Webinar - The National Customs Brokers & …...6.2 million ISF-10s 2,350 Filers 194,000 ISF...
Transcript of Webinar - The National Customs Brokers & …...6.2 million ISF-10s 2,350 Filers 194,000 ISF...
Webinar This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Introduction & Contacts
Lisa Gelsomino, President/CEO – Avalon Risk Management
• COAC Bond Working Group, NCBFAA ISF subcommittee, TSN eBond Subcommittee • Avalon ISF and eBond outreach to over 5,000 trade participants • ISF-http://www.avalonrisk.com/isf.html ISF Hotline: 847-700-TISF(8473) • 847-700-8192 or [email protected])
M. Craig Clark, Program Manager – CBP Headquarters
Office of Cargo and Conveyance Security (OFO) • As Program Manager, he is national point of contact for all ISF matters • Mr. Clark can be reached directly at 202-344-3052 or [email protected] • Or send questions to [email protected] • Refer to CBP ISF website for current information
Tom Molloy, Director of Customs & Trade Compliance – UPS
• Chair of NCBFAA ISF Subcommittee, Tom is LCB with CCS and CES designations • Over 33 years industry experience, he also holds a Master’s Degree in Psychology • 310-404-2762 or [email protected] • www.ncbfaa.org
100% Cargo Screening
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
SAFE Port Act of 2006
• 100% scanning by NIIs at foreign port prior to arrival
• $8 million x 2,100 shipping lanes at over 700 ports
• July 1, 2012 Deadline
• July 1, 2014 two-year waiver expires
• DHS asking Congress for two more years, show Risk Based Approach is working.
CBP’s Risk Based Approach
• Less than 1% of incoming containers is illicit cargo (Congressional Report 4/13)
• C-TPAT secures supply chain
• Container Security Initiative (CSI) at 60 ports that handles 80% of cargo to US
• ISF 10+2 rule targets cargo before it arrives in the U.S.
http://www.strtrade.com/news-publications-100-percent-cargo-container-scanning-060214.html
ISF Action Date
ISF Proposed Rule (NPRM) 01/02/08
ISF Interim Rule 01/26/09
“Flexible” Enforcement 01/26/09
“Informed Compliance” 01/26/10
CBP FAQ 07/09/10
ISF Enforcement 07/09/13
ISF Enforcement Guidance 05/13/14 CBP FAQ on ISF Guidance 05/18/14
NPRM (ISF-5) TBA ISF Final Rule ETA of 8/14
ISF Document
1st notice of ISF bonds CBP 19CFR149(b)
CBP ISF Interim Rule
CBP ISF Web Page
CBP ISF Mitigation Guidelines
CBP FAQ (updates pending with OR&R)
CBP CSMS Enforcement Message
CBP CSMS #14-000283 ISF Enforcement CBP FAQ dated 05/18/14
Questions or comments to: [email protected]
ISF Timeline & Updates
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF by the Numbers
January 26 – November 23, 2009
3.4 million ISF-10s
1,900 ISF Filers (90% customs brokers)
99,700 ISF importers on file
95% importers filing ISF
6,000 vessel stow plans
101 million container status messages
January 26 – September 21, 2010
6.2 million ISF-10s
2,350 Filers
194,000 ISF importers on file
97% importers filing ISF nationally
82% compliance in NY/NJ January 01, 2013 – December 31, 2013
10,508,000 ISF-10s / 4.31M as of 5/30/14
2,500+ Filers (remains constant in 2014)
264,000 + ISF importers on file
90%+ importers filing ISF nationally
22,000+ vessel stow plans
369+ million container status messages
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Statistics and Updates
Bond Statistics
10,508,000 ISFs in 2013
74,000 ISF-D Singles/Year (estimate)
99% of ISFs filed against CTBs
2014 Statistics
4,310,000 ISFs through 5/30/14
12,300,000 ISFs since 7/9/13
13-14M ISF-10s estimated annually
What about ACE Cargo Release?
Ocean shipments effective 1/4/14
Deployment C released 4/5/14
Will certify summary for release
ACE Cargo Release “will not replace ISF, but it will allow the filer to fulfill the ISF requirements. The approach is that if we have the data in the system, the trade will not have to send it again. CBP cannot say when this will be operational…it may be after Deployment C or a separate deployment just for the ISF integration.”
Per COAC meeting in May, the July 2014 deployment will include ACE Cargo Release (previously simplified entry) that will allow the Entry and ISF to be filed in ACE (unified entry) provided Entry and ISF data elements are available and filed on a timely basis. http://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/ace-development-and-deployment-schedule
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Cargo & Conveyance Security
Augustine Moore
Acting Executive Director
Chris Kennally
Deputy Executive Director
John Landers
Director, Cargo Control
Craig Clark
Program Manager
Regina Park
ACAS Manager
7 other staff members =
12 total
• Dan Baldwin retired 12/31/13
• Todd Hoffman was Acting Executive Director for 5 months
• Effective 5/13/14, Augustine Moore now Acting Executive Director
• John Landers became Director effective January 2014.
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
New ISF Enforcement Guidance
ISF Enforcement
Cargo Holds Updated policy remains the same
Does not always mean an NII
Rarely means full inspection
Liquidated Damages Effective 5/13/14
Informed compliance outreach 3 warnings before port will issue
a liquidated damage claim
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Ocean Volume – Impact on ISF
Per Zepol’s 2013 U.S. Port Report: LA/Long Beach is 54% of top 20 volume West Coast: 70% of volume of top 20 volume
HOLY Smokes! It’s the
dreaded ISF Cargo Hold
AGAIN!
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Enforcement on Local Level
Each port will implement based on local needs/resource
Port Date
LA/Long Beach 07/12/13
NY/NJ 07/19/13
Seattle 07/22/13
San Francisco/Oakland 07/25/13
Baltimore 08/05/13
Original ISF Enforcement Notices, nothing new to date
Port Notice Link
LA 13-026 Public Bulletin
Pipeline 13-027-NWK
CBP Trade Information Notice 13-17 WA
Notice 782-13-09
BWI Port Information Notice 2013-16
For example, LA/Long Beach
• Updated policy maintains local discretion at the port level based on infrastructure and staffing resources (placing cargo holds on freight vs. issuing LD claims).
• Non-compliant volume is high in LA/LB
• Holding LCL cargo effective 10/7/13 on ISFs not filed 48 hours prior to arrival in the U.S.
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Since 7/9/13, non-compliant ISFs subject to cargo holds in ACE
• The updated ISF enforcement guidance does not change this
ISF Enforcement - Cargo Holds
• When is CBP using ISF cargo holds? (<1% of cargo) – When ocean cargo arrives without an ISF
– When ISFs are filed “significantly” late (as defined by port policy)
– Entry cannot be made at ocean port without an ISF
– Sent to G.O. if entry is not made (manual cargo holds)
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• 2Q Hold Code = Carrier Hold Overseas – At this time, should only be used when there is a threat to national security.
– Contact CBP-HQ ([email protected]) if 2Q is used for non-compliance reasons only.
– Carriers are not responsible to police ISF compliance.
ISF Enforcement - Cargo Holds
• Targeting/Security Assessment – Each port has its own process for handling manual cargo holds.
– Some ports do not have facilities to strip consolidated cargo when cargo is held, so a single late ISF can delay an entire container.
– CBP does not compare ISF (6-digit) to Entry data (10-digit); however, this may be reviewed during a hold/inspection—security data is the concern
– After 3 violations, Liquidated Damages could be assessed in addition to or instead of cargo holds (varies by port).
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• B/L commonly known as the “11th data element.”
• B/L required as part of the ISF transmission – ISF Importer must provide B/L to lowest common denominator
– ISF Filer must query ACE to secure a B/L match (auto query for 60 days)
– This links ISF to Customs manifest in ACE to be visible to CBP
• CBP cannot target ISF without a B/L match – CBP needs match prior to arrival to conduct targeting
– Failure to match prior to arrival may result in cargo hold
– A B/L mismatch is an inaccurate ISF
– Liquidated damage claim possible
– Potential for 2 LD claims, late ISF and inaccurate ISF if untimely B/L match
– Cap is $10,000/any one ISF transaction
Bill of Lading Match in ACE
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Carrier Cargo Hold Data
• Port of Delivery Holds in 2014 – 698 total, average 34 per week
– 687, no ISF on File (98.5%)
– 11, ISF on file, (1.5%) but the data contains some type of compliance issue, and CBP placed a hold for further review
– Majority of POD Holds in Long Beach/LA, ORF, OAK
– Over 50% reduction from 2013, down from 78 per week
• Port of Loading Holds in 2014 – 6 Do Not Load due to No ISF on File
– Placed in error, removed when CBP was notified
• 704 ISF Holds in 2014 – 490 (70%) did not have exams
– 204 (29%) had NIIs
– 10 (1%) had intensive exams
Fewer EXAMS
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Local Policy in LA/Long Beach – LA holds cargo without an ISF on file at least 48 hours prior to arrival
– LCL Cargo: CBP places “2O” hold at HB/L level to hold container at terminal
– When CBP sees the electronic PTT, they will override the ISF hold with a “1W” authorization to transfer the goods to the CFS. • Note: CBP will remove the hold only after they have issued the manual hold to the CFS
and acknowledged back.
– CBP will place a “2O” hold on House B/Ls in the container(s), but when the in-bond entry is authorized in M1, CBP will override the hold with a “1J” in-bond authorization so cargo can move.
• Other Port Practices
ISF Enforcement - Cargo Holds
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Delays and Extra Costs for Importers – Inventory carrying costs could be 2-5 day shipment delay
– Costs for holding freight at origin or destination if ISF missing or late
– Costs for non-intrusive inspection (NII) or exam plus all applicable fees
– Exam charges must be paid before cargo is released
• Best Practices – File ISF timely, file updates until cargo’s arrival per 19 CFR 149.2(d)
– ACE B/L match 48 hours prior to cargo arrival for targeting purposes.
– Load cargo that has ISF acceptances in same container.
– Consolidate with other C-TPAT cargo as best practice.
– C-TPAT members can search C-TPAT Status Verification Interface
– A Flexible Filing (FR, FT, FX) must be updated 24 hours prior to cargo arrival as a Compliant Transaction (CT).
ISF Cargo Hold Exposures
KaPoW! We must ZAP Out THOSE costly
liquidated damage claims!
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
New ISF Enforcement Effective 5/13/14
Vessel Stow Plan
Container Status Message (CSM) Data
1. Booking Party name/address
2. Ship to Party
3. Commodity HTS-6
4. Foreign Port of Unlading
5. Place of Delivery
(FROB*, IE, TE)
ISF-10 “U.S. Bound” Cargo
24 Hrs Prior to Lading*
(3461 Entries, IT, FTZ)
1. Importer of Record or FTZ Number 2. Consignee Number(s) 3. Seller (Owner) name/address 4. Buyer (Owner) name/address 5. Ship to Party name/address 6. Manufacturer (Supplier) name/address 7. Country of Origin 8. Commodity HTS-6 digit level
9. Container Stuffing Location 10. Consolidator (Stuffer) name/address
ASAP, But NLT 24 Hrs Prior to Arrival
ISF-5 “Transit” Cargo
24 Hrs Prior to Lading*
*FROB ISF-5 is required anytime prior to lading
Carrier Requirements
NLT 48 Hrs After Departure*
w/in 24 Hrs of Creation or Receipt
*Anytime prior to arrival for voyages less than 48 Hrs
For all vessels carrying containers
ISFs must contain the lowest bill of lading number (i.e., regular or house B/L) as referenced in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE).
*Must be linked together as a line-item at the ISF shipment level
*ISFs for “exempt” break bulk shipments are required NLT 24 hrs prior to arrival
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Types of Violations for Liquidated Damages – $5,000 per Late File (15-20% of ISFs filed late)
• Includes Non File, these are considered Late Files (even if no bond on file)
• CBP’s primary focus, all ISF claims issued to date were due to Late ISFs
– $5,000 per Incomplete/Inaccurate ISF
• Missing Information or B/L
• B/L Mismatch
– $5,000 per Incorrect/Incomplete ISF Update
– $5,000 per ISF not Withdrawn/Deleted
– $10,000 maximum per any one ISF Transaction
• ISF Penalty Provisions – ISF Importer Penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1595a(b) = value of cargo
Liquidated Damages (Importers)
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• ISFs must still be filed:
– Timely: Vessel Departure Message – 24 Hours (local time) • CBP does not hold the importer responsible if the VDM was not
provided by the carrier
– Completely/Accurately • B/L Match is major concern (can make ISF appear to be missing)
• Updating a Flexible Filing to CT at least 24 hours prior to arrival
• Liquidated Damages May Be Assessed: – ISF importer has more than 3 violations
• Regardless if an LD claim could have been issued (no bond on file)
– 3 violations starts from 5/13/14 and ends 5/13/15
– 3 violations are based on ISF importer, not by port or filer
ISF Enforcement – Liq Damages
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Three Warnings to Violating ISF importer
– Before CBP will pursue a liquidated damage claim
– Importer must have a bond for a claim to be issued
• Informed Compliance Outreach
– Email, Telephone, or Letter (no plans to copy surety or CHB)
– CBP will have greater visibility to repeat violators
– Expose geographic areas requiring more outreach
• How Will CBP Track Violations?
– CBP will use an internal database visible nationwide
– CBP HQ will perform analysis of the data
– Does not include claims prior to 5/13/14
ISF Informed Compliance
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Focus on “Significantly Late” ISFs
– Defined by individual port (30 day vs. 2 day voyages)
– Late ISFs impacting CBP’s ability to target cargo and assess risk for cargo holds
– ISFs filed after arrival are always late; exposed to liquidated damages after 3 warnings and cargo holds at any time
• CBP-HQ Review
– Provides another year of review from 5/13/14 to 5/13/15
– CBP-HQ reviews claim details before 5955A is issued
– HQ will conduct analysis of informed compliance records
– Review each violation to ensure it aligns with ISF enforcement strategy
Focus on Severe Violations
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF and 6-Year Statute
• ISF Liquidated Damage Claims – Subject to 6-year statute per 28 USC § 2415(a).
– Before 7/9/13: CBP has no intention of issuing any LD claims prior to when ISF enforcement began, except in cases of fraud.
– After 7/9/13: CBP has up to 6 years to issue an LD claim for any ISF violations that occur on or after 7/9/13.
New ISF Enforcement Policy Advises Ports – Issue LD claims within 6 months of the ISF violation,
otherwise understood no claim should be forthcoming.
– Does not remove CBP’s right to issue claims up to 6 years per statute, or in the case of criminal activity or fraud.
– Allows sureties to consider return of collateral more timely
– Sureties do not have to consider stacking liability
$50K vs. $300K (6 years x $50K)
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Impact of New ISF Policy
• Another year of “Measured” Enforcement – Over 6 years total since 1/26/09
– Claims issued within 6 months eliminates stacking exposure
• Guidance on “Significantly” Late ISFs and 3 Warnings – Eliminates nuisance claims (1-2 days late)
– 1% of ISF transactions vs. estimated 11-20% of ISF transactions
– 10-12 million ISFs x .01 = 100,000 to 120,000 “potential” violations
• First-Time/One-Shot Importers – Start with “clean” slate for known ISF violations
– Makes bonding easier for “ISF Jail” since no exposure to LD claim unless more than 3 violations; there will still be an ISF Cargo Hold
– ISF Submission Type 5 – Late ISF, No Bond on File (soon to be eliminated)
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• What about claims requested prior to May 13, 2014?
– CBP HQ will not approve liquidated damages prior 5/13/14
– Except in cases of criminal activity or fraud
Impact of New ISF Policy
• Large/High Volume Importers
– Is policy unfair? Per CBP, “no” since ISF laws have been in force since 1/26/09; provided ample time to meet the laws.
– An enforcement policy based on percentage of volume is also unfair to less experienced importers.
– Larger importers have invested in compliance; don’t typically have ISFs that are considered “significantly late”
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Impact of New ISF Policy
• Importer has 5 ISF violations over next year
– All “significantly” late ISFs (based on local port policy)
– Old Policy: $5,000 x 5 = $25,000 / $11,000 / $5,500
– New Policy: $5,000 x 2 = $10,000 / $ 3,500 / $1,750
– Overall Benefit: $15,000 / $ 7,500 / $3,750
# Action Old Policy Mitigate C-TPAT New Policy
1 Email $5,000 $1,000 $ 500 $0
2 Phone Call $5,000 $2,500 $1,250 $0
3 Letter $5,000 $2,500 $1,250 $0
Total $15,000 $6,000 $3,000 $0
4 LD Claim $5,000 $1,000 $ 500 $ 500-$1,000
5 LD Claim $5,000 $2,500 $1,250 $1,250-$2,500
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Liquidated Damages
– How does the new policy impact LD exposures?
– Will ISF violations receive LD claims routinely like Late Entries?
Impact of New ISF Policy
100/Year % # Worst Best C-TPAT New C-TPAT C1 Bond
Violation 3% 1-3 $ 15,000 $ 6,000 $ 3,000 $0 $0 N/A
Violation 5% 5 $ 25,000 $11,000 $ 5,500 $3,500 $1,250 N/A
Violation 10% 10 $ 50,000 $23,500 $11,750 $17,500 $8,750 $50,000
Violation 20% 20 $100,000 $48,500 $24,250 $41,000 $20,500 $50,000
• Worst assumes $5,000 liquidated damage per violation, no mitigation
• Best assumes $1,000 for 1st time violation, $2,500 for all subsequent violations
• C-TPAT assumes 50% reduction of Best
• New is New Policy but doesn’t reflect 50% C-TPAT reduction
Craig, I heard there was a way to BAM down those
claims?
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Mitigating Factors • ISF-5 for FROB cargo is not subject to liquidated damages at this time, but would be subject to same
violation types and mitigating factors.
• 6 Mitigating Factors: 1) ISF progress since 1/26/09; 2) Small # of violations to shipments (as %);
3) C-TPAT Tier 2 or 3 status; 4) Demonstrated action to reduce future violations; 5/6) ISF filed late or inaccurate, can mitigate if due to factors outside importer’s control (such as carrier error).
• 4 Aggravating Factors: 1) Non-cooperative; 2) Multiple errors on the ISF;
3) Rising/Deteriorating Error Rate; 4) Smuggling/Fraud.
Violation Type Cause Max. 1st Violation All Other C-TPAT
ISF-10 Filing Late File $5,000 $1,000-$2,000 $2,500 50%
ISF-10 Filing Inaccurate Filing $5,000 $1,000-$2,000 $2,500 50%
ISF-10 Filing Inaccurate Update(s) $5,000 $1,000-$2,000 $2,500 50%
ISF-10 Filing Withdrawal/Deletion $5,000 $1,000-$2,000 $2,500 50%
ISF Mitigation Guidelines
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Mitigation Best Practices
• Importer’s ISF Performance Record – How long has importer been compliant with ISF?
– Emphasize importer’s compliance record (especially 3 warnings)
• Timeliness/Accuracy (95% timely/98% accurate)
• Include ISF Progress Report (from Filer or ACE portal)
• Overall cooperation
• C-TPAT Status – Request 50% mitigation based on C-TPAT status of importer
and/or ISF Filer.
• Describe Nature of Error or Violation – If clerical in nature, describe why it occurred?
– Was carrier at fault? Provide specific details.
– Was it a one-time or repeat violation? Explain.
– Outline how future violations will be avoided.
ISF Mitigation Best Practices
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
• Maintain Records for Mitigating Factors in Petitions
– CSMS# 14-000359 - Delays in ISF Processing on 6/20/14
– CSMS# 14-000260 - Disruption to ISF Bill Matches on 4/17/14
– CSMS# 14-000219 - Delays in ISF Processing on 4/17/14
– CSMS# 14-000129 - ISF Rejections on 3/20/14
• Other Mitigating Factors
– Carrier changes the B/L number causing a mismatch
– ISF was filed timely but B/L mismatch made it appear late
– One of the 3 ISF warnings was made in error based on the above or another reason, petition 4th claim for relief
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ACE ISF Portal
• All ACE accounts access ISF reports in same manner – Go to References Tab
– Select Task “Links” from Menu Panel on the left
– Button to “Launch ISF” will appear
• “Launch ISF” will open new window – Sign up for reports in Reports Menu
– Reports will then appear in Reports Tab (check daily) CSMS #11-000155 effective 7/13/11 http://apps.cbp.gov/csms/viewmssg.asp?Recid=18395&page=9&srch_argv=11-000155&srchtype=&btype=abi&sortby=&sby= http://apps.cbp.gov/csms/docs/18395_749938721/Final_Information_Notice_ISF_Portal.pdf
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Progress Reports
• Per CBP, only an estimate of ISF compliance
• C-TPAT tier 2 and 3 receive line item detail
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Progress Reports
• Measures ISF Timeliness based on Vessel Departure Messages (VDMs) received by CBP minus 24 hours per local time (based on mother vessel)
• “ISFs Not Measured for Timeliness” occur when no VDM received by CBP.
• Per CBP, these are not late ISFs and do not negatively affect an importer’s compliance rate.
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Reports in ACE
• CSMS #12-000031 dated 2/1/12
• Late ISF Report for ISF Filers and Importers
• By Filer by Importer Report — Available in PDF or Excel
— Allows for line item detail and compliance
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
ISF Surety Data in ACE
• Surety receives snapshot of ISF activity (monthly) • Since 3/10/14, surety receiving vessel departure message/date
• ISF Transaction Count based on Avalon Data – Based on Avalon data (ACE portal July 2011, VDMs March 2014
– Format/Filer: 80% ABI; 20% AMS
– Status: 99.89% Accepted; .11% Rejected
– Action Reason: 98.28% CT vs. Flexible Filing (FR, FT, FX)
– Bond Type: 98.4% CBs; 1.6% STBs
– ISFs Late: 16% based on Avalon’s data (not fully populated yet); 11% with more data (not complete data)
Bond
Holder
ISF
Imp #
ISF
Imp
Name
Filer#
Name VDM
ISF
Sent
Date
Formt Action Status Action
Reason
Shipment
Type
ISF
Status
ISF
# SCAC
Bill
#
Bill
Type
Bond
Type
Bond
Code Error
Bond
#
Name
09/10/13
01:38:10
PM
09/06/13
01:38:24
PM ABI Add Active CT 01 Accepted BM 9 16 STB#
IR#
09/08/13
2:10:28
PM
09/13/13
04:19:38
PM AMS Add Active CT 01 Accepted OB 8 1 CTB#
ISF Transaction Query Allows the user to query ISF transaction
details by Importer#, Bond#, SCAC code,
B/L# or ISF transaction#.
The user may enter a value into one field
to see all relevant results or enter values in
multiple fields to narrow down the results.
A snapshot of the generated report will
appear on screen and it can be exported
as an Excel or PDF file.
ISF Transaction Data
Report Results
Importer No Importer Name
ABC IMPORTER
ABC IMPORTER
Bond No
9876U1234
9876U1236
Bill No
1234567890
3546567890
ISF Transaction No
ABC-61568708693
ABC-61568708693
10-123456789
10-123456789
ABC IMPORTER
ABC IMPORTER
9876U1240
9876U1246
1234567683
4324165487
ABC-75323708693
ABC-75323346431
10-123456789 ABC IMPORTER 9876U1253 9687654323 ABC-69935138693
10-123456789
10-123456789
Report Criteria
Description : Generate a report of ISF transaction details for the chosen criteria.
Run Report
Importer No: Bond Serial No:
Filer or SCAC Code: ISF Transaction No:
10-123456789 Bond No:
Bill No:
ISF Transaction Date
1/2/2014 10:31:08 PM
1/16/2014 4:26:19 AM
1/7/2014 10:44:14 PM
1/27/2014 02:04:14 PM
1/12/2014 06:42:00 AM
ISF Transaction DataISF Transaction Data
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Contact and Links to Information
Avalon Risk Management
ISF Questions Group email: [email protected], Hot Line: 847-700-8473
ISF Claim Questions Zuleika Medina: [email protected], Surety Claims Manager
ISF Information http://www.avalonrisk.com/isf.html;
CBP Information
Craig Clark [email protected] or [email protected]
CBP ISF Page http://www.cbp.gov/border-security/ports-entry/cargo-security/importer-security-filing-102
CBP ISF FAQs http://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/10_2faq_0.pdf http://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Addendum to FAQ_Updated ISF Enforcement Strategy.pdf
ISF Mitigation Guidelines http://www.avalonrisk.com/questnewsletter/news/mitigation.pdf
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Questions?
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014
Premier Provider of Innovative Insurance and Surety Solutions
This presentation is not open to the press and has a legal Copyright © June 2014