Vortex Lattice Anisotropyin

Magnesium Diboride

Morten Ring Eskildsen

Department of PhysicsUniversity of Notre Dame

R. Cubitt and C. D. Dewhurst

Institut Laue Langevin, Grenoble, France

N. Jenkins, M. Kugler, G. Levy, S. Tanaka and Ø. Fischer

DPMC, University of Geneva, Switzerland

J. Jun, S. M. Kazakov and J. Karpinski

Solid State Physics Laboratory, ETHZ, Zürich, Switzerland

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation,

MaNEP and the Swiss Federal Office BBW.

Collaborators

VL Anisotropy in Uniaxial Superconductors

L. J. Campbell, M. M. Doria and V. G. Kogan, Phys. Rev. B 38, 2439 (1988).

•

•

•

Rotating applied field away from axis distorts vortex lattice.

Vortices in unit cell lies on ellipse.

Distortion determined by anisotropyof penetration depth and coherencelength

MgB2: A Two-Band Superconductor

H. J. Choi et al., Nature 418, 758 (2002).

-band

-band

J. Nagamatsu et al.,Nature 410, 63 (2001).

Vortex Lattice Imaging by SANS

•

•

•

•

The reciprocal lattice is directly observed in diffraction patterns measured on 2D detector.

VL distortion due to uniaxial anisotropy?

VL reflectivity determined by superconducting penetration depth and coherence length.

Measurements done at d22 at Institut Laue Langevin (ILL).

Form Factor Measurements

Measurement of absolute scattered intensity allows determination of characteristic lengthscales.

•

Vortex Lattice Anisotropy

•

•

•

MgB2 is uniaxial superconductor.

Measurements done with field rotated away from c axis.

VL anisotropy reflects .

2 K, 0.5 T

Field & Temperature Dependence of

Anisotropy increases with both field and temperature.

Increase with field due to suppresseion of -band and is expected to saturate at = H ~ 6.

•

•

Increase with temperature due to thermally mixing of and bands.

Temperature dependence in good agreement with theoretical prediction.

•

•

A Couple of Problems…

Anisotropy found by STS with H c is smaller than SANS extrapolation.

SANS results on MgB2 powder gives upper limit on = 1.4 at 0.5 T/2 K, well below result for single crystals.

NMR at 2 T and 5 K indicates close to 1 (W. Halpering, Northwestern).

•

•

•

R. Cubitt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157002 (2003).

…More Problems:A Vortex Lattice Reorientation

TransitionLow field orientation with VL-planes perpendicular to a-axis.

Reorientation quantified by angular split of the two degenerate domain orientations.

At 60 split the VL is aligned parallel to a-axis, and a single domain is re-formed.

As field is rotated away from c axis the transition field remains essentially unchanged, but transition becomes 1st order.

•

•

•

•

VL Anisotropy above Reorientation Trans.

Above reorientation transition Bragg peaks no longer lies on an ellipse!

May be effect of slight misalignment between crystalline axes and field rotation axis.

•

•

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

70

80

90

100

110

120

D22 D11 D11

"Und

isto

rted

" V

L op

enin

g an

gle,

(

degr

ees)

Applied Field (T)

VL anisotropy drops to ~1 (no anisotropy) above reorientation transition.

VL anisotropy no longer reflects !?!

•

•

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

1.0

1.2

1.4

D22 D11 D11

VL

anis

otro

py,

Applied Field (T)

Summary

•

•

•

•

•

Two-band superconductivity in MgB2 is now well established, with the smaller gapassociated with the 3D -band and the larger gap with the 2D -band.

SANS form factor measurements show a suppression of superconductivity in the -band with increasing field, in quantitative agreement with results obtained by STS.

The supression of the -band leads to structural changes of the VL:

1. With H || c, the VL undergoes a 30o reorientation in the field range 0.5 - 0.9 T.

2. Below the reorientation transition, the VL anisotropy was determined as a function of field and temperature and found to increases with both temperature and field. We believe that this reflects a changing penetration depth anisotropy.

3. Above reorientation transition the VL is rhombic and isotropic, and apparently no longer influenced by penetration dept anisotropy!