Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com
Transcript of Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com
![Page 1: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy
Presented By: Victoria Grace
![Page 2: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Orality and LiteracyTwo crucial pathways into written language.
![Page 4: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Big Picture Thinking
• Writing has transformed human consciousness • Without writing, the mind could not think or be aware• Writing is technology• New technology brings the critique into existence• Those who argue against technology, need technology to get their points
across• Plato’s argument against writing… was written
![Page 5: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Text is contumacious
• Contumacious meaning disobedient to authority
• There is no way to directly refute a text
• It has already been printed
• No matter how many times you refute a text, the words on the page will still say the same thing
• This is why people have burned books
![Page 6: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mentality of Oral Culture
• Many people argue against technology (this includes written text) using the same arguments that Plato’s Socrates once did
• 1. Writing is inhuman
• 2. Writing destroys memory
• 3. Written text is unresponsive
• 4. The written word cannot defend itself
![Page 7: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reason for Tantalizing Involutions
• Intelligence is relentlessly reflexive
• Even the external tools that are used to implement its workings become “internalized”
• Overthinking of every form of technology
• “Everyone is a critic”
![Page 8: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Writing and its Association with Death
• Paradoxical
• Writing is resurrected into limitless living
• An infinite number of people will potentially read a certain text
![Page 9: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Writing is a Technology
• It uses tools, equipment, and special surfaces
• Writing initiated what computers have only continued
![Page 10: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Talking is Natural
• Every person will learn how to talk
• Conversation will flow naturally because you do not have to be aware of grammar rules
• You can speak without being conscious
• Writing can be seen as artificial because putting thoughts to paper requires you to think and consciously contrive articulable rules• This is a good thing because it expands human potential
![Page 11: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Alphabet and Symbols
• Written characters allow for communication
• Those who are unable to speak or understand a certain language, can use written symbols to help communicate
• Writing is more than 26 letters composed in different arrangements
![Page 12: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Memory vs Written Records
• Written records serve as evidence
• Word of mouth is less valid
• We use charts and diagrams to document
• There is significant value within written statistics
![Page 13: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Dynamics of Textuality
• Spoken words can never go alone; they have to occur with a person
• The words in a text are alone
• Even more so, the person writing the text usually spends some amount of time alone
![Page 14: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Precision
• Writing gives us a chance to carefully select our words
• There is always someone willing to analyze our work, so we are more likely to carefully compose
• With writing, words can be changed and erased
• Edits are possible
![Page 15: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• The shift from oral speech to written speech is essentially a shift from sound to visual space
• Print reinforces and transforms the effects of writing on thought and expression
• Print makes writing widely available
![Page 16: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
My View
• Agree with Walter Ong
• On the other hand… I do think it is a little ridiculous to spend so much time arguing about which form of communication is better
• Every form of technology serves a purpose• It is up to us to find out what that purpose is
![Page 17: Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy - WordPress.com](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e1ca9320db113ea931441c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Thoughts? Questions? Opinions?
Would you rather only be able to communicate through oral conversation, or written text?