VOLUME II - Regional SanSO-2 Laguna Blvd. to Franklin Blvd. $21,360,000 SO-3 Franklin Blvd. to East...

VOLUME IIChapter 9- Recommended Capital Improvement Program............................................... 9-19.1 Recommended Capital Expenditures ............................................................... 9-19.2 Schedule of Improvements ............................................................................... 9-19.2.1 Project Prioritization......................................................................................... 9-19.3 Comparison to Previous Master Planned Expenditures ................................... 9-39.4 Guidelines for Implementation......................................................................... 9-59.4.1 Project Verification .......................................................................................... 9-5

List of Figures PageFigure 9-1 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-2 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-3 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-4 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-5 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-6 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-7 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-8 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Figure 9-9 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-3Figure 9-10 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-4

List of Tables PageTable 9-1 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-1Table 9-2 ......................................................................................................On Page 9-2Table 9-3 ......................................................................................................On Page 9-3Table 9-4 .......................................................................................... Following Page 9-5

SRCSD Interceptor System Master Plan 2000

S:\MP 2000\Draft MP2000\Chapter 9\Chapter 9.doc 9-1

Chapter 9

Recommended Capital Improvement Program

9.1 Recommended Capital ExpendituresThe recommended SRCSD Interceptor System Master Plan Capital Improvement Programcontains 52 projects required to convey wastewater flows from existing and planneddevelopment to the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The facilities arescheduled to be constructed over the next 35 years, and when operational, will providecapacity for all planned development within the Urban Services Boundary and WestSacramento. The total capital cost of the master planned facilities is $950,100,000. Thiscost is in year 2000 dollars and does not include inflation or interest adjustments for any ofthe identified projects. The capital cost of each project is shown in Table 9-1. The capitalexpenditure per year is shown on Figure 9-1.

9.2 Schedule of ImprovementsThe improvements identified in MP 2000 have been assigned start and completion datesbased on the anticipated need for each facility to be operational. The start and completiondates for each project are contained in the project schedule, Figure 9-2. A large format,more detailed project schedule may be found in the appendix of this report. A visualrepresentation of the recommended project implementation over time is shown in Figures9-3 through 9-8.

9.2.1 Project PrioritizationThe recommended interceptor projects were developed to address existing and futurecapacity deficiencies in the existing interceptor system, and to extend conveyance facilitiesto planned development within the SRCSD service area. Each project was categorized intoone of three types of project justifications:

Category A: Required to relieve existing capacity deficiency

Category B: Required to relieve future capacity deficiency

Category C: Required to provide conveyance of wastewater generated fromfuture planned development beyond the reaches of the existinginterceptor system

TABLE 9-1ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST OF RECOMMENDED INTERCEPTOR PROJECTS

Project ID Project LocationEstimated Capital

CostBR-1 SRWTP to Franklin Blvd. $14,180,000

BR-6A South of Gerber Rd. to Bradshaw Rd. $16,620,000BR-6B South of Elder Creek to Mayhew and Jackson $19,600,000BR-7 Jackson Hwy. to International Dr. $31,890,000BR-8 International Dr. to Folsom Blvd. $29,890,000SR-1 Folsom Blvd. to South of American River $10,820,000SR-2 South of American River to Pennsylvania Ave. $9,300,000

FE-1B East of Sunrise Blvd. to Folsom South Canal $10,890,000FE-3 Iron Point Road $11,790,000

FE-3PS South of Iron Point Road $4,660,000LE-1 SRWTP to Franklin Blvd. at Dwight Rd. $9,000,000NN-1 Del Paso Rd. to end of pipe $3,400,000ARPS Arden Pump Station Site to south of American River $20,000,000RCPS Cordova Pump Station Site $9,350,000

UNW-1 Natomas PS to Del Paso Blvd. $29,200,000UNW-2 Del Paso Blvd. to Elkhorn Blvd. $26,280,000UNW-3 Elkhorn Blvd. to Natomas East Main Drain $8,660,000UNW-4 Natomas East Main Drain to Cherry Lane $14,460,000UNW-5 Cherry Lane to East of Watt Ave. $22,260,000UNW-6 East of Watt Ave. to West of SPRR $8,290,000DRR-1 28th St. and Elkhorn Blvd. to Scotland Dr. $7,080,000UNW-7 West of SPRR to Van Maren PS $12,620,000UNW-8 Van Maren Pump Station $13,920,000UNW-9 Van Maren PS to Fair Oaks Blvd. $14,210,000LNW-1 SRWTP to West of Sacramento River $27,500,000SRPS Southport Regional Pump Station (Phase 1 - 3) $33,050,000

LNW-2 West of Sacramento River to South of Linden Rd. $84,010,000WSCSM West Sacramento Treatment Plant $2,000,000LNW-3 South of Linden Rd. to Natomas Pump Station $75,070,000NNPS Natomas Pump Station Site (Phase 1 - 4) $21,090,000SO-1 SRWTP to Laguna Blvd. $8,660,000SO-2 Laguna Blvd. to Franklin Blvd. $21,360,000SO-3 Franklin Blvd. to East of Bruceville Rd. $18,270,000LC-1 SRWTP to Bruceville Rd. $24,840,000LC-2 Bruceville Rd. to Waterman Rd. $44,700,000LC-3 Waterman Rd. to Excelsior Rd. $36,040,000LC-4 Excelsior Rd. to Sunrise Blvd. $20,500,000LC-5 Sunrise Blvd. to end of pipe $5,430,000DC-1 Waterman Rd. North of Bond Rd. to Deer Creek $25,430,000DC-2 Deer Creek to Folsom South Canal $18,210,000DC-3 Folsom South Canal to end of pipe $16,080,000DC-4 South of Crevis Creek to end of pipe $3,320,000MA-1 Happy Lane to East of Folsom South Canal $37,020,000AJ-1 Sunrise and Douglas to West of Jaeger Rd. $5,080,000AJ-2 Sunrise and Douglas to White Rock Rd. $17,400,000

AJ-2S Sunrise and Douglas to North of Morrison Creek $7,490,000AJ-3 White Rock Rd. to South of Hwy 50 $7,680,000

AJ-3S White Rock Rd. to Old White Rock Rd. $3,930,000AJ-4 Sunrise and Douglas to end of LC-5 $21,940,000RL-1 Elkhorn Blvd. to Elverta Rd. East of Rio Linda Blvd. $10,800,000

BR-6BS Bradshaw Rd. to South of Elder Creek Rd. $2,990,000FS-1 South of Hwy. 50 to Iron Point Rd. $8,440,000

Total $966,700,000

Black & Veatch 1/4/2001

Figure 9-1SRCSD Master Plan 2000 - Estimated Capital Expenditures

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

$20020

00

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

2032

2034

Year

ly E

xpen

ditu

res

($ M

illio

ns)

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Cum

ulat

ive

Expe

nditu

res

($ M

illio

ns)

Yearly ExpendituesCummulative Expenditures

Project Start FinishSRCSD Interceptor Master Plan 2000 1/3/00 2/16/01Upper NWI Design Report 7/3/00 5/11/01Lower NWI Design Report 6/8/00 12/5/01Interceptor Design Manual 1/3/01 11/13/01Bradshaw Interceptor Section 1 & 2 1/3/00 10/6/00Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6A 1/3/00 7/11/03Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6B 1/3/00 4/16/04Bradshaw Interceptor Section 7 1/2/01 11/29/04Bradshaw Interceptor Section 8 1/8/01 1/14/05Sunrise Interceptor Section 1 12/9/02 12/15/06Sunrise Interceptor Section 2 12/9/02 12/15/06Folsom East Interceptor Section 1B 6/5/00 12/13/02Folsom East Section 3 & Pump Station 1/3/00 11/29/02Laguna Interceptor Extension 2/19/01 8/29/03North Natomas Interceptor 1/3/02 7/14/04Arden Pump Station / Force Main 1/3/00 4/19/02Rancho Cordova Pump Station (Phase 1) 11/1/00 7/23/02Rancho Cordova Pump Station (Phase 2) 2/15/18 8/26/20Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 1 1/3/03 1/11/07Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 2 & 3 12/3/04 6/11/09Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 4 4/2/07 10/9/09Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 5 & 6 2/19/01 1/14/05Dry Creek Relief 7/8/02 1/14/05Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 7 & 8 6/4/01 4/29/05Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 9 1/3/07 7/14/09Lower Northwest Interceptor Section 1 4/3/02 2/28/06Southport Regional Pump Station (Phase 1) 4/7/03 7/7/06Southport Regional Pump Station (Phase 2) 1/4/16 4/5/19Southport Regional Pump Station (Phase 3) 1/7/30 4/8/33Lower Northwest Interceptor Section 2 7/8/02 6/2/06West Sac Collection System Modifications 7/7/03 1/13/06Lower Northwest Interceptor Section 3 10/7/02 1/19/07Natomas Pump Station (Phase 1) 10/5/00 1/7/04Natomas Pump Station (Phase 2) 1/2/06 4/3/09Natomas Pump Station (Phase 3) 1/4/12 4/7/15Natomas Pump Station (Phase 4) 1/6/20 4/7/23South Interceptor Section 1 5/7/07 11/13/09South Interceptor Section 2 & Pump Station 10/8/07 10/14/11South Interceptor Section 3 6/14/10 12/21/12Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 1 9/7/09 3/16/12Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 2 3/19/12 2/12/16Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 3 2/15/16 1/10/20Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 4 1/13/20 12/8/23Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 5 1/3/22 7/12/24Deer Creek Interceptor Section 1 1/13/20 7/21/23Deer Creek Interceptor Section 2 7/24/23 1/29/27Deer Creek Interceptor Section 3 2/1/27 8/9/30Deer Creek Interceptor Section 4 8/12/30 2/18/33Mather Interceptor Section 1 7/5/11 1/12/15Aerojet Interceptor Section 1 7/8/13 1/15/16Aerojet Interceptor Section 2 1/18/16 7/27/18Aerojet Interceptor Section 2S 1/18/16 7/27/18Aerojet Interceptor Section 3 9/25/20 4/6/23Aerojet Interceptor Section 3S 4/7/23 10/16/25Aerojet Interceptor Section 4 7/16/29 6/10/33Rio Linda Interceptor Section 1 2/6/23 8/15/25Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6BS 1/4/21 7/14/23Folsom South Pump Station and Force Main 1/3/20 7/14/22

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033

Figure 9-2SRCSD Interceptor Master Plan 2000 Project Schedule

1/3/01



Those projects assigned to Category A were scheduled to begin as soon as possible.Projects in Category B and C were scheduled based on the need for sewerage facilities asprojected by anticipated development plans.

The projects contained in each category are listed in Table 9-2.

TABLE 9-2 – PROJECTS LISTED BY CATEGORY

Category A Category B Category CBR-1 RCPS FE-3

BR-6A UNW-9 FE-3PSBR-6B LNW-1 NN-1BR-7 SRPS UNW-1BR-8 LNW-2 UNW-2SR-1 LNW-3 UNW-3SR-2 NNPS UNW-4

FE-1B WSCSMLE-1 SO-1ARPS SO-2

UNW-5 SO-3UNW-6 LC-1DRR-1 LC-2UNW-7 LC-3UNW-8 LC-4RCPS LC-5

DC-1DC-2DC-3DC-4MA-1AJ-1AJ-2

AJ-2SAJ-3

AJ-3SAJ-4RL-1

BR-6BSFS-1



As shown in Figure 9-1 there is a spike in project expenditures between the years 2002 and2006. This period of high expenditures is primarily caused by the construction of threemajor interceptor projects: Bradshaw/Folsom, Upper Northwest, and Lower Northwest.The yearly expenditures for these projects are shown in Figure 9-9. The Bradshaw/Folsomand Upper Northwest Interceptors are required to relieve existing capacity deficiencies inthe SRCSD interceptor system and CSD-1 trunk system. Although the project segments ofthe Lower Northwest Interceptor are classified as Category B projects, they are required toprovide relief to the Natomas and Arden Pumping stations. Each of these pumping stationsare being upgraded to increase capacity, however, this is intended to only be a stop-gapmeasure to allow a reasonable timeframe for the design and construction of the LowerNorthwest Interceptor.

9.3 Comparison to Previous Master PlannedExpenditures

The 1994 update to the Sacramento Sewerage Expansion Study (SSES) estimated the totalcapital cost of the recommended interceptor projects to be $595,100,000 (1993 dollars).The current MP 2000 estimate is $966,700,000. The major increases in project costsaccounting for the $371,600,000 increase are itemized in Table 9-3, below. The differencebetween the $385 million total increase and $372 million difference from the previousmaster plan is due to a net cost savings on other projects contained in the MP 2000.

TABLE 9-3 – PROJECTS CONTRIBUTING TO INCREASED PROGRAM COSTS

Item: Increase:Inflation (ENR CCI) $93 millionLower Northwest Interceptor $148 millionUpper Northwest Interceptor $61 millionNewly Identified Projects $82 millionTotal: $385 million

A description of each of these items is presented below.

Inflation - The Sacramento Sewerage Expansion Study - 1994 Update used anENR Construction Cost Index (CCI) of 5,600 which represented the mid-pointbetween the 20-cities index and the San Francisco index at the time the estimatewas being generated. The January 2000 value of this index is 6474. Thisrepresents a 15.6% increase due to inflation of the seven-year period and results inan $93 million increase in program costs.

Lower Northwest Interceptor – The SSES estimated the cost of the LowerNorthwest Interceptor to be $95 million (2000 dollars). The MP 2000 estimate forthese facilities is $243 million. The MP 2000 assumes a West Sacramento route forthe Lower Northwest Interceptor and increases the size of the interceptor facilities

Figure 9-9Major Near Term Interceptor Projects

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Cap

ital C

ost (

$ M

illio

ns)

Bradshaw/Folsom Interceptor

Upper Northwest Interceptor

Lower Northwest Interceptor



to provide conveyance capacity for West Sacramento. A cursory review of theoriginal estimate revealed some additional reasons for the large discrepancy.Approximately half of the base pipeline cost from the SSES was based on a unitcost for 72-inch force main of $320 per foot. This unit price appears to be low forthe type of area the pipeline is routed through. Additionally, the $5 million basecost of expanding the Natomas Pump Station to 73 mgd appears to be low.

Upper Northwest Interceptor – The Upper Northwest Interceptor was estimatedat $89 million (2000 dollars) in the SSES. The estimate from the Upper NorthwestInterceptor Design Report is approximately $138 million, and the MP 2000estimate is $150 million. The increase is primarily attributable to the increasedcapacity of the facilities identified in the design report to divert additional flowsfrom impacted trunk facilities in the northeast system. Additional costs are alsoexpected to be incurred due to the combination of poor soil and accelerateddevelopment in the North Natomas Area. The increase from the Design Reportestimate to the MP 2000 estimate was related to the need to increase the size of theinterceptor to convey higher flows based on modeling results, and costs associatedwith deepening the pipeline to provide gravity service to a larger portion of theservice area.

Newly Identified Projects – The Interceptor System Master Plan 2000 hasidentified additional projects beyond those identified in the SSES that will berequired to provide conveyance capacity to serve ultimate development within theUrban Services Boundary. These projects include the ARPS (Arden Pump StationModifications), FS-1 (Folsom South Pump Station and Force Main), and AJ-1through AJ-4 (AeroJet Interceptor). Modifications to the Arden Pump Station areneeded to bring its capacity up to the value assumed in the SSES (approximately105-mgd). The Folsom South Pump Station was required due to the realignment ofFolsom East Interceptor Section 3 to Iron Point Road. The AeroJet Interceptor isrequired to provide service to the Mather/AeroJet Area. This area was originallyidentified as not requiring sewer service. However, due to changes in land useplanning since the SSES, this area has been assigned an average developmentdensity of 6 ESD per acre.

A comparison of expenditures in relation to time between the SSES and the MP 2000 isshown in Figure 9-10. To estimate expenditure over time for the SSES the capital cost foreach phase was divided evenly by the number of years per phase. The costs associatedwith interceptor projects completed to date are indicated in red. The total costs to date forthe previously construction interceptors have been added to the cumulative MP 2000 costsin order to compare with the previous estimates of the entire program.

As indicated in Figure 9-10, total expenditures since 1993 have been less than projected inthe 93/94 SSES. This indicates that not all improvements identified in Phase 1 of the93/94 SSES were completed on schedule. The delay in the construction of these facilitieshas contributed to the expenditure spike projected between the years 2002 and 2006.

Black & Veatch Final CIP Expend.xls

Figure 9-10SRCSD Interceptor Actual and Recommended Expenditures

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$12019

9319

9419

9519

9619

9719

9819

9920

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

1720

1820

1920

2020

2120

2220

2320

2420

2520

2620

2720

2820

2920

3020

3120

3220

3320

3420

35

Cap

ital E

xpen

ditu

re p

er Y

ear (

$ M

illio

ns)

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Cum

ulat

ive

Expe

nditu

res

($ M

illio

ns)

1993/94 SSES (1993 dollars)

1993/94 SSES (2000 dollars)

MP 2000

Actual Expenditures

Cumulative Values



9.4 Guidelines for ImplementationThe MP 2000 provides a detailed plan of the interceptor facilities and right of waynecessary to provide sewage conveyance within the Sacramento County USB and citylimits of West Sacramento. Timing of interceptor projects identified for constructionwithin the next 20 years is based on the operational condition of the existing regionalfacilities and/or SACOG growth projections within the study area. Projects identified forconstruction after the year 2020 are based on buildout densities within the USB that are notassociated with a particular timeframe. Projects scheduled after 2020 are intendedprimarily to identify facilities required to provide service under a developed USB scenario.As the case with previous master planning efforts, the MP 2000 should be consider a“working document” and subject to review at least every year and updated every fiveyears.

Table 9-4 summarized the recommended interceptor projects, describes project “drivers”and timing considerations, and assigns a priority level to the project.

9.4.1 Project VerificationThe modeling results of the expanded interceptor system during a 10-year design periodstorm at buildout of the USB predict two interceptors with significant surcharging causedby limited pipe capacity. These facilities are the McClellan Interceptor and the LagunaInterceptor. The predicted surcharging may be caused by inaccurate flow monitoringinformation. It is recommended that additional flow monitor analysis be performed inthese areas and the hydraulic model be recalibrated before identifying future relief projects.

If major land use changes have occurred since the completion of this MP 2000, designflows should be updated and the hydraulic model re-run to determine the impacts the landuse changes have on the interceptor system.

Finally, the SRCSD should continue metering flow at strategic locations along theinterceptor system. This data should be used to verify and update regional inflowcoefficient (Kp) values throughout the service area. By periodically updating the hydraulicmodel with this information, the SRCSD may accelerate or delay recommended projectsbased on the most recent system response information.

Improvement Project Category Driver Priority Timing Considerations Start Finish Start Finish

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 1&2 ARequired for relief of Central and Northeast Interceptors. Needed to bring Bradshaw Sections 3, 4, 5A, and 5B into service.

- Under Construction - - - 10/6/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6A A Required for relief of Central and Northeast Interceptors. 1 Requires completion of Bradshaw 1 & 2, project under design1/3/2000 5/4/2001 5/7/2001 7/11/2003

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6B A Required for relief of Central and Northeast Interceptors. 1 Requires completion of Bradshaw 1 & 2, project under design1/3/2000 2/8/2002 2/11/2002 4/16/2004

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 7 A Required for relief of Northeast area and Folsom Interceptor. 2 Required to abandon portion of Folsom Interceptor prior to extension of Light Rail1/2/2001 9/23/2002 9/24/2002 11/29/2004

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 8 A Required for relief of Northeast area and Folsom Interceptor. 2 Required to abandon portion of Folsom Interceptor prior to extension of Light Rail1/8/2001 2/14/2003 2/17/2003 1/14/2005

Sunrise Interceptor Section 1 A Required for relief of capacity deficient trunks in Northeast area. 2 Coordinate with extension of Light Rail12/9/2002 1/14/2005 1/17/2005 12/15/2006

Sunrise Interceptor Section 2 A Required for relief of capacity deficient trunks in Northeast area. 212/9/2002 1/14/2005 1/17/2005 12/15/2006

Folsom East Interceptor Section 1B A Existing Folsom Interceptor at capacity during PWWF. Required to provide capacity for new development in Folsom. 2 Folsom Blvd road improvements6/5/2000 10/5/2001 10/8/2001 12/13/2002

Folsom East Section 3 C Required to provide service to new development in Folsom East area. 2

Requires peak shaving in Folsom East Interceptor prior to completion of Bradshaw and Folsom East 1B. This project has been combined with Folsom East 3 Pump Station to form a single construction project.

1/3/2000 9/22/2000 9/25/2000 11/29/2002

Folsom East 3 Pump Station C Required to provide service to new development in Folsom East area. 2

Requires peak shaving in Folsom East Interceptor prior to completion of Bradshaw and Folsom East 1B. This project has been combined with Folsom East Section 3 to form a single construction project.

1/3/2000 9/22/2000 9/25/2000 11/29/2002

Laguna Interceptor Extension A Required to bring Laguna Interceptor into service and relieve existing deficiencies in Elk Grove trunk system. 1 Requires completion of MP20002/19/2001 6/21/2002 6/24/2002 8/29/2003

North Natomas Interceptor C Required for new development in North Natomas and Metro Air Park areas. 31/3/2002 5/7/2003 5/8/2003 7/14/2004

Arden Pump Station / Force Main A Existing PWWF exceeds firm capacity of pump station. 1 Requires completion of MP2000 and Arden Capacity Study1/3/2000 10/6/2000 10/9/2000 4/19/2002

Rancho Cordova Pump Station (Phase 1) A

Pump station does not have firm capacity for Peak Wet Weather Flows 1 Currently under design

11/1/2000 10/16/2001 10/17/2001 7/23/2002

Rancho Cordova Pump Station (Phase 2) B

Pump station does not have sufficient capacity for ultimate development of the area. 3

Dependant upon actual flows as monitored at the pump station

2/5/2018 6/7/2019 6/10/2019 8/14/2020

Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 1 C

Required for new development in North Natomas and Rio Linda and relief of Northeast area. 2

Available capacity of Dry Creek Interceptor, Natomas and Arden Pump Stations

1/3/2003 2/10/2005 2/11/2005 1/11/2007



Available capacity of Dry Creek Interceptor, Natomas and Arden Pump Stations. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 3 to form a single construction project.

12/3/2004 1/11/2007 1/12/2007 6/11/2009

TABLE 9-4

ConstructionDesignSCHEDULING AND PRIORITY LIST


Improvement Project Category Driver Priority Timing Considerations Start Finish Start Finish



Available capacity of Dry Creek Interceptor, Natomas and Arden Pump Stations. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 2 to form a single construction project.

12/3/2004 1/11/2007 1/12/2007 6/11/2009

Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 5 A

Required for relief of capacity deficient trunks in Northeast area including Mission Trunk. 1

Requires completion of MP2000. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 6 to form a single construction project.

2/19/2001 11/8/2002 11/11/2002 1/14/2005



Requires completion of MP2000. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 5 to form a single construction project.

2/19/2001 11/8/2002 11/11/2002 1/14/2005

Dry Creek Relief A Required for relief of Dry Creek Interceptor. 1 Requires completion of Upper Northwest Section 5 & 6 7/8/2002 11/7/2003 11/10/2003 1/14/2005



Requires completion of Upper Northwest 5 & 6. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 8 to form a single construction project.

6/4/2001 2/21/2003 2/24/2003 4/29/2005



Requires completion of Upper Northwest 5 & 6. This project has been combined with Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 7 to form a single construction project.

6/4/2001 2/21/2003 2/24/2003 4/29/2005

Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 9 B

Required for relief of future capacity deficiency in Northeast area. 3 Depends on impact of development on trunk capacity

1/3/2007 5/6/2008 5/7/2008 7/14/2009

Lower Northwest Interceptor Section 1 B

Required for relief of Northeast area and for new development in North Natomas. 1

Available capacity of Arden Pump Station, Natomas Interceptor, and Mission Trunk. Requires completion of Lower Northwest Design Report

4/3/2002 12/23/2003 12/24/2003 2/28/2006

Southport Regional Pump Station B Required for relief of Northeast area and for new development in North Natomas and West Sacramento. 1Project to be constructed in multiple stages to provide flexibility in the facility's ultimate capacity. Requires completion of Lower Northwest Design Report

4/7/2003 8/6/2004 8/9/2004 7/7/2006




7/8/2002 3/26/2004 3/29/2004 6/2/2006

West Sacramento Collection System Modifications C Capacity considerations at West Sacramento Treatment Plant. 1 Requires completion of Lower Northwest Interceptor

7/7/2003 11/5/2004 11/8/2004 1/13/2006




10/7/2002 11/12/2004 11/15/2004 1/19/2007

Natomas Pump Station B Required for relief of Northeast area and for new development in North Natomas. 1Limited capacity of existing Natomas Pump Station. Project to be constructed in multiple stages to provide flexibility in the facility's ultimate capacity

10/5/2000 2/6/2002 2/7/2002 1/7/2004

South Interceptor Section 1 C Required for future development in East Franklin area. 2 Requires construction of Laguna Interceptor Extension 5/7/2007 9/5/2008 9/8/2008 11/13/2009

South Interceptor Section 2 C Required for future development in East Franklin area. 2 10/8/2007 11/13/2009 11/16/2009 10/14/2011

South Interceptor Section 3 C Required for future development in East Franklin area. 2 6/14/2010 10/14/2011 10/17/2011 12/21/2012

TABLE 9-4 - CONTINUEDSCHEDULING AND PRIORITY LIST

Design Construction


Improvement Project Category Driver Priority Timing Considerations Start Finish Start FinishLaguna Creek Interceptor Section 1 C Required for future development in Southeast county. 3 Available capacity in Bradshaw 9/7/2009 1/7/2011 1/10/2011 3/16/2012

Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 2 C Required for future development in Southeast county. 3 Available capacity in Bradshaw 3/19/2012 12/6/2013 12/9/2013 2/12/2016




Deer Creek Interceptor Section 1 C Required for future development in Deer Creek basin. 3 1/13/2020 5/14/2021 5/17/2021 7/21/2023




Mather Interceptor Section 1 C Required for new development in Sunrise-Douglas area. 3 Requires completion of Bradshaw 7 7/5/2011 11/5/2012 11/6/2012 1/12/2015

Aerojet Interceptor Section 1 C Required for future development in Aerojet area. 3 7/8/2013 11/7/2014 11/10/2014 1/15/2016


Aerojet Interceptor Section 2S C Required for future development in Aerojet area. 3 1/18/2016 5/19/2017 5/22/2017 7/27/2018


Aerojet Interceptor Section 3S C Required for future development in Aerojet area. 3 4/7/2023 8/8/2024 8/9/2024 10/16/2025

Aerojet Interceptor Section 4 C Required for future development in Aerojet area. 3 Available capacity in Bradshaw 7/16/2029 4/4/2031 4/7/2031 6/10/2033

Rio Linda Interceptor Section 1 C Required for future development in Rio Linda. 3 2/6/2023 6/7/2024 6/10/2024 8/15/2025

Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6BS C Required for future development West of Bradshaw. 3 1/4/2021 5/6/2022 5/9/2022 7/14/2023

Folsom South PS and Force Main C Required for future development in Folsom South area. 3 1/3/2020 5/6/2021 5/7/2021 7/14/2022

SCHEDULING AND PRIORITY LISTDesign Construction

TABLE 9-4 - CONTINUED


SRCSD Master Plan 2000Project Summary

Project Name: Bradshaw Interceptor Section 1 & 2

Project ID: BR-1 1

Location: SRWTP to Franklin Blvd

Description of Facility: 90 and 120-inch gravity pipeline

Length: 6,690 ft.

Design Capacity: 206 to 303 mgd

Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast and Central Interceptors

Primary Construction Method: Open Cut

Special Considerations: Tunnel beneath railroad and wetlands

Base Construction Cost: $5,689,592

Special Structures: $1,765,000Traffic Control: $56,896

Environmental Mitigation: $20,000Right-of-Way: -

Special Construction/Pipe Jack: $2,778,713Contingency: $1,031,020

Total Construction Cost $11,341,221

Engineering/Admin/Legal Costs: $2,835,305

Total Capital Cost: $14,176,526

BR-1 10/13/20006:06 PM

Bradshaw1-2.xls 10/13/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor- Sections 1, 2

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

0+00 10+00 20+00 30+00 40+00 50+00 60+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

120"

Bradshaw Equalization Structure

90"

Lagu

na C

reek

Franklin Blvd. Transition Structure

Influ

ent T

rans

ition

Str

uctu

re

Exis

ting

90"

Dia

. RC

P

120"

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g


Project Name: Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6A

Project ID: BR-6A 2

Location: Elk Grove-Florin and Gerber Rds to Bradshaw Rd and Elder Creek

Description of Facility: 108-inch gravity pipeline

Length: 14,875 ft.

Design Capacity: 215 mgd



Special Considerations: Railroad crossing


Special Structures: -Traffic Control: -

Environmental Mitigation: $100,000Right-of-Way: $56,406

Special Construction/Pipe Jack: $158,510Contingency: $1,733,939




BR-6A 10/13/20006:09 PM

Bradshaw 6A.xls 10/13/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor- Section 6A

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

336+00 356+00 376+00 396+00 416+00 436+00 456+00 476+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

108"

Ger

ber R

oad

Flor

in R

oad

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g

Bra

dsha

w/C

entr

al J

unct

ion

Stru

ctur

e


Project Name: Bradshaw Interceptor Section 6B and Jackson Connector

Project ID: BR-6B 3

Location: Bradshaw Rd and Elder Creek Rd to Jackson Hwy


Length: 11,359 ft.




Special Considerations: Crossing Jackson Hwy








BR-6B 10/13/20006:10 PM

Bradshaw 6B.xls 10/13/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor- Section 6B

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

484+75 494+75 504+75 514+75 524+75 534+75 544+75 554+75 564+75

Station

Elev

atio

n

Bradshaw/Jackson Junction Structure

84"

Jack

son

Hig

hway

Bradshaw Section 6A

108"

Bradshaw Road

Elde

r Cre

ek R

oad

Mor

rison

Cre

ek


Project Name: Bradshaw Interceptor Section 7

Project ID: BR-7 4

Location: Bradshaw Rd and Jackson Hwy to International Dr


Length: 26,300 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast area and Folsom Interceptor


Special Considerations: Traffic control for Bradshaw Rd and Kiefer Blvd


Special Structures: $589,782Traffic Control: $594,816






BR-7 10/13/20006:11 PM

Bradshaw 7.xls 10/13/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor- Section 7

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

570+00 620+00 670+00 720+00 770+00 820+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

Happy Lane

Lower Placerville Road

84"

72"

Bradshaw Road

Bradshaw/Mather Junction Structure

Keifer Boulevard

Bra

dsha

w/J

acks

on J

unct

ion

Stru

ctur

e

Old Placerville Road


Project Name: Bradshaw Interceptor Section 8

Project ID: BR-8 5

Location: International Dr to Folsom Blvd And Citrus Rd


Length: 17,975 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast area and Folsom Interceptor


Special Considerations: Traffic control for construction in International Dr, Kilgore Dr, and Folsom Blvd, Crossing Sunrise Blvd and RT tracks








BR-8 10/13/20006:11 PM

Bradshaw 8.xls 10/13/2000

Bradshaw Interceptor- Section 8

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

833+00 853+00 873+00 893+00 913+00 933+00 953+00 973+00 993+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

Folsom Boulevard

72"

Folsom/Citrus West Junction Structure

48"

Folsom/Citrus East Junction Structure

Citrus Drive

Kilgore Road

International Drive

Sunr

ise

Bou

leva

rd

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g


Project Name: Sunrise Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: SR-1 6

Location: Folsom Blvd And Citrus Rd to Sunrise Blvd Bridge


Length: 8,670 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast area trunks


Special Considerations: Hwy 50 crossing, Traffic control for construction in Sunrise Blvd








SR-1 10/13/20006:12 PM

sunrise1 10/13/2000

Sunrise Interceptor - Section 1

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

1012+75 1022+75 1032+75 1042+75 1052+75 1062+75 1072+75 1082+75 1092+75

Station

Elev

atio

n

48"

Vortex Drop Structure

Sunrise Boulevard

Hig

hway

50

Col

oma

Roa

d

Citrus Road

Fols

om/C

itrus

Eas

t Jun

ctio

n St

ruct

ure


Project Name: Sunrise Interceptor Section 2

Project ID: SR-2 7

Location: Sunrise Blvd Bridge to Pennsylvania Ave and Sunset Ave

Description of Facility: 36-inch gravity pipeline, 24-inch pressure pipeline

Length: 7,871 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast area trunks


Special Considerations: American River Crossing, Traffic control for construction along Sunrise Blvd








SR-2 10/13/20006:12 PM

sunrise2 10/13/2000

Sunrise Interceptor - Section 2

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

1099+00 1109+00 1119+00 1129+00 1139+00 1149+00 1159+00 1169+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

Pressure Manhole

Pennsylvania Avenue

36"

36"

24"

Vort

ex D

rop

Stru

ctur

e

Am

eric

an R

iver

Microtunneling


Project Name: Folsom East Interceptor Section 1B

Project ID: FE-1B 8

Location: Folsom Blvd And Citrus Rd to Hwy 50 and Folsom South Canal


Length: 10,500 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Existing Folsom Int at capacity during PWWF andrequired to provide capacity for new devel. in Folsom


Special Considerations: Traffic control for construction in Folsom Blvd








FE-1B 10/13/20006:12 PM

folsomeast1B 10/13/2000

Folsom East Interceptor- Sections 1B

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

0+00 20+00 40+00 60+00 80+00 100+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

48"

Folsom/Citrus EastJunction Structure

48"


48"

Folsom Boulevard


Project Name: Folsom East Interceptor Section 3

Project ID: FE-3 9

Location: Folsom Blvd and Iron Point Rd to Iron Point Rd and Oak Ave Pkwy

Description of Facility: 36 and 42-inch gravity pipeline, 16 and 24-inch force main

Length: 15,154 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required to provide service to new development in Folsom East area


Special Considerations: Traffic Control for construction in Iron Point Rd








FE-3 10/13/20006:12 PM

folsomeast3 10/13/2000

Folsom East Interceptor- Section 3

150

200

250

300

350

400

0+00 20+00 40+00 60+00 80+00 100+00 120+00 140+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

42"

16" and 24" FM

36"

36"

Iron Point Road

Prai

rie C

ity R

oad

Fols

om B

oule

vard

FE

3 In

terc

epto

r Jun

ctio

n St

ruct

ure


Project Name: Folsom East Interceptor Section 3 Pump Station

Project ID: FE-3PS 10

Location: Iron Point Rd North of Hwy 50

Description of Facility: New pump station

Length: N/A


Project Justification: Category C: Required to provide service to new development in Folsom East area


Special Considerations:


Special Structures: -Traffic Control: $0


Special Construction/Pipe Jack: -Contingency: $486,499


Engineering/Admin/Legal Costs: $932,456


FE-3PS 10/13/20006:13 PM


Project Name: Laguna Extension Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: LE-1 11

Location: SRWTP to Franklin Blvd and Dwight Rd


Length: 7,900 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of trunk sewer in Big Horn Blvd andto bring Laguna Interceptor into service


Special Considerations: Tunneling under wetlands


Special Structures: $1,510,653Traffic Control: $0


Special Construction/Pipe Jack: -Contingency: $1,439,719




LE-1 10/13/20006:13 PM

Lei-1 10/13/2000

Laguna Extension Interceptor- Section 1

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

-5+00 5+00 15+00 25+00 35+00 45+00 55+00 65+00 75+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

60"

Con

nect

to E

xist

ing

Bra

dsha

wEq

ualiz

atio

n St

ruct

ure

Con

nect

to E

xist

ing

60"

in F

rank

lin B

lvd

at M

H 1

19-0

13-0

10

108"

54" South Interceptor

102" Laguna Creek Interceptor

Tunnel

Laguna Extension Junction Structure


Project Name: North Natomas Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: NN-1 12

Location: Del Paso Rd at Arco Arena to South of Elkhorn Blvd


Length: 6,700 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required for new development in North Natomas andMetro Air Park areas





Environmental Mitigation: -Right-of-Way: -





NN-1 10/13/20006:13 PM

Nni-1 10/13/2000

North Natomas Interceptor- Section 1

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

0+00 10+00 20+00 30+00 40+00 50+00 60+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

42"

36"

Tunnel Construction


Project Name: Arden Pump Station Improvements

Project ID: ARPS 13

Location: Arden Pump Station Site, Howe Ave and Enterprise Dr

Description of Facility: Upgrade of existing Arden Pump Station

Length: N/A

Design Capacity: 100 mgd +/- to be determined

Project Justification: Category A: Existing PWWF exceeds firm capacity of pump station

Primary Construction Method:

Special Considerations: Specific improvements to be determined, $5,000,000is a budgetary placeholder.








ARPS 10/13/20006:14 PM


Project Name: Rancho Cordova Pump Station Improvements

Project ID: RCPS 14

Location: Cordova Pump Station Site, Chase Dr

Description of Facility: Upgrade of existing pump station / construct new PS in future

Length: N/A


Project Justification: Category A/B: Pump station does not have sufficient firm capacityfor existing flows nor ultimate development of the area


Special Considerations: Project contains Phase 1 (pump station upgrade) andPhase 2 (construction of new pump station in future)








RCPS 1/4/200110:34 AM


Project Name: Upper Northwest Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: UNW-1 15

Location: Natomas Pump Station to Del Paso Blvd


Length: 10,400 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required for future devel. in North Natomas and Rio Linda and relief of Northeast trunks and Dry Creek Int

Primary Construction Method: Tunneled

Special Considerations: Poor soil conditions and high ground water


Special Structures: -Traffic Control: $0






UNW-1 10/13/20006:14 PM

Unwi-1 10/13/2000

Upper Northwest Interceptor- Section 1

-35

-25

-15

-5

5

15

25

10+00 30+00 50+00 70+00 90+00 110+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

84"

96"

East Drainage Canal

Nat

omas

Pum

p St

atio

n

C1

Can

al

Del

Pas

o B

oule

vard

Tunnel Construction




Location: Del Paso Blvd To Elkhorn Blvd


Length: 10,652 ft.



Primary Construction Method: Tunneled

Special Considerations: Poor soil conditions and high ground water








UNW-2 10/13/20006:15 PM

Unwi-2 10/13/2000


-35

-25

-15

-5

5

15

25

114+00 134+00 154+00 174+00 194+00 214+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

84"

84"

East Drainage Canal

Elkh

orn

Bou

leva

rd

Tunnel Construction




Location: Elkhorn Blvd to Natomas East Main Drain


Length: 6,129 ft.







Environmental Mitigation: -Right-of-Way: $2,648





UNW-3 10/13/20006:15 PM

Unwi-3 10/13/2000


-15

-5

5

15

25

35

45

220+50 230+50 240+50 250+50 260+50 270+50 280+50

Station

Elev

atio

n

84"84"

Elkhorn Boulevard




Location: Elkhorn Blvd and NEMDC to Elkhorn Blvd and Cherry Ln


Length: 11,084 ft.




Special Considerations: Railroad crossing and traffic control along Elkhorn Blvd








UNW-4 10/13/20006:15 PM

Unwi-4 10/13/2000


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

281+80 301+80 321+80 341+80 361+80 381+80

Station

Elev

atio

n

66"

Dry CreekJunction Structure

Elkhorn Boulevard

Dry

Cre

ek

Nat

omas

Eas

t Mai

n D

rain

age

Can

al

84"

54" Rio Linda Interceptor

27" Dry Creek Interceptor

Rio

Lin

da B

oule

vard

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g

Junction Structure




Location: Elkhorn Blvd and Cherry Ln to Elkhorn Blvd and Watt Ave


Length: 19,385 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Northeast area


Special Considerations: Traffic control along Elkhorn Blvd, Watt Ave crossing








UNW-5 10/13/20006:15 PM

Unwi-5 10/13/2000


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

390+00 410+00 430+00 450+00 470+00 490+00 510+00 530+00 550+00 570+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

66"

Dry Creek ReliefJunction Structure

Elkhorn Boulevard

28th

Str

eet

Dry

Cre

ek

Junction Structure

54"

Junction Structure

Wat

t Ave

nue

Dry

Cre

ek R

oad

42" Dry Creek Relief


Project Name: Upper Northwest Section 6


Location: Elkhorn Blvd and Watt Ave to Elkhorn Blvd and Don Julio Blvd


Length: 9,370 ft.




Special Considerations: Traffic control along Elkhorn Blvd, Don Julio Blvd crossing,




Special Construction/Pipe Jack: $42,840Contingency: $865,093




UNW-6 10/13/20006:16 PM

Unwi-6 10/13/2000


50

70

90

110

130

150

586+50 596+50 606+50 616+50 626+50 636+50 646+50 656+50 666+50 676+50

Station

Elev

atio

n

48"


Elkhorn Boulevard

Wal

erga

Roa

d

48"

Don

Jul

io

Ave

nue

Don Julio TransitionStructure


Project Name: Dry Creek Relief

Project ID: DRR-1 21

Location: 28th St and Elkhorn Blvd to 28th St and Scotland Dr


Length: 8,703 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required for relief of Dry Creek Interceptor










DRR-1 10/13/20006:16 PM

DRR.xls 10/13/2000

Dry Creek Relief

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0+00 10+00 20+00 30+00 40+00 50+00 60+00 70+00 80+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

42"

28th Street

Dry Creek Relief Junction Structure

42"

Dry

Cre

ek M

H 2

0300

918


Project Name: Upper Northwest Section 7


Location: Elkhorn Blvd and Don Julio Blvd to Van Maren Pump Station

Description of Facility: 36-inch force main

Length: 16,040 ft.




Special Considerations: Probable dual force main, Crossing Railroad, Roseville Rd, and I-80Traffic control along Elkhorn Blvd, Greenback Ln, and Auburn Blvd



Environmental Mitigation: $20,000Right-of-Way: $1,368,330





UNW-7 10/13/20006:16 PM

Unwi-71 10/13/2000


110

120

130

140

150

160

170

680+20 682+20 684+20 686+20 688+20 690+20 692+20 694+20 696+20 698+20

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

Elkhorn Boulevard

Ros

evill

e R

oad

36" FM

Hill

sdal

e B

oule

vard

Bore & JackR

ailro

ad C

ross

ing

Don

Jul

io T

rans

ition

Str

uctu

re

Unwi-72 10/13/2000


110

120

130

140

150

160

170

700+00 702+00 704+00 706+00 708+00 710+00 712+00 714+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

Elkhorn Boulevard

36" FM

And

rea

Bou

leva

rd

Util

ity C

ross

ings

Unwi-73 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

715+00 717+00 719+00 721+00 723+00 725+00 727+00 729+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

Elkhorn Boulevard

36" FM

Diablo Drive

OlympicWay

Util

ity C

ross

ings

Unwi-74 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

730+00 732+00 734+00 736+00 738+00 740+00 742+00 744+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

I-80 FreewayOlympicWayVerner Avenue

Bore & Jack

Unwi-75 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

745+00 747+00 749+00 751+00 753+00 755+00 757+00 759+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

Greenback LaneVerner Avenue

Low

ered

for

Util

ity C

ross

ings

Unwi-76 10/13/2000


70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

760+00 762+00 764+00 766+00 768+00 770+00 772+00 774+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

Greenback Lane

3- 2

0'x1

2' B

ox C

ulve

rts

Unwi-77 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

775+50 780+50 785+50 790+50 795+50 800+50

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

Greenback Lane Auburn Boulevard

Unwi-78 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

805+00 807+00 809+00 811+00 813+00 815+00 817+00 819+00 821+00 823+00 825+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

Auburn Boulevard Halifax Street

Box

Cul

vert

Stre

am C

ross

ing

Unwi-79 10/13/2000


90

100

110

120

130

140

825+00 827+00 829+00 831+00 833+00 835+00 837+00 839+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM

36" FM

Halifax Street Westbrook Drive

FM lowered to avoid conflicts


Project Name: Van Maren Pump Station


Location: West of Van Maren Dr and Auburn Blvd


Length: N/A












UNW-8 10/13/20006:17 PM




Location: Van Maren Pump Station to Old Auburn Rd and Fair Oaks Blvd


Length: 13,185 ft.


Project Justification: Category A: Required to relieve future capacity deficincies inNortheast trunk system


Special Considerations: Traffic control along Auburn Blvd, Sunrise Blvd crossing


Special Structures: -Traffic Control: $434,106






UNW-9 10/13/20006:17 PM

Unwi-9 10/13/2000


90

110

130

150

170

190

210

840+61 860+61 880+61 900+61 920+61 940+61 960+61 980+61 1000+61

Station

Elev

atio

n

36"

Auburn Boulevard

Aub

urn

Bou

leva

rd

Van

Mar

en L

ane

36"

Old Auburn Road

36"


Project Name: Lower Northwest Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: LNW-1 25

Location: SRWTP to West of Sacramento River

Description of Facility: 96-inch force main

Length: 17,917 ft.


Project Justification: Category B: Required for relief of Northeast area and futureNorth Natomas and West Sacramento development


Special Considerations: Crossing Interstate 5, Highway 160, Southern Pacific Railroad,and Sacramento River








LNW-1 10/13/20006:17 PM

Lnwi-1 10/13/2000

Lower Northwest Interceptor- Section 1

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

0+00 20+00 40+00 60+00 80+00 100+00 120+00 140+00 160+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

96" FM

Mor

rison

Cre

ek

2-72" FM

Southport Regional Pump Station

SRWTP Influent Junction Structure

96" FM

Sacr

amen

to R

iver

Lagu

na C

reek

96"FM

Hw

y 16

0

Inte

rsta

te 5

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g


Project Name: Southport Regional Pump Station

Project ID: SRPS 26

Location: West of Sacramento River, Northwest of SRWTP


Length: N/A




Special Considerations: Facility is anticipated to be constructed in phasesPhase 1: 100 mgd Phases 2 & 3: additional 75 mgd each








SRPS 10/13/20006:17 PM




Location: West of Sacramento River to South of Linden Rd


Length: 41,602 ft.




Special Considerations: Crossing Willow Point Babel Slough








LNW-2 10/13/20006:18 PM

Lnwi-2 10/13/2000

Lower Northwest Interceptor- Section 2

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

225+00 275+00 325+00 375+00 425+00 475+00 525+00 575+00Station

Elev

atio

n

120"

Riv

er R

oad

120"

Will

ow P

oint

Bab

el S

loug

h

Transition Structure

Sout

hpor

t Reg

iona

l Pum

p St

atio

n


Project Name: West Sacramento Collection System Modifications

Project ID: WSCSM 28

Location: Throughout West Sacramento Collection System

Description of Facility: Necessary modifications of collection system to connect to LNWI

Length: Varies

Design Capacity: Varies

Project Justification: Category C: Needed to serve West Sacramento

Primary Construction Method: Varies

Special Considerations: Cost estimate to be refined by Lower Northwest Design Report








WSCSM 10/13/20006:18 PM




Location: South of Linden Rd to Natomas Pump Station

Description of Facility: 60 and 84-inch force main

Length: 43,467 ft.


Project Justification: Category B: Required for relief of Northeast area and futureNorth Natomas development


Special Considerations: Crossing of Sacramento River, I-80, Business 80, Hwy 84, Garden Highway, and West Capitol Ave


Special Structures: -Traffic Control: $1,129,510






LNW-3 10/13/20006:18 PM

LNWI-3a 10/13/2000

Lower Northwest Interceptor- Section 3a

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

595+19 645+19 695+19 745+19 795+19Station

Elev

atio

n

84" FM

Lind

en R

oad

84" FM

Jeffe

rson

Bou

leva

rd

Bar

ge C

anal H

ighw

ay 8

4

Bus

ines

s 80

Wes

t Cap

itol A

venu

e

LNWI-3b 10/13/2000

Lower Northwest Interceptor- Section 3b

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

814+94 864+94 914+94 964+94 1014+94Station

Elev

atio

n

84" FM

Nat

omas

Pum

p St

atio

n

84" FM

Sacr

amen

to R

iver

Wes

t Dra

inag

e C

anal

2-60" FM

Inte

rsta

te 8

0

Gar

den

Hig

hway


Project Name: Natomas Pump Station Expansion

Project ID: NNPS 30

Location: Natomas Pump Station Site

Description of Facility: 175 mgd Pump Station

Length: N/A


Project Justification: Category B: Required for relief of Northeast area and futureNorth Natomas development


Special Considerations: Facility is anticipated to be constructed in phasesPhase 1: 100 mgd Phase 2: additional 75 mgd








NNPS 10/13/20006:21 PM


Project Name: South Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: SO-1 31

Location: SRWTP to Laguna Blvd


Length: 8,886 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Capacity required to serve new development in the south area


Special Considerations: Crossing Laguna Blvd and Railroad








SO-1 10/13/20006:21 PM

sintusb1.xls 10/13/2000

South Interceptor- Section 1

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

0+00 10+00 20+00 30+00 40+00 50+00 60+00 70+00 80+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

54"

Southern Pacific Railroad

Lagu

na B

lvd

Lagu

na E

xten

sion

Junc

tion

Stru

ctur

e


Project Name: South Interceptor Section 2 and South Interceptor Pump Station

Project ID: SO-2 32

Location: Laguna Blvd to Franklin Blvd South of Elk Grove Blvd

Description of Facility: 54-inch gravity pipeline, 36-inch force main

Length: 8,032 ft.




Special Considerations: Crossing Elk Grove Blvd and Railroad








SO-2 10/13/20006:22 PM

sintusb2 10/13/2000


-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

88+90 98+90 108+90 118+90 128+90 138+90 148+90 158+90 168+90

Station

Elev

atio

n

36" FM54"

Elk G

rove

Bou

leva

rd

Southern Pacific Railroad


Project Name: South Interceptor Section 3

Project ID: SO-3 33

Location: Bruceville Rd to Franklin Blvd South of Elk Grove Blvd

Description of Facility: 36, 48, and 54-inch gravity pipeline

Length: 20,168 ft.




Special Considerations: Traffic control for construction in Franklin BlvdCrossing Bruceville Rd



Environmental Mitigation: -Right-of-Way: $2,621,576





SO-3 10/13/20006:22 PM

sintusb3 10/13/2000


-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

169+00 219+00 269+00 319+00 369+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

54"

39"

48"

Bru

cevi

lle R

oad

Franklin Blvd


Project Name: Laguna Creek Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: LC-1 34

Location: SRWTP to Big Horn Blvd


Length: 13,297 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required for future service to east county area


Special Considerations: Wetlands mitigation for construction in Laguna Creek, CrossingFranklin Blvd and Bruceville Rd, Tunnel under wetlands at SRWTP








LC-1 10/13/20006:22 PM

Lci-1 10/13/2000

Laguna Creek Interceptor- Section 1

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0+00 20+00 40+00 60+00 80+00 100+00 120+00

Station

Elev

atio

n

102"

102"

Lagu

na E

xten

sion

Jun

ctio

n St

ruct

ure

Fran

klin

Bou

leva

rd

Bru

cevi

lle R

oad

42" Elk Grove Trunk

Elk Grove Trunk Bypass



Project ID: LC-2 35

Location: Bruceville Rd North of Big Horn Blvd to Waterman Rd North of Bond Rd


Length: 20,092 ft.




Special Considerations: Wetlands mitigation for construction in Laguna Creek, Tunneling underWaterman Ridge, Crossing Hwy 99, Elk Grove Florin Rd, Railroad








LC-2 10/13/20006:23 PM

Lci-2 10/13/2000


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

132+97 182+97 232+97 282+97 332+97

Station

Elev

atio

n

102"

96"H

ighw

ay 9

9

Stoc

kton

Bou

leva

rd

Elk

Gro

ve- F

lorin

Roa

d

Waterman Ridge

Wat

erm

an R

oad

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g

Dee

r Cre

ek J

unct

ion

Stru

ctur

e



Project ID: LC-3 36

Location: Waterman Rd North of Bond Rd to Excelsior Rd South of Gerber Rd

Description of Facility: 72, 78, and 84-inch gravity pipeline

Length: 26,421 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required for future sevice to east county area


Special Considerations: Wetlands mitigation for construction in Laguna Creek, RR Crossing,Traffic control for construction in Bradshaw Rd and Excelsior Rd








LC-3 10/13/20006:23 PM

Lci-3 10/13/2000


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

333+89 383+89 433+89 483+89 533+89 583+89

Station

Elev

atio

n

72"

84"

Shel

don

Roa

d

Cal

vine

Roa

d

Bra

dsha

w R

oad

Exce

lsio

r Roa

d

78"

15" TrunkInv=33.81

Rai

lroad

Cro

ssin

g

Dee

r Cre

ek J

unct

ion

Stru

ctur

e



Project ID: LC-4 37

Location: Excelsior Rd South of Gerber Rd to Sunrise Blvd South of Jackson Hwy

Description of Facility: 66, 72, 78-inch gravity pipeline

Length: 22,297 ft.




Special Considerations: Wetlands mitigation for construction in Laguna CreekCrossing Folsom South Canal and Florin Rd








LC-4 10/13/20006:23 PM

Lci-4 10/13/2000


40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

598+09 648+09 698+09 748+09 798+09Station

Elev

atio

n

78"

72"

Fols

om S

outh

Can

al

66"

Eagl

e's

Nes

t R

oad

Flor

in R

oad

66"



Project ID: LC-5 38

Location: Sunrise Blvd South of Jackson Hwy to end of pipe East of Sunrise Blvd


Length: 6,208 ft.




Special Considerations: Wetlands mitigation for constuction in Laguna CreekCrossing Jackson Hwy and Sunrise Blvd




Special Construction/Pipe Jack: $510,600Contingency: $869,089




LC-5 10/13/20006:23 PM

Lci-5 10/13/2000


80

90

100

110

120

130

140

821+06 831+06 841+06 851+06 861+06 871+06 881+06

Station

Elev

atio

n

Lagu

na C

reek

66"

Hw

y 16

Sunr

ise

Bou

leva

rd

Aer

ojet

Inte

rcep

tor S

ectio

n 4

(Dro

p St

ruct

ure)


Project Name: Deer Creek Interceptor Section 1

Project ID: DC-1 39

Location: Waterman Rd North of Bond Rd to Wilton Rd and Deer Creek


Length: 23,167 ft.


Project Justification: Category C: Required for future service to southeast county


Special Considerations: Traffic control for construction in Bond Rd, Grant Line Rd, andWilton Rd








DC-1 10/13/20006:24 PM

VOLUME II - Regional SanSO-2 Laguna Blvd. to Franklin Blvd. $21,360,000 SO-3 Franklin Blvd. to East...

Documents

Transcript of VOLUME II - Regional SanSO-2 Laguna Blvd. to Franklin Blvd. $21,360,000 SO-3 Franklin Blvd. to East...