merbunwfors.files.wordpress.com · Web viewCharles Darwin proposed the concept of sexual...
Transcript of merbunwfors.files.wordpress.com · Web viewCharles Darwin proposed the concept of sexual...
Meril BennyEnglish 21003Prof. Magliato
Survey Report: Do Americans like to date outside their race?
Abstract
This research was conducted to determine if Americans like to date outside their race.
Scientist, Jared Diamond’s research claims that humans often choose partners that are similar to
them. Race is a system created by humans to classify themselves according to shared physical
traits, genetics or ancestry. Interracial coupling has only become common in recent years, as
once in this country it was something people got punished for. In order to understand the validity
of diamond’s claim, a survey was created and sent out to eighty individuals of different races, to
understand if they preferred to date outside their race or not. The results yielded were that of 18-
24 years old Americans like to find partners outside their races. And elements such as religion,
political stance, education and other social traits are significantly influential on the selection
process over race.
Introduction
Charles Darwin proposed the concept of sexual selection 150 years ago in On the Origin
of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Darwin's theory, that of natural selection, offered an
explanation that the scientific community—and society in general—could, at the very least,
vigorously discuss (“Mate Choice and Sexual selection”, 2009). Mating selection in the 20th
century however has been drastically different. Humans selection of mates have been depended
on many different factors such as physical and social traits of a person. Humans often choose
people who are similar too them and look for people that most resemble themselves. This brings
about my question if Americans in the 20th century prefer to date/ find partners of their own race
or outside their race. According to Jared Diamond,
humans create a “search image” for their potential
partner at a very young age. Diamond states that this
search image often resembles themselves or people
close to them.
Race is a social construct created by humans to
group people. It is not biological. Yet, it is a factor that
divided this country from the very beginning and also it
is something that we refuse to discuss. Political and
racial tension is extremely high at the moment. Hate
between different groups is also very relevant. These
factors affect the way people choose their mates. Race
and ethnicity when choosing partners is important to
people because, it is a big element that you have in
common with. This research report will allow us to see
how much importance people give to the matter of race
while finding a mate. Fig 1
Method
The hypothesis, “Do Americans like to date within their race” was tested by creating an online
survey using Google Forms, and collecting the results of 80 individuals. The survey was divided
into four sections and 30 questions were given in total. The first section included the
biographical questions, such as age, race, years lived in the US, gender (figure 1).
In the second section, I included 6 questions
(6-11) on the physical traits that affect the
process of selecting a partner. These questions
were to be answered on a scale of 1 to 5. One
being not important and 5 being very
important. In the third section I included 6
questions on the social traits that affect the
process of selecting a partner. These questions
( 12-17) were also to be answered on a linear
scale from 1 to 5.
Fig 2
Fig 3
The fourth section mainly focused on the
questions that will help me test my
hypothesis. I included question on religion,
race, and ethnicity, which are all important to
people and their different cultures. (questions
18-29). The first two questions were to be
answered on a linear scale of 1-5 and the rest
were to be answered in a multiple choice
format. Fig 4 & 5
I also chose to include a question
asking for any comments in a
short answer format so I can get
some feedback on the survey.
The survey was distributed using text messages, Facebook and Instagram posts. I received more
than enough responses so I closed the survey at 80. I tried to get people of different races. So I
posted the survey on the CCNY Facebook page
for buying and selling items. After collecting
data from the 80 respondents, Google forms
calculated the information automatically and
gave me the data in charts and graphs. The
multiple choice answers were visualized in pie
charts and the the linear scale answers were
visualized in bar graphs.
Results
The survey was conducted to find out whether
Americans like to date within or outside their
own race. The majority of the survey was taken
by people ages 18- 24 (91.3%) The majority
respondents were female (75%) and the
majority respondents were born in the US
(72.5%). The respondents were 46.3% Asian or
Pacific Islander, 21.3% Hispanic or Latino,
11.3% White, 8.8% Black, and 8.4% were
mixed or other races. Fig 6
The answers from the second section showed the
importance of physicals traits when selecting a
partner.I inluded height, weight, skin color, body
type, eye and hair color. Majority of the respondents
picked options 3&4 for height and weight and body
type which shows that these two factors are quite
important when choosing a partner. The answers for
the importance of skin color was of a descending
order. This was interesting because the majority was
1, (not important 32.5%), and the percentage
decreased from 1 to 5. Half of the respondents
answered that eye and hair color were not important,
the rest were between 2-4, and two people (2.5%)
answered that these two traits are very important.
From these six questions, its is clear that the minority
of the respondents find these physical traits to be
very important when selcecting a partner. Skin color
especially stood between option 1,2& 3 which are the
‘not moderately important’ options.Only 2-9 people
out to 80 found these physical traits to be exteremly
important.
Fig 7
The third section of questions which gathered people’s
opinion on social traits when selecting a partner .The question
of political affiliation got a variety of answers. But the
majority was option 4, which means that it is moderrately
important. Wealth or Economic status was given a 3 by the
majority so it’s a factor that is a factor of some importance.
The question of religious backgroud gave me two different,
almost half anf half responses. 23.8% answered that religion
was not important, 27.5% answered that it was very
important , 16.3% answerd option 2, 17.5% answered 3 and
15% answered 4. Intelellect or educational backgroud had a
gradual increading trend of answers, but the majority found
this factor to be important - very important .
Fig 8
Fig 9
Age was given importance (Figure 9) , and the majority of the respondents believed that it was
not important for their partner to be mulilingual (fig 9), 41.3 % answered not important. How it
was not a staggerening response, 23.8% answered option 3, 16.3% answered 4 and 5% answered
(5), very important.
Fig 10
Figure 10,11 & 12 shows the next set
of questions that I asked which
focused on race and dating and
religion. When asked between race
and religion, 77.5% answered they
find religion more important than race.
81.3% of my respondents answered
that they would rather find someone
compatible over a partner their family
approves. I asked my survey
participators if they have ever dated
interracially. Half of them said yes and
half said no (. The rest answered that they have not dated interracially. I asked if they would
would be open to interracial dating and almost all answered yes, except for the 5% who said they
are not open to dating outside their race, and the rest said its complicated. When I asked if people
found people of other races attractive 93.8 % answered yes, 3.7% answered no and 2.4%
answered maybe/ depends.
Fig 11
Fig 12
I asked if participators if their parents would support their decision if they chose of date someone
of another race, (first chart in figure 12) and the majority 43.7% said maybe, 37.5% said yes, and
17.5% said no, 1.2% said yes only if they’re religiously similar. The second question on figure
10, got a 98.8% yes and one person said no, they wouldn’t support a friend or sibling who was
dating a person of another race. I also reflected interracial dating on their own kids by asking if
they would care if their son/daughter marry someone outside their race. 80% percent said no,
15% percent said yes, the rest said not sure/ if they’re religiously similar. The last question was
just asking for any comments and figure 13 shows the responses that I received.
Discussion
The data collected in the survey suggest that Americans are open to dating outside their
race if the opportunity arises. According to that data 93.8% of my respondents find people of
other races attractive. And 91.3% were open to dating people of other races. Dating in 2017 in
America where our culture is so diverse and have people of all races and identities have an
impact on our preferences. Jarred Diamond states that our childhood upbringing, and people
around us have an affect on who we choose as our partners. America has been a home to people
immigrating from all over the world since the beginning of this country. We are not in a country
where its people just look one way. We are country of diverse people and culture and growing up
in such environment influences our preferences.
Diamond’s findings suggested, that religion and personality influences our choice more
that physical appearance. This could be supported through my survey, according to the responses
on the question, “Which is more important to you: Partner of the same religion or race”, 77.5%
answered religion and 22.5% answered race. Religion is an element that people value, and
people tend to find partners who shares the same religion, which makes them more compatible. I
received several responses where they answered “If religiously similar” on many other question.
Which shows that people care deeply about aspects such as religion, personal beliefs, and values
over the color of someone’s skin or their race. This could be also seen through the responses on
the importance of skin color, political affiliation, intellect, age, wealth and religious background.
The majority found skin color to have little importance but on the contrary found political
affiliation, intellect, age, wealth and religion important. When asked if their parents would
support their decision to date someone outside their race, the majority said maybe. One
respondent said that their parents were xenophobic and another said if religiously similar. These
answers show that even though our culture is so diverse in this day and age, most people’s
family/ parents prefer to date within their own people. Parents prefer for us to find people like
them. When asked if they rather choose someone their parents approve or some one who is
compatible 81.3% answered someone who is compatible. This also suggests how dating/ finding
partners is different in 2017.
The ‘comments’ question yielded some interesting responses (fig 11). One respondent
with a religious and conservative background expressed (4th comment) that people need to see
beyond wealth, economic status, race and religion. Which is suggesting that they do not find
these aspects to be important while choosing a partner. While another respondent (7th comment)
added that these elements are important, and that they should be similar in values, and that there
should be ‘giving and receiving’ equally in all aspects of a relationship. They also added that
dating apps are superficial and only shows the physical aspects of a person and that there is no
real connection. These two responses which shows two different view point that I received in my
results. These opinions and preferences may be formed due to how they were raised and where
they grew up. As Diamond stated, our upbringing affects how and who we choose as our
partners.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this survey shows that people in the 20th century do like to date outside
their own race. However, race does not play a major role in the selection process. One’s physical
and social traits seemed to be of more value over anything else. The survey showed that some
people still found race, skin, color, and other physical traits to be very important. But the
majority of the respondents found it to have less importance. My survey results correspond to
Jared Diamond’s philosophy in mate selection to some extent.
References
Jones, G.A. (n.d). Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin?
Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/106/Supplement_1/10001.full
Diamond, J.M. (1992). The third chimpanzee: the evolution and future of the human animal.
New York, NY: Harper Collins