Weston / Stone

15
Edward Weston By: Katherine Stone

description

Photography Presentation onEdward Weston by Katherine Stone

Transcript of Weston / Stone

Page 1: Weston / Stone

Edward WestonBy: Katherine Stone

Page 2: Weston / Stone

1924

Page 3: Weston / Stone

1926

1927

1927

Page 4: Weston / Stone

Early Life

• Born in Highland Park, Il– March 24, 1886

• 16 years old when he received his first camera– Kodak Bull’s Eye #2

• Moved to California in 1906 to pursue a career in photography

• Married in 1909– Flora May Chandler– Together they had four sons

Page 5: Weston / Stone

1929

1929

Page 6: Weston / Stone

1930

1930

1932

Page 7: Weston / Stone

Career

• Opened and ran his own studio in California from 1911-1922

• In 1922 he went to Middleton, Ohio, where his photographs marked a turning point in his career.

• 1923, he moved to Mexico City where he opened yet another studio.

• 1926, he returned to California.• After 1927, Weston’s main photographic subject were

nudes, landscapes, and still-lives. • Best known for his carefully composed, and sharply focused

images

Page 8: Weston / Stone

1935

1934

1937

Page 9: Weston / Stone

1937

1938

1937

Page 10: Weston / Stone

Life (continued)

• In 1937, Weston was the first photographer to receive the Guggenheim Fellowship.– It was renewed the following year.

• Several books about his work have been published.– In one, the text was written by his wife.

• He had developed Parkinson’s disease in 1948, making it his last working year.

• Died in January 1, 1958 at the age of 71.

Page 11: Weston / Stone

1939

1939

1941

Page 12: Weston / Stone

1941

1941

Page 13: Weston / Stone

Critic’s ReviewOn Weston's view, the peculiar, defining characteristics of photography include its remarkable capacity to render fine detail by

means of a microscopic mosaic of silver grains that cannot be reproduced by skills of hand. For Weston, the key to producing aesthetically notable photographs rests on the photographer's ability to look at a scene and to construct a “pre-visualized” image by imagining how the scene might be translated into a photograph. Weston places special emphasis on the difference between ordinary seeing and “seeing photographically,” that is, constructing an image of the objects arrayed in front of the camera in terms of the choice of lens, film, exposure, film development, and printing technique. Weston's position assumes that photographs, when made by “purely photographic” means, are different in kind from other sorts of pictures and that good photographs declare their independence from all other graphic media. For Weston, the difference between photography and, say, painting is that when properly used, cameras introduce us to a domain that is unavailable to a painter, and it is the exploration of this domain that constitutes the art of photography. While pre-modernist photographers like Emerson and his followers saw the possibility that photography could become an art by aligning itself with the then current values of painting and graphic media, Weston deplored the imitation of the practices of artists in other depictive media and saw it as the major obstacle to the production of aesthetically valuable photographs.

Like all purist positions on photography, Weston's arguments are conditioned on suppositions that are impossible to warrant. For example, he believed that so-called soft-focus lenses (lenses that cannot resolve sharp images) must be avoided because they do not resolve detail in a way that he claimed is peculiar to photography, but of course such lenses are “purely optical” and pictures made with them are no less pure than his favored creations. Viewed positively, however, Weston's major achievement as a critic of photography can be found in his insistence on the difference between the objects placed in front of a camera and the subject of a photograph. For him, the subject of a photograph depends on the way in which the picture is formulated. If the formula is insipid and well known, it may well seem that there is an equivalence between an object photographed and the subject of the picture, but if the fashioning departs from the most usual or ordinary response, the subject of the picture may be a revelation of some aspect of the object photographed (or, for that matter, the subject might be a relationship between items depicted in the photograph). Of course, the notion of revelation in art is anything but revolutionary, but the thought that photographs might probe beyond the obvious, superficial aspects of what could be seen in front of a camera was new and served as a fundamental element of modernist photography.

Page 14: Weston / Stone

My Review

• Edward Weston had the ability to dramatically change his photographic style half way through his career. This is a picture taken late in his career after switching from a soft-focused lens to sharp and hard edged images. It is a very artistic picture showing texture in the sandy mountains. There is also a very good contrast in the shadows andthe darker parts of the mountains,which happen to land on the horizontal thirds.

1938

Page 15: Weston / Stone

Bibliography

• Snyder, Joel, et al. "Photography." Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Ed. Michael Kelly. Oxford Art Online. 13 Mar. 2009 <http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/opr/t234/e0400>.

• Weston, Cole. "Edward Weston Biography." Edward-Weston.com. 11 Mar. 2009 <http://www.edward-weston.com/edward_weston_biography.htm>.