabilizers other than Al & V (eg. Ti-13Nb-

13Zr, Ti-15Mo-2.8Nb )13Zr, Ti-15Mo-2.8Nb ) Surface ModificationsSurface Modifications

Problem:Problem:

Implant surface change with time due to oxidation, Implant surface change with time due to oxidation, precipitation…precipitation…

Possible solutions:Possible solutions: Oxide layers ( minimize ion release)Oxide layers ( minimize ion release) Prosthetic component from noble alloys Prosthetic component from noble alloys Phase stabilizers other than Al & V (eg. Ti-13Nb-Phase stabilizers other than Al & V (eg. Ti-13Nb-

13Zr, Ti-15Mo-2.8Nb )13Zr, Ti-15Mo-2.8Nb ) Surface ModificationsSurface Modifications

Screw Implants (Left to Right: TPS screw, Ledermann screw, Branemark screw, ITI Bonefit screw)                                                                                                                              Cylinder Implants (Left to Right: IMZ, Integral, Frialit-1 step-cylinder, Frialit-2 step-cylinder)

Types of Implants

First Surgical Phase (Implant Placement)Under Local anesthetic the dentist places dental implants into the jaw bone with a very precise surgical procedure. The implant remains covered by gum tissue while fusing to the jaw bone.

Second Surgical Phase (Implant Uncovery)After approximately six months of healing. Under local anesthetic, the implant root is exposed and a healing post is placed over top of it so that the gum tissue heals around the post.

Prosthetic Phase (Teeth)Once the gums have healed, an implant crown is fabricated and screwed down to the implant.

Procedure

Cost

Wide variability in costsWide variability in costs Single implant costs anywhere from Single implant costs anywhere from

$500 - $6000$500 - $6000 Average ~ $1250 - $5000Average ~ $1250 - $5000 $80,000 for full mouth reconstruction$80,000 for full mouth reconstruction

MarketMarket

Nobel Biocare Nobel Biocare currently the currently the leader leader

US market US market grows ~ 20% grows ~ 20% annually, annually, though it has though it has historically historically been weakbeen weak

Nobel Biocare Nobel Biocare currently the currently the leader leader

US market US market grows ~ 20% grows ~ 20% annually, annually, though it has though it has historically historically been weakbeen weak

Growing Dental MarketGrowing Dental Market

Potential Market Size:Potential Market Size: 10% over 18 missing 10% over 18 missing

a tootha tooth11

69% of those aged 35-69% of those aged 35-44 missing at least 1 44 missing at least 1 toothtooth

2% of market 2% of market penetrationpenetration22

10% of worldwide dental 10% of worldwide dental marketmarket33

US market for implants is US market for implants is growing ~20% annuallygrowing ~20% annually

1. US Department of Health

2. www.3implant.com

3. http://investor.nobelbiocare.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=139018&p=irol-dental

Surface modification for metallic implants

PassivationPassivation Ion implantationIon implantation Texturing Texturing

This work was supported by grants from University of Ferrara, Italy (F.C.), Fondazione CARIFE (F.C.), Guya-bioscience, Ferrara, Italy (F.P.), Fondazione CARISBO (F.P.), Finalized Project ‘‘Materials Tailored for Advanced Technologies’’, National Research Council (C.N.R.), Rome, Italy (A.P.), and Ministry of Education, University and Research (M.I.U.R.), Rome, Italy (A.P.).

This work was supported by grants from University of Ferrara, Italy (F.C.), Fondazione CARIFE (F.C.), Guya-bioscience, Ferrara, Italy (F.P.), Fondazione CARISBO (F.P.), Finalized Project ‘‘Materials Tailored for Advanced Technologies’’, National Research Council (C.N.R.), Rome, Italy (A.P.), and Ministry of Education, University and Research (M.I.U.R.), Rome, Italy (A.P.).

Contract grant sponsors:

Unife 60%; CARIFE; CARISBO;

Guya-Bioscience (Ferrara, ITALY)

Contract grant sponsors:

Unife 60%; CARIFE; CARISBO;

Guya-Bioscience (Ferrara, ITALY)

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by grants from Unife 60%(F.C.) and

Guya-bioscience (F.P.).

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by grants from Unife 60%(F.C.) and

Guya-bioscience (F.P.).

OsseointegrationOsseointegration

(A) Hematoma occurs near screw threads

(B) After 3 weeks – Osteoblasts begin forming spongy bone

(C) After 4 months – spongy bone replaced by compact bone Lamellar bone – strongest type of bone, most desired next to implant

(D) Osseointegration failure

(A) Hematoma occurs near screw threads

(B) After 3 weeks – Osteoblasts begin forming spongy bone

(C) After 4 months – spongy bone replaced by compact bone Lamellar bone – strongest type of bone, most desired next to implant

(D) Osseointegration failure

Endorsing an intuition of a potential future successful application on mankinds, it was started a trial on rabbits using Biolok titanium dental implants, previously treated to obtain a surface coating with nanocrystalline film of metallic dioxide.

Three groups of dental implants has been manufactured and surgically inserted in rabbits tibia:

1. uncoated dental implants (control);

2. TiO2 surface coated dental implants;

3. ZrO2 surface coated dental implants.

Endorsing an intuition of a potential future successful application on mankinds, it was started a trial on rabbits using Biolok titanium dental implants, previously treated to obtain a surface coating with nanocrystalline film of metallic dioxide.

Three groups of dental implants has been manufactured and surgically inserted in rabbits tibia:

1. uncoated dental implants (control);

2. TiO2 surface coated dental implants;

3. ZrO2 surface coated dental implants.

After thirty days bone sections have been analyzed in correspondance of the contact bone-implant zone and different osseointegration rates have been evaluated among the three groups above. The difference has been based on the presence of marks identifying small bone trabeculae.

The results concerning osseointegration were extremely interesting: while in the cortical portion there are no differences among the three types of implants, around the implants embedded in the medullary portion, clearly appeared outstanding new bone apposition around TiO2 coated implants (55%) and ZrO2 coated implants (43%) if compared to the results obtained by uncoated implants (31%).

After thirty days bone sections have been analyzed in correspondance of the contact bone-implant zone and different osseointegration rates have been evaluated among the three groups above. The difference has been based on the presence of marks identifying small bone trabeculae.

The results concerning osseointegration were extremely interesting: while in the cortical portion there are no differences among the three types of implants, around the implants embedded in the medullary portion, clearly appeared outstanding new bone apposition around TiO2 coated implants (55%) and ZrO2 coated implants (43%) if compared to the results obtained by uncoated implants (31%).

Medullary portion in endosseous uncoated dental implant section.

new bone apposition = 31%

Medullary portion in endosseous uncoated dental implant section.

new bone apposition = 31%

Medullary portion in endosseous TiO2 coated dental implant section

new bone apposition = 55%

Medullary portion in endosseous TiO2 coated dental implant section

new bone apposition = 55%

Medullary portion in endosseous ZrO2 coated dental implant section

new bone apposition = 43%

Medullary portion in endosseous ZrO2 coated dental implant section

new bone apposition = 43%

Anatase surface nanoscopic topography (300 x 300 nm), produced according to the patented method .

Anatase surface nanoscopic topography (300 x 300 nm), produced according to the patented method .

Electronic Microscope zoom on zirconium dioxide coated surface