What do resource productivities really measure? Julia K. Steinberger, Fridolin Krausmann Marina...

17
What do resource productivities really measure? Julia K. Steinberger, Fridolin Krausmann Marina Fischer-Kowalski, Nina Eisenmenger International Society of Ecological Economics Oldenburg/Bremen, Germany
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of What do resource productivities really measure? Julia K. Steinberger, Fridolin Krausmann Marina...

What do resource productivities

really measure?

Julia K. Steinberger, Fridolin KrausmannMarina Fischer-Kowalski, Nina Eisenmenger

International Society of Ecological Economics

Oldenburg/Bremen, GermanyAugust 22-25 2010

2

What is resource productivity?

better is higher input Resource

output GDPtyProductivi :

EconomyOil

EconomyOil

3

Policy goals for resource productivity: European Union

EU Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, 2005.

4

Policy goals for resource productivity: Japan

Japanese 3R policies based on Material Flow Analysis

Takiguchi and Takemoto, 2008

5

Resource productivity and income

Material Productivity Energy Productivity

International data, year 2000 Domestic Material Consumption: Steinberger et al. 2010

Domestic Energy Consumption: Krausmann et al 2008

Market Exchange Rate GDP: World Bank 2007

R2 = 0.84 R2 = 0.77

Resource productivity:

measure of sustainability –

or higher incomes?

6

Analytic framework: 3 extensive and 3 intensive variables

BrickTestament.com

Oil

2. GDP3. Resources (Energy and materials)

1. Consumption = Resource / Population

2. Income = GDP / Population

3. Productivity = Income / Consumption

Oil

3. Productivity = GDP / Resource

1. Population

= ?

7

Balancing income & consumption: income elasticity

Income elasticity = b

bIncomeanConsumptio

When income increases by 1%, consumption increases by b%

8

Elasticity & the Environmental Kuznets Curve

Resource consumption

Income

b > 0

b ~ 0

b < 0

9

Consumption, income and elasticity

Material Consumption Energy Consumption

INELASTIC

Proportional

Somewhat inelastic

10

Income elasticity vs. resource productivitybIncomea nConsumptio Income elasticity

of consumption

We find that ... productivity depends on income through b!

We now know:

b)(1b

Incomea

1

Incomea

Income

nConsumptio

Income

use Resource

GDP tyProductivi

Which means that if we do some math ...

Oil

11

Oil

Balancing productivity & income: through income elasticity!

dIncomectyProductivi

= 1-b

When income increases by 1%, productivity increases by (1-b)%

d

12

Is productivity-income-elasticity relation real?

Energy ProductivityMaterial Productivity

b = 0.9

b = 0.1

b = 0.4

=> d = 1 - b

13

Relation is real: what does it mean?

Productivity of material or energy resource use

1. Behaves like an aggregate: between inelastic biomass and more

elastic fossil fuels, depending on their shares in the aggregate.

2. If there is a significant inelastic share, productivity will increase with

income.

Aggregate productivity does not measure “sustainable” or

“efficient” economies: it measures high income economies.

Using resource productivity as a policy goal is (generally)

rewarding business-as-usual, and does not imply

reductions in resource use.

14

Possibility: income-corrected productivity

15

Productivity and dematerialization in the EU-27

Gro

wth

in

pro

du

ctiv

ity

Growth in GDP

Absolute dematerialization

Relativedematerialization

No decoupling at all

Absolute dematerialization

Relativedematerialization

No decoupling at all

16

Conclusions

• Resource productivity depends on the relation between

income and consumption: income elasticity of consumption.

• Dematerialization requires increasing productivity faster than

economic growth.

• Which is equivalent to requiring reduced consumption at

higher incomes ....

• ... in other words, requiring negative income elasticity.

• Rather than a policy focus on productivity increases, which

encourages business-as-usual, the focus should be directly

on reducing consumption.

17

Thanks for your attention!

• Any questions?