· Web viewProposal for Identification of Crop Varieties. XXXXX. BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum ....
Transcript of · Web viewProposal for Identification of Crop Varieties. XXXXX. BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum ....
Proposal for Identification of Crop Varieties
XXXXXBREAD WHEAT
(Triticum aestivum L.)
for Cultivation Conditions of XXXXX Zone
(Maharashtra and Karnataka under irrigated timely sown conditions)
Submitted to
Varietal identification CommitteeAICRP on Wheat and Barley
Name of proposing department and institute or University with
Logo
1
photograph
Field View of proposed bread wheat variety XXXXX
2
Proforma for Submission of Proposals for Identification of Crop Varieties/
Hybrids by Workshops
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
3
Insert a photograph of proposed variety in landscape
Field view photograph Field view photograph
XXXXXX: Some characteristic features
At heading stage Spike Spikelets
Lower glume Germ width and crease
1
photograph photograph photograph
photograph photograph photograph
Proposal for Identification of Wheat Variety XXXXXX for XXXXXXXXX conditions of XXXXXX Zone by Varietal Identification committee of AICRP on Wheat and Barley
1. Name of the crop and species : Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
2.a) Name of the variety
under which tested in AICRP trials
: XXXXX
b) Proposed name of the variety : XXXXX
3. Sponsored by (institute) : XXXXXXXXXXXXX4. a) Institution or agency
responsible for developing variety
: XXXXXXXXXXXX
b) Name of the person who helped in the development of the variety
:
A. Developers:Scientific StaffName Role/ContributionXXXX : XXXX
XXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX
B. CollaboratorsXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX
C. Technical Assistance in developmentXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX
5. a) Parentage (with details of its pedigree including source from which variety/ Inbred/A, B and R lines of hybrid has been developed)
: XXXX
b) Source of material in case of introduction : XXXX
c) DNA profile of variety/inbred/A, B, R line of hybrid vis à-vis check variety/ line
Please see Table No. 6
d) Breeding method used : Selection
e) Breeding objective : To develop high yielding bread wheat varieties with better quality attributes.
6. State the varieties which are most closely resemble the proposed variety in general characters
:Varieties Pl. Ht.
(cm)Earshape
Ear density
Grain shape
Grain hardness
XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
1
XXXXXX XX
XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
7.Recommended productions ecology (Rainfed/Irrigated; high/low fertility; season)
: XXXX
8.
Specific area of its adaptation (zones and states for which variety is proposed) and recommended productions ecology
: XXXX.
9. Description of variety :a) Plant height : XXXXb) Distinguishing
morphological characters : Please see attached varietal description Annexure I
c) Maturity (range in number of days) (from seedling/ transplanting to flowering, seed to seed)
:
Seed to flowering: XX days (Range: XX-XX days) Seed to seed: XX days (Range: XX-XX days)
Details in Table. No. 1.2d) Maturity group (early,
medium and late wherever such classification exists)
: XXXX
e) Reaction to major diseases under field and controlled conditions (reaction to physiological strains/ races/pathotypes/ bio-types to be indicated wherever possible )
:Bullet points describing disease reaction
Please see Table 3,3.1a,b,c and 3.2.
f) Reaction to major pests (under field and controlled)
:Bullet points describing pest reaction
Please see Table No. 4g) Agronomic features (e.g.
resistance to lodging, shattering, fertilizer responsiveness, suitability to early or late sown conditions, seed rate etc.)
:Bullet points describing agronomic performance
Please see Table No. 2 & 2.1
10. Quality of produce :
Grain quality : Bullet points describing quality performance
Please see Table No. 5 and 5.111. a) Yield data in coordinated
trials (breeding, agronomy, pathology, entomology, quality etc) regional/inter regional district trials year wise (levels of fertilizer application, density of plant population and superiority over local control/standard variety to
: Bullet points describing performance in yield trials in comparison to checks
2
be indicated (to be attached)
b) Yield data from national, demonstration/large scale demonstrations (to be attached)
: Not applicable
12. a) Agency responsible for maintaining breeder seed : XXXX
b) Quantity of breeder seed in stock (kg)
Variety:
XX quintals of breeder seed is available to meet all the requirements of seed chain.
13.
Specific recommendations, if any, for seed production (e.g. staggered sowing, plating ratio of parental lines of hybrids in foundation and certified seed production, probable area of seed production)
: There is no specific recommendation for seed production of XXXX.
14.Vivid presentation (field view, close-up of single plant and seed)
: Attached overleaf
15. Package of practices along with attainable yield levels : Please see Table No.7
16. Any other pertinent information : Briefly describe highlights of varietal performance in
comparison to check variety(s)
3
Signature of all contributors in development
(XXXX) (XXXX) (XXXX) (XXXX)
Proposed by
Sponsored by
(XXXXXXXX)Head of organization/Institute/University
Address
4
( XXXX)DesignationAddress
( XXXX)Head of departmentAddress
5
Checklist for Identification of Wheat Variety XXXXX for XXXXX condition of XXXXX Zone by Varietal Identification Committee of AICRP on Wheat and Barley, Year
Sl No. Details/document Attached
1. Parentage with details of its pedigree including source from which variety/Inbred/A, B and R lines of hybrid has been developed Yes No
2. Source of material in case of introduction (IC/EC numbers provided by NBPGR) Yes No
3. Flow chart of details of development of variety/ parental lines of hybrids NA
4. Molecular/ DNA profile of variety/hybrid/A, B, R line of hybrid vis-à-vis check variety/ line (details of unique amplicons that distinguishing markers along with photographs
Yes No
5. Detailed description of hybrid/variety Yes No
6. Detailed description of the parental lines of hybrid NA
7. Yield data and other data on diseases, insect-pest, quality etc. from coordinated trials Yes No
8. Yield data from national, demonstration/large scale demonstrations NA
9. Specific recommendations, if any, for seed production (e.g. staggered sowing, planting ratio of parental lines of hybrids in foundation and certified seed production, probable area of seed production etc.)
Yes No
10. Vivid presentation (field view, close-up of single plant and seed) with the help of photographs of the variety) Yes No
11. Package of practices Yes No
12. Proforma signed by all co-authors and Head of Organization Yes No
13. Any other pertinent information NA
Signature of Head of the Institution
6
Table 1. Summary yield data of Coordinated Varietal Trials
Name of the proposed variety : DBW168 Adaptability Zone : PZProduction conditions : Irrigated timely sown
Items Year of testing Trials
Proposed variety Check varieties
CD (0.05)
XXXX Check var1
Check var2
Check var3
Check var4
Yield (q/ha)
Year1 (name of trial) 5Year2 (AVT I) 11Year3 (AVT II) 10MeanWeighted mean
% Increase / decrease over checks
Year1 (name of trial)Year2 (AVT I)Year3 (AVT II)Over meanOver weighted mean
Frequency in 1st NS group
Year1 (name of trial)Year2 (AVT I)Year3 (AVT II)Total
7
Table 1.1: Yield data (q/h) of coordinated trials at individual locations
Name of the proposed variety : XXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXProduction conditions: XXXXX
Locations
Proposed variety Check Varieties CD
(5%)XXX Check var1
Check var2
Check var3
Check var4
NIVT- (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2..Centre nFrequency in 1st NSGAVT-I (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2........Centre nFrequency in 1st NSGAVT-II (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2.......Centre nFrequency in 1st NSG
Yield potential (q/ha)# indicates entry in 1st non-significant group
8
Table 1.2. Data on ancillary characters
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXX
Production conditions :
XXX
Year
Proposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4
Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean
Heading (days)
Year1
Year2
Year3
Mean
Maturity (days)
Year1
Year2
Year3
Mean
Plant height (cm)
Year1
Year2
Year3
Mean
1000-grain weight (g)
Year1
Year2
Year3
Mean
9
Table 2. Adaptability to Agronomic Variables
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions :
XXXXX
Experiment / Item Sowing Time
Proposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3
Check var4
Yield (q/ha)
Timely
Late
Mean
% gain/loss in yield with late sowing over timely sowing
% Increase / decrease over checks
Timely
Late
Over mean
CD (P=0.05):Sowing=1.05; Variety = 1.40; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS
10
Table 2.1: Adaptability to agronomic variables
Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX
Experiment / Item Sowing Time
Proposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check
var3Check var4
Earheads/m2
Timely
Late
MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=6.04; Variety = NS; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS
Number of Grains per spike
Timely
Late
MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=0.97; Variety = NS; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time
within Variety = NS
1000-Grain Weight (g)
Timely
Late
MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=0.47; Variety = 0.73; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS
11
Table 3: Reaction to major diseasesName of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions :
XXXXX
Disease Year
Proposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1
Check var2
Check var3
Check var4
HS ACI HS ACI HS ACI HS ACI HS ACIYellow Rust
Natural condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
Artificial condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
Brown Rust
Natural condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
Artificial condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
Stem Rust
Natural condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
Artificial condition
Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI
HS = Highest score, ACI = Average coefficient of infection, ND- Not developed
12
Table 3.1: APR response to rust pathotypes and AUDPC values
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions : XXXXX
Disease Pathotype Location
Proposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4
Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3
Yellow rust
APR ResponseCentre1Centre2..Centre n
AUDPC Values Centre
Brown rust
APR ResponseCentre1Centre2Centre3Centre1Centre2Centre3
AUDPC Values Centre
Black (Stem) rust
APR ResponseCentre1Centre2Centre3Centre1Centre2
13
Centre3AUDPC Values
Centre
14
Table 3.1a: SRT Data on Yellow/Leaf/Stem (Black)/ rust (Flowedale/mahabaleshwar)
Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX
PathotypeXXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4
Table 3.1b: SRT Data on Yellow/Leaf/Stem (Black)/ rust (Flowedale/mahabaleshwar)
PathotypeXXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4
Table 3.1c. Gene Postulation based on SRT data
DiseaseProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4
Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3Yellow RustBlack RustBrown Rust
15
Table 3.2: Reaction to other diseases
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions :
XXXXX
Disease Year
Proposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1
Check var2
Check var3
Check var4
HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av
Karnal Bunt
Year2
Year2
Mean
Leaf Blight (dd)
Year2
Year2
Mean
FHB or Head Scab (0-5)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Powdery Mildew (0-9)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Flag Smut (%)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Foot Rot (%)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Loose Smut (%)Year2
Year3
HS = Highest score, AV = Average score
16
Table 4: Reaction to insect pests
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions :
XXXXX
Disease Year
Proposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1
Check var2
Check var3
Check var4
HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av
Shoot fly incidence (%)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Brown wheat mite(no. of mites/10cm2 area)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Wheat aphid (Score 1-5)
Year2
Year2
Mean
Root aphid (Score 1-5)
Year2
Year2
MeanHS = Highest score, AV = Average score
17
Table 5: Data on important quality characteristics
Name of the proposed variety :
XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX
Production conditions :
XXXXX
Grain characteristics
YearProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check
var2Check var3 Check var4
Protein (%)
Year1Year2
Year3
Mean
Grain appearance (max score 10)
Year1Year2
Year3
Mean
Hectolitre weight (kg/hl)
Year1Year2
Year3
Mean
Sedimentation value (ml)
Year1Year2
Year3
Mean
Grain Hardness index
Year1Year2
Year3
Mean
18
Table 5.1: Data on other quality characteristics
Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX
Chapati, bread and biscuit quality
YearProposed variety Check Varieties
XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4Chapati, bread and biscuit quality
Chapati quality (max score 10)Bread loaf volume (ml)Bread quality (max score 10)Extraction rate (%)Biscuit spread factorDry gluten (%)Wet gluten (%)Gluten index (%)Phenol test (max score 10) Nutritional qualityYellow pigment (ppm)Fe (ppm)Zn (ppm)
High molecular weight glutenin subunits
YearProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4
HMW subunitsGlu-D1Glu-A1Glu-B1Glu-1 Score
19
Table 6: Marker profile generated using selected set of STS / ASPCR markers.
Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX
GenotypesMarkers
Rhtb VP1B3A Wxb1A Vrn-
1aVrnA1b
R1VrnA1b
R2Ppd-D1 PPO33 DuPw004 Lr10 Lr34228 414 290 481 A B
XXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4
20
Figure 1. Dendrogram showing relative diversity of genotypes under the Advanced Varietal Trial (second year entries and checks)
21
Paste the Dendrogram showing relative diversity of genotypes under the Advanced Varietal Trial here
Figure 2. Flow chart of details of development of bread wheat variety DBW168
22
Paste the pedigree flow chart of your variety here
Table: 7. Package of practices along with attainable yield levels.
1. Suitability of the variety for the area:
2. Selection of field and/land preparation:
3. Seed treatment:4. Sowing time:5. Seed rate/sowing
method:6. Fertilizer doses:7. Weed control:
8. Pest and Disease control :
9. Irrigation:10. Harvesting:11. Quality: 12. Mean Yield:13. Potential Yield:
23
Annexure IXXXXX
Varietal Description (Based on DUS descriptors)
1. Coleoptile (Anthocyanin pigmentation) :2. Growth habit :3. Foliage colour (Boot stage) :4. Flag leaf
1. Attitude :2. Anthocyanin pigmentation of auricles :3. Hairs on auricles :4. Waxiness of sheath :5. Waxiness of blade :6. Length :7. Width :
5. Culm: waxiness of peduncle :6. Average heading days (75% ears emerge) :7. Average maturity days (75% ears turn yellow) :8. Plant height (excluding awns) :9. Ears
a. Waxiness :b. Shape in profile :c. Density :d. Length excluding awns :e. Colour :
10. Awns or scurs a. Presence :b. Length :c. Colour :d. Altitude :
11. Outer glume pubescence :12. Lower glume
a. Shoulder width :b. Shoulder shape :c. Beak length :d. Beak shape :
13. Peduncle a. Length :b. Attitude :
14. Grain a. Colour :b. Shape :c. Germ width :d. Crease :e. Brush hair :f. Hardness :g. 1000-grains weight :
15. Any other special feature(s) :
24