Wastewater Characteristics from Marcellus Shale … Characteristics from Marcellus Shale Gas...
Transcript of Wastewater Characteristics from Marcellus Shale … Characteristics from Marcellus Shale Gas...
[Add your own pictures here]
Wastewater Characteristics from Marcellus
Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania
Managing the Risks of Shale Gas Development
Resources for the Future
Washington, DC
2
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Purpose of this work
• Statistically analyze characteristics of flowback,
produced water, and drilling fluid waste sent to
wastewater treatment facilities in PA, 2008-2011.
• If recycling, treatment, and disposal options involve
exposure to the environment/human health, knowledge
of wastewater constituents helps quantify risks.
• Results may be useful in: • Evaluating current and future wastewater treatment
technologies, infrastructure capacity, and siting.
• Understanding potential impacts of treated wastewater on rivers
and streams.
• Setting effluent standards
3
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Comparison with Other Analyses
• Marcellus Shale Water Characterization funded by
Marcellus Shale Coalition and ASWCMC Consortia. • Consistent sampling from 19 locations, analysis performed by a
single lab, flowback samples at 0, 1, 5, 14, 90 days.
• GE also has a database (data from various shales).
• Data in our analysis are publicly available, focus on
waste sent to treatment facilities (rather than recycling,
deep injection), include drilling fluid waste and other
categories.
4
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Data Source: Form 26R, submitted
to PADEP by “residual waste” generators
• Generator information
• Waste description (pH range, physical
state, appearance)
• Chemical analysis attachments
• Process description, schematic diagrams
• Management of residual waste – location
information for processing/disposal
facilities, information about beneficial use
• Certification
5
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development When is a Form 26R required?
• A company that generates > 2200
pounds of residual waste from a
“generating location” in a single
month during the calendar year
must file a Form26R by March 1 of
the following year.
• Non-hazardous industrial waste
• Individual chemical analysis
required for each waste type (DEP
waste codes)
2540-PM-BWM0404 Rev. 8/2010 Codes
RESIDUAL WASTE CODES (RWC)
GENERIC MANUFACTURING WASTES (Continued) 413 Asphalt (Bituminous), Asphalt Shingles 414 Ceramic Waste 415 Linoleum Wastes 416 Thermal Insulation Wastes (Cellulose, Glass,
Wool) 417 Wiring, Conduit, Electrical Insulation 418 Sawdust, Wood Shavings/Turnings 419 Empty Containers (Metallic, Non-Metallic Drums,
Pails) 420 Process Wastewaters (Non-Haz) (Do Not Report
Sanitary Sewage Or Uncontaminated Non-Contact Cooling Water)
421 Contaminated Non-Contact Cooling Waters 422 Oil/Water Emulsions, Oily Wastewaters 423 Landfill Leachate 424 Treated Wood, Railroad Ties 430 Food Waste (Excluding Wastewater Treatment
Sludge) 440 Resins 450 Polymers (Other Than 407, 409) 460 Vinyl (Sheet, Upholstery) 470 Spent Filters (Air/Gas) 471 Spent Filters (Aqueous) 472 Spent Filters (Non-Haz Fuel, Oil, Solvent) 473 Paint Filters, Other Cloth/Paper Filters,
Supersacs 474 Grease 480 Refractory (Furnace, Boiler) (Other Than 103) 481 Carbon/Graphite Residue/Scrap 482 Baghouse Dust (Other Than 105, 106) 483 Blasting Abrasive/Residue (Other Than 109) 484 Gypsum Plaster Molds, Drywall 499 Other Generic Waste
SPECIAL HANDLING WASTES 501 Asbestos Containing Waste (insulation, brake
lining, etc.) 502 PCB containing waste 503 Oil Containing Waste (absorbant, rags) 504 Paints (Liquid) 505 Spent Catalysts 506 Contaminated Soil/Debris/Spill Residue (Non-
petroleum) (Dredge Material, Water Intake Debris and Sediment, Coal Mill Rejects)
507 Waste Petroleum Material Contaminated Soil/Debris
508 Virgin Petroleum Fuel Contaminated Soil/Debris 509 Waste Oil That Is Not Hazardous Waste Oil
(automotive, machining, cutting, etc.) 510 Waste Tires
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT, MAINTENANCE WASTE/SCRAP 701 Pumps, Piping, Vessels, Instruments, Storage
Tanks 702 Scrap From Maintenance And Product
Turnaround 703 Batteries (Non-Haz) 704 Grinding Wheels, Sanding Disks, Polishing
Belts, Welding Rods, Broken Tools 710 Plant Trash 799 Other Maintenance Waste NON-COAL MINING, OIL AND GAS, AND OTHER WELL DRILLING WASTES 801 Drilling Fluids, Residuals (other than those
under 802-810; includes drill cuttings from monitoring well and drinking water well construction)
802 Brine (natural salt water separated at oil and gas wells)
803 Drilling Fluid Waste (oil and gas drilling mud, other drilling fluids other than fracing fluid and spent lubricant)
804 Fracing Fluid Waste (oil and gas drilling fracturing fluid, flow-back fracturing fluid, flow-back fracturing sand)
807 Basic Sediment (oil and gas production storage impurities, sediment from produced oil at storage tank battery)
808 Servicing Fluid (oil and gas production well maintenance/work over fluids, oil/water-based mud and foam)
809 Spent Lubricant Waste (spent oil and gas drilling lubricants, spent plug drilling lubricants)
810 Drill Cuttings (oil and gas drill cuttings)
MISCELLANEOUS 901 Auto Shredder Fluff 902 Non-Hazardous Residue From Treatment Of
Hazardous Waste (other than 203) 999 Other DO NOT REPORT SANITARY SEWAGE OR UNCONTAMINATED NON-CONTACT COOLING WATERS. DO NOT REPORT OFFICE, LUNCHROOM, RESTROOM WASTES
DO NOT REPORT CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION DEBRIS
6
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Form 26R Required Analytes for
Marcellus Shale or Other Gas Wells
Acidity Chemical Oxygen
Demand Magnesium Silver
Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3) Chlorides Manganese Sodium
Aluminum Chromium MBAS (Surfactants) Specific Conductance
Ammonia Nitrogen Cobalt Mercury Strontium
Arsenic Copper Molybdenum Sulfates
Barium Ethylene Glycol Nickel Thorium
Benzene Gross Alpha Nitrite-Nitrate Nitrogen Toluene
Beryllium Gross Beta Oil & Grease Total Dissolved Solids
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand
Hardness (Total as
CaCO3) pH Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Boron Iron – Dissolved Phenolics (Total) Total Suspended Solids
Bromide Iron – Total Radium 226 Uranium
Cadmium Lead Radium 228 Zinc
Calcium Lithium Selenium
Additional constituents that are expected or known to be present in the wastewater.
7
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Data Collection
N: number of laboratory reports in our database
N = 85
N = 11
N = 74
N = 8
8
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Dataset Summary
Variable Count
laboratory report 178
company 22
well 104
well with location info. 95
wastewater treatment facilities 37
wastewater treatment facilities with location info. 21
Sample year Freq.
2009 75
2010 77
2011 18
NA 8
Total 178
9
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Categories of Chemicals
• Lab samples are tested for a total of 432 different
analytes that we are able to identify in the data, in
the following categories:
• General chemicals
• Organics
• Pesticides
• Metals
• Radioactive Materials
• Only 198 of these analytes are actually measured
in one or more samples (many NAs, NDs, BDLs).
10
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Comparison of General Chemicals
in Brine and Fracking Fluid Waste
11
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Comparison of Metals in
Brine and Fracking Fluid Waste
12
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Comparison of Organics
in Brine and Fracking Fluid Waste
13
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Comparison of Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Materials in Brine and Fracking Fluid Waste
14
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Waste Shipments: Cl- Concentrations
at Wells and Treatment Facilities
15
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Preliminary Conclusions
• High chemical concentrations are observed pre-
treatment, emphasizing need for effective treatment.
• When barium is detected (92% of samples), median concentration is
> 40 times Pennsylvania’s wastewater effluent standard and > 200
times the SDWA maximum contaminant level for barium.
• Concentrations of chloride, TDS, bromide, radium-228 and strontium
in pretreatment wastewater are also far higher than either
wastewater effluent standards or drinking water standards.
• Wastewater composition is highly variable over the
course of the shale gas extraction process -- a
challenge for effective treatment and management.
• Form26 filed once/year/waste type/generating location – constituent
concentrations could vary even within this temporal/spatial window.
16
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Preliminary Conclusions, cont.
• Produced water has very different composition than
flowback, typically having higher chloride, TDS and
radium-228 concentrations. Obviously more difficult to
recycle, requiring different technology/higher costs.
• Many constituents may be effectively removed by
chemical waste treatment facilities currently treating this
waste (e.g., metals); others may not (e.g., salts).
• Further research on potential risks from wastewater
treatment and release to rivers and streams is
warranted.
18
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Life Cycle of Water
Surface
water
fracing
fluid
additives
Groundwater
Hydraulic
fracturing Pound/
tank
Onsite
treatment
Offsite
WWTF
Surface
discharge
Other high
value reuse
landfill
Drilling fluid
additives
Drilling Pound/
tank
Onsite
treatment
Flowback
water
Produced
water
Deep well
injection
Pound/
tank
Sampling location
Clean water
Chemicals
Wastewater
Recycling
Mixing tank
Chemicals
Chemicals
19
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Fracing Fluid Waste (Flowback) and
Brine (Produced Water)
Fracing Fluid Waste (Flowback) Brine (Produced Water)
Complete
fracking Connect wellhead
to gas pipe to
start production
The length of
flowback can be
from 2 weeks to
one month or
longer. It varies
by developer.
Some reports don’t distinguish them using above method, but call
them all flowback and distinguish them by days after fracing
completion. For example, completion day 0, 1, 3, 5, 14, 30 and 90.
We use 30 days as a cut off to assign waste type and code for
these reports.
20
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Compare Form 26R and MSC Results
F26R_802
MSC Study F26R_804 Produced
Parameter Influent 5-Day Flowback 14-Day Flowback Flowback Water
pH 7.2 6.6 6.2 6.9 5.8
Alkalinity 52.5 138 85.2 1819.7 2521.9
TDS 334 67300 120000 60156.5 182948.6
TSS 9.6 99 209 387.5 205.7
TOC 3.8 62.8 38.7 79.8 1928.5
BOD 149 2.8 2.8 595.4 855.6
Oil & Grease 31 < 5 7.4 NA NA
Sodium 67.8 18000 16383 35887.7
Calcium 32.9 4950 4982 15003.6
Magnesium 6.7 559 491.6 1412.4
Iron 1.2 39 41.9 106.5
Barium 0.4 686 1025.8 84328.8
Chloride 42.3 41850 40462.5 99711.8
21
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Compare Concentrations to Standards/Criteria
Primary environmental public health concerns:
Parameter NOB
Median
(mg/L)
Standard
(mg/L) Note
Barium 159 651 2 EPA MCL
Barium 159 651 10
PA wastewater effluent standards
monthly average
Strontium 156 1275 4
EPA recommended limit for finished
municipal drinking water
Strontium 156 1275 10
PA wastewater effluent standards
monthly average
Benzene 44 0.05 0.005 EPA MCL
Ecological and secondary drinking water concerns:
Chlorides 154 53250 250
EPA SMCL, PA wastewater effluent
standards
Magnesium 152 581 0.05 EPA SMCL
TDS 156 87150 500
EPA SMCL, PA wastewater effluent
standards
Sulfate 78 86 250 EPA SMCL
22
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Previous Data Sampling and Analysis of
Flowback Water
Marcellus Shale Water Characterization • Funded by MSC and ASWCMC Consortia
• Sampling from 19 locations
• Includes general chemistry and detailed analysis of constituents of interests
• Lists of constituents of interest provided by the PADEP
• Over 250 determinations performed on samples
• Samples taken at 0, 1, 5, 14 and 90 days following the frac job at each
location
• Sampling at Day 0: raw water without additives; raw water with chemical
additives before sand addition
• Uniformity of sampling and analysis:
• Standardized Plans
• Sampling performed by URS
• Analyses performed by one lab (Test America)
GE also maintains a database, including data from various
shales.
23
RFF project focuses on environmental risks
from shale gas development Wastewater Streams Considered
Code Description
801
Drilling Fluids, Residuals (Other than those under
802-810; includes drill cuttings from monitoring Well
and drinking water well construction)
802 Brine (natural salt water separated at oil and gas
wells)
803
Drilling Fluid Waste (oil and gas drilling mud, other
drilling fluids other than fracing fluid and spent
lubricant)
804
Fracing Fluid Waste (oil and gas drilling fracturing
fluid, flow-back fracturing fluid, flow-back fracturing
sand)