What are Pigments ?? Most Common types of Pigments are, Inorganic Pigments Organic Pigments
description
Transcript of What are Pigments ?? Most Common types of Pigments are, Inorganic Pigments Organic Pigments
1
IMPLICATIONS OF AGGREGATION AND MASS FRACTAL NATURE OF AGGREGATES ON THE
PROPERTIES OF ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND POLYMER COMPOSITES
By
N. Agashe*, G. Beaucage*, D. Kohls*, S. Sukumaran*, G. Skillas†, G. Long‡, J. Ilavsky#, P. Jemian§, L. Clapp&, R. Schwartz&
*Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA†Inst. f. Verfahrenstechnik, ETH Zentrum ML F24, CH–8092 Zurich, Switzerland.‡Ceramics Division NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
#University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
§University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL 61801 , USA.
&Colors Group, Sun Chemical Corp., Cincinnati, OH 45232 , USA.
2
What are Pigments ??
Most Common types of Pigments are,
• Inorganic Pigments
• Organic Pigments
Other types include Metallic and Pearlescent.
The smallest size of an aggregate necessary for scattering is given by Bragg’s Law, 2
R
sin22.0~RThe optimum size of the aggregate can be
estimated by integrating the Guinier Law,
3
Why Organic Pigments ?
• Most of the research in the pigment industry is concentrated on inorganic pigments like titania.
• Until now all work on organic pigments has examined only the surface fractal nature of the organic pigment particles.
• We make the first attempt to study the aggregation of organic pigments, the mass fractal nature of these aggregates and their relationship to the optical properties.
• The typical size of primary particles of organic pigments is 0.05 to 0.1 m. The optimal size necessary for good scattering is about 0.5 m.
4
Fractal Structures – have Fractional Dimension
• Surface Fractal Object, (ds)
Irregular Surface
• Mass Fractal Object, (df)
Irregular Structure
5
Common Organic Pigments are,
• Azo Pigments: Monoazo (-NH-) or Diazo (-N=N-)– Quinacridones, Naphthol Reds, Diarylides, Rhodamines, and Naphthoic Acid.
• Phthalocyanines: (Naphthol) & (-CN)– Metal and Non-metal
• Perylenes
• Carbazoles
• Triphenyl Methane
• Anthraquinone and Indigoid Pigments
Denotation: C.I. PR 122 (Pigment Red 122)
6
Regimes of Aggregation
• Diffusion Limited Aggregation, df < 2 (df ~ 1.8)
• Reaction Limited Aggregation, df > 2 (df ~ 2.5)
• Intermediate Regime
Transport
Limited
Reaction
Limited
7
Aggregation of Organic Pigments
• Forces behind aggregation of organic pigments are weak electrostatic forces like van Der Waal’s forces, static charge, chemical polarity and surface tension.
• Processing also dictates the nature of the aggregates.
• Color is produced in pigments by scattering.
Any Scattering
2R
Best Scattering
sin22.0~R
For visible light, ~ 0.5 m
• The typical particle size for organic pigments is 0.05 to 0.1 m. Aggregation is necessary for good scattering.
8
Scattering in Organic Pigments
Mie ScatteringDilute Systems, Large Particles,
Higher Index Difference
Rayleigh Ganz ApproximationAll Systems, All Particles Particles,
Lower Index Difference
For X-Rays, the comparable contrast difference is very small between the pigment and the polymer.
9
Small and Ultra Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS/USAXS)
Range of q for SAXS is 0.01 to 0.1, while USAXS can go down to q value of 0.0001
B3
B2
B1
Log
(I)
Log (q) (q in Å-1)
- 4
- df
- 4
G2,
Rg 2
G1,
Rg 1
df is the mass fractal dimensionFor fractal objects,
fdRM ~
10
Unified Function for Mass Fractal Model
Unified Function, used to fit the scattering data, is based on six parameters,
• Guinier Prefactors: G1 and G2
• Radius of Gyration: Rg1 and Rg2
• Power law Prefactor: B1
• Fractal Dimension: df
The diameter of a sphere having similar Rg as the aggregate can be used to estimate the size of the aggregate.
RgD 6.2~
11
Results
• The results are a survey of some of the behavior seen when organic pigments are milled into polymers.
• This is the first attempt to characterize the aggregation according to the process by which the aggregates are formed.
• The mass fractal behavior of these aggregates is studied.
• The primary particle of each organic pigment is examined to see if it is made up of a single crystal or multi crystals.
12
Diazo Pigment Red 170 (235-0170)
TEM – Dpp = 0.2 m
LS – Dagg = 0.4 m
Powder – Non Mass Fractal
Dpp = 0.2 m
20% in PMMA – Mass Fractal, df = 2.5 (RLA)
Dagg = 2.35 m
13
Diazo Pigment Red 170 (235-1170) Higher Luminosity
TEM – Dpp = 0.15 m
LS – Dagg = 0.35 m
Powder – Non Mass Fractal
Dpp = 0.156 m
20% in PMMA – Mass Fractal, df = 2.67 (RLA)
Dagg = 2.01 m
14
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
0.0012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
q (Å)-1
Plain PP
1% PY14 in PP
1% PV19 in PP
5% PR122 in PP
1% PR122 in PP Peak for PP (q ~ 0.027 Å)
Shifted Peak for PP (q ~ 0.048 Å)
• PMMA, used earlier, is a non-crystalline polymer.
• PP is a semi-crystalline polymer. The addition of pigments has an effect on the crystallinity of PP.
15
108
106
104
102
100
10-2
10-4
10-6
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1
q (Å)-1
-4
-4
-1.91
-4
-1.5
0.13 µm
0.13 µm
0.13 µm12 µm
12 µm
Raw Data PR122 Powder Unified Fit PR122 Powder Raw Data PR122 (1% in PP) Unified Fit PR122 (1% in PP) Raw Data PR122 (5% in PP) Unified Fit PR122 (5% in PP)
Monoazo Pigment Red 122
TEM – Dpp = 0.1 m (length)
LS – Dagg = 0.2 m
Powder – Non Mass Fractal
Dpp = 0.13 m
1% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1.91 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.13 m
5% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1.5 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.13 mC. I. PR 122
16
1010
108
106
104
102
100
10-2
10-4
Inte
nsi
ty (
cm)-1
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
q (Å)-1
-4
-4
-2.32
-1.55
-1
-4
-4
0.03 µm
1.2 µm
0.16 µm
1.0 µm
0.26 µm
Raw Data PV19 Powder Unified Fit PV19 Powder Raw Data PV 19 (1% in PP) BGS Corr Data PV19 (1% in PP) Unified Fit PV19 (1% in PP) Raw Data PV 19 (5% in PP) Unified Fit PV19 (5% in PP)
Monoazo Pigment Violet 19
TEM – Dpp = 0.05 m
LS – Dagg = 0.4 m
Powder – Mass Fractal, df = 2.32 (RLA)
Dpp = 0.03 m, Dagg = 1.2 m
1% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1.55 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.16 m, Dagg = 1.0 m
5% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.26 mC. I. PV 19
17
1010
108
106
104
102
100
10-2
10-4
Inte
nsi
ty (
cm)-1
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
q (Å)-1
-4
-4
-4
-2.34
-2.7
0.035 µm
0.32 µm
0.43 µm
0.052 µm
Raw Data PY13 Powder Unified Fit PY13 Powder Raw Data PY13 (5% in PP) Unified Fit PY13 (5% in PP)
Disazo Pigment Yellow 13
TEM – Dpp = 0.1 m
LS – Dagg = 0.5 m
Powder – Mass Fractal, df = 2.34 (RLA)
Dpp = 0.035 m, Dagg = 0.32 m
5% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 2.7 (RLA)
Dpp = 0.052 m, Dagg = 0.49 m
C. I. PY 13
18
1010
108
106
104
102
100
10-2
10-4
10-6
Inte
nsi
ty (
cm)-1
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
q (Å)-1
-4
-4-2.77
-2.63
0.125 µm
0.52 µm
0.08 µm
0.43 µm
Raw Data PY14 Powder Unified Fit PY14 Powder Raw Data PY14 (5% in PP) Unified Fit PY14 (5% in PP)
Disazo Pigment Yellow 14
TEM – Dpp = 0.1 m
LS – Dagg = 0.5 m
Powder – Mass Fractal, df = 2.63 (RLA)
Dpp = 0.125 m, Dagg = 0.52 m
5% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 2.77 (RLA)
Dpp = 0.08 m, Dagg = 0.43 m
C. I. PY 14
19
108
106
104
102
100
10-2
10-4
Inte
nsi
ty (
cm)-1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1
q (Å)-1
-4
-4
-4-1.62
-1.4
0.14 µm
0.14 µm
0.12 µm
4.5µm
1.1µm
Raw Data PY83 Powder Unified Fit PY83 Powder Raw Data PY83 (1% in PP) BGS Data PY83 (1% in PP) Unified Fit PY83 (1% in PP) Raw Data PY83 (5% in PP) Unified Fit PY83 (5% in PP)
Pigment Yellow 83
TEM – Dpp = 0.1 m (length)
LS – Dagg = 1.2 m
Powder – Non Mass Fractal
Dpp = 0.14 m
1% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1.4 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.14 m, Dagg = 1.1 m
5% in PP – Mass Fractal, df = 1.62 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.12 m, Dagg = 4.5 mC. I. PY 83
20
Phthalocyanine Pigment Green 7
TEM – Dpp = 0.05 m
LS – Dagg = 0.1 m
Powder – Non Mass Fractal
Dpp = 0.018 m
50% in PE – Mass Fractal, df = 1.4 (DLA)
Dpp = 0.036 m, Dagg = 0.767 m
X=Cl
21
Effect of Pigments on the lamellar thickness of PP
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
0.0012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
q (Å)-1
Plain PP
1% PY14 in PP
1% PV19 in PP
5% PR122 in PP
1% PR122 in PP Peak for PP (q ~ 0.027 Å)
Shifted Peak for PP (q ~ 0.048 Å)
The Long Period decreased from 233Å to 131Å on addition of pigments
22
Conclusions
• Organic pigments field has ignored the importance of aggregates to optical properties. Mass fractal aggregates were observed for all the pigments when milled into polymers.
• The size of a crystal is too small to scatter visible light. Aggregation is critical to have good optical properties, and this issue has been dealt with for the first time.
• There is an incredible range of behavior in terms of aggregation, based on the polarity of the compound and the particle size.
• Some contradictions in the behavior can be seen.
• There is a potential to control and design the aggregate size and structure of organic pigments if we had a bit more understanding.
23
Future Work
• Carry out mass fractal analysis using different pigments from different classes and different polymers.
• Study of processing effects on the nature of aggregates.
• Study of effect of additives on the behavior of aggregates.
• Mass fractal analysis of digital electron micrographs of organic pigment powders and polymer samples.
• Simulations of the process of formation of aggregates starting from primary particles.
• Simulate growth processes for different systems like asymmetric particles, polydispersity and roughness of surfaces.