VOLVO EATS LEAN TRANSFORMATION
-
Upload
julian-kalac-peng -
Category
Engineering
-
view
93 -
download
3
Transcript of VOLVO EATS LEAN TRANSFORMATION
1Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
EATS LEAN TRANSFORMATION
July 15, 2014 Prepared by Julian Kalac, P.Eng
Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt.
2
Overview EATS-Exhaust After Treatment System
• VOLVO Patented Design
• EATS-Exhaust After Treatment System
• EATS uses Selective Catalytic Reduction SCR and a Diesel
Particulate Filter DPF to filter & convert (treat) Nox into CO2,
which exits through the exhaust stack
• EATS Rack , made by Mancor Automotive, is the integrated
final product assembly of SCR and DPF
• EATS standard cost = $570/pc, (material=$180, Labour= $380)
• 2013 Annual volume = 2000 units (8/day, 40/week)
• 2014 demand increased to 3000 units, (12/day, 60/week)
3
EATS
RACK
Exhaust After Treatment System
SCR
AIR
COOLER
AIR
CLEANER
DPF
4
EAST (Exhaust After Treatment System)
EATS RACK
5
ISSUES/CONSTRAINTS1. Product design issues affecting quality/productivity
2. High Final Inspection Reject Rate (>30%)
3. Design drawings outdated, part modifications not tracked,
drawings not updated. Parts being modified daily
4. Max Production Capacity 8pc/day using 2 shifts (6 people)
5. Production Cycle Time= 4.5 Days, WO lead time = 3days
6. Batch Production with high WIP > 33
7. NO PFD, VSM
8. No Production Plan, No Production Order Tracking
9. No SOP’s, NO TRAINING
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
6
DESIGN ISSUES
• Product design Issues causing excessive Non-Value
Add (NVA) welding to fit parts. Only able to produce 8
sets/day on 2 shifts
• Increased customer demand in 2014 by ~50%
compared to 2013 (2780 pcs)
• Avg Monthly production in 2013 was 233pcs/month,
7.7/day
• YTD Avg monthly production is 358/month (12pcs/day)
• March productivity = 421 (14/day)
7
EATS Improvement Project
Problem Statement
1. Unresolved product/design issues causing 30% Internal Quality
reject rate , and limiting max throughput 8 sets/day on 2 shifts
2. Production unable to meet increased Customer demand from 40
to 60pcs/week, resulting in 2 day shut down in Volvo plant
3. Customer lead time = 4 days, WO lead time (internal) = 3 days +
1 safety. Currently the actual lead time for 1 EATS rack > 4 days,
Objective(s)
1. Redesign parts to eliminate profile gaps and standardize
2. Product quality by 80%, reduce reject rate from 42% to <5%
3. Product Lead time by 50% (from 4 to 2 days)
4. Productivity by 50%, from 8-12pcs/day
Estimated Savings= $600K to $800K
8
SO WHAT DID WE DO ?
• We formed a team, April 21, 2014 we kicked off the project
• Developed KPI target metrics, centralized KPI board, created
benchmarks, tracked progress by the hour
• Developed a project timeline plan, open issues list & with
weekly project review meetings
• We trained both shifts (42 operators) on Lean Six Sigma tools,
Batch vs Continuous Flow
• Developed Current & Future state VSM, identified key areas for
improvement,
• We reverse engineered, started to create new prototype parts,
measure them and develop as Built Drawings
9
Project Timeline
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
10
Measure Phase Metrics
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
11Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
PROJECT EATS OPEN ISSUES LIST 15-Jul-14
Project Owner- Julian K.,
Count open 13
PROJECT OBJECTIVE = Implement Lean Single Pc Continuous flow and reduce total processing cycle time by 75% (from 1pc/4 day down to 1pc/1 day )
#
Project Tasks Date Added Resp % Complete Status / Update
Original Due Date
Completed
Date
Actual Weekly
Savings $
1827/829/830/831 & 827 COMPLETED QA VERIFIED -->832 problems Roger to see
Victor on issues -->828 not programmed (75% COMPLETED1-May-14 Roger 75%
QA TO TO verify and ADVISE when the 828 are completed and
the 8325-May-14
2 Need a decision on DPF channel interefence with tubes. Overdue since Dec 2013 1-Dec-13 Brian B/ Cust 50% CAUSES 7 MIN/PC REWORK AND NVA WELDING 20-May-14
3 401 bracket on SCR side still causes intereference requiring "crow bar" to open 12-Dec-13 Brian B 0% CAUSES ADDITIONAL 5MIN/PC REWORK 20-May-14
4 Need to add joining tubes to cycle count list and report count 3-Jun-14 Avinder 0% OVERDUE NO RESPONSE 6-Jun-14
5 Need to ensure that the same weekly schedule is posted at tacking/R7/joining & paint 3-Jun-14 Avinder 0%
Almost every week scheduling issues with WO not
matching schedule and wrong part numbers on
work orders
6-Jun-14
6 SUPERVISORS NOT DOING 5S AUDITS IN THEIR AREAS MIN OF 3X/WEEK- 3-Jun-14 MIKE/GLEN 50%
Supervisors not doing their audts 3/week as
required. None of the supervisors have done any
audits last week
6-Jun-14
7 SOME OPERATORS RUBBER STAMPING 5S CHECKS. SUPERVISORS RESPONSIBLE 1-Jul-14 BRIAN/MIKE/GLEN 0%Joining still not doing any 5S audits. Already
advised. Supervisor not supporting 5S2-Jul-14
8 PAINTLINE NOT TRACKING PRODUCTION PER WO 6-May-14 MIKE 50% No CUM Chart 8-May-14
9Need training plan to include cross training between robot and joining. Tacking used
as role model for other areas6-May-14 BRIAN/FERNANDO 0%
overdue supervisor fails/refuses to support cross
functional training4-Jul-14
10NEED TO START PAINTING ON 2ND SHIFT. CURRENTLY ONLY PAINTING ON DAY
SHIFT27-May-14 Glen/Brian 0%
MAJOR ISSUE -->EATS ASSY SHUT DOWN
BECAUSE NO PAINTERS ON 2ND SHIFT30-May-14
STATUS TASK OVERDUE CRITICAL TO QUALITY
TASK OVERDUE IMPORTANT TO PROCESS
TASK COMPLETED
12
EATS DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
1. Redesigned 5 main SCR and DPF parts which reduced
profile gaps from 15mm to < 1mm
a) Reduced Non-Value Add welding by 54”
b) Reduced overall fit & tack cycle time by 70 min
2. Validated new design in production on 240 pcs, 4 different
runs with no issues.
3. Created an ECN, with As-Built/Red line drawings with
revised part profile dimensions and obtained Volvo
Engineering approval
4. Trained in-house design engineers on Design Validation
and Product Reliability testing, DFMEA and PFMEA
5. Developed DFSS templates for future use
13
Problem areas
14
BEFORE IMPROVEMENT Part# 21290534
¾” Fillet Weld
15
Part# 21290534
< 1MM GAP
16
EATS DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
17
EATS VSM –BEFORE APRIL 21 -2014 (8 sets/day)
Customer Demand
Total Non-Value Add Time = 4.5 days
Value Added Time = 173 min (2.8Hrs)
2 operator
C/T = 34 min
C/O = 0.5 hr
Uptime = 61%
Joining &
Inspection
2 operator
C/T = 52 min
C/O = 0.5 hr
Uptime = 86%
1 operator
C/T = 47 min
C/O = 0 hr
Uptime = 78%
Manual
Weld
1 QC+ 1 welders
8 sets/day
47 min34 min52 min
1 day 2 day1 day 0.5 days
Production
Order
WK
D
Wk
INVENTORY
C/T = 40 min
C/O = 0 min
Uptime = 83%
Robot Weld
40
Customer
BLaser Break
Press
WIP WIP
VA Time
NVA Time
I
REWORK
Batch & Que Production
tacking
18
Lean Continuous Flow ProductionEATS VSM after April 23 2014, (12 sets/day 54% Improvement)
3x Week
Market Forecast
Total Non-Value Add Time = 1.5 days
Value Added Time = 114 min ~2 Hrs
Customer
A
Customer
B
0.5 operator
C/T = 44 min
C/O = 5 min
Uptime = 70%
0.5 operator
Tacking
C/T = 30 min
C/O = 0.5 hr
Uptime = 85%
1 QC+ 1 welders
C/T = 40 min
C/O = 0 min
Uptime = 95%
Joining &
Inspection
12 sets/day
Production
Control
Laser Break
Press
Robot 7
D
40 min44 min30 min
0.5 days 1 days0 days
INVENTORY TURN-
OVER RATE
NVA Time
VA Time
1 Pc continuous flow
PAINT
19Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
20Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
TYPEPART#
SHORT/LONG
TUBESETUP TIME (MIN) PICKING TIME
TOTAL
TIME
SETUP OR
CHANGEOVER
A 22214829 LONG TUBE 30 45 75 SETUP
A 22214830 LONG TUBE 5 15 15 CHANGEOVER
B 22214827 SHORT TUBES 30 45 75 SETUP 3 SETUPS
B 22214828 SHORT TUBES 5 15 20 CHANGEOVER
B 22214831 SHORT TUBES 5 15 20 CHANGEOVER
B 22214832 SHORT TUBES 5 15 20 CHANGEOVER
C 21721770 SPECIAL 60 60 120 MAJOR SETUP
D 10MCC88-83 SERVICE PART
LOST TIME (MIN)= 210 345
LOST HRS= 3.5 5.75
SETUP = 1 HR CHANGEOVER= 30 MIN
TYPEPART#
SHORT/LONG
TUBESETUP TIME (MIN) PICKING TIME
TOTAL
TIME
SETUP OR
CHANGEOVER
A 22214829 LONG TUBE 30 60 90 SETUP
C 21721770 SPECIAL 120 120 240 SETUP
B 22214831 SHORT TUBES 45 60 105 SETUP 8 FULL SETUPS
A 22214830 LONG TUBE 45 60 15 SETUP
B 22214828 SHORT TUBES 45 60 105 SETUP
B 22214829 LONG TUBE 45 60 105 SETUP
B 22214832 SHORT TUBES 45 60 105 MAJOR SETUP
D 10MCC88-83 SERVICE PART
LOST TIME (MIN)= 480 765LOST HRS= 8 12.8
NUMBER OF SETUPS= 8
PRODUCITON SCHEDULING RULES
1 MIN RUN QTY= 4 PCS (1 CART)
2 KEEP NUMBER SETUPS =< 2 /DAY AND INCREASE CHANGEOVER TIME INSTEAD
3 SCHEDULE THE ABOVE SETUP AND CHANGEOVER TIME INTO THE PRODUCITON SCHEDULE
4 KEEP THE LONG TUBE AND SHORT TUBE ORDERS TOGETHER IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE SETUP TIME
5 ALWAYS SCHDULE 770 AS THE LAST OR FIRST ORDER OF THE WEEK, NEVER MIX IT WITH OTHER ORDERS
6 ENSURE CYCLE COUNT OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS IS DONE EVERY WEEK BEFORE SCHEDULING
7 KEEP SAFETY STOCK OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS 10 PCS ALWAYS IN STOCK TO PREVENT SHORTAGE
8 GIVE PRODUCTION MIN 1 WEEK (7 DAYS) NOTICE BEFORE INCREASING TAKT TIME
9 ALWAYS FOLLOW THE SEQUENCE A->B->C->D
A=LONG TUBE, B= SHORT TUBE, C-770, D-LONG TUBE
NOT RECOMMENDED EATS SCHEDULE B->C->A->D
A=LONG TUBE, B= SHORT TUBE, C-770, D-LONG TUBE
21Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
WEEK OF DATE EATS PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
START TIME= 7:00
WORK ORDERPART
NUMBER QTY TAKING COMPLETED ROBOT 7 COMPLETED JOINING COMPLETED
PAINT LINE
COMPLETEDFG
1ST CART 1ST CART 1ST CART 1ST CART 4PCS
WOXXXXXX 222148XX 4PCS 9:00 11:30 14:00 17:00 17:00
2ND CART 2ND CART 2ND CART 2ND CART 8pcs
8PCS 11:00 14;00 16:30 19:30 19:30
3RD CART 3RD CART 3RD CART 3RD CART 12PCS
12PCS 13:00 17:30 20:00 22:30 22:30
1 CART= 4PCS EVERY 3HRS
22
LEAN TRANSFORMATION
We maintained ZERO WO LATES (since April 21, 2014)
We reduced quality reject rate from 30% down to 3%
We reduced total lead time from 4.5 down to < 2 days
We reduced total cycle time from 3Hrs to 0.7Hrs/pc
We reduced our WIP from 33 pcs to 12pcs in < 2 weeks
We achieved our project objectives in a 3 month period, ,
something that was considered not possible before !!
23
Control Phase We created a Master Sample, approved by Engineering &
Quality, which is used as a quality control reference
Implemented process control checks in all upstream and
downstream operations
We identified WIP as being the leading indicator to our
performance, and continue to track it daily
Developed training videos for Tacking, Joining & Welding
We implemented cross functional 5S audits, with
supervisors/managers and workers
We empowered the operators to lead & make decisions
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
24Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
25Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
26Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
EATS RACK SCHEDULE
Day Date WO # Time # Check
MON July 14, 2014 WO137798 22214831 7:30-8:15 1 J8:15-9:00 2 J
Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3 J√ TACKED 10:00-10:45 4 JJ JOINED LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5 ❼
❼ ROBOT 7 WELDED 12:00-12:45 6 ❼
12:45-1:40 7 ❼
1:50-2:30 8 ❼
2:30-3:15 9 ❼
3:15-4:00 10 ❼
4:00-4:45 11 ❼
4:45-5:30 12 √Tuesday July 15, 2014 WO137799 22214831 7:30-8:15 1 √
8:15-9:00 2 √Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3 √
10:00-10:45 4 √LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5 √
WO137800 22214829 1 √12:45-1:40 2 √1:50-2:30 3 √2:30-3:15 4 √3:15-4:00 5 √4:00-4:45 6
4:45-5:30 7
Wed July 16, 2014 WO137801 22214830 7:30-8:15 1
8:15-9:00 2
Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3
10:00-10:45 4
LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5
12:00-12:45 6
12:45-1:40 7
1:50-2:30 8
2:30-3:15 9
3:15-4:00 10
4:00-4:45 11
4:45-5:30 12
Thursday July 17, 2014 WO137802 22214830 7:30-8:15 1
8:15-9:00 2
Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3
10:00-10:45 4
LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5
12:00-12:45 6
12:45-1:40 7
1:50-2:30 8
2:30-3:15 9
3:15-4:00 10
4:00-4:45 11
4:45-5:30 12
Friday July 18, 2014 WO137803 22214829 7:30-8:15 1
8:15-9:00 2
Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3
10:00-10:45 4
LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5
12:00-12:45 6
12:45-1:40 7
1:50-2:30 8
2:30-3:15 9
3:15-4:00 10
4:00-4:45 11
4:45-5:30 12
Break (1:40-1:50)
Break (1:40-1:50)
Break (1:40-1:50)
Break (1:40-1:50)
Break (1:40-1:50)
EATS RACK SCHEDULE
Day Date WO # Time # Check
MON July 14, 2014 WO137798 22214831 7:30-8:15 1 J8:15-9:00 2 J
Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3 J√ TACKED 10:00-10:45 4 JJ JOINED LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5 ❼
❼ ROBOT 7 WELDED 12:00-12:45 6 ❼
12:45-1:40 7 ❼
1:50-2:30 8 ❼
2:30-3:15 9 ❼
3:15-4:00 10 ❼
4:00-4:45 11 ❼
4:45-5:30 12 √Tuesday July 15, 2014 WO137799 22214831 7:30-8:15 1 √
8:15-9:00 2 √Break 9:15-9:25 9:00-10:00 3 √
10:00-10:45 4 √LUNCH (11:30-12) 10:45-11:30 5 √
WO137800 22214829 1 √12:45-1:40 2 √1:50-2:30 3 √2:30-3:15 4 √3:15-4:00 5 √4:00-4:45 6
4:45-5:30 7
Wed July 16, 2014 WO137801 22214830 7:30-8:15 1
Break (1:40-1:50)
Break (1:40-1:50)
ew
27Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
EATS WO LATES BY WEEK
WO LATES YTD WO LATES
28Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12week
% Rejects/week(Internal)
29Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35EATS WIP BY WEEK
TOTAL WIP UCL WIP LCL WIP
30Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
11.5
18.3
12.4
9.3
7.3
9.7
14.3
13.0
14.0
17.0
19.6
26.0
28.0
30.0
22.0
27.0
28.6
24.0
28.027.3
24.0
27.3
30.5
23.0
26.7
29.5
26.4
21.0
25.7
16.0
23
28
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0EATS CELL EARNED HRS
TOTAL HRS Target HRs
New target= 7.5hrs x 3
31Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
148176 179
213
261
180
JAN FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE
EATS 2014 YTD FG/Month
32Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
11.5
18.3
12.4
9.3
7.3
9.7
14.3
13.014.0
17.0
19.6
26.0
28.0
30.0
22.0
27.0
28.6
24.0
28.027.3
24.0
27.3
30.5
23.0
26.7
29.5
26.4
21.0
25.7
16.0
23
28
5.8
9.2
6.2
4.73.7
4.9
7.26.5 7.0
8.5
15.1
20.0
21.5
23.1
16.9
20.822.0
18.5
21.521.0
18.5
24.8
27.7
20.9
24.3
26.8
24.0
19.1
23.4
14.5
21.0
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
EATS DAY v TOTAL HRS
TOTAL HRS Day Shift Hrs Target HRs
33Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
7.4
8.8 8.95
10.65
13.05 12.86
Jan Feb March April May June
EATS PCS/DAY
34
EATS PROJECT SAVNGS
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
BASED ON SHIFT HRS REDUCTION
MIN/PC Hrs/Pc PCS/SHIFT DAY SHIFT DAY SHIFT DAY SHIFT AFT shift AFT SHIFT AFT shift
DEPARTMENTS Capacity Capacity 7.5 Hrs PCS/SHIFT HRS PCS/HR PCS HRS PCS/HR
TACKING 30 0.5 12 11 7.5 1.507 1 0.5 1.1ROBOT 7 WELDING 44 0.7 12 10 7.5 1.333 2 1.2 1.2
JOINING 45.0 0.8 12 10 7.5 1.333 2 1.5 1.33TOTAL= 119 1.98 12 10.43 22.5 1.3911 1.4 3.2 1.2
Hrs/Pc
TOTAL HRS USED/12PCS= 25.7 2.14
TOTAL HRS BEFORE FOR 8 PCS= 45.0 5.625
Labour hrs saved per day (12pcs) = 3.49
REDUCED SHIFT HRS
ACTUAL
35
BEFORE & AFTER PRODUCTIVITY SAVINGS
Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS Pcs/Day Hrs Shift Operators Total Hrs Hrs/Pc QTY REQUIRED HRS REQUIRED
8 7.5 6.0 45 5.625 2,000 11250
AFTER IMPROVEMENTS Pcs/Day Hrs Day Operators Total Hrs Hrs/Pc QTY REQUIRED HRS REQUIRED
12 7.5 3.43 25.7 2.142 2,000 4283
HRS SAVED= 6966.67
30.00$
ANNUAL LABOUR SAVINGS =209,000.00$
LABOUR RATE
36Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .
EATS PROJECT SAVNGS
BASED ON SHIFT HRS REDUCTION
MIN/PC Hrs/Pc PCS/SHIFT DAY SHIFT DAY SHIFT DAY SHIFT AFT shift AFT SHIFT AFT shift
DEPARTMENTSCapacity Capacity 7.5 Hrs PCS/SHIFT HRS PCS/HR PCS HRS PCS/HRTACKIN
G30 0.5 12 11 7.5 1.507 1 0.5 1.1
ROBOT
7 44 0.7 12 10 7.5 1.333 2 1.2 1.2
JOINING 45.0 0.8 12 10 7.5 1.333 2 1.5 1.33TOTAL= 119 1.98 12 10.43 22.5 1.3911 1.4 3.2 1.2
Hrs/Pc
TOTAL HRS USED/12PCS= 25.7 2.14
TOTAL HRS BEFORE FOR 8 PCS= 45.0 5.625
Labour hrs saved per day (12pcs) = 3.49
BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS Pcs/Day Hrs Shift Operators Total Hrs Hrs/Pc QTY REQUIRED HRS REQUIRED
8 7.5 6.0 45 5.625 2,000 11250
AFTER IMPROVEMENTS Pcs/Day Hrs Day Operators Total Hrs Hrs/Pc QTY REQUIRED HRS REQUIRED
12 7.5 3.43 25.7 2.142 2,000 4283
HRS SAVED= 6966.67
30.00$
ANNUAL LABOUR SAVINGS = 209,000.00$
Rework cost reduction 22214829 EATS
Reject Rate Units/yearUnits
reworked
Rework
HRS/pc Rework cost/pc Annual Rework cost
30% 2000 600 0.5 22.50$ 13,500.00$
222,500.00$
REDUCED SHIFT HRS
ACTUAL
LABOUR RATE
TOTAL ANNUAL PROJECT SAVINGS
37
Next Steps
• Develop a transition hand-off plan with production
• Continue to lead/drive & audit activities as needed
• Daily KPI meetings with the team members until transition
• Continue with weekly project review meetings until
transition
• Continue to support the cell and use the best
practices/lessons learned in other areas
38Helping Our Customers Be More Successful . . .