Weather Bombs as impact Parameter 08032017
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
marco-pluijm -
Category
Environment
-
view
18 -
download
0
Transcript of Weather Bombs as impact Parameter 08032017
© Marco Pluijm 08/03/2017
© Express
Weather Bombs as Impact Parameter Marco Pluijm M.Sc. Innovator and Seasoned Professional Weather bombs are hot. Judging the number of articles in the media about this phenomenon, one could conclude that they are increasing in frequency of occurrence and intensity. What some articles also tell us is that not all weather bombs actually deserve that qualification. It’s also the new media who seem to love the typecasting as a part of their headlines. It attracts attention and so do the spectacular pictures that often come with it The formal definition of a “weather bomb” is a type of extratropical cyclone, characterized by a low pressure system in which the central barometric pressure drops at least 24 millibar in 24 hours. Weather bombs come with hurricane-‐force winds, massive waves, extreme downpour or very heavy snowfall. Records show average waves of 14 to 15 meters high along the UK West Coast, with in there much larger extremes. Based on a global 30-‐year dataset, it is estimated that every year there are between 45 and 65 of these explosive events across the world, mainly in the northern hemisphere. The actual number is thought to be much higher and hard to predict due to significant gaps in the global observation networks. Which also makes that their trend in terms of frequency and intensity is equal debatable.
© Marco Pluijm 08/03/2017
However, linking weather bombs with the increased activity of hurricanes, provides a hypothesis of similar growth of frequency and activity. Regardless the actual number, given their presence, relative short duration and recorded massive impact forces, weather bombs shall be taken into account as an integral part of accelerated climate change. Which brings them in the same category as hurricanes, storm surges, etc. All extreme wather impact impact phenomena which do not seem to follow traditional patterns any more. As a consequence of which coastal defense strategies and structures need to be planned and designed with much larger flexibility and internal redundancy. Calling for a different approach all together. The current, traditional strategy with regard to coastal defense and maintenance, is mainly pretty much based on a 2-‐Dimensional approach. A way of coastline defense and maintenance which is loosing terrain faster and faster, in more than one way. Due to the increase in the unpredictability and impact forces, mitigating measures such as sand nourishments are becoming less and less attractive or have even become obsolete all together. Also due to their often marginal structured effectiveness and non sustainability. Whatever sand an d other sediment resources shall be used in a much more sophisticated way. Given the challenges of today, the way forward is moving on towards a true 3-‐Deimensional approach, covering and including a much wider area of the foreshore and by taking into account all of the relevant coastal features, present or to be reconstructed or enhanced. Integrating them into adequate and much more extreme weather impact safe, resilient and sustainable solutions. One of the challenges to meet, is that the required knowledge to do so, often seem to have eroded with about the same pace as many of these re-‐nourished beaches, dunes and foreshores. The industry has put basically all its effort in developing bigger and faster models, however without extending and improving their functionalities or interaction. When evaluating the capabilities and computational models which are currently on the market for design and impact assessments for open coastal waters and sediment dominated coasts, the conclusion cannot be other than that over the past decade or so, in particular the breakerzone area has got most of the attention. Apparently hardly any attention has been given to the zone between the most landward minus 3 meter and most seaward minus 15 or 20 meter depth contour. And so gone into the knowledge-‐ and tool development with regard to (enhanced) utilization of related coastal processes, their action and interaction and the extreme conditions we are talking about right now. Based on this assessment, it seems fair to conclude that the effort now really needs to pick up and catch up with what’s going on out there. Putting the processes, natural features and empirical relationships first. With some additional and supportive computational model development, including knowledge bases and expert systems.
© Marco Pluijm 08/03/2017
Which development shouldn’t require the explosive impact of a weather bomb as wake-‐up call. The Resilient by Nature approach is an instrument which has helped to pave the way for such an holistic based development. Based on “know your system”, making optimal use of natural features and their characteristics and developed from there onwards. Providing the framework, analyses and toolkit to build upon. Robust and moving on indeed. More information about the Resilient by Nature approach for coastal challenges can be found on https://www.slideshare.net/MarcoPluijm/resilient-‐by-‐nature-‐update-‐27012017