Welcome to the Master Plan Public Meeting · 28/02/1995 · • Foster compatible development. How...
Transcript of Welcome to the Master Plan Public Meeting · 28/02/1995 · • Foster compatible development. How...
Mas
ter
Plan
Welcome to the Master Plan Public Meeting
Existing Airport Layout
What is a Master Plan?
Decision-making tool to guide development of the Airport.– Managementandoperatingpolicies
– Constructionofnewandexpandedfacilities
– Reserveareasforfutureairportdevelopment
Needs to consider:–Safetyandsecurity
–Maintainpracticalcosts
–Customerserviceandsatisfaction
–Maintainlandusesthatallowsforlogical incrementaldevelopment
Why prepare a Master Plan?
To provide an overall framework needed to guide orderly and strategic development of DIA.– Meetfutureneeds
•Additionalcapacity •Changingtravelneeds andcharacteristics
– Addressanticipated changesintheindustry
•Newtechnologies •Changingaircraftfleets •Securityrequirements •Environmentalpriorities •Energy (fuelsources/prices) •Economicchanges •Operationalchanges •Regulatorychanges
–Promotecohesiveand integrateddevelopmentin theairportenvirons
•Supportandmaximize economiccontributionto regionandstate •Fostercompatible development
How did we get here?
The opening of DIA has led to strong passenger traffic growth.
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
10,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30,000,000
50,000,000
70,000,000
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Pas
seng
ers
September 2003 Opening of sixth runway, Runway 16R/34L – the 16,000-foot runway is the longest commercial runway in North America
Early 1970s/1980s Congestion at Stapleton Airport leads to an expansion study for the existing airport and a site selection study for a new airport
September 1989 FAA Approval / Groundbreaking
February 28, 1995Airport Opening
50-Millionth Passenger
40-Millionth Passenger
30-Millionth Passenger
May 1988Adams County annexation
election agrees to annexation of land for Airport to the
City and County of Denver
April 1988Intergovernmental Agreement
signed by Adams County andthe City and County of Denver ORIGINAL DESIGN CAPACITY – 50 MILLION PASSENGERS
Base Forecast
May 1989 Denver approves referendum to build Denver International Airport
1994Continental Airlines announces dismantling of Denver hub and the new Frontier Airlines launches
2006 Southwest Airlines launches service from Denver
2001 Economic recession and attacks of September 11th
1986Original
Frontier Airlinesceases operations
STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Annual Passenger Traffic at Denver International Airport
How is DIA doing?Feature Summary
PassengerTraffic Fifth-busiestairportinNorthAmerica andoneofthehighestgrowthrates ofmajorairportsinpastfiveyears
Resiliency Airlinecapacityhasremainedstrong comparedtootherlargeairportsin challengingeconomicclimate
AirlineCosts Airlinecostshavebeenreducedby 31percentoverlastsevenyears
5%
0%
-5%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-10%
-15%
-20%
DENVER
Dallas/
Ft. Worth
Atlanta
New York/J
FK
San Fra
ncisco
Houston/B
ush
Los Angeles
P
hoenix
Chicago O’H
are
Las Vegas
-2.0% -2.4%-3.5% -3.9% -4.4%
-6.4%
-10.5% -10.9%
-15.1%
-9.4%
$18.00
$17.00
$10.00
$16.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$15.00
$14.00
$12.00
19951996
19971998
19992000
20012002
20032004
20052006
20072008
(e
st)
$11.00
$13.00
$16.85
$16.07
$15.58
$14.27
$14.33
$12.86
$15.28 $15.20
$14.51
$13.01 $12.90
$11.41 $10.69
$10.59
DIA Cost per Enplaned Passenger
Percent Change in Scheduled Seat Departures January - June 2008 vs. January - June 2009
2008Rank Airport Passengers 1 Atlanta 90,039,280 2 ChicagoO’Hare 69,353,654 3 LosAngeles 59,542,151 4 Dallas/Ft.Worth 57,069,331 5 Denver 51,245,334 6 NewYork/JFK 47,790,485 7 LasVegas 44,074,707 8 Houston/Bush 41,698,832 9 Phoenix 39,890,896 10 SanFrancisco 37,234,592 11 Orlando 35,622,252 12 Newark 35,299,719 13 Detroit 35,144,841 14 Charlotte 34,732,584 15 Miami 34,063,531
Annual Passenger Traffic - US Rankings Calendar Year 2008
Sources: Airports Council International; OAG Schedule Tapes; and Denver International Airport Financial Statistics
Feature Summary
Domestic IncreaseinnonstopDestinations destinations
International NonstopservicetoLondonDestinations andFrankfurtandmultiple destinationsinCanada, Mexico,andCostaRica
Cargo Cargotonnagehas decreasedby50percent overlasteightyears
Noise Nonoiseviolations in2008
Regional $22.3billionperyearinEconomy employeesalariesand relatedeconomicactivity
Environmental IndustryleaderforFocus environmentalstewardship
550,000
600,000
650,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
19801981
19821983
19841985
19861987
19881989
19901991
19921993
19941995
19961997
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
2008
Airc
raft
Ope
ratio
ns (T
akeo
ffs &
Lan
ding
s)
Total Annual Aircraft Operations
NN
SS
EEWW
Saskatoon
Regina
Los AngelesOrange County
San Diego
SacramentoOakland
Palm SpringsOntario
Burbank
Santa BarbaraBakersfield
Montrose
Gunnison
AspenVail
GrandJunction
Steamboat Springs
MontereyFresno
El Paso
Reno
DENVER
Phoenix
Tucson
Las Vegas
ColoradoSprings
Vernal
Moab
Farmington
Salt Lake City
JacksonBoiseIdaho Falls
Redmond
Medford
Eugene
Portland
Seattle
Riverton
LaramieRock Springs
CortezTelluride
Cody
San FranciscoSan Jose
Casper
Cheyenne
BillingsBozeman
Great FallsMissoula
Kalispell
Helena
Spokane
Pasco
Kansas City
Dallas
LittleRock
GrandRapids
Washington-DCA
CedarRapids
New Orleans
Ft. Lauderdale
Miami
Tampa
Orlando
WichitaDodge City
Hays
Great BendGarden City
LiberalSpringfield
Lincoln
Moline
St Louis
Peoria
Milwaukee
Madison
Omaha
Rapid City
Minneapolis
PierreGilletteSheridan
Worland
ScottsbluffNorth Platte
Chadron
AlamosaPueblo
Amarillo
Bismarck
To Anchorage
DickinsonFargo
Traverse CityAppleton
Sioux Falls
Des Moines
KearneyMcCook
AustinHouston-IAH & HOU
San Antonio
Tulsa
MemphisOklahoma City
Fayetteville
New York-LGA
Philadelphia
New York-JFK
BaltimoreIAD
Chicago-ORD & MDW
Detroit
Columbus
CincinnatiDaytonIndianapolis
CharlotteKnoxville
Raleigh/Durham
Nashville
Huntsville
Birmingham
Cleveland Newark
PittsburghAkron/Canton
Boston
Ottawa
Atlanta
Albuquerque
Durango
To Honolulu,Lihue, Kona & Kahului
Note: Some markets served seasonally onlySource: Official Airline Guide (OAG) Schedule Tapes, June 2008
Vancouver
Edmonton
Los Cabos
Puerto Vallarta
Mazatlan
Mexico City
Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo
Toronto
Montreal
Winnipeg
Calgary
Cancun
San Jose
Cozumel
London/Heathrow
Frankfurt
Munich
Frankfurt
How is DIA doing?
Destinations Served Nonstop from Denver International AirportDomestic and International
What is the Master Plan process?
The master plan will be completed in the 1st quarter of 2010.
Inventory
TerminalAirfieldLandsideSupport facilities
Forecast
Demand scenariosProjections – Passengers – Aircraft operations – Cargo – General Aviation
FacilityRequirements
Assess capacity of existing facilitiesDetermine future facility needs
AlternativesConcepts
PreferredDevelopment
Plan
Refine based on feedback from stakeholdersFinal adjustment based on technical requirement
ImplementationPlan
Phasing of expansionBusiness planningEnvironmental overview
AirportLayout Plan
Capital improvement planFacility development decision treeFinancial plan
FAAApproval
FAAApproval
Outreach
Adv
isor
y C
omm
itte
e
Adv
isor
y C
omm
itte
e
Pub
lic M
eeti
ng
Adv
isor
y C
omm
itte
e
Adv
isor
y C
omm
itte
e
Pub
lic M
eeti
ng
Adv
isor
y C
omm
itte
e
AIRFIELD
TERMINAL LANDSIDE
SUPPORT
AlternativeConcepts
ScreenedConcepts
IntegratedConcepts
Shortlist IntegratedConcepts
PreferredAlternative
SCREENING
SCREENING
EVALUATION
INTEGRATION
Ongoing Public Outreach
We Are Here
How are the forecasts developed? AircraftForecast Scenario Passengers Operations Implications
Base Forecast +84% +77%
Scenario 1: IncreaseddemandforHighGrowth +108% +98% allfacilities
Morelandsidesupport(carrental, hotel,parking)Scenario 2: Moreterminalsupport(securityDecreasein checkpoints,ticketing)hubbing/connecting Reducedairfieldoperations activity +64% +60% Reducedgatedemands
RequiresfewergatesbutmoreScenario 3: concoursefrontageAnevolutiontolarger Feweraircraftoperationsaircraftfleet +84% +64% Airfieldenhancements
Scenario 4:Robustinternationalgrowth LargeraircraftasDenverevolvesintoan Internationalarrivalfacilitiesinternationalgateway +103% +90% Higherconnectionpercentage
Forecast base activity in 2030 using FAA, airline, historic and socioeconomic data
STEP 1
Developed a range of potential futurescenarios
STEP 2
Evaluate the implications of airport operations and passenger activity under different scenarios
STEP 3
Project passenger, aircraft, and cargo activity in 2030 for each forecast scenario
STEP 4
Airline Plans
FAA
HistoricalTrends
National AviationActivity & Trends
SocioeconomicData
AircraftFleet
FORECAST
Forecast of activity received FAA approval in 2007. The long-term activity growth trends serve as the basis for long range airport development planning and factors may influence actual activity growth (e.g. such as current economic conditions).
Growth (2008 to 2030)
What is forecasted between now and 2030?Significant future growth is anticipated at DIA.
Com
mer
cial
Pas
seng
ers
Commercial PassengersActivity Forecast Scenarios - Commercial Passengers
45,000
Cargo Existing 25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Cargo Forecast
General Aviation Existing
General Aviation Forecast
Other Air Taxi Existing
Military Existing
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
Year 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029
100,000,000
120,000,000
Scenario 4Scenario 1
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000Scenario 2
Scenario 3Base Forecast
0
20,000,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Existing
High Growth (2006-2015)
Scenario 1
Scenario 3
Base Forecast (2006-2015)
Base Forecast
Scenario 2
Scenario 4
Existing
High Growth (2006-2015)
Scenario 1
Scenario 3
Base Forecast (2006-2015)
Base Forecast
Scenario 2
Scenario 4
Scheduled Aircraft ActivityActivity Forecast Scenarios - Commercial Operations(Takeoffs & Landings)
1,000,000
1,100,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
500,000
600,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035400,000
Scenario 4
Scenario 2Scenario 3
Base Forecast
Scenario 1
Com
mer
cial
Pas
seng
er O
pera
tion
s
Cargo Volume Forecasts
700,000
800,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
0
300,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Carg
o Vo
lum
e (in
tons
)O
pera
tions
(Tak
eoffs
& L
andi
ngs)
200,000
100,000
Forecast Tonnage
Other Aircraft Activity
20,000
Other Air Taxi Forecast
Military Forecast
Historic Tonnage
Master plan activity forecasts guide a range of facility needs over a 25-year planning horizon. Actual development decisions will be based on achieving projected activity triggers rather than specific calendar milestones.
What are the airfield needs?
One runway by 2015 and two to three more by 2030.
7.01,400,000
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
Ope
rati
ons
(Tak
eoff
s &
Lan
ding
s)
Tota
l Num
ber
of R
unw
ays
Annual Capacity - Existing Airfield & Current Air Traffic Procedures789,000 Operations
Aver
age
Del
ay P
er O
pera
tion
(Min
utes
)
0.0
1.0
2.0
0
200,000
400,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
8
10
12
2
4
6
0 2006 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Existing Base Forecast Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4
Aircraft Delay CurveExisting Airfield (Base Forecast)
Runway Requirements
Note: The average delay per aircraft values reflect only those delays attributed to the runway component. Other operational delays, such as those associated with aircraft taxi operations, enroute airspace and/or gate availability are not included in these values.
Annual Capacity- Existing Airfield
Projected Annual Operations - Base Forecast
Historical Annual Operations
Average Aircraft DelayCurrent ATC Procedures
Evaluation Criteria
-Meets2030 requirements-Airfieldoperational efficiency-Lengthofadditional taxiwaydevelopment-Impactstoexisting facilities
Current AirfieldFuture Airfield (2030)Future Airfield (Beyond 2030)Annexation LineProperty Line
What are the terminal needs?
In the short term (2015), expansion of the existing facilities.– 20additionalgates
– Internationalpassengerprocessingandgates
– Passengertrainexpansion
– Baggagesystemupgrades
– Expansionofpassengersecurityscreening
– FasTracksrailstation
– On-sitehotelaccommodations
What are the terminal needs?
In the long term (2030), creation of new facilities.– Approximately100additionalgates
– Significantinternationalpassenger processingexpansion
– Terminalexpansionequivalenttotwoorthreeadditional modules(existingterminalconsistsofthreemodules)
– Passengertrainandbaggagesystemexpansions
Gate Requirements
Terminal Requirements
250
300
7.0
8.0
100
150
200
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Mai
nlin
e Eq
uiva
lent
Gat
es R
equi
red
Mile
s of
Gat
e Fr
onta
ge
0
50
0.0
1.0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gate Frontage Required
Gate Frontage AvailableBuild-out of Concourses A, B, C
Mainline Equivalent Gates Required
Terminal Area Required
Number of Terminal Modules
6
7
4,000,000
4,500,000
3
4
5
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
Num
ber
of T
erm
inal
Mod
ules
Term
inal
Are
a (s
quar
e fe
et)
0
2
0
1,000,000
Forecast Demand Scenarios
1,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,0001
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Gate Requirements
Terminal Requirements
250
300
7.0
8.0
100
150
200
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Mai
nlin
e Eq
uiva
lent
Gat
es R
equi
red
Mile
s of
Gat
e Fr
onta
ge
0
50
0.0
1.0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gate Frontage Required
Gate Frontage AvailableBuild-out of Concourses A, B, C
Mainline Equivalent Gates Required
Terminal Area Required
Number of Terminal Modules
6
7
4,000,000
4,500,000
3
4
5
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
Num
ber
of T
erm
inal
Mod
ules
Term
inal
Are
a (s
quar
e fe
et)
0
2
0
1,000,000
Forecast Demand Scenarios
1,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,0001
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Existing Terminal Area
CONCOURSE C
CONCOURSE B
CONCOURSE A
TERMINAL
MODULE 1
MODULE 2
MODULE 3
What are the concepts for terminal expansion?
Current Terminal/ConcoursesFuture Terminal &Concourse Expansion (2030)Future Terminal &Concourse Expansion (Beyond 2030)
Existing Template Expansion Concept
East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept
South Terminal Concept
Evaluation Criteria
-Meets2030 requirements-Flexibilityto meetdemands beyond2030-Passenger convenience-Meetssecurity requirements
What are the landside needs?
Expansion of all facilities over the planning horizon.– Roadways– Parking– RentalCar– TerminalCurbside– CommercialVehicleFacilities
Public Parking Requirements
700
800
90,000
100,000
400
500
600
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Acr
es
0
300
0
30,000
Forecast Demand Scenarios
40,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Spaces
Existing
Acres2006
Existing2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
20,000
10,000 100
200
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Spac
es
Employee Parking Requirements
90
10014,000
60
70
80
8,000
10,000
12,000
Acr
es
0
50
0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
6,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Spaces
Existing
Acres2006
Existing2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
4,000
2,000
30
40
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Spac
es20
10
Rental Car Facility Requirements250
200
0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
100
50
Acr
es
Requirements at 85% Utilization
Existing
Requirements at 100 % Utilization
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Public Parking Requirements
700
800
90,000
100,000
400
500
600
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Acr
es
0
300
0
30,000
Forecast Demand Scenarios
40,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Spaces
Existing
Acres2006
Existing2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
20,000
10,000 100
200
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Spac
es
Employee Parking Requirements
90
10014,000
60
70
80
8,000
10,000
12,000
Acr
es
0
50
0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
6,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Spaces
Existing
Acres2006
Existing2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
4,000
2,000
30
40
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
Spac
es
20
10
Rental Car Facility Requirements250
200
0
Forecast Demand Scenarios
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
100
50
Acr
es
Requirements at 85% Utilization
Existing
Requirements at 100 % Utilization
2006 Existing
2015 Base
Forecast
2020 Base
Forecast
2025 Base
Forecast
2030 Base
Forecast
2030 Scenario 1
2030 Scenario 2
2030 Scenario 3
2030 Scenario 4
What are the concepts for landside expansion?
Evaluation Criteria
-Abilityto accommodate 2030demands-Locationoffacilities-Efficientland utilization
FasTracks Rail AlignmentFuture RoadwaysAnnexation LineProperty Line
Public ParkingRental Car FacilitiesEmployee ParkingLandside People MoverGround Transportation Center
Existing Template Expansion Concept
East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept
South Terminal Concept
What are the support facility needs?
Expansion of most facilitiesrequired over the planning horizon.
80
100
1202006 Existing20152030
20
40
60
Acre
s
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Belly F
reight
All-Carg
o
General A
viatio
n
Airlin
e Main
tenance
Airlin
e GSE
Consolid
ated M
ateria
l Handlin
g
Airport
Mainte
nance
Airport
Operatio
ns
Airlin
e Adm
inist
ratio
n
Flight K
itchens
Support Facilities Requirements
Evaluation Criteria
-Meets2030 requirements-Regionalaccess-Proximityto associatedfacilities-Utilities/other infrastructure-Expandability
Support Facilities AlternativesCurrent AirfieldFuture Airfield (2030)Future Airfield (Beyond (2030)Existing Support FacilitiesFuture Areas for Support FacilitiesAnnexation LineProperty Line
What are the next steps?
Public and Stakeholder Outreach– Additionaladvisory committeemeetings
– Secondpublicmeetingon preferreddevelopmentplan (mid-summer2009)
– FAAreviewandapproval ofairportlayoutplan (early2010)
Deputy Manager
Manager of Aviation
Preparation of Airport Layout Plan
AIRFIELD
TERMINAL LANDSIDE
SUPPORT
AlternativeConcepts
ScreenedConcepts
IntegratedConcepts
Shortlist IntegratedConcepts
PreferredAlternative Note: No government affairs
No customer service No community affairs
Research & Planning
Marketing
SCREENING
SCREENING
EVALUATION
INTEGRATION
We Are Here
Preparation of Airport Layout Plan
How can you provide input?
Input from the public is encouraged and welcomed.– Filloutacommentcard
– Visitwww.flydenver.com/masterplan
Mas
ter
Plan