Web 2 0 Rubrics
3
PEER ASSESSMENT THE WIKI CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 0 Content/facts Everything covered in a comprehensive and clear way. Most things covered in a comprehensive and clear way. Some areas covered but some things are missing. Lots of missing bits, but what’s there is good. What happened to your wiki? Graphics Graphics and/or multimedia effectively and tastefully used to enhance the content/ presentation. Graphics and/or multimedia used to enhance the content/ presentation. Graphics and/or multimedia used, but are not always relevant/ do not always enhance the content/ presentation. Graphics and/or multimedia are distracting/detract from the content/ presentation. Graphics and/or multimedia missing, irrelevant OR detract from the content/ presentation. The Wiki Looks great and is easy to understand. Looks good and is pretty clear. Looks okay but can be confusing. Doesn’t look finished/more effort could have been put in. Things aren’t too clear. Where’s your wiki? Navigation Clear and easily navigated. Links make sense and are well named. Easily navigated. Links make sense and are mostly well named. Navigation was okay, although some links had strange names or were confusing. Really confusing navigation/ everything on one page. I got lost! /16 COLLABORATION AND TEAMWORK CATEGORY Advanced (3) Proficient (2) Unsatisfactory (1) Initiative Leader in group, organized work, checked on progress, and gave direction. Played an active role in coming up with new ideas, took initiative in getting tasks completed, asked for help when needed Played a passive role, generating few new ideas; usually did only what he/she was told to do, did not ask for help Support Actively helped others and checked on progress. Helped other members when asked, listened to the others’ ideas, acted in a positive way towards the project and the group Seemed incapable of helping others or was not willing to participate/ criticised project or group members/ acted as a distraction Problem-solving Actively looks for and suggests solutions to problems. Does not suggest or refine solutions, but is willing to try out solutions suggested by others. Does not try to solve problems or help others solve problems. Lets others do the work. Contributions and work ethic Helped out with all work not done, demonstrated willingness to work outside of class time if necessary to complete project Prepared to work each day, completed his/her tasks on time, spent most of the work time productively, was only absent if absolutely necessary Off-task, did not complete assignments/did not attend class during project work time/ contributed only to minor parts of the project Work-sharing with tadalist.com A tadalist created. Tasks fairly shared and completed. A screen dump of tadalist submitted. A tadalist created. Tasks not necessarily fairly shared/completed. A screen dump of tadalist submitted. A tadalist not created/tasks not allocated/tasks not completed. A screen dump of tadalist not submitted. Working with Others Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together. Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others, but sometimes is not a good team member. Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Often is not a good team player. Time Use Classroom time was used to work on the project. Conversations were focused on the work and not disruptive. Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time, but conversations could be disruptive or did not focus on the work. Student did not use classroom time to work on the project and/or was highly disruptive. Collaborating on the internet All work uploaded to GoogleDocs and effectively shared with partner. Screen dumps of GoogleDocs submitted. Some work uploaded to GoogleDocs but not always used or shared with partner. Screen dumps of GoogleDocs submitted. No work uploaded to GoogleDocs. Screen dumps not submitted. /24
-
Upload
buhall -
Category
Technology
-
view
322 -
download
0
Transcript of Web 2 0 Rubrics
PEER ASSESSMENT THE WIKI
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 0
Content/facts Everything covered in a comprehensive and clear way.
Most things covered in a comprehensive and clear way.
Some areas covered but some things are missing.
Lots of missing bits, but what’s there is good.
What happened to your wiki?
Graphics
Graphics and/or multimedia effectively and tastefully used to enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia used to enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia used, but are not always relevant/ do not always enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia are distracting/detract from the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia missing, irrelevant OR detract from the content/ presentation.
The Wiki Looks great and is easy to understand.
Looks good and is pretty clear.
Looks okay but can be confusing.
Doesn’t look finished/more effort could have been put in. Things aren’t too clear.
Where’s your wiki?
Navigation Clear and easily navigated. Links make sense and are well named.
Easily navigated. Links make sense and are mostly well named.
Navigation was okay, although some links had strange names or were confusing.
Really confusing navigation/ everything on one page.
I got lost!
/16
COLLABORATION AND TEAMWORK CATEGORY Advanced (3) Proficient (2) Unsatisfactory (1)
Initiative Leader in group, organized work, checked on progress, and gave direction.
Played an active role in coming up with new ideas, took initiative in getting tasks completed, asked for help when needed
Played a passive role, generating few new ideas; usually did only what he/she was told to do, did not ask for help
Support Actively helped others and checked on progress.
Helped other members when asked, listened to the others’ ideas, acted in a positive way towards the project and the group
Seemed incapable of helping others or was not willing to participate/ criticised project or group members/ acted as a distraction
Problem-solving Actively looks for and suggests solutions to problems.
Does not suggest or refine solutions, but is willing to try out solutions suggested by others.
Does not try to solve problems or help others solve problems. Lets others do the work.
Contributions and work ethic
Helped out with all work not done, demonstrated willingness to work outside of class time if necessary to complete project
Prepared to work each day, completed his/her tasks on time, spent most of the work time productively, was only absent if absolutely necessary
Off-task, did not complete assignments/did not attend class during project work time/ contributed only to minor parts of the project
Work-sharing with tadalist.com
A tadalist created. Tasks fairly shared and completed. A screen dump of tadalist submitted.
A tadalist created. Tasks not necessarily fairly shared/completed. A screen dump of tadalist submitted.
A tadalist not created/tasks not allocated/tasks not completed. A screen dump of tadalist not submitted.
Working with Others
Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together.
Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others, but sometimes is not a good team member.
Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Often is not a good team player.
Time Use Classroom time was used to work on the project. Conversations were focused on the work and not disruptive.
Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time, but conversations could be disruptive or did not focus on the work.
Student did not use classroom time to work on the project and/or was highly disruptive.
Collaborating on the internet
All work uploaded to GoogleDocs and effectively shared with partner. Screen dumps of GoogleDocs submitted.
Some work uploaded to GoogleDocs but not always used or shared with partner. Screen dumps of GoogleDocs submitted.
No work uploaded to GoogleDocs. Screen dumps not submitted.
/24
LANGUAGE OF THE WEB CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 0
Content/facts
More than 10 web terms are explained. A quiz or activity is included on the wiki, which uses these words effectively.
At least 10 web terms are explained. A quiz or activity is included on the wiki, which uses these words effectively.
10 web terms are explained, but things might be unclear. A quiz or activity is included on the wiki, which uses these words, but the game could be more effective.
Fewer than 10 web terms explained/ explanation not always correct. Quiz not included, or is not relevant/ effective.
No web terms explained.
Graphics
Graphics and/or multimedia effectively and tastefully used to enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia used to enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia used, but are not always relevant/do not always enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia are distracting/detract from the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia missing, irrelevant OR detract from the content/presentation.
Mechanics No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
A few grammatical spelling or punctuation errors.
Many grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
Grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors makes the writing too difficult to understand.
Referencing All resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Most resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Resources are referenced, although the format is not always correct.
Resources rarely referenced/incorrect format.
No resources referenced.
/16
WEB 2.0?! I DIDN’T KNOW THERE WAS A 1.0! CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 0
Content/facts
All questions answered in a comprehensive and clear explanation of Web 2.0, written in student’s own words.
Most questions answered clearly on Web 2.0, written in student’s own words.
Most questions answered on Web 2.0, but not always written in student’s own words.
Few questions answered on Web 2.0. but not in students own words
Questions on Web 2.0 not answered.
Internet Use
Successfully uses internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Usually able to use internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Occasionally able to use internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.
Was not able to use internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.
Graphics
Graphics and/or multimedia effectively and tastefully used to enhance the content/presentation
Graphics and/or multimedia used to enhance the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia used, but are not always relevant/do not always enhance the content/presentation
Graphics and/or multimedia are distracting/detract from the content/ presentation.
Graphics and/or multimedia missing, irrelevant OR detract from the content/presentation
Mechanics No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
A few grammatical spelling or punctuation errors.
Many grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
Grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors makes the writing too difficult to understand.
Referencing All resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Most resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Resources are referenced, although the format is not always correct.
Resources rarely referenced/incorrect format.
No resources referenced.
/20
WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 0
Graphics
The interactive timeline website was effectively used, and the widget is well placed in the wiki.
The interactive timeline website was pretty well used, and the widget is appropriately placed in the wiki.
The interactive timeline website was used to some extent, and the widget is placed in the wiki.
The timeline is barely used but is placed in the wiki.
The time line is not used/not placed in the wiki.
Internet Use
Successfully uses internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Usually able to use internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Occasionally able to use internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.
Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.
Was not able to use internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.
Content/facts
All questions answered in a comprehensive and clear explanation of the history of the internet, written in student’s own words.
Most questions answered clearly on the history of the internet, written in student’s own words.
Questions answered on the history of the internet, but not always written in student’s own words.
Few questions answered on the history of the internet, but not in students own words
Questions on the history of the internet not answered.
Timeline
Key facts and dates were identified for all major events. The timeline comprehensively covers 1950s – 2009.
Key facts and dates were identified for most major events. The timeline covers 1950s – 2009.
Key facts and dates were identified for some major events. The timeline covers some parts of 1950s – 2009.
Only some key facts and dates reported on the timeline. 1950s-2009 not properly covered.
Only a few key facts and dates reported/facts and dates not relevant.
Mechanics No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
A few grammatical spelling or punctuation errors.
Many grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
Grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors makes the writing too difficult to understand.
Referencing All resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Most resources are referenced, in the correct format.
Resources are referenced, although the format is not always correct.
Resources rarely referenced/incorrect format.
No resources referenced.
/24
Overall total: /100 Overall grade:
