Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding...
Transcript of Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding...
![Page 1: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
University of British ColumbiaSLIM
Wavefield-denoising and source encodingRongrong Wang, Ozgur Yilmaz, and Felix Herrmann
Released to public domain under Creative Commons license type BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).Copyright (c) 2015 SLIM group @ The University of British Columbia.
![Page 2: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising version
2
Source encoding using Wavefields SVD
Conclusion
![Page 3: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Fourier, Curvelet domain denoising [Sacchi et al., 1998] [Hennenfent, and Herrmann 2006]
• f-‐x Singular Spectrum Analysis [Trickett 2002] [Oropeza and Sacchi, 2011]
• Mid-‐point offset domain denoising [Kumar et al., 2013]
Denoising techniques for incoherent noise
3
Issues : the denoising result is not obvious for FWI.
![Page 4: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Minimizing data misfit
where,
Full-waveform inversion
4
[J. Virieux and S. Operto, 2009 ]
[Tarantola, 1984]
minimize
X
i,j
kP⌦iui,j � di,jk22
subject to Ai,j(m)ui,j = qi,j ,
m - squared slowness
di,j - observed data of the ith shot at the lth frequency
qi,j - the ith shot at the lth frequency
Ai,j - Helmholtz operator of qi,j
⌦i - receivers of the ith source
P⌦i - restriction to the receiver locations
![Page 5: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Wavefield-Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)
Unconstained formulation:
where,
Eliminating u by variable projection
So
5
[van Leeuwen, T and Herrmann, F J , 2013]
[Peters, B, Herrmann, F J and van Leeuwen, T and , 2014]
(u, m) = minu,m
g�(u,m)
g�(u,m) =X
i,j
�2kP⌦iui,j � di,jk22 + kAi,j(m)ui,j � qi,jk22
g�(m) = g�(m, u(m))u(m) = minu
g�(m,u)
[Y. Aravkin, A. and van Leeuwen, T 2013]
rg�
(m) = rx
g�
(m, u)
minm,u
g�(m,u) = minm
g�(m)
⌘ rmkA(m)u� qk2F
![Page 6: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Alternating projection method
Fix , solve from
Fix , update by first or second order methods
6
Ai,j(mk�1)
�P⌦i
�ui,j =
qi,j
�di,j
�
mk�1
mkuk
uk
mk = mk�1 � ↵H�1rkA(m)uk � qk2F
![Page 7: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Wavefield denoising, interpolation and extrapolation
7
Look at the first update u1
, which is a solution to
Ai,j(m0
)
�P⌦i
�ui,j =
qi,j
�di,j
�
u1
can be used as a
• denoiser: P⌦iui,j ⇡ di,j is smoothed data.
• interpolation/extrapolation method: dext
i,j ⌘ P⌦
ui,j , where ⌦ = [⌦i
![Page 8: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Denoising effects
8
The denoising e↵ect depends on �
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
10
20
30
receivers
h=1h=.01h=.002
![Page 9: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Interpolation
9
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
10
20
30
observed noisy data with missing receivers
![Page 10: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Interpolation
10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
observedtrueλ=0.01
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
observedtrueλ=0.002
![Page 11: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Interpolation
11
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
observedtrueλ=0.0003
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
observedtrueλ=0.0001
wrong direction
![Page 12: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Extrapolation
12
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400−100
−50
0
50
data from true modeldata from initial modelextrapolated
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
2
4
6
Source location : 167
Receivers of this source: 117 to 217
Union of all receivers ⌦ = [⌦i: 0 to 384
Error
Receivers
real part of data
![Page 13: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pros and Cons
Pros: provided that a good and are used, the output
Cons
13
• is sparse in curvelet domain• has fast decaying singular vectors in the mid-‐point offset domain
• is of low rank in the SSA analysis• has a consistent frequency as the current frequency slice• is not very sensitive to
�
�
�• no good strategy to choose , even when the noise level is known
• one may need a different for each frequency/source• large computational complexity
u1
m0
m0
![Page 14: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The denoising formulationSuppose the noise level is roughly known. We propose to
solve
The problem intrinsically decouples for all the , so we solve
each independently.
14
min
ukA(m0)u� qk2F
subject to kP⌦iui,j � di,jk2 ✏i,j , 8i, j.
i, j
ui,j
![Page 15: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The method of multipliers
The method of multipliers solves general problems of the form
The augmented Lagrangian of the above system
Alternatively update x and p
15
min
x
f(x) subject to g
i
(x) 2 C
i
C
i
are convex,f ,g
i
are di↵erential with Lipschitz continuous gradients
L(x, p) = f(x) +X
i
1
2�ikDCi(pi + �ihi(x)k22 �
1
2�ikpik22
x
k+1 = argminx
L(x, pk)
p
k+1i
= D
�iCi(pk
i
+ �
i
h
i
(xk+1)) where DC(p) = p�⇧Cp
![Page 16: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Implementation detailsLet
Alternatively update
.
16
L(ui,j ,p) = kA(m)ui,j � qi,jk2 +1
2�kD✏i,j (p+ �(P⌦iui,j � di,j)k22 �
1
2�kpk22
pk+1i,j = D✏i,j (p
ki,j + �(P⌦iu
ki,j � di,j))
where D✏(x) =
✓max
⇢0, 1� ✏
kxk2
�◆x
uk+1i,j = min
vL(v,pk
i,j) rvL(v,pki,j) = AT (m) (A(m)v � qi,j) +
1
2PT⌦i
·D✏(pki,j + �(P⌦iu
ki,j � di,j))
LBFGS:
![Page 17: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Denoising result
is the best for WRI that we found manually.
The denoising algorithm automatically gives a similar output.
170 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
λ=0.0003WRI-denoise
� = 0.0003 �
![Page 18: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Marmousi
True Initial
18
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
km/s km/s
![Page 19: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Marmousi
• 2160m ✕ 8060m• 12m ✕ 12m grid• 223 uniformly spaced source and receivers at the surface• 1D initial guess• 3Hz-‐ 12Hz• WRI: 10 iterations for each frequency • FWI: stops when converges to local minimum• Same SNR for each frequency
19
![Page 20: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Marmousi
True Initial
20
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
km/s km/s
![Page 21: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Clean data
FWI inversion WRI inversion
21
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
km/s km/s
![Page 22: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Noisy data
FWI, SNR=6.8 WRI, SNR=4.8
22
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
km/s km/s
![Page 23: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Souce encoding/data compression
[Habashy, T., ABubakar, A, Pan, G, and Belani, A. 2011] proposed to use SVD for data compression.
The simultaneous sources corresponding to is
So, it’s also a source encoding technique that speeds up the implementation.
23
dcompr
= dobs
Vr
,dobs
= U⌃V T ⇡ Ur
⌃r
V T
r
dcompr
qcompr
⌘ qVr
![Page 24: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SVD on the WavefieldRecall in WRI
Observe
where
24
rg�
(m) = rx
g�
(m, u) ⌘ rmkA(m)u� qk2F
kA(m)u� qk2F ⇡ kA(m)uVr � qVrk2F
u = U ⌃V T
![Page 25: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SVD on the WavefieldRecall in WRI
Observe
where
25
rg�
(m) = rx
g�
(m, u) ⌘ rmkA(m)u� qk2F
kA(m)u� qk2F ⇡ kA(m)uVr � qVrk2F
u = U ⌃V T
Source encoding
![Page 26: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Simulation Result: clean dataUse 25 out of 223 sources, data compression rate 9:1. Inversion method WRI
26x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Encoding with Encoding withVr Vr
km/s km/s
![Page 27: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Clean Data
27x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Use 25 out of 223 sources, data compression rate 9:1. Inversion method FWI
Encoding with Encoding withVr Vr
km/s km/s
![Page 28: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Denoising effect: white Gaussian noise (4.8 SNR)
28x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Use all data Use 1/3 of the data dobs
Vr
km/s km/s
![Page 29: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Denoising effect: erratic noise
Use all data Use 1/3 of the data
29x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
dobs
Vr
x
z
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
0
500
1000
1500
20002
3
4
5
6km/s km/s
![Page 30: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Clean data: Towing in a row
30x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Use all data Use SVD, compression rate 3:1 Offsets: 0-‐3.5km, 1 moving sources, 101 receivers,
km/s km/s
![Page 31: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Noisy, towing in a row (SNR=6)
31x
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
z
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Offsets: 0-‐3.5km, 1 moving sources, 101 receivers, Use all data Use SVD, compression rate 3:1
km/s km/s
![Page 32: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Conclusion
We proposed two Wavefield based denoising methods that can be used to remove both white and erratic noise.
The wavefield SVD approach is also a good compression technique, is useful to set source locations that best illuminate the subsurface.
We showed the denoising version of WRI is effective and fast, which opens the door for another inversion technique.
32
![Page 33: Wavefield-denoising and source encoding · Wavefield-denoising and source encoding Rongrong*Wang,*Ozgur*Yilmaz,*and*Felix*Herrmann. Outline Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI)-denoising](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040716/5e1fd3430a51ab73cb1ac8f0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
This work was in part financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada via the Collaborative Research and Development Grant DNOISEII (375142-‐-‐08). This research was carried out as part of the SINBAD II project which is supported by the following organizations: BG Group, BGP, CGG, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, DownUnder GeoSolutions, Hess, Petrobras, PGS, Schlumberger, Sub Salt Solutions and Woodside
Acknowledgements
Thank you!