What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a...

9
What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and questions 1

Transcript of What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a...

Page 1: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction

Emily Nurse (for ATLAS)

Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and questions

1

Page 2: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Diffraction

• Why are we interested in soft-diffraction?– Interesting in its own right– Affects inclusive “minbias” measurements :

• Potential for model dependent unfolding (can be minimised)• Can we define our final state to suppress diffraction (ie/ to tune

non-diffractive parameters)?

– Affects luminosity determination

• Our philosophy :– Measure physical observables sensitive to diffraction

2

Page 3: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

ATLAS detectors

3

Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators

LUminosity Cerenkov Integrating Detector

Zero Degree Calorimeter

2.12 < |η| < 3.8

5.61 < |η| < 5.93

|η| > 8.3

Inner Detector

|η| < 2.5

Calorimeters

|η| < 5.0

Page 4: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Diffraction in minbias?

4

Page 5: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Diffraction suppressed samples?

5

Pythia 6Pythia 8

Plots from Markus Warsinsky

Phojet

Where should we cut to suppress diffraction?Depends strongly on the model!

Page 6: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Diffraction suppressed samples?

6

Pythia 8Plots from Markus Warsinsky

We start to cut hard into our phase space!Make anti-gap cuts? (needs to be a particle level definition)

Page 7: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Luminosity determination

7

Typical forward detector :2 particles with :2.5 < |η| < 4.5, p > 1 GeV

Study by Beate Heinemann for MB&UE workshop

Pythia6 vs Pythia8 : ~6%Pythia8 vs Phojet : ~10%Pythia6 vs Phojet : ~17%

N.B. σ the same in Pythia6 and Pythia8, but particle spectra different

√s= 7 TeV

Page 8: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Luminosity determination with MC

• Ultimately we should constrain with our 7 TeV data • What should we use for now?

– Should Pythia6 diffractive models be considered “wrong”?– But Pythia6 ND models have received the most “attention” and

describe our data better!– Can we combine Pythia8 SD, DD with Pythia6 ND?– Can we make better use of Tevatron/HERA data now?

8

MCs differ by (differential) σSD , σDD and particle spectra!

Page 9: What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.

DiffractionEmily Nurse

Advice we want from this community

1. What is a good particle level definition of a diffraction suppressed / enhanced sample ?

2. What soft diffractive models are on the market for us to use?– So far we have used Phojet, Pythia6, Pythia8– What inputs/ parameters can we vary / tune

3. Can they already be better constrained from HERA/Tevatron data?– do we need Pythia8 to simulate ep so we could use HERA data to constrain

diffraction?

4. What should we measure to help constrain these models?– Differential diffractive cross-sections based on rapidity gaps

– Particle distributions (particularly in the forward region) enhancing diffraction through rapidity gaps / low multiplicity cuts

9