AAFES Contingency Capabilities Strategic Planning & Partnerships - Contingency Operations
Welcome to Joint Engineer Contingency Operations -...
Transcript of Welcome to Joint Engineer Contingency Operations -...
SAME 2013 Joint Engineer Conference & Expo • May 21-24 • San Diego, Calif.
Welcome to Joint Engineer Contingency Operations
Moderator: Col. Dan Grey, USA (Ret.), The Louis Berger Group Speakers: Capt. Allan Stratman, NAVFAC Southwest Mr. Mike Boyd, Engineer Advocacy Branch, HQ USMC Col. Michael Kozak, HQ USAF Mr. James Rowan, U.S. Army Engineer School Maj. Gen. Todd Semonite, USA, USACE
Naval Construction Force Overview
CAPT Al Stratman
Functions and Capabilities
Seabees provide:
Expeditionary construction and engineering (combat service
support) to Navy, Marine Corps, Joint, and other operational
forces
Horizontal & Vertical Construction
Construction & Operation of Expeditionary Bases and Facilities
Amphibious & Underwater Construction
Defensive combat capability
Tactical and sustainment bridging
“With compassion for others, we build,
we fight, for peace with freedom.”
Civil Engineer Corps Officer
Career Path
Naval Officer /
Expeditionary
Warrior
Engineer /
Technical
Professional
Acquisition /
Business
Professional
INTERDEPENDENT COMPETENCIES THAT FACILITATE
THE CEC’S UNIQUE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE U.S. NAVY
Naval Construction Force Structure
FY14
22 and 30 NCR: •Deployable C2 staffs able to meet OPLAN timelines
•NCR Commanders are dual-hatted as deputy group commander
NMCB 14
NECC
NMCB 27
7NCR CBMU 202
NMCB 1
NMCB 11
NMCB 133
UCT 1
Combat
Camera
CBMU 303
NMCB 3
NMCB 22 NMCB 17
NECC
PAC
UCT 2
NMCB 4
NMCB 5
NMCB 18 NMCB 25
Naval
Construction
Group 1
9NCR 1NCR
30 NCR
AC Command
RC Command
Naval
Construction
Group 2 22 NCR
NCF Command Relationships
USFFC
PACFLT
NAVSOUTH
PACFLT
NAVEUR
NAVAF
NAVCENT
NCF Global Snapshot (Current as of 21 MAR 2013)
Guam
NMCB 5
Sasebo
NMCB 5
Yokosuka
NMCB 5
Atsugi
NMCB 5
Djibouti
NMCB 4
Timor Leste
NMCB 5
Spain
NMCB 4
Diego Garcia
NMCB 5
Kenya
NMCB 4
Ethiopia
NMCB 4
7
Italy
NMCB 4
Philippines
NMCB 5
Cambodia
NMCB 5
COMCAM
COMCAM
Uganda
NMCB 4
Total Force Strength:
13,815 (AC 6,888/RC 6,927)
Total Deployed:
1,582 (AC 1,078/R504)
Belize
CBMU 202
Korea
NMCB 5
Tanzania
UCT 1
Bahrain
NMCB 4
Afghanistan
NMCB 4
Kuwait
NMCB 4
Afghanistan
NMCB 15
Okinawa
NMCB 5
TOTAL: 3.06 x NMCB (2.06 AC / 1.0 RC)
• PAC: 1.0 x NMCB (1.0 AC / 0.0 RC)
• CENT: 1.33 x NMCB (0.33 AC / 1.0 RC)
• EUR/AF: 0.7 x NMCB (0.7 AC / 0.0 RC)
• SOUTH: 0.03 x NMCB (0.03 AC / 0.0 RC)
Tanzania
NMCB 4
Croatia
NMCB 4
Functions and Capabilities
We support the Navy, USMC, Army, SOF,
Joint/Combined Forces, State Department, FEMA and
other US Government agencies, and Coalition/UN
Missions through planned deployments and crisis
response.
Disaster Relief Limited
Regional Contingencies
Major Combat Operation
Humanitarian Action
Forward-Deployed Engineers
Exercise Related
Construction
Marine Corps
Engineers
Enabling 21st
Century Expeditionary Operations
23 May 13
Mike Boyd,
HQMC Engineer and EOD Branch
Deputy
“The Basics of Engineering
never Change”
but …
Post-OEF Expeditionary
Engineering must evolve as
operational imperatives,
concepts & missions are
changing.
Marine Corps
Expeditionary Engineering
10 01 May 13
– Every Marine a rifleman/Fight as Infantry
– Combat, Combat Support and Combat
Service Support roles
– Organic to Ground
Combat/Aviation/Logistics Combat
Elements
– Easily task organized
– Explosive Hazard breaching and clearing
– Mobility, Countermobility, Survivability
– Limited horizontal and vertical
Construction
– Expeditionary Airfield Construction
– Bulk Fuel and water
– Tactical bridging
– EOD embedded in Engineer Organizations
The Marine Engineer….
12
Emerging
Operational
Requirements
Training
Force
Readiness
Equipment
Modernization Rapid
Reconstitution
In-Stride
Reset
Many considerations….but ONE focus
Endstate – support this Marine!
Maritime
Prepositioning
Programs
Fiscal
Realities
Near Term Future
• Less Money
• Lightened weight and energy consumption
• “Re-Balance” to the Pacific
• Adaptable (Special Purpose MAGTFs, Joint Force)
• Scalable (TSC to MCO)
• Returning to Naval Roots
• Self-Sustaining
01 May 13 13
ROMO
Pacific Pivot
Maint Co
5/15/609/0/0
MT Co
4/1/313/0/0
Sup Co 10/12/427/1/64
GS Maint Co
3/2/156/0/0
Engr Svcs Co
4/1/125/0/0 Engr Svcs Co
4/1/125/0/0
H&S Co
9/3/135/1/1
3D Marine Logistics Group (FY12-15)
Food Svc Co
1/2/130/0/0
Svc Co
22/13/177/0/8
HQTRS REGT
68/25/998/6/27
Comm Co
10/4/219/0/0
HQTRS Co
17/2/105/0/0
CLR 3 (DS)
66/7/1183/6/24
CLR 35 (GS)
47/35/1763/3/66
CLB 351 28/31/1484/2/65
3D MED BN 3/0/96/129/356 H&S Co
M28261
3/0/64/47/110
CLC 36
2/3/101/0/5
H&S Co
13/0/121/2/19
Engr Spt Co
3/7/310/0/0
Bulk Fuel Co
M29103 NM
1/4/184/0/0
Engr Co
/135/0/0
H&S Co
M29091
0/0/5/4/9
3D Den Co
0/0/0/24/48
11TH Den Co
0/0/0/24/48
21ST Den Co
M29094
0/0/0/24/48
9TH ESB 24/21/869/2/19
3D DEN BN 0/0/5/76/153
MLG HQTRs
54/10/194/12/60
EOD Co
M29106
2/9/119/0/0
Lndg Spt Co
5/1/128/0/0
CLB 3
24/2/534/2/11
H&S Co
M29031
12/0/77/2/11
Trans Svcs Co
6/0/238/0/0
Maint Svcs Co
2/1/94/0/0
CLB 4
24/2/534/2/11
Trans Svcs Co
6/0/238/0/0
Maint Svcs Co
2/1/94/0/0
Hansen, Oki
HQTRS Co
16/2/123/1/1
Kaneohe, HI
3D MLG MO / MW / ME / NO / NE
262 / 98 / 5108 / 234 / 705
5468 939 Marine & Navy Total:
6407
Surg Co A
0/0/16/41/123
Surg Co B
0/0/16/41/123
MEU CLB 31
13/3/239/6/19
Kaneohe, HI
Hansen, Oki
POST FSRG (182.1K)
*Updated as of : 120912
HQTRS CO
18/3/115/2/2
Iwakuni, JA
FY14 Redesignate
FY12 ReOrg FY13 ReOrg FY13 Activation
FY13 Activation
FY14 Realignment
FY14 Restructure
FY14 Restructure
FY14 Restructure
FY12 Permanent Structure
FY15 Restructure FY14 Restructure
H&S Co
M29035
12/0/77/2/11
CLC 35
9/5/153/0/8
Kaneohe, HI
FY13 Activation
Engr Co 5/1/135/0/0
Engr Co 5/1/135/0/0
Enhances Direct Support to Combat Forces, General Engr Support Challenge
Marine Engineer Manning
50%
21%
19%
5% 5%
USMC Engineers 2001 172K 14.4K 2012 202K 16.4K 2015 182K 15.5K 2017 ?
Logistics Combat Element
Ground Combat Element
Aviation Combat Element
Command Element
Supporting Establishment
17 01 May 13
Reduction in Combat Engr Bn in 2015 – Reliance on
Reserves
MAGTF Engineer Sources
MAGTF
Civilian
Contractors
Seabees
Engineer
Support
Battalion
Joint/
Combined
Engineers
Combat
Engineer
Battalion
Marine
Wing Support
Squadron
Host
Nation
Support
19
Equipment Scalability Example
D9
Medium
Crawler
Tractor
Skid Steer
Loader
1150
TRAM
Counter IED Training
Enhance and sustain
S&T focus to enable the Objective Force
VIETNAM DESERT
SHIELD/STORM
Explosive Hazard Challenges
Technological Dilemma
NEAR TERM OBJECTIVE
FORCE
PROBING FOR MINES
VIETNAM - 1965
AN/PSS 12
HSTAMIDS
MICLIC APOBS
TECHNOLOGY
LEAP
RWS
AUTONOMOUS
ROBOTIC
CLEARANCE
OPERATIONS
STANDOFF DETECTION
STANDOFF
NEUTRALIZATION
FORWARD LOOKING
Progress over the last 50 years has been limited
ABV
Future of MCM?
Lightening the Load??
2001
Equipment Spending Per Marine
PASGT Helmet
Uniform
Combat Boots
PASGT Vest
Sun, Wind, Dust
Goggles
Load Carrying
Equipment
Light Weight Helmet
MTV w/ ESAPI, S-
SAPI, throat and
groin protectors,
& integrated load
carriage
FR Gloves
FR Combat
Ensemble
Ballistic Eye
Protection
FR Balaclava
Knee and Elbow
Pads
$5583 $15,639
2012
Evolution of Clothing and Personal Protective Equipment
93 pounds
23 01 May 13
SPACES Battery Charger • Lighten the Load
• Tactical Logistics Distribution • Unmanned Convoy Vehicles
Small Unit Water Purifier • Advanced Technology
• +19 % Efficiency
• Cloudy Conditions
• Use On The Move
Mobile Solar Power
GREENS (300 Watts Continuous Power)
LED Lights
Aerial Delivery
Energy Demand Reduction
24 01 May 13
Strengths and Weaknesses
• Decade of Success
• Engineers/EOD more Joint than any other occupational fields
• Non-engineer perceptions of Engineering
• Phenomenal Material Readiness
• Warrior Culture
• Tripled Warranted Contracting Officers
• Negotiation on facilities billets
01 May 13 25
26
Seabees ISO MAGTF?
22 and 30 NCR: •Deployable C2 staffs able to meet OPLAN timelines •NCR Commanders dual-hatted as deputy group commander
NMCB 14
NECC
NMCB 27
7NCR CBMU 202
NMCB 1
NMCB 11
NMCB 133
UCT 1
Combat Camera
CBMU 303
NMCB 3
NMCB 22 NMCB 17
NECC PAC
UCT 2
NMCB 4
NMCB 5
NMCB 18 NMCB 25
Naval Construction
Group 1
9NCR 1NCR
30 NCR
AC Command
RC Command
Naval Construction
Group 2 22 NCR
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
27
Evolving AF Role in Joint
Contingency Operations
Col Mike Kozak
AF/A7CX
20 May 13
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Overview
AF Civil Engineer Forces – Current State
Total Force Postured to meet ISC Construct
Expeditionary CES, Prime BEEF, and RED HORSE Capabilities
Organizational Challenge: Diverse Clientele
577th Expeditionary Prime BEEF Group
Challenge, Reduce Theater Expeditionary Engineering BOG
Answer, Over the Horizon (OTH) Support
1st Expeditionary Civil Engineer Group
Key Take Aways
Vignettes
28
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Differences Between Expeditionary CES &
Prime BEEF
Garrison/Expeditionary CES
Light Construction/Repair/Maint
Varies according to size of base and
number of facilities
BOS-I responsibilities
Wing/base asset
NO outside-the-wire capability
Fire/EOD/Emergency Mgt caps
Primary customer: AF Wing CC
Expeditionary Prime BEEF
Light Construction/Repair
94 military + 23 contractors per sq
NO BOS-I responsibilities
COMUSFOR/COMIJC CJOA asset
Limited outside-the-wire capability
NO fire/EOD/Emergency Mgt caps
Primary customer: ISAF/USFOR
29
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Differences Between Expeditionary RED
HORSE & Prime BEEF
RED HORSE
Heavy Construction
404 military + 0 contractors per sq
Self-sustaining (with re-supply)
Engineers + med, loggies, food
services, vehicle mx, contracting
Deploys with construction
equipment
COMAF AOR asset
Primary customer: Air Force
Expeditionary Prime BEEF
Light Construction/Repair
94 military + 23 contractors per sq
NOT self-sustaining
Engineers + 1 vehicle mx, 2
loggies, 2 comm personnel
Relies on pre-po/leased assets for
construction equipment
COMUSFOR/COMIJC CJOA asset
Primary customer: ISAF/USFOR
30
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Organizational Challenge:
Diverse Clientele Example: Support 11 Major Organizations
CJTF-101
1/4 BCT
101st CAB
4th CAB
CJTF Paladin
MAGTF
2 SCR
1/10 MTN
2/101 BCT
525 BFSB
196th MEB
Support all 6 Regional Commands (other engineer TFs tied to specific RCs)
Create a theater-wide, Title X, engineer organization!
Lots of competing priorities!
31
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
577th Expeditionary Prime BEEF
Group Core Competencies
Installation Engineering
Master planning
Project programming
Project design
Contract development and oversight
Surveying
Light troop construction, repair, & recovery (~ 120 man-days per project)
Excluded Mission Sets:
Combat Engineering & BOS-I
Infrastructure/Equipment Maintenance
Service Contract, TCN, & MILCON Management
Emergency Services (Fire, Emergency Management, EOD)
32
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Shindand
Qalat
Jacobabad
Mazar-e-Sharif
Gardez
Shkin
Bamyan
Salerno Salerno
Oruzgan
Farah
Lwara
Musa Qalah
Band-E
Qala I Naw
Baghlan
Feyzabad
Maimana
Ghazni
Bari Kowt
Chaghcharan
Orgun-E
Spin Boldak
Baghran Sharana
Asadabad
Naray
Kunduz
Wolverine
Tarin Kowt
Ghecko
Deh Chopan
Blessing
Kandahar
Rhino
LZ
Herat
Bagram
Bastion/
Leatherneck
Shkin
Lwara
Zormat
Dwyer
Jalalabad
Ramrod
577th Expeditionary Prime
BEEF Squadron –
Afghanistan (E) Bagram
Kabul
Shank
777th Expeditionary Prime
BEEF Squadron –
Afghanistan (S, SW) Kandahar
577th Expeditionary Prime
BEEF Group – Afghanistan Bagram
877th Expeditionary Prime
BEEF Squadron (N, W) Mazar E Sharif
33
Sheberghan
Deh Dadi
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Challenge, Reduce Theater
Expeditionary Engineering BOG
34
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Answer, Over the Horizon
(OTH) Support
35
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
1st Expeditionary Civil Engineer
Group Core Competencies
36
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Key Take Aways
AF Civil Engineer Forces Currently Postured to meet ISC
Construct - Continued AF & Joint Advocacy/Relevancy Key
Prime BEEF Supports Embedded Wing Garrison & Expeditionary
Civil Engineer Missions
Flexible/Scalable structure, can also fulfill AF & Joint General
Purpose Force Missions
RED HORSE Supports Theater Level AF & Joint General Purpose
Force Missions
1 ECEG Over the Horizon Support combines strengths of
Expeditionary Prime BEEF & RED HORSE forces to provide
Theater Level 911 General Purpose Engineer capability
37
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Kandahar
38
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FOB Gamberi
39
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FOB Torkham
40
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Camp John Pratt
41
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
COP Sabari
42
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
C-SMART in CJOA-A
43
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FOB Thunder
44
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Bagram Water Well COIN
Mission
45
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Salang Tunnel
46
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FOB Al Masaak
47
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
RC-South
48
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Bagram
49
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Rapid Runway Repair – FOB
Fenty
50
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
MAAS/EALS Support
51
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Southwest Asia
52
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Airfield Rubber Removal Team
53
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FOB Kunduz
54
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Mazar-e-Sharif
55
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Southwest Asia
56
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Expeditionary RED HORSE
Core Competencies
57
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Kandahar
58
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Southwest Asia
59
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Camp John Pratt
60
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Southwest Asia
61
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Southwest Asia
62
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Kandahar Airfield
63
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Questions
64
Joint Engineer Contingency Operation
Workshop
US Army Engineer Structure
Mr. Jim Rowan
Deputy Commandant
US Army Engineer School
23 May 2013
Engineer Vision and HQs Mission
MISSION : ENGINEER HQs and SCHOOL generates the military
engineer capabilities the Army needs; training and certifying Soldiers
with the right knowledge, growing professional leaders, organizing
and equipping adaptive units, establishing a framework of doctrine for
integrating capabilities with operations, and remaining an adaptive
institution in order to provide Commanders with the freedom of action
they need to win decisive action as part of JIIM-IA (“Whole of
Government”, “Whole of Society”) team.
VISION:
• The World’s Best and Most Versatile Military Engineers
• Technically as well as Tactically Expert
• It’s lonely in the lodgement !
• Warriors Always
• Expeditionary Training and Mindset
• Regimental Family
• Most Flexible and Adaptive Units and People
• Soldiers and civilians that inspire each other
• Soldiers who dare to demand “Let Us Try”…and get it done
Engineer Warriors leading to serve maneuver forces:
“A Regiment inspired to overcome all challenges to enable victory”
Assure Mobility
Enable Expeditionary Force Projection & Logistics
Lines of Engineer Support “The Unique Work of Our Profession”
Develop Partner Capacity & Infrastructure
Enhance Protection
Modular Engineer Company Formations
The Reason We Exist “Our Purpose: Provide Freedom of Action”
Capabilities “Interdependent Disciplines”
CBT ENG
GEN ENG GEO
S EN
G
Op
era
tio
na
l E
ng
Fo
rce
US
AC
E A
CC
ES
SIO
NS
Key Tasks for the Profession
• Breed the Army’s best/most creative/most agile leaders…
inspired with passion
• Focus on the unique skills and capabilities our Regiment
provides
• Support the forces in contact (expeditionary ops, SOF, Cyber,
HLD, theater shaping ops; partner capacity and infrastructure
prep of theater). Engineers units are always in the fight.
• Capture what we have learned (or relearned) in a decade of
war… apply to it all DOTMLPF
• Weigh the Main Effort by remissioning engineers- no engineers
not applied to our missions (no Engineers in the reserve)
• Build Great Engineers… warriors always
• Readiness is key… revolutionize home station and functional
Engineer training
• Win as a team…JIIM-Industry-Academia
• From dawn of warfare to today and in the first and last 300
meters to any objective- maneuver, fires and engineers …
serving proudly with a Sapper’s heart
The Engineer Regiment
Unified Land Operations
Mission Command
Decisive Action
Core
Competencies
CAM
WAS
Offense
Defense
Stability DSCA
BEB
x + +
l l
• Addressing “Over-modularization”
of the engineer force
The Army Engineer Profession: A Model
What the Army Must Do
Historic Examples:
1920-30s Rainbow Planning
Airmobile
Active Defense
AirLand Battle
Last decade: Counterinsurgency
Narrow Lens
Defeat A2/AD
Wide Lens
Army also did
missions
outside this
narrow lens
Gain and Maintain Access Unified Land Operations
Deter Defeat
Project Power
Deter &
Defeat CT/IW
HD/
DSCA
Presence
Counter
WMD Cyber
Nuclear Deterrence
Stability/
COIN HADR
Specific Threat
Specific Location
Specific threat, degree of certainty
and location drove: Doctrine
Equipment
Training
Organizational Structure
Force Posture
What the Army Must Do: Prevent, Shape, and Win:
Strategic guidance requires the Army to conduct a wide range of
missions while retaining the ability to focus more narrowly on
projecting power to deter and defeat aggression once a specific
threat emerges.
The combination of a narrow focus within a wide lens allows the Army to adjust more rapidly to potential threats.
The Army must maintain a high level of operational adaptability
Insurgents
Criminal
Organizations States
Terrorists
Proxies
Near States
Space
Army Structure
ARNG350,200
31
3,3
00
36
,90
0
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY13358,200
-3,827
346,3
73
8,000
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY14358,200
-4,513
345,6
87
8,000
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY15357,200
346,8
88
-3,312
7,000
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY16355,200
346,8
06
-3,394
5,000
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY17353,200
348,7
10
-1,490
3,000
36
,90
03
13
,30
0
FY18350,200
348,2
88
-1,912
31
3,3
00
FY19350,200
-1,912
36
,90
0348,2
88
ARNG350,200
14
5,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
4,000
FY13205,000
-1,885
190,9
76
4,139
14
7,1
61
47
,70
0
2,000
4,000
FY14205,000
-3,431
191,4
30
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
FY19205,000
-2,992
193,8
69
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
FY15205,000
-4,021
192,8
40
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
FY16205,000
-4,163
192,6
98
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
FY18205,000
-2,992
193,8
69
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
FY17205,000
-3,007
193,8
54
4,139
14
9,1
61
47
,70
0
4,000
4,139
AC
Legend Operating Force
Allowance
Generating Force
Allowance TTHS Allowance SAMAS Structure
AC – Wartime… RC – IMA… Allowance
Based on SAMAS working file as of 26 October 2012.
(Trainees, Transients, Holdees and Students) USAR AGR
Non-Add
AC490,000
33
4,1
64
92
,13
66
3,7
00
36
7,1
39
92
,13
67
0,1
61
FY13539,700
10,264
363,6
56
-3,4833
55
,83
19
2,1
36
68
,13
3
FY14524,100
8,000
356,6
93
+862
33
9,6
91
92
,13
66
5,2
73
FY16502,100
5,000
342,0
48
+2,357
33
4,1
64
92
,13
66
3,7
00
FY17490,000
334,8
84
+720
33
4,1
64
92
,13
66
3,7
00
FY18490,000
336,1
79
+2,015
33
4,1
64
92
,13
66
3,7
00
FY19490,000
336,1
79
+2,015
34
8,0
00
92
,13
66
6,6
64
FY15512,800
6,000
347,8
62
-138
205,000
• This is a continuous process to make sure we have the right mix of capabilities
available to the joint force commander for decisive action.
USAR
580
560
540
520
500
480
460
360
350
210
200
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
7
0
569k
512k
502k
524k
556k
540k
Army Reduction Ramp by FY17
358.2k
355.2k 353.2k
350.2k
ARNG
USAR
206k 205k
AC
490k
Army
2020
BEB Implementation ??
Fiscal Constraints
Pre 9-11
Maneuver Support Enabler Mix
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ARMY
ENGINEER
MILITARY POLICE
CHEMICAL
(52%)
(22%)
(30%)
(21%)
(33%)
(49%)
(46%)
(37%)
(15%)
(29%)
(24%)
(42%)
AC
NG
AR
• Aligns Engineer Mission Command
with BCT centric Army Expert advice to commander for mission
command
Plan for and employ EAB assets
• Provides all BCTs with full spectrum
stance with a baseline* of organic
engineer capability (25% Auth by ROA) Gap Crossing
Breach Capability
Route Clearance
Horizontal Construction
• Makes employment of EAB Engineers
in support of BCTs more effective and
efficient*
• Synchronizes Engineer capability with
ARFORGEN and improves Campaign
Continuity
• BEB billpayer was primarily BSTB HQs
and EAB engineer organizations
EAB EAB
Status: • Final decision pending, but very close
• Begin implementation as early as FY14
Note: Vertical Plt and Horizontal Support Sqd
removed to meet BCT Force Cap
H I S ABN
438 417 457 415
BEB Size
BCT Engr Bn (BEB)
EAB EAB
17%
75%
5% 3%
Pre BEB Engineer Regiment
AC EAB
RC EAB
AC BCT
RC BCT
11%
68%
11% 10%
Post BEB Engineer Regiment
AC EAB
RC EAB
AC BCT
RC BCT
The significant shift of structure into the BCT formation shows a sizable investment to supporting the BCT commander forward on the battlefield.
Changes in Engineer Regiment Structure with BEB Implementation
Changes in Engineer Structure with BEB Implementation by Compo
4,226
4,422
936
3,874
4,291
Pre BEB Active Component
Construction
Combat
Specialized
Mission Command
BCT
2384
3603
880
2398
9,290
Post BEB Active Component
Construction
Combat
Specialized
Mission Command
BCT
16949
85332221
8112
2680
Pre BEB ARNG
Construction
Combat
Specialized
Mission Command
BCT
14909
7748
2190
7456
7896
Post BEB ARNG
Construction
Combat
Specialized
Mission Command
BCT
10,127
6,814
1,341
5,220
Construction Totals
Combat Totals
Specialized EN Totals
Mission Command
USAR TAA 14-18 EAB Totals
No Change
While the BEB is primarily a combat engineering formation the cost was almost twice as much
construction structure compared to combat due to simultaneous force shaping actions on the BCT.
HHC, TEC
2 USAR
Sapper Co
8 AC, 38 ARNG,
8 USAR
GPC
4 AC
Quarry Plt
9 ARNG
Vertical Co
7 AC, 42 NG,
34 AR
ENGR Dive Tm
5 AC, 2 ARNG
HQ Canine
0 AC
FEST-M
2 AC, 2 USAR
HHC EN Bde
4 AC, 7 NG, 4 AR
MRBC
4 AC, 12 ARNG,
9 USAR
Real Estate Tm
2 USAR
HQ FFTG
0 AC, 7 ARNG,
8 USAR
HHC EN Bn
11 AC, 44NG, 26
AR
Clearance Co
12 AC, 4 ARNG,
12 USAR
CMT
4 AC, 4 ARNG,
2 USAR
FFTG Tm
7 AC, 12 ARNG,
9 USAR
Prime Power Bn
1 AC
Topographic Co
0 AC, 1 ARNG
EFD
4 ARNG, 16 USAR
FEST-A
7 AC, 20 USAR
EN Support Co
3 AC, 23 NG,
5 USAR
Asphalt Tm
16 ARNG, 7 USAR
Canine SQD
0 AC
HQ Well Drilling
1 ARNG
MAC
3 AC, 18 NG ,
19 USAR
Concrete Tm
0 AC, 13 ARNG,
11 USAR
EHCC
0 AC, 3 ARNG,
1 USAR
Well Drilling Tm
6 NG
Horizontal Co
8 AC, 45 ARNG
25 USAR
EHT
0 AC, 8 ARNG,2
USAR
ESP
10 ARNG, 3 USAR
S & D
6 AC, 23 ARNG
12 USAR
Area Clearance
0 AC, 4 ARNG,
12 USAR
Engineer Force Pool Units
EN Mission Command
Combat Engineering
General Engineering
Specialty Capabilities Baseline Capabilities
BEB
32 AC, 28 ARNG
Construction FDU Geospatial FDU RC Only
Factors That Will impact Organizations
• Brigade Engineer Battalion Implementation
• Echelon Above Brigade Re-design
– Geospatial FDU
– Construction FDU
– Combat Engineer Company re-design
• Tactical Wheel Vehicle Study
• Grade Plate Review
• Women in the Army Policies
Are we pulling on too many levers at the same time?
Who is synchronizing the joint engineer structure?
EAB EN Redesign Concept Key Components
Construction Company Design:
• Multi-functional companies vs pure companies
• Enhance company capability
Explosive Hazards Operations: • Assess Area clearance capability
• Solidify EHO as a mission, usually nested with movement and
maneuver, not just an organization or materiel solution
• Off-Leash Explosive Dogs will be vital to EHO for the foreseeable
future
• Identify what capability and Organizations should endure
Gap Crossing:
• Develop a light bridging system for IBCT
• Maintain a fixed and float LOC bridging
Power Projection/Early Entry
• Must have the right capability in the AC to project our CONUS based
army into an anti-access or area-denial theater
• Airfields and Ports are the most critical asset and the lifeline for the
Army
• Determine capabilities and solutions to support the D+30-90 day
requirement
Shaping Terrain/Countermobility
• Develop a lethal/non-lethal and scaleable countermobility capability
Support to SOF
• SOF operations will continue to grow as a requirement
• Engineer regiment must provide properly “SOF” trained enablers to
support these requirements
Contingency Basing /Power Generation/CL IV:
• Base camps will again be required as a projection platform
• Must minimizing the resources to run base camp energy and utilities
• The engineer regiment must be prepared to absorb the management,
storage, and distribution of class IV building materials in theater
Geospatial
• All army missions are tied to geospatial information
• Need the right capability in the appropriate organization to support
each theater and deployment
Fire Fighting
• This capability is critical to APOD ops, and Base Camps
• The army has a unique capability that can augment civil capability
Building Partner Capacity:
• Requires technical engineering skills
• Closely linked with USACE partnership
AC/RC Integration:
• The Engineer Regiment will be at least a 19/81 mix of AC/RC
• What RC capability will be required early
• What capabilities will be RC only and which will require additional
capacity
• Key capabilities should have commonality across components
Support to DSCA:
• Urban Search and Rescue (Assured Mobility through a disaster site)
• Response and recovery from WMD or disaster
Maintaining Volunteer Force and Professional
Engineering
77
Questions / Discussion
79
Joint Engineering and the Way Ahead
MG Todd Semonite
23 May 2013
Joint Engineering: The ability to execute and
integrate combat, general, and geospatial
engineering to meet National and JFC requirements
to assure mobility, provide infrastructure to position,
project, protect, and sustain the joint force, and
enhance visualization of the operational area, across
the full spectrum of military operations.
Source: JP 3-34, Joint Engineering Operations
Joint Engineering Defined
Joint Engineering in Practical Terms
Community of
Practice
JS J4 and Service
Engineers
Community of Interest
Stakeholders
DUSD (I&E)
COCOM
Engineers
DLA
National
Geospatial
Agency
Facility
Management
Agencies
Service
Logisticians
DHS
FEMA
DoS
Acquisition Community
Deployment
System
Distribution
System
Operational
Elements
Service Programmers
R&D Community
COCOM ‘s
Service
Component
Commands
Joint Engineer Attributes
82
Networked. The ability to access and use information from all sources in
order to create and share a common operating picture. Able to synchronize
across many links to plan, control, move, and execute through coordinated
action.
Effective. The ability to produce the intended effect or end state via the
application of the most suitable and efficient means.
Expeditionary. Organized and postured for rapid global deployment and
employment. Capable of strategic and operational movement via air, sea, and
rail followed by immediate employment in support of forward deployed
elements.
Integrated. Composed of elements that function together seamlessly with
unity of effort. Capable of substitution without loss of capability or
effectiveness.
Precise. The ability to provide the required capability (or mix of capabilities) at
the correct/required time and location.
Agile/Tailorable. The ability to react quickly and adapt to dynamic conditions
and missions, scalable to provide the required capacity and effects.
Enduring/Persistence. The ability to accomplish missions and functions over
extended time without degrading productivity, capacity, and effectiveness.
Joint Force 2020 Attributes
83
• Globally agile, responsive with regional expertise.
• Broadly versatile and specialized in some mission areas (balanced).
• Able to apply discriminate power and able to generate overwhelming force.
• Adaptable and resilient to deal with rapidly changing and unanticipated situations.
• Technology enabled and built on training and abilities of people.
• Interdependent for reasons of economy and also self-sufficient.
• Digitally networked and able to operate when communications degraded.
• Expeditionary & Agile/Tailorable
• Effective & Integrated
• Precise & Effective
• Agile/Tailorable & Enduring/Persistence
• Networked
• Integrated
• Networked & Enduring/Persistence
and Joint Engineer Attributes
Joint Engineer Capabilities
Engineer Joint Capabilities
General Engineering: Gap Crossing
Develop and Maintain Facilities
Establish LOCs
Global Access Engineering
Repair and Restore Infrastructure
Harden Key Infrastructure and Facilities
Master Design Combat Engineering: Defeat Explosive Hazards
Enhance Mobility
Deny Movement and Maneuver
Enhance Survivability Geospatial Engineering Utilize Geospatial Data Provide Mobility Assessments
Unknown Permissive Hostile
USN
General Engineering
Combat Engineering
Geospatial Engineering
Unknown Permissive Hostile
USMC General Engineering
Combat Engineering
Geospatial Engineering
Unknown Permissive Hostile
USAF General Engineering
Combat Engineering
Geospatial Engineering
Unknown Permissive Hostile
USA
General Engineering
Combat Engineering
Geospatial Engineering
Service Engineer to Joint Capabilities
Unknown Permissive Hostile
USA
USN
USMC
USAF
Gap Crossing
Master Design
Harden Key Infrastructure & Facilities
Repair and Restore Infrastructure
Develop & Maintain Facilities
Establish LOCs
Global Access Engineering
Enhance Survivability
Deny Movement and Maneuver
Enhance Mobility
Defeat Explosive Hazards
Utilize Geospatial Data
Provide Mobility Assessments
JCA Element:
Operating Environment:
Joint Engineers Linked to Capabilities
Op
era
tio
nal
Str
ate
gic
T
acti
cal
US
A
US
N
US
MC
US
AF
Gap
Cro
ssin
g
Maste
r D
esig
n
Hard
en
Key I
nfr
astr
uctu
re &
Fa
cil
itie
s
Rep
air
an
d R
esto
re I
nfr
astr
uctu
re
Develo
p &
Main
tain
Fa
cil
itie
s
Esta
bli
sh
LO
Cs
Glo
ba
l A
ccess E
ng
ine
eri
ng
En
ha
nce S
urv
ivab
ilit
y
Den
y M
ov
em
en
t an
d M
an
eu
ver
En
ha
nce M
ob
ilit
y
Defe
at
Exp
los
ive H
azard
s
Uti
lize G
eo
sp
ati
al
Data
Pro
vid
e M
ob
ilit
y A
sses
sm
en
ts JCA Element:
Level of War:
Supply (AC Only)
87
Demand vs Supply – Joint Engineer Capacity
Notional Demand
For Engineer Capability
Shape
Seize
Initiative Dominate Stabilize Enable Civil
Authority Deter
0 I II III IV V
Goals & Requirements:
Prepare & Shape
the Theater
Crisis Defined
Force Tailoring
Assure Freedom
of Action
Theater Access
Infrastructure
Apply Dominant Force
and Achieve
Full Spectrum Superiority
Establish Security
Restore Services
Transfer Authority
Redeploy
Surge Needs
General Engineering Combat Engineering Mix Mix General Engineering
Geospatial Engineering
Supply (AC & RC) Risk
Risk
Risk
88
Challenge Element Rating Issue/Danger Strategy
Engineer
Equipping
Construction
Equipment
Mixed operating
platforms, energy
inefficiency, difficulty
training & maintaining.
Continue with
common
requirement and
acquisition
strategy
Assault Bridging
Mixed platforms,
bridges that fail to
support loads and
traffic.
Joint Assault
Bridge program
Breaching
Lack of Engineer
survival and inability to
assure mobility of
supported force.
Assault Breacher
Vehicle program
Overall Resource limitations
curtail procurement.
JOEB integration
of interoperability
issues.
Thoughts on Future Challenges and Status
89
Challenge Element Rating Issue/Danger Strategy
Joint Engineer
Force Structure
Defining joint
floors/targets
Undersized sized force
and incorrect skills and
capabilities.
JOEB force
assessment and
engagement with
Force
Management
process
AC/RC balance
Stress on the force,
inability to meet
OPLAN deployment
timelines.
Engagement in
force shaping
and sizing
process
Account for
partner
capacities
Duplication of capacity,
incorrect force and
capabilities,
uninformed decisions
impacting capacity.
JOEB force
assessment and
engagement with
SAME, industry,
and interagency.
Overall Incorrect mix of skills,
capability, and
capacity.
Force
assessment and
JOEB
engagement
Thoughts on Future Challenges and Status
90
Challenge Element Rating Issue/Danger Strategy
Engineer
Doctrine JP 3-34
Failure to capture
lessons and lack of
future relevance.
Joint doctrine
review and
update process
JP 3-15
Over reliance on mine
warfare and lack of
relevance in shaping
the operational
environment.
Joint doctrine
review and
update process
Service
Engineer
Doctrine Linkage
to Joint
Lack of integration and
synchronization,
inability to achieve
proper effect and
efficiency.
Revitalize the
JOEB Doctrine
Work Group
Account for
Engineering in
Other Doctrine
Only Engineers know
and understand
Engineering otherwise.
Revitalize the
JOEB Doctrine
Work Group
Overall
Failure to capture
lessons, inability to
achieve proper effect,
lack of future
relevance.
Revitalize JOEB
Doctrine Work
Group and
engage in joint
doctrine process
Thoughts on Future Challenges and Status
91
Challenge Element Rating Issue/Danger Strategy
Theater
Engineer Staff &
C2
Doctrine Failure to follow
principles in JP 3-34,
chapters II and III.
Refine JP 3-34
principles
Structure
Loss of 1NCD,
disconnect from
theater and component
commands.
Reassess
required
functions and
refine unit and
staff structures.
Overall
Lack of unity in
purpose and inability to
achieve needed
effects.
Refine doctrinal
principles and
staff structuring.
Thoughts on Future Challenges and Status
92
Challenge Element Rating Issue/Danger Strategy
Developing
Future Engineer
Leaders
Joint
Qualifications
Skills mismatches and
inability to fill key
positions.
Map service
skills and
qualifications to
joint needs and
key positions
Train and
Educate
Inability to grow senior
leaders, lack of
Engineer relevance.
Build from ITRO
and JEOC
Overall Inadequate skills, no
joint vision
Maintain a Joint
Community and
Governance
Tactical/unit
level experience
Lose of a decade plus
of experience and joint
operations.
Exchange
programs &
JEOC
Strategic
Integration &
Governance
Top down with no cross
talk, missed
opportunities and
decisions.
Revitalize JOEB
Work Group
Structure
Overall
Revert to separate and
disconnected Service
Engineer
Perspectives.
JOEB Work
Groups and
Annual Work
Plan
Thoughts on Future Challenges and Status
93
JROC
Joint Operational Engineer
Board
CHAIR: Engr CAM + DJ4
MEMBERS: Service & COCOM
Engineers (GO/FO Level)
JOEB Coordination Group
CHAIR: J4 Engr
MEMBERS: Service Engineers (O6
Level)
SAME
USAG
Doctrine
Equipping
Resourcing
Requirements
Training
Engineer RDT&E
SAME Joint
Senior NCO
Panel
SAME Joint Engineer
Contingency Operations
Committee
US
AF
En
grs
Navy E
ng
rs
US
MC
En
grs
Arm
y E
ng
rs
SWG
TWG
CWG
DTWG
IWG
Engineer Governance “Synchronized”
JOEB Work Group Framework
94
Level of Detail
Bre
ad
th o
f V
isio
n
Capabilities Work Group
Capability Frame Work Linked
to Resources and Risk
Doctrine and Training Work Group
Missions and Effects
Synchronized thru Doctrine
and Education
Interoperability Work Group
Task and Platform Level
Integration Aimed at
Interoperability
Concepts and Experimentation
Transformation Work Group
Balance Limited
Capacity with Broad
Global Demand
Sourcing Work Group