Health Care Reform Updates Presented by Barb Gerken, Legislative Co-Chair.
Washington State Legislative Updates
-
Upload
mike-purdy -
Category
Business
-
view
663 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Washington State Legislative Updates
1
Legislative Updates on Public Works Contracting
Mike PurdyMichael E. Purdy Associates, LLC
(206) 762-2699 (office)(206) 295-1464 (cell)
2
Agenda
1. 2012 Legislative Session
2. 2011 Legislative Session Reciprocal Bid Preference
3. CPARB Alternative Public Works Reauthorization Committee
3
2012 Legislative Session
Bills that passed– Job Order Contracting
– Prevailing Wages
4
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – Passed
Engrossed House Bill 2328
Unanimously passed both Senate and House
Signed by Governor on March 29, 2012
Effective on June 7, 2012– 90 days after March 8, 2012 adjournment
5
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – Existing
Existing Authorized AgenciesState Department of Enterprise Services (formerly GA)
University of Washington
Washington State University
Cities with population over 70,000
Counties with population over 450,000
Port Districts with revenues greater than $15 million per year
Public Utility Districts with revenues from energy sales greater than $23 million per year
All School Districts
State ferry system
6
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – Passed
Authorized Agencies – Added by Legislature
Regional universities Western Washington University Central Washington University Eastern Washington University
The Evergreen State College
Sound Transit
7
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – Passed
Amount of each Work Order
Existing Amount New Amount
$300,000 $350,000
8
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – Passed
CPARB reporting year basis
Existing New
Contract Year July 1 – June 30
9
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – NOT Passed
Provisions that did NOT pass– Yearly Dollar Threshold: Would have raised from
$4 million per year to $6 million per year the total dollar amount of work orders an agency could execute
– Contract Term: Work orders executed within the contract term could have been completed after the end of the contract term
– Subcontracted Percentage: Amount of work to be subcontracted would have changed from 90% of the actual work in a Job Order Contract to 60% of the Job Order Contract total
10
2012 Legislative Session- Job Order Contracting – NOT Passed
HB 2369 did NOT pass– Regional Transit Authorities: Would have
permitted all Regional Transit Authorities to use Job Order Contracting
Sound Transit – Will be the only authorized Regional Transit
Authority to use Job Order Contracting Engrossed House Bill 2328
11
2012 Legislative Session- Prevailing Wages – Passed
Substitute Senate Bill 6421
Unanimously passed both Senate and House
Signed by Governor on March 29, 2012
Effective on June 7, 2012– 90 days after March 8, 2012 adjournment
12
2012 Legislative Session- Prevailing Wages – Passed
Filing Affidavits of Wages Paid On Behalf of: Allows contractor to file the Affidavit
of Wages Paid on behalf of a subcontractor if subcontractor is out of business or fails to file
Lower Tier: Applies to subcontractors who contract with lower tier subcontractors
Timing: May not occur sooner than 31 days after Final Acceptance
Liability: Contractor filing Affidavit accepts responsibility for unpaid prevailing wages by subcontractor
13
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Design-Build on WSDOT projects Second Substitute Senate Bill 5250 would have
required WSDOT to:– Threshold: Use Design-Build on projects
over $5 million, down from current $10 million
– Reporting: Report to legislature each biennium on the performance of Design-Build on its projects
Passed Senate 47-1. House didn’t vote
14
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Use of Design-Build HB 2327 would have:
– Portable Facilities: Permitted Design-Build for the erection of portable facilities as defined in WAC 392-343-018
– Modular Buildings: Restricted Design-Build modular buildings to “not more than five prefabricated modular buildings per installation site.”
Was sponsored by CPARB
15
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
GC/CM and Design-Build Selection HB 2327 would also have added the
following selection criteria: Firm’s outreach plan to include small,
economically and socially disadvantage businesses
Firm’s past performance in the utilization of small, economically and socially disadvantaged businesses
Was sponsored by CPARB
16
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Protests on GC/CM Projects House Bill 1971 would have:
– Protest Process: Established protest process for selection of EC/CM and MC/CM At both short list and finalist stages
– Owner’s Role: Added Owner to review protests
Sponsored by CPARB. Introduced in 2011.
17
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
No Retainage on Federal Projects Senate Bill 6063 would have:
– Prohibited withholding of retainage on federally funded transit facilities and relying on bond
Federal Regulations: Response to U.S. DOT regulations requiring prompt payment to subcontractors
2011 Legislation: Would have corrected 2011 amendment to RCW 60.28.011 only prohibiting retainage on federally funded highways, roads, streets.
18
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Small Businesses on Small Works Rosters Substitute House Bill 1173 would have: Limited Competition on Limited Public Works:
– Threshold increased from $1 to $7 million– Contractor annual gross revenue
Definitions: Micro-business and Mini-business– Revenue and location based– Owners to adopt “additional procedures to
encourage” use of these businesses on Small Works Roster projects
– “Principal office located in Washington” conflicts with RCW 39.04.380 for resident contractor: “physical office located in Washington”
19
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Streamlining Small Public Works Projects House Bill 1970 would have:
– Bonding and Retainage: Permitted agencies to waive bonding and retainage on projects of $5,000 or less, even if not using the Small Works Roster. Agencies would pick up liability for claims
– Prevailing Wage Forms: Increased from $2,500 to $5,000 when agencies could accept prevailing wage forms under Limited Public Works process without L&I certification
Sponsored by CPARB. Introduced in 2011
20
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Requiring Certified Payrolls Senate Bill 6416 would have required: Earlier Submission of Intents: Submission of
Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages before an Owner “finalizes a contract for any public work.”
Payrolls Before Payment: Submission of electronic payrolls from contractor and subcontractors before any payment to contractor.
Publish Payrolls: Owners to publish payrolls on a “publicly accessible database” after deleting Social Security numbers. Owners would also forward payrolls to L&I.
21
2012 Legislative Session- Bills That Did NOT Pass
Prevailing Wage Liability for Successor Firms House Bill 2669 would have required:
– Successor Firm Liability: Assumption of prevailing wage liability by a successor contracting entity for previous prevailing wage violations If successor entity knew of the violation at time
of sale Defines successor entity
Passed the House 54-41. No Senate vote
22
2011 Legislative Session- Reciprocal Bid Preference
States with 5% public works bid preference: Alaska, Nevada, Wyoming, New Mexico
Effective March 30, 2012
If “a bid is received from a nonresident contractor from a state that provides a percentage bidding preference, a comparable percentage disadvantage must be applied to the bid of that nonresident contractor.”
RCW 39.04.380
23
2011 Legislative Session- Reciprocal Bid Preference
Definition of nonresident contractor:– From a state with a percentage bid
preference and– At the time of bidding, does not have a
physical office located in Washington State of residence for a nonresident
contract is the state in which the contractor was incorporated or the business entity was formed
24
2011 Legislative Session- Reciprocal Bid Preference
Bidder In-State
Out-of-State
Bid Amount
Preference % for state of out-of-state firm
Bid Price for Evaluation Purposes
1 X $100,000 5% $105,000
2 X $103,000 N/A $103,000
3 X $104,000 0% $104,000
25
CPARB Alternative Public Works Reauthorization Committee
June 2013 Sunset: RCW 39.10 – Alternative Public Works
Committee: Meeting this year to address issues and develop legislation for CPARB and Legislature
26
CPARB Alternative Public Works Reauthorization Committee
Job Order Contracting Issues:– Yearly dollar threshold increase– Contract term– Subcontracted percentage– Expansion of authorized agencies– Use JOC contracts through piggybacking
27
CPARB Alternative Public Works Reauthorization Committee
GC/CM issues:– Owner role when GC/CM bids to self-perform– Prequalification by GC/CM when bidding to self-
perform– Flexibility regarding unsuccessful MACC
negotiations– When should subcontract bidding occur. Trend
toward more early bidding– Selection criteria relating to small businesses– Protest procedures for EC/CM and MC/CM– Subcontract bidding and union membership
28
CPARB Alternative Public Works Reauthorization Committee
Design-Build issues:– More flexibility to provide for progressive Design-
Build– Smaller projects by certified agencies without
Project Review Committee approval– Modify criteria for when Design-Build may be
used– Selection criteria relating to small businesses– Portable facilities and modular buildings
29
Free e-mail Subscription to my Blog:http://PublicContracting.blogspot.com
30
Michael E. Purdy Associates, LLC- Contact Information
Mike PurdyPrincipal
Office (206) 762-2699
Cell (206) 295-1464
E-mail [email protected]
Web www.mpurdy.com
Blog http://PublicContracting.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpurdy
http://twitter.com/#!/MikePurdy
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Michael-E-Purdy-Associates-LLC/92090808667
PO Box 46181, Seattle, WA 98146
3131
Experience: After more than 30 years as a manager in public contracting and procurement in Seattle, Mike Purdy retired in early February 2010. He began his career with the City of Seattle, where he was the City’s Contracting Manager. After more than 21 years with the City, he served for five years at the Seattle Housing Authority as Contracting and Procurement Manager. Most recently, he was the Contracts Manager for the University of Washington’s capital projects office, where he was responsible for managing design and construction contracts for more than $1 billion worth of projects.
Michael E. Purdy Associates, LLC: In his retirement, Mike remains active in contracting and legislative issues as the principal of Michael E. Purdy Associates, LLC (www.mpurdy.com), a consultant firm established in 2005 to help public agencies, contractors, and consultants develop and implement effective contracting strategies. He is a frequent speaker and trainer on public contracting issues. Mike also maintains the popular Public Contracting Blog at http://PublicContracting.blogspot.com, designed to keep public agencies, contractors, and consultants up-to-date on key developments in contracting. He is also a member of a number of industry wide committees and task forces.
Education: Mike has a bachelor’s degree in business and public administration and an MBA, both from the University of Puget Sound, and a master of divinity degree from Fuller Theological Seminary.
32
Michael E. Purdy Associates, LLC- The Fine Print
1. Copyright: This document is copyrighted by Michael E. Purdy Associates, LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, modified, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise without prior written permission.
2. Not Legal Advice: The opinions, information, and interpretations provided in this document are the personal opinions of Mike Purdy, are for educational and informational purposes only, and do not represent legal advice. Mike Purdy is not an attorney. When appropriate, readers of this document are encouraged to consult with an attorney to obtain legal advice.