What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?
description
Transcript of What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?
![Page 1: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of
Assessments?
Planning for 2014-2015 and Beyond
West Virginia Department of EducationOffice of Assessment, Accountability, and Research
![Page 2: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background
• Standards (2009)• Revised Assessment (2009)• Cut Scores (2010)• CCSS Adoption (WV Next Generation
Standards, Summer 2010)• CCSS Implementation (2013) • Restrictions to policy led to interim CC support
(2013)
![Page 3: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A State of Transition
• Current Assessment System– Formative, interim, and summative in grades 3-11– Math, ELA, science and social studies
• Future Assessment System– Smarter Balanced in math and ELA– Legacy assessment (and future augmentation) in
science and social studies – Interim assessments and formative (Smarter and
custom)– Diagnostics in all (custom)
![Page 4: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Current Year Concerns
• Historically mixed-mode testing• 2013-2014 was the first year with 100%
online testing• Concerns exist with legacy assessment
comparability• Further concerns with comparability
![Page 5: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Impact on System
• Instructional Responsiveness & Actionable Data– Summative Assessments: least instructionally responsive
but greater depth of coverage (Math & ELA)– Complete Interim Assessments: monitoring status of
students– Interim Assessment Blocks: more granular understanding
of student learning– Diagnostic Assessments: loss of the most instructionally
responsive and granular assessment events (Acuity)– Major questions on ability to support costs for the latter
![Page 6: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Cost Implications
• West Virginia Current Operating Budget– ~182,000 students assessed – Approximately $54/student to support 4 content-
based balanced assessment system– Using estimate of $27/student for Smarter Balanced
(for summative, interim, and digital library)– Remaining budget for science and social studies
administration and development for summative, interim, and diagnostic
![Page 7: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Accountability Implications
• WV awarded flexibility from ESEA in 2012• Currently in 2nd year of flexibility request• Executive order from governor to switch to A-F
system concurrent with Smarter Balanced implementation
• Both systems require use of growth (SGPs), inclusive of growth to standard
• Goal of including science for accountability by 2017-2018 (including growth)
![Page 8: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Accountability Implications
• Current year’s online transition requires a comparability study (science and social studies)
• Observed growth is slated to be included 2014-2015 calculations, but not growth to standard
• Science and social studies baseline may be the 2013-2014 data
• Potential linking studies using a third set of items and scales may mitigate challenging cross-year comparisons
![Page 9: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Impact on Practice
• Key to successful implementation is about systemic capacity building– Fortunate to have historical awareness of a balanced
assessment system– Too much focus on assessment events – Shift in focus toward an assessment process– Previous system (post-hoc alignment) – buy-in challenges– Smarter approach (aligned by design) – bringing along
both assessment and instructional community
![Page 10: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Impact on Practice
• Key to successful implementation is about systemic capacity building– Substantial revision to our PD delivery in 2013-2014
• Formerly supported by SEA because of small state size• Too much professional assistance, insufficient professional
development– Regional Education Service Agencies
• Increased funding• Increased professional development personnel• Ongoing increase in the collaboration with SEA leadership and
content and technical staff
![Page 11: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Impact on Practice
• Small state benefit—monitoring equity of distributed PD quality– Statewide R&E study has focused on implementation of our latest
Educator Enhancement Academics (EEA) – focused on standards and instructional practices to understand key areas of high quality PD• Content and pedagogy focus• Coherence• Active learning• Collective participation • Duration
– Subsequent study will focus on assessment process Dissemination of results
![Page 12: What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments?](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070501/56816934550346895de08924/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Contact Information
Juan M. D’BrotExecutive DirectorOffices of Assessment, Accountability, and ResearchBuilding 6, Room 8251900 Kanawha Blvd EastCharleston, WV [email protected] 304-554-2546