Wannop, Laura - WhatDoTheyKnow

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, Matthew

Sent: 21 August 2013 14:03

To: '

Subject: RE: Heygate

of 3

06/03/2014

Hi - you can go anytime you want. Just give me half a days notice to inform the security guys

From: @artangel.org.uk]

Sent: 21 August 2013 13:59 To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Heygate

Sorry we've got wires crossed. We're with you for a meeting at 12 on 28/8. For and I to visit site another time, soon as possible, would be great, before the end of the week if at all feasible??

Artangel www.artangel.org.uk On 21 Aug 2013, at 12:35, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi I will notify my colleague in the Housing team that both yourself and will be attending site on Wednesday 28th August at 12 noon - he will notify the security guards and ensure access is granted Regards Matt



Subject: Re: Heygate

Dear Matthew, Thanks. is flexible but would like to visit as soon as possible. I know that is precisely NOT plenty of notice so could you just advise what the earliest reasonable day might be? He's modelling various aspects of our build currently and hasn't seen it in the flesh.

is good for Weds 28 at 12.

Also, do you have a plan that shows the area immediately south of that shown on the one I drew a ref line on. We just need to look at the bottom left hand corner of the red line area to understand appropriate fencing. Thanks for your help.


Hi , Arranging access will not be a problem. You will just need to give me plenty of notice and confirm date / time / number of people etc and we'll notify the security personnel accordingly Matt



Subject: Heygate

Dear Matthew, Good to speak to you earlier. I've mailed and asked him about Weds and will get back to you. I have someone associated with the design/build process called who would like to a visit to the building, having not himself been before (he's one of own 'crew' who will be heavily implicated in the work we do further down the line). Is there any way of us getting access now that the fence is up? best wishes,

Artangel 31 Eyre Street Hill London EC1R 5EW

@artangel.org.uk

of 3

06/03/2014

The email you received and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this in error please notify us immediately. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or the person responsible for delivering it to them you may not copy it, forward it or otherwise use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful. Where opinions are expressed in the email they are not necessarily those of Southwark Council and Southwark Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent.


of 3

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura


Sent: 19 November 2013 16:19

To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Heygate ArtAngel project comms

Page 1 of 3

06/03/2014

Dear Matt, How are things progressing on this? Looking forward to hearing from you. best,


@artangel.org.uk On 15 Nov 2013, at 08:59, Rees, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi , Licence will actually be a lease. We made our final changes yesterday so should be with you today or Monday.

. I'm going to push this forward this morning hopefully

Matt "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that may have sustained changes in transmission".

From: @artangel.org.uk> To: Rees, Matthew

Sent: Thu Nov 14 16:58:49 2013

Subject: Fwd: Heygate ArtAngel project comms

Dear Matthew, Further to yours, here’s additional context, a similar thought process going on at LL. I’m sharing all this at AA here, and will take to production meeting discussion Monday at 12, pls let me know any feedback from your side. I will write to late today or tomorrow am. In the meantime, I would be hugely grateful if you can

. I will talk to our QS about that. Can you also give any indication of expected timescale on the formal license? best, Begin forwarded message:

�� Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The email you received and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this in error

Page 2 of 3

06/03/2014

please notify us immediately. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or the person responsible for delivering it to them you may not copy it, forward it or otherwise use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful. Where opinions are expressed in the email they are not necessarily those of Southwark Council and Southwark Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent.

Page 3 of 3

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: lease

Page 1 of 2

06/03/2014

Matt, I am sorry to hear you’ve not been well. But I’m glad it’s not a fundamental issue that cannot be worked out. I think I’m now at a stage where I have to enter into a contract for the value of works we’ll ask for from Squibb. I am trying to delay it until I have a reassurance of the costs being underwritten, but I obviously can’t risk delaying the process as we’re already at quite a risk of shortening the potential period of exhibition by a delayed programme. best,



Hi Unfortunately the signing of the lease is going to be further delayed as there have been on-going discussions between the council and Lend Lease about its wording. This has been resolved now but we will need to enter in to a deed of variation for the Lend Lease demolition contract in order to finalise the funding position. Our legal team do not want to sign the lease without the deed of variation being in place. It is just a process issue rather than arguing over final details so no need to worry on that front. Apologies for not being in touch sooner - been off sick for past few days so just catching up Matt



To: Rees, Matthew Subject: lease

Dear Matt I’m sorry, I hate to email again, but I wonder if we can talk today about the situation with the lease agreement?

best,


@artangel.org.uk


Page 2 of 2

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, Matthew

Sent: 20 August 2013 14:37

To:

Subject: RE: Leaseholders

Page 1 of 3

06/03/2014

Hi Well there is nothing that we can do about this now and hopefully there will not be too much fall out. Obviously we would have preferred to have an opportunity to see any communications before they are sent out especially as we are still unsure as to whether the CPO approval is being challenged and whether your proposal is deliverable. Can you confirm when the letters were distributed and also provide a copy of the letter that was sent out - our comms team would like this so that they can prepare a press statement in the event that they have a media enquiry. . It would be great if we could meet next week to discuss progress. are in our offices on Wednesday 28th - would you able to join us at 11.30 - 12.30? Regards Matt



Subject: Re: Leaseholders

Matt, As mentioned in last email I sent prior to this I had intended to begin that process of communication with leaseholders and have indeed written ( previously supplied addresses). I hadn't realised there might be an issue. Perhaps we can speak this afternoon, and about a meeting date.


Morning

that you have listed own their properties on the estate- .

We would request that any discussion or communications with the is done after discussion with ourselves. We are still within the judicial review period which ends 7th Sept I think and we have to be mindful of this. Can we programme in the next team meeting please? Perhaps next week to touch base with

yourselves and Lend Lease? Matt "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that may have sustained changes in transmission".

From: @artangel.org.uk>

To: Rees, Matthew Sent: Mon Aug 19 10:05:46 2013

Subject: Leaseholders

Dear Matthew, Can I just clarify whether the situation in respect of on the Estate has changed since July this year? I know , but do

at this point? (And I know Crosways Church naturally continues to have an interest.)


@artangel.org.uk

The email you received and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this in error please notify us immediately. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or the person responsible for delivering it to them you may not copy it, forward it or otherwise use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful. Where opinions are expressed in the email they are not necessarily those of Southwark

Page 2 of 3

06/03/2014

Council and Southwark Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent.

Page 3 of 3

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, Matthew

Sent: 15 October 2013 12:49

To:

Cc: Nakendo, Fahad

Subject: RE: licence

Page 1 of 2

06/03/2014

Hi , I am happy with the draft licence. Please print, sign and return as requested by Fahad. I have read through the planning material. Unfortunately I think it needs a bit of rejigging -- more than can be done via a phone call conversation I think. Would it be possible for you to send word files for the planning statement and D&A statement? I can the spend an hour trying to move things around later this afternoon and forward back to you Matt

From: @artangel.org.uk] Sent: 15 October 2013 10:34

To: Rees, Matthew

Cc: Nakendo, Fahad Subject: Re: licence

Hi Matt, If you have a chance today, let me know whether this is good to go. Also when you have had a chance to look at them, I would appreciate your first thoughts on the planning materials I sent. best,


@artangel.org.uk On 14 Oct 2013, at 17:47, "Nakendo, Fahad" <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear I revised the Tenant's name as requested. I have inserted the 16th October (tentatively) as the commencement date for the licence period. Matt, please confirm that you are happy for licence to commence on proposed date and if you need any further clarifications from If we are all in agreement, please print off copy sign/date and forward a copy to us. Kind Regards, Fahad


To: Nakendo, Fahad Cc: Rees, Matthew

Subject: licence

Dear Fahad, Did you receive my final two comments, and suggestion we try get our licence signed now, if there is no other barrier to doing so? best,


@artangel.org.uk


<131009_AH_Art Angel-site compound licence_Final.doc><Artangel authorised site and access route091013.pdf>

Page 2 of 2

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Planning statement, right version

Attachments: Design and Access Statement II.pdf; ATT04080.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, Matthew


To:

Subject: RE: planning

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Hi , Please see the below comments - ill get back re: cultural strategy but dont let this hold you up sending over any draft documentation Matt


To: Rees, Matthew Subject: planning

Thanks for the meeting, good to see you looking so well, Matt. I heard you say you were off tomorrow, so I'm going to fire the questions I can think of in your direction. 1) it was mentioned that you/planning would like to advise on the wording for the planning application. I started with:

2) Can you double check the postcode, I can't find it on the Royal Mail! - SE171SX 3) We are applying for planning permission to construct this and for it to remain onsite until the end of May. Are we also asking for an associated change of use within the same application? - - Not change of use 4) We are undertaking demolition works on the basis of consent already given. Do you have the references so that we can include? - planning reference 12-AP-3203

I'll liaise with quickly Thanks.


@artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Planning statement

Attachments: Design and Access Statement II.docx; ATT03399.htm; Covering Letter.docx; ATT03400.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Matt Thanks. Herewith D&A -- I've added images from the construction sequence. Couple of things I slightly tweaked of yours but all seemed completely sensible to me. Especially the excisions... Yes to logo, will add to planning statement Here also letter. Thanks.

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: license

Page 1 of 2

06/03/2014

Matthew, Thanks, that's appreciated. Yes, clearly we want to avoid this tripping us up! best,


@artangel.org.uk On 28 Oct 2013, at 14:46, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Meeting with legal team tomorrow to respond to consider the Lend Lease proposal in respects to licences etc. Unfortunately the project is very close to being tangled up in lbs / LL legal framework. Something that we all want to avoid - im hopeful our legal colleagues will assist I definitely intend to keep you posted Matt "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that may have sustained changes in transmission".


To: Rees, Matthew Sent: Mon Oct 28 14:27:23 2013

Subject: license

Dear Matthew, When possible, can you update me on the progress of any conversations concerning the license/agreements that we need to put in place? I need to give the directors here some reassurances about that process as we move closer towards an onsite start date. I would really like to have this settled before or at the same time as the signing of contracts with others. You will probably guess that puts pressure on us to get this sorted this week. It would be good to know your thoughts. Thanks.


@artangel.org.uk


Page 2 of 2

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: planning

Attachments: Design and Access Statement V.pdf; ATT27933.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Dear Matt, Wow. This is a process. I may be nearly there. I now have all plans complete and scaled, and the documents are revised (I sent you a non-latest version of the D&A statement). The latest of that attached. Fees: Do I assume that it is therefore…. "Non Residential >> 'Other material change of use of building or land' " Given that it is twenty to six on a Friday, I may in the end hit send on Monday morning….!

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: planning

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Okay, I will get onto this. Thanks

Artangel www.artangel.org.uk On 24 Oct 2013, at 16:52, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

Also - there is a planning fee that needs to be paid of £385 that requires to be paid as well on application. All the documentation looks fine to me so it would probably be easier for you to submit online via the planning portal instead of printing the documents out and then heading to Tooley St to submit the cheque. Would that be ok? Matt


Sent: 22 October 2013 15:33 To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: planning

Dear Matt, I am currently waiting for the redraw on our plans along the lines you suggested, and for some advice and plans in relation to Tree Protection (which looks slightly more complicated than I had imagined). But here is where everything else stands.


1

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, MatthewSent: 09 December 2013 15:58To: 'Subject: RE: re Marston

Good stuff. See you on site at 4.30pm

-----Original Message-----From: @artangel.org.uk]Sent: 09 December 2013 15:49To: Rees, MatthewSubject: Re: re Marston

Yes to 4.30 onsite. We will open up, install and be back out by the time you get there. Let me know of any problems.

Best

Head of Programmes and Production

Artangelwww.artangel.org.uk

> On 9 Dec 2013, at 11:32, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:> > Hi ,> > Apologies for the lack on communication recently. As way of update:> > Lease - I believe this is now resolved and awaiting Southwark to seal the signed lease.> > Funding letter - we are nearly there in reaching agreement with Lend Lease whilst incurring legal fee's agreeing revised wording for existing legal agreements. Very annoying but hoping that this week we'll have the necessary documents signed and sealed. I'll then be able provide you with a letter of agreement confirming that we will reimburse you on receipt of monthly invoices issued from Artangel.> > Camera - I will not be in the office today so cannot meet with you > this afternoon. I can meet tomorrow however at 4.30pm> > Hope this is ok> > Matt> > -----Original Message-----> From: @artangel.org.uk]> Sent: 05 December 2013 16:03> To: Rees, Matthew> Subject: re Marston> > > Hi Matt,> > If we can organise ourselves to do this on Monday, would you be available to check all is resecured to you satisfaction at the end of that day? > > best

2

>

> > Artangel> www.artangel.org.uk> > The email you received and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.> > If you have received this in error please notify us immediately.> > If you are not the intended recipient of the email or the person responsible for delivering it to them you may not copy it, forward it or otherwise use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful.> > Where opinions are expressed in the email they are not necessarily those of Southwark Council and Southwark Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent.>

1

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, MatthewSent: 09 January 2014 11:57To:Subject: RE: site

all done

-----Original Message-----From: @artangel.org.uk]Sent: 09 January 2014 11:41To: Rees, MatthewSubject: Re: site

Hi Matthew,

I'm not 100% sure how security will react so if you could make sure that they know is coming, that would be appreciated.

On 9 Jan 2014, at 11:40, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi ,> > I believe Jon is going to give you a call to discuss below. Happy for > you to visit site - I trust that our security still have the approved > lis he gate. I will email them now and request they provide > access this afternoon> > Regards> > Matt> > -----Original Message-----> From: @artangel.org.uk]> Sent: 09 January 2014 11:32> To: Rees, Matthew> Subject: site> > Dear Matthew,> > Good to see you on Tuesday. I have left information for Jon at the > backdoor and phoned to speak to him, but haven't heard back. I do want > to confirm that this is in hand.> > In the meantime, with equipment still onsite that needs our attention, > what are the hurdles to anyone of us or our crew returning to site.> Shall we do this on a case by case basis, in which case, can I > organise for to get onsite, and if possible, given that > it's reasonably sunny, could this be this afternoon?> > She will just be on ground level checking our cameras are still there.> > > > The email you received and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are

2

addressed.> > If you have received this in error please notify us immediately.> > If you are not the intended recipient of the email or the person responsible for delivering it to them you may not copy it, forward it or otherwise use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful.> > Where opinions are expressed in the email they are not necessarily those of Southwark Council and Southwark Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent.>

Wannop, Laura

From: Rees, Matthew


To:

Subject: RE: Planning statement

Attachments: Covering Letterv2.docx

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Few changes (please not request for contact details )


Sent: 16 October 2013 10:48 To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Planning statement

Matt Thanks. Herewith D&A -- I've added images from the construction sequence. Couple of things I slightly tweaked of yours but all seemed completely sensible to me. Especially the excisions... Yes to logo, will add to planning statement Here also letter. Thanks.

Wannop, Laura



To:

Cc: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: programme/site setup

Page 1 of 2

06/03/2014

I wonder if we should try and get a mooted site visit to Friday, which might enable us also to look at this?


@artangel.org.uk On 16 Oct 2013, at 16:33, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks As mentioned at previous meeting the security personnel current use the store room (within your site boundary) for the toilet. We will need to provide access to this facility during the works / performance period so one of the first tasks on site will need to be exploring a potential alternative means of access for security to the toilets. I am meeting with colleagues in housing tomorrow and will explore further as to whether there are other toilets that the security could use - alternatively Keltbray may be prepared to allow them to use their toilets within the adjacent site compound. I'll raise this with when I next have the opportunity Matt


To: Rees, Matthew Cc: Abbott, Jon;

Subject: programme/site setup

Dear Dear Matt, Here is a copy of high level programme, showing relevant detail. What we will need to understand is whether SBC/LL can allow that we proceed with preparations to set up site as of next week. The programme at the moment is both behind where we had hoped and allows very little slack indeed, so one the one hand I

believe it is essential that we don't lose time. On the other hand, I'm aware that we can't do this without communicating appropriately with everyone who may need to know. best wishes,


Page 2 of 2

06/03/2014

Artangel Heygate ProjectHigh Level Programme

Week -1 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 15 Week 16 Week 17 Week 18….……..

Letter of intent Artangel

Notify Asbestos and Issue Section 80

Carry out all paperwork inlcuding SWMP, RAMS, Lifting Plans and gain CDM approval

Issue residents newsletters

p Planning application submittedp Notification to building controlp Discharge of final planning conditions for demolition

Detai ing of steelwork designs, fabricate & procure

Conduit ighting reroute

Temporary scaffold access stairs

Site Set Up

Install perimeter fence and tree protection to secure site

Survey services and isolate back to head / haz matt surveys

Soft strip and Asbestos removal

Install temp steelwork to existing building

Demolish link bridge and garages

Demolish one balcony and install slab

Place emergency scaffold staircases so as not to obstruct new bu ld

Demolish remaining blacony and install slab

Structural demolition and reconstruction

p Assumed planning determination date Interior Fit out

Site Preparatation

p Public openings

Open period 24/2 — 31/5/2014

p Closure

Structural demolition to slab

07/07/201426/05/201419/05/201417/02/2014 02/06/2014 09/06/2014 16/06/2014 23/06/2014 30/06/201424/02/201410/02/201425/11/2013 02/12/2013 09/12/2013 16/12/2013 23/12/2013 30/12/2013 06/01/2014 13/01/2014 20/01/2014 27/01/2014 03/02/201418/11/201314/10/2013 21/10/2013 28/10/2013 04/11/2013 11/11/2013

1

Wannop, Laura

From: @artangel.org.uk]Sent: 05 December 2013 16:03To: Rees, MatthewSubject: re Marston

Hi Matt,

If we can organise ourselves to do this on Monday, would you be available to check all is resecured to you satisfaction at the end of that day?

best

Artangelwww.artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: site arrangements

Page 1 of 3

06/03/2014

Thanks Matthew, We’ll work on this — I know has already asked Squibb to action and I have reiterated this morning. If we are able to speak on the phone, there remain a few pressing matters: 1) License, where we are up to and how quickly we can formalise arrangements now 2) Your advice on one issue related to planning 3) Your advice/view on news lettering local contact I am in a meeting between 14:30 and probably 4pm, but otherwise I can try and reach you when it suits you.



Morning Apologies for any confusion yesterday / this morning. We are in the process of reviewing security arrangements on site but as it stands Keltbray personnel are only responsible for vehicles travelling to and from the demolition site and not the Southwark managed area of the estate. Security personnel from VPS are employed by Southwark are responsible for patrolling the non-demo estate area. The number of VPS staff is to be reduced from today onwards though. I suggest that all authorised artangel and squibb staff are collated on a list for the VPS staff purposes

. Therefore all authorised

personnel should be issued with this badge asap. I'll inform our security contractors today and hopefully these revised practices can be introduced from tomorrow onwards. Does this sound reasonable? I'm in and out of meetings today but hopefully will catch up on phone at some point

Matt Matt "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that may have sustained changes in transmission".


To: Rees, Matthew Cc:

Sent: Mon Nov 11 16:40:43 2013 Subject: site arrangements

Dear Matthew, Thanks for your help last week during what was probably quite a stressful period. Your security this morning were, perhaps understandably, a litte confused as to who we were and what was going on. They asked, quite reasonably, that we formalise a system for access to our/Squibb site. Perhaps we can agree what this will be as soon as possible, ideally so that we are a bit clearer from tomorrow? We have asked Squibb to equip themselves with appropriate identification for both vehicles and crew. But this will only make sense if site security are briefed about the works going on, that it is a Squibb site, and are aware that they should admit only Squibb and Artangel personnel. I can supply a list of authorised Artangel personnel to be printed and to be held at the gate if that makes sense, and can equally

I would be comfortable — unless you feel it is beyond their remit — that they ask to see this so we have some confidence that people will be challenged. I think the idea of the main gate (ie the first on before the left turn into the Keltbray site) being manned by Keltbray seems not to be the case — if that’s the expectation from LL or SBC, I think that might need re-checking. Do feed back to me and let me know what you think of this proposal, and if we can pass this to the team onsite.

since this can only be a good idea, let's reinforce the need for clear ID for all

Page 2 of 3

06/03/2014

Squibb personnel and agree ourselves a system of Artangel passes/ID and list of those who should be pre-approved! best,


@artangel.org.uk


Page 3 of 3

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Cc:

Subject: security list

Attachments: Security list Squibb Heygate.pdf; ATT194100.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Please find the list of names attached. These are pertinent to initial works, but additional crew will be onsite for asbestos and steel installation, names to be supplied. All Squibb operatives will be badged this week. I will supply named passes to other project staff and I will send a scanned sample of each to you. best,

Named Squibb Operatives

SquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibb

Named Squibb Site VisitorsSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbArctec Structures

Named Artangel Project staffMcLennanMcLennanArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangelAtelier OneAtelier One

Named Site CrewArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangel

Wannop, Laura


Sent: 06 February 2014 17:28

To: Rees, Matthew

Cc:

Subject: Re: Squibb Access

Importance: High

Page 1 of 2Squibb Access

06/03/2014

Thanks, Matt.


To: Rees, Matthew Cc:

Sent: Thu Feb 06 17:17:07 2014 Subject: Re: Squibb Access

Dear Matt, Apologies that this comes late in the day. I hope to make a visit to site to connect with our contractors and PM tomorrow at 10am. Could you inform security and include three names (myself,

). Can you confirm by return. Thanks.



Page 2 of 2Squibb Access

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Re: Welfare toilets blocked at main sewer.

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Dear Matt, We took it upon ourselves to deal with the problem of non-working toilets mentioned below directly. Apparently there was some prior damage to one of the pipes. I'm awaiting a report back but I wanted to make you aware. Did you receive my message yesterday, and can we speak on the phone today?

Artangel www.artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Cc:

Subject: Re: Site visit today

Page 1 of 3Site visit today

06/03/2014

Noted.



Hi , I have to request that you do not visit the estate until Monday next week. This includes any construction activities I am afraid. This is an instruction from senior council officers I am afraid. Sorry for late notice. Speak later "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that may have sustained changes in transmission".

From: @artangel.org.uk> To: Rees, Matthew

Sent: Tue Nov 05 09:15:44 2013 Subject: Re: Site visit today

11am

I will try to call early afternoon.

Artangel www.artangel.org.uk On 5 Nov 2013, at 07:59, "Rees, Matthew" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi , Can you confirm who will be visiting site today and when? Many thanks Matt "Southwark Council does not accept liability for loss or damage resulting from software viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing those of Southwark Council. The information in this e-mail and any attached files is confidential and may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege or be subject to privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, the retaining, distribution or other use of any transmitted information is strictly prohibited. E-mails are transmitted over a public network and Southwark Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy of a message that

may have sustained changes in transmission".



Page 2 of 3Site visit today

06/03/2014

Wannop, Laura


Sent: 04 December 2013 10:59

To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: Security list

Attachments: Security List.pdf; ATT517149.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

On reflection, I’ve just revised the list so that it is up to date. Perhaps it can simply be reissued? Thanks.


@artangel.org.uk

Named Squibb OperativesSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibb

Named Squibb Site VisitorsSquibbSquibbSquibbSquibbArctec Structures

Named Artangel Project staffMcLennanMcLennanArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangelArtangelAtelier OneAtelier One

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew;

Subject: Red line

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

I've looked again at the plans. The redline on the site plan for the license is wrong. However, I believe the fencing plan shows the hoarding in the the right place, assuming it is intended to runalong the line of the existing fronts of the existing garages rather than to the front edge of the pavement. I can't see a strong reason why it should need to be at the front edge of the pavement, doing so creates a disconnection between existing structures and the proposed line of the hoarding, and it narrows the effective width of the access way (though trucks presumably won't regularly mount the pavement). I drew this conclusion from looking at the position of the column in the image and on the plan here where the curved section of wall is. The column is clearly on the pavement... Hope that's clear. New plans will follow.


@artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: submission

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

That should be in and cheque to come tomorrow. Thanks for your help. best,


@artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura



To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: TPP

Attachments: Tree protection detail 231013.docx; ATT21894.htm; Tree protection 130611-HD-TPP-WG-3.5.pdf; ATT21895.htm

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

This is the updated TPP drawing from Treeworks. We have further written information on the Tree Protection Approach. I don't know whether it warrants incorporation into the D&A statement?

Wannop, Laura


Sent: 25 September 2013 11:52

To: Rees, Matthew

Subject: updates

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Hi Matthew, Looks like the license is in progress, would be good to keep that moving. However, we've kind of left behind our Head of Terms. Do we need to ensure we sign those off ? Thanks for sorting out the visit with , much appreciated. best,


@artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura


Sent: 25 September 2013 10:16

To: Rees, Matthew

Cc:

Subject: site visit

Page 1 of 1

06/03/2014

Hi Matt, It will be 15.30 tomorrow for the visit to Heygate, just me and . Many thanks.


@artangel.org.uk

Wannop, Laura - WhatDoTheyKnow

Documents

Transcript of Wannop, Laura - WhatDoTheyKnow