Water Source Menu Maps Coconino Plateau Technical Advisory Committee

Presented to the Coconino Plateau Watershed Partnership

July 31, 2015

Water Source Menu Maps

• Generalized Depiction of Surface Water Features

• Generalized Depiction of Groundwater Aquifers

• Generalized Summary of Water Demand and Use

Surface Water Features

• Largest amount of data.

• Combined large data sets with field data.

• Data discrepancies resolved individually such as overlapping stream types, small effluent reaches and numerous small lakes and wetlands.

• Future updates require field inspection of surface water features to verify current map classifications.

Groundwater Features

• Difficult finding suitable GIS data to depict aquifers.

• Challenging to display aquifers in a manner that conveys their overlying relationships.

• Hydrogeologic section shows vertical sequence of aquifers.

• Future revisions should be minimal.

Water Demand Features

• Major component is the water demand/use table.

• Circle shows total water demand in acre feet • Pie chart symbols show percent water demand

met by different sources • Text box shows

– demand center name – total water demand in acre feet per year – surface water / groundwater sources – percent water use municipal, agricultural, industrial or

effluent reuse.

Demand Table - 2010 Water Demand and Use in Acre Feet for Year 2010 OBJECTID Provider

Ttl_Demand

SW_Demand SW_Source

SW_UseM

SW_UseA

GW_DmndC

GW_DmndR GW_DmndP

GW_UseM

GW_UseA

GW_UseI

Rclm_Dmnd

Rclm_UseM

Rclm_UseA

GW_DmndN

TtlDmndCat

Total demand

Surface water demand

Surface water source

Surface water use - Municipal

Surface water use - Agricultural

Ground water demand - C aquifer

Ground water demand - R-M aquifer

Ground water demand - Perched water bearing zones

Ground water use - Municipal

Ground water use - Agricultural

Ground water use - Industrial

Reclaimed effluent demand

Reclaimed effluent use - Municipal

Reclaimed effluent use - Agricultural

Ground water demand - N aquifer

Total demand divided into 5 catagories

1 Flagstaff 10384 3989 Lake Mary 3989 0 4165 0 199 4364 0 0 2031 2031 0 0 88 2 Williams 1130 500 City Reservoirs 500 0 0 500 0 500 0 0 130 0 130 0 66 3 Red Lake (Kaibab) 80 30 Kaibab Lake 30 0 0 0 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 4 Sedona 4900 0 0 0 0 3500 0 3500 0 0 1400 0 1400 0 66

5 Winslow 4250 1500 LCR/CLR-1000, LCR/CHV-440 0 1500 1750 0 0 1750 0 0 1000 0 1000 0 66

6 Catalyst Paper Co. 26000 0 0 0 14000 0 0 0 0 14000 12000 0 12000 0 88 7 Joseph City 2900 2000 Little Colorado 0 2000 900 0 0 500 400 0 0 0 0 0 66 8 APS-Cholla PP 15373 0 0 0 15373 0 0 0 0 15373 0 0 0 0 88 9 Holbrook 4200 2500 Little Colorado 0 2500 1500 0 0 1000 500 0 200 0 200 0 66

10 Peach Springs (Hualapai) 210 0 0 0 0 0 210 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

11 Seligman 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 Cameron 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 44 13 Leupp 200 0 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

14 Twin Arrows Casino 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

15 Bellmont (Flagstaff Meadows) 44 0 0 0 44 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

16 Doney Park 800 0 0 0 800 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 17 Flagstaff Ranch 60 0 0 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 18 Forest Highlands 575 0 0 0 575 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 19 Fox Ranch 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

20 Kachina/Mountainare 450 0 0 0 450 0 0 450 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

21 Pinewood/Munds Park 240 0 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 40 40 0 0 44

22 PWCC 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 1200 66 23 LeChee 175 175 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 24 Copper Mine 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 22 25 Kayenta 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 510 0 0 0 0 0 510 44 26 Pinon 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 310 44 27 Shonto 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 44 28 Red Lake 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 44 22 29 Tuba City 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000 44 30 Moenkopi 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 160 44 31 Hotevilla-Bacavi 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 35 22 32 Oraibi 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 22 33 Kykosmovi 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 22

34 Shungopavi/Mishongnovi 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 22

35 First Mesa/Polacca 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 162 44 36 Second Mesa 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 37 Keams Canyon 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 57 22 38 Bodaway/Gap 170 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 170 44 39 Bitter Springs 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 22 40 White Cone 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 41 Tolani Lake 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 42 Dilkon 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 43 Bellmont (NAD) 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 44 Parks 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 45 Mormon Lake 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 46 Ft Valley 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 47 Ashfork 44 0 0 0 0 44 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 48 Supai (Havasupai) 50870 50700 Havasu Creek 50700 0 0 170 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 49 Tusayan 287 0 0 0 0 217 0 217 0 0 70 70 0 0 44 50 Valle 70 0 0 0 0 70 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

51 Grand Canyon Village 775 600 Roaring Spring 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 175 0 44

52 Page 3000 2250 Page, Lake Powell 2250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 750 0 0 66

53 Sterling Creek Fish Hatchery 7250 7250 Oak Creek 0 7250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66

NOTES LCR - Little Colorado River; CLR - Clear Creek; CHV - Chevlon Creek

• Summarizes GIS requirements

• Map update considerations : – Collaborative process works well with one person

managing data and preparing maps.

– Collect or verify field data using GIS/GPS data.

– Compile data prior to starting GIS work.

– GIS effort to update the maps will depend on volume of new data.

– Estimate 60-80 hours to update data and maps.

Coconino Plateau Watershed Partnership

Compilation of Water Source Menu Maps

Coconino Plateau Watershed Partnership Water Source Menu Maps

Don Reiff, GIS Lead

Bureau of Reclamation

June, 2015

Water Source Menu Maps

Questions?

Deborah Tosline, Bureau of Reclamation Don Bills, US Geological Survey

Strategic Planning Retreat – CPTAC Priority Task List Update June 25, 2015 Water Source Menu Maps

Surface Water - completed Groundwater Aquifers – completed Water Demand/Supply - completed Final GIS map files and map image files – expected 7/30/15 Attribute/meta-data tables – expected 7/30/15 Notes – expected 7/30/15 House, maintain, and update the Demand, SW, GW maps – TBD

NARFGM (Northern Arizona Regional Flow Groundwater Model) Scenario runs – completed Draft report – completed Final report – expected 9/30/15 Use model to identify at-risk environmental resources – TBD Use scenarios and models for regional planning - TBD Consider water with-drawl impacts on Oak Creek - TBD

Red Gap Ranch (RGR) Review groundwater model results for impact of Navajo Nation and RGR GW pumping on Chevlon/E. Clear Creek completion 9/30/15 Explore Red Gap Ranch partnership opportunity - TBD

Sustainable Water Management Framework – continuing, needs funds/resources to complete Recommend continued research requirements for ecological water needs Increase system flexibility – develop recommendations for regional drought planning Identify funding opportunities to develop thresholds for ecological water needs Explore regional funding opportunities to support regional GW monitoring Purchase development rights analysis Increase emphasis on DSM strategies Identify ways to optimize effluent reuse Identify water conservation opportunities/incentives and new technologies Recommend water conservation strategies

Develop alternative planning options if pipeline does not advance – completed 6/2014 Alternatives for tribal delivery – TBD

Field Trip Images

Obed Meadow, Peat Bog

Artesian spring, Clear Creek

blw. Mc Hood Reservoir

Chevelon Reservoir log jam

Chevelon Creek seeps

Field Trip Images