Pepperdine Law Review Pepperdine Law Review

Volume 8 Issue 4 Article 9

5-15-1981

Volume 8 Index Volume 8 Index

David T. Stowell

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr

Part of the Other Law Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation David T. Stowell Volume 8 Index, 8 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 4 (1981) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol8/iss4/9

This Index is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Katrina.Gallardo@pepperdine.edu, anna.speth@pepperdine.edu, linhgavin.do@pepperdine.edu.

VOLUME VIII INDEXTITLE INDEX TO ARTICLES

Alternative For Small Business Raising CapitalUnder the Securities Act of 1933 ....................... David H. Barber 899

Evaluation of Judicial Performance;A Tool for Self-Improvement ......................... Richard L. Aynes 255

Muko & Conex: The Third CircuitResponds to Connell ............................... R.A. King, M. Moser 79

Oral Will Contracts and the Statuteof Frauds in California, 1896-1980:A Summary and Evaluation ............................ Marc P. Bouret 41

A Reappraisal of General AndLimited Jurisdiction in California ........................ Thomas Kallay I

Regulatory Reform: RestructuringFederal Agency Regulatory Power ...................... Donald T. Bliss 619

The Policeman's Duty and the LawPertaining to Citizen Encounters ....................... Charles Oberly 653

AUTHOR INDEX TO ARTICLES

Aynes, Richard L., Evaluation of JudicialPerformance, A Tool for Self-Improvement ............................ 255

Barber, David H., Alternatives For SmallBusiness Raising Capital Under theSecurities Act of 1933 ................................................. 899

Bliss, Donald T., Regulatory Reform: RestructuringFederal Agency Regulatory Power ..................................... 619

Bouret, Marc P., Oral Will Contracts and TheStatute of Frauds in California, 1896-1980:A Summary and Evaluation ........................................... 41

Kallay, Thomas, A Reappraisal of General andLimited Jurisdiction in California ...................................... 1

King, R. A., Muko & Conex: The Third Circuit Responds to Connell ........ 79Moser, M., Muko & Conex: The Third Circuit

Responds to Connell .................................................. 79Oberly, Charles, The Policeman's Duty and

the Law Pertaining to Citizen Encounters ............................. 653

COMMENT INDEX

A Barometer of Freedom of the Press:The Opinions of Mr. Justice White .................................... 157

Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realitiesof Artificial Beings and Legal Fictions ................................. 367

F.T.C. Regulation of Endorsements inAdvertising- In the Consumer's Behalf? ............................... 695

1189

Has The Right to Jury Trial as GuaranteedUnder the Seventh Amendment Become Outdatedin Complex Civil Litigation ............................................ 189

How To Accomplish A Tax Free PensionPlan Rollover ............. .................................. 933

Nearly A Century In Reserve: OrganizedBaseball, Collective Bargaining and TheAntitrust Exemption Enter the 80's .................................... 313

Oil Eaters: Alive and Patentable:Diamond v. Chakrabarty .............................................. 747

Punitive Damages and the Drunken Driver ................................ 117The Real Estate Brokerage Industry and

Antitrust Implications ................................................. 967

NOTE INDEX

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure to SubmitMaster Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in Property Value ........ 835

California Expands Tort Liability Under the Novel "Market Share" Theory:Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories ........................................ 1011

Consolidated Edison Company of New York v. Public Service Commissionof New York: Freedom of Speech Extended to Monopolies-Is ThereNo Escape For the Consumer? ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087

Harris v. McRae: Whatever Happened to the Roe v. Wade Abortion Right?. 861Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital: Negligent Infliction of Emotional

D istress .............................................................. 813NLRB v. Yeshiva University: Teacher Participants In University Policy

Formulation Deemed Managerial Under NLRA ........................ 473Police Shootings-Administrative Law as a Method of Control Police:

Peterson v. City of Long Beach ........................................ 419The New Starker: A Nonsimultaneous Exchange Expands Section

1031/Collateral Estoppel Clarification .................................. 223Truman v. Thomas: The Rise of Informed Refusal ......................... 1067United States v. Henry: The Further Expansion of the Criminal

Defendant's Right to Counsel During Interrogations ................... 451United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic Standing

............................................... 1045World-Wide Volkswagen Corporation v. Woodson: Minimum Contacts in a

M odern W orld ........................................................ 779

CALIFORNIA LAW SURVEY INDEX

Becker v. S.P. V. Construction Company, Compensatory Damages in Excessof Prayer Amount Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section580 .................................................................... 616

California Teachers Association v. San Diego Community College District,Back-Pay under Education Code Section 45025 ........................ 1152

Carsten v. Psychological Examining Committee, Board Members Standingto Sue ................................................................ 577

Chatterton v. Eu, Judicial Vacancies ....................................... 575Deas v. Knapp, Business and Professions Code Section 10475 .............. 1175De Los Santos v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, Attorney-Client Privileges

604Deronde v. Regents of the University of California, Bakke applied to Law

School ................................................................ 1131

1190

(Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Fox v. Ehrumantraut, Sale of Stock in Privately Owned Business UnderCorporate Securities Law Section 25104 ................................ 617

Graham v. Scissor Tail, Nonneutrality Prohibit ............................ 1156Haines v. Barney's Club, Inc., Public Policy Behind Compounding Crimes.. 1185Hocharion v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Civil Procedure Code

Section 581(a) ........................................................ 1176Hovey v. Superior Court of Alameda County, Voir Dire Examinations ...... 504Hubbard v. Boelt, Fireman's Rule Extended to Police Officers .............. 1186In re Angelia P., Clear and Convincing Proof .............................. 1178In re Hop, Commitment under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 4825. 1114In re Marriage of Schiffman, Best Interests of the Child ................... 1180Jarvis v. Cory, Article 4 sections 17 and 12(e) of the California Constitution

...................................................... 1183Johns-Manville v. Contra Costa Superior Court, The Scope of the Exclusive

Remedy under California Labor Code sections 3601 and 4553 ........... 591Knight v. Hallsthammar, Implied Covenant of Habitability ................. 1172Miller v. Eisenhower Medical Center, Private Hospitals Held to Public

Hospital Standards ...................................... 602Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Negligent Infliction of Emotional

D istress .............................................................. 534Moore v. Moore, Community Installment Payments Made on Separate

Property After M arriage ............................................... 564Owens v. Superior Court, Speedy Trial Under California Penal Code

Section 1382 .......................................................... 530Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals

Board, Unemployment Insurance Code Section 409.2 .................. 1153People v. Chadd, Consent of Counsel ...................................... 1117People v. Hall, Prior Admissions: Criminal Procedure ..................... 531People v. Harris, Excessive Pretrial Publicity ....... .................. 1115People v. Jenkins, Legislative Intent Creates Exception to General Rule .... 1151People v. Kurland, The Effect of Material Omissions Within Search

Warrant Affidavits Under California Penal Code Section 1538.5-40 ...... 517People v. Wheatley Glaze, Ordinances Regulating Arcades-First

Amendment .... ............................................ 532Stanton v. Panish, Judicial Vacancies ................................ 575Thompson v. County of Alameda, Government Immunity & the Duty to

W arn ................................................................. 551Van Atta v. Scott, "Own Recognizance" Under California Code of Civil

Procedure Section 526(a) ............................................... 614

1191

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAWBack-Pay Under Educational Code Section 45025: California Teachers

Association v. San Diego Community College District .............. 1152Board Members Standing to Sue: Carsten v. Psychological Examining

Com m ittee ........................................................ 577F.T.C. Regulation of Endorsements in Advertising: In the Consumer's

B ehalf? ........................................................... 695Legislative Intent Creates Exception to General Rule: People v.

Jenkins ........................................................... 1151Police Shootings-Administrative Law as a Method of Control Over

Police: Peterson v. City of Long Beach ............................ 419Unemployment Insurance Code Section 409.2: Pacific Legal

Foundation v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board................................................ 1153

ANTITRUSTMuko & Conex: The Third Circuit Responds to Connell ................ 79Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, Collective

Bargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 313The Real Estate Brokerage Industry and Antitrust Implications ........ 967

CIVIL PROCEDUREAgins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure to

Submit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Defense in PropertyV alue ............................................................. 835

A Reappraisal of General and Limited Jurisdiction in California ....... 1Civil Procedure Code Section 581(a): Hacharian v. Superior Court of

Los Angeles County .............................................. 1176Has the Right to a Jury Trial as Guaranteed under the Seventh

Amendment Become Outdated in Complex Civil Litigation? ....... 189Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital: Negligent Infliction of

Em otional Distress ................................................ 534"Own Recognizance" Under California Code of Civil Procedure section

526(a): Van Atta v. Scott .......................................... 614The New Starker: A Nonsimultaneous Exchange Expands Section

1031/Collateral Estoppel Clarification .............................. 223Truman v. Thomas: The Rise of Informed Refusal ..................... 1067United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045World-Wide Volkswagen Corporation v. Woodson: Minimum Contracts

in a Modern W orld ................................................ 779

COLLATERAL ESTOPPELThe New Starker: A Nonsimultaneous Exchange Expands Section

1031/Collateral Estoppel Clarification .............................. 223

COMMUNITY PROPERTYCommunity Installment Payments made on Separate Property after

Marriage: Moore v. Moore ......................................... 564

CONSTITUTIONAL LAWA Barometer of Freedom of the Press: The Opinions of Mr. Justice

W hite ............................................................. 157

1192

(Vol. 8: 1189, 1981j Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure toSubmit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in PropertyV alue ............................................................. 835

Article 4 sections 17 and 12(e) of the California Constitution: Jarvis v.Cory ............................................................. 1183

Bakke applied to Law School: Deronde v. Regents of the University ofCalifornia ....................................... ................ 1131

Commitment Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 4825: In reHop .................................................. 1114

Consolidated Edison Company of New York v. Public ServiceCommission of New York ......................................... 1087

Harris v. McRae: Whatever Happened to the Roe v. Wade AbortionR ight? ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857

Has the Right to a Jury Trial as Guaranteed Under the SeventhAmendment Become Outdated in Complex Civil Litigation? . . . . . . . 189

Judicial Vacancies: Chatterton v. Eu .................................. 575Judicial Vacancies: Stanton v. Panish ................................. 575Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, Collective

Bargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 313Ordinances Regulating Arcades-First Amendment: People v. Wheatley

Glaze .................................................. 532Prior Admissions: Criminal Procedure People v. Hall ................ 531Speedy Trial Under California Penal Code Section 1382: Owens v.

Superior Court ................................................... 530The Effect of Material Omissions Within Search Warrant Affidavits

Under California Penal Code Section 1538.5-40: People v. Kurland 517The Policeman's Duty and the Law Pertaining to Citizen Encounters 653United States v. Henry: The Further Expansion of the Criminal

Defendant's Right to Counsel During Interrogations ............... 451United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045Voir Dire Examinations: Hovey v. Superior Court ..................... 504

CORPORATIONSConsolidated Edison Company of New York v. Public Service

Commission of New York: Freedom of Speech Extended toMonopolies-Is There No Escape for the Consumer ................ 1087

Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and LegalFictions ........................................................... 367

Sale of Stock in Privately Owned Business under Corporate SecuritiesLaw Section 25104: Fox v. Ehrumantraut .......................... 617

CRIMINAL LAWCorporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and Legal

Fictions ........................................................... 367Public Policy Behind Compounding Crimes: Haines v. Barney's Club,

Inc ............ ................................................... 1185Speedy Trial Under California Penal Code Section 1382: Owens v.

Superior Court ................................................... 530The Effect of Material Omissions Within Search Warrant Affidavits

Under California Penal Code Section 1538.5-40: People v. Kurland 517The Policeman's Duty and the Law Pertaining to Citizen Encounters 653United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045Voir Dire Examination: Hovey v. Superior Court of Alameda County .. 504

1193

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Consent of Counsel: People v. Chadd ................................. 1117Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and Legal

Fictions ................................ 367Excessive Pretrial Publicity: People v. Harris ......................... 1115Prior Admissions: Criminal Procedure: People v. Hall ................. 531Speedy Trial Under California Penal Code Section 1382: Owens v.

Superior Court ................................................... 530United States v. Henry: The Further Expansion of the Criminal

Defendant's Right to Counsel During Interrogations ............... 451United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045

DAMAGESPunitive Damages and the Drunken Driver ............................ 117

DEFENSES

Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and LegalFictions ........................................................... 367

Fireman's Rule Extended to Police Officers: Hubbard v. Boelt ......... 1186Governmental Immunity and the Duty to Warn: Thompson v. County

of A lam eda ....................................................... 551The Policeman's Duty and the Law Pertaining to Citizen Encounters .. 653United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045

DISCOVERY

Civil Procedure Code Section 581(a): Hocharian v. Superior Court ofLos Angeles County .............................................. 1176

United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of AutomaticStanding .......................................................... 1045

DISCRIMINATION

Bakke Applied to Law School: Deronde v. Regents of the University ofCalifornia ........ ...................................... 1131

Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, CollectiveBargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 313

DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Best Interests of the Child: In re Marriage of Schiffman ............... 1180Clear and Convincing Proof: In re Angelia P .......................... 1178Community Installment Payments Made on Separate Property after

Marriage: Moore v. Moore ......................................... 564

DUE PROCESS

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure toSubmit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in PropertyValue .................. ................................ 835

Article 4 sections 17 and 12(e) of the California Constitution: Jarvis v.C ory ............................................................. 1183

Bakke Applied to Law School: Deronde v. Regents of the University ofCalifornia ........................................................ 1131

Commitment under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 4825: In reH op .............................................................. 1114

Has the Right to a Jury Trial as Guaranteed Under the SeventhAmendment Become Outdated in Complex Civil Litigation? ....... 189

Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, CollectiveBargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 317

1194

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

The Effect of Material Omissions Within Search Warrant AffidavitsUnder California Penal Code Section 1538.5-40: People v. Kurland . 517

Voir Dire Examinations: Hovey v. Superior Court of Alameda County . 504

EDUCATION

Back-Pay Under Education Code Section 45025: California TeachersAssociation v. San Diego Community College District .............. 1152

EMPLOYEE, BENEFITS

Article 4 Sections 17 and 12(e) of the California Constitution: Jarvis v.Cory ............................................................. 1183

Back-pay Under Education Code Section 45025: California TeachersAssociation v. San Diego Community College District .............. 1152

Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, CollectiveBargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 313

Private Hospitals Held to Public Hospital Standards: Miller v.Eisenhower Medical Center ....................................... 602

The Scope of the Exclusive Remedy Under California Labor CodeSections 3601 and 4553: Johns-Manville v. Contra Costa SuperiorC ourt ............................................................. 591

EQUAL PROTECTION

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure toSubmit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in PropertyValue ........ -.......................................... 835

Bakke Applied to Law School: Deronde v. Regents of the University ofCalifornia ........................................................ 1131

Commitment Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 4825: In reH op .............................................................. 1114

Has the Right to a Jury Trial as Guaranteed Under the SeventhAmendment Become Outdated in Complex Civil Litigation? ....... 189

EVIDENCE

Attorney-Client Privileges: De Los Santos v. Superior Court of LosA ngeles ........................................................... 604

Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital: Negligent Infliction ofEm otional Distress ................................................ 813

Police Shootings-Administrative Law as a Method of Control OverPolice: Peterson v. City of Long Beach ............................ 419

The Policeman's Duty and the Law Pertaining to Citizen Encounters .. 653Truman v. Thomas: The Rise of Informed Refusal ..................... 1067United States v. Henry: The Further Expansion of the Criminal

Defendant's Right to Counsel During Interrogations ............... 451United States v. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence of Automatic

Standing .......................................................... 1045

FAMILY LAW

Best Interests of the Child: In re Marriage of Schiffman ............... 1180Clear and Convincing Proof: In re Angelia P .......................... 1178

INSURANCE

Punitive Damages and Drunken Driver ................................ 117

1195

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

F.T.C. Regulation of Endorsements in Advertising: In the Consumer'sB ehalf? ........................................................... 695

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

Judicial Vacancies: Chatterton v. Eu .................................. 575Judicial Vacancies: Stanton v. Panish ................................. 575

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

Evaluation of Judicial Performance; A Tool for Self-Improvement ...... 255

JUVENILE LAW

Attorney-Client Privilege: De Los Santos v. Superior Court of LosA ngeles ........................................................... 604

LABOR LAW

Back-Pay Under Education Code Section 45025: California TeachersAssociation v. San Diego Community College District .............. 1152

Muko & Conex: The Third Circuit Responds to Connell ................ 79Nearly a Century in Reserve: Organized Baseball, Collective

Bargaining and the Antitrust Exemption Enter the 80's ............ 313NLRB v. Yeshiva University: Teacher Participants in University Policy

Formulation Deemed Managerial under NLRA ..................... 473Nonneutrality Prohibited: Graham v. Scissor-Tail ..................... 1156Private Hospital Held to Public Hospital Standards: Miller v.

Eisenhower Medical Center ....................................... 602The Scope of the Exclusive Remedy Under California Labor Code

Sections 3601 and 4553: Johns-Manville v. Contra Costa SuperiorC ourt ............................................................. 591

PATENT

Oil Eaters: Alive and Patentable: Diamond v. Chakrabarty ............ 743

PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING

How to Accomplish a Successful Tax Free Pension Plan Rollover ...... 933

PRODUCTS LIABILITY

World-Wide Volkswagen Corporation v. Woodson: Minimum Contactsin a M odern W orld ................................................ 779

PROPERTY LAW

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure ToSubmit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in Property,V alue ............................................................. 835

Business and Professions Code Section 10475: Deas v. Knapp ......... 1175Implied Covenant of Habitability: Knight v. Hallsthommer ............. 1172The Real Estate Brokerage Industry and Antitrust Implications ........ 967

REGULATORY REFORM

Regulatory Reform: Restructuring Federal Agency Regulatory Power.. 619

SECURITIES

Alternatives For Small Business Raising Capital Under the SecuritiesA ct of 1933 ........................................................ 899

Sale of Stock in Privately Owned Business Under Corporate SecuritiesLaw Section 25104: Fox v. Ehrumantraut .......................... 617

1196

[Vol. 8:1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

STATUTES

Agins v. City of Tiburon: Open Space Zoning Prevails-Failure toSubmit Master Plan Prevents a Cognizable Decrease in PropertyV alue ............................................................. 835

Civil Procedure Code Section 581 (a): Hocharian v. Superior Court ofLos Angeles County .............................................. 1176

Compensatory Damages in Excess of Prayer Amount Under CaliforniaCode of Civil Procedure Section 580: Becker v. S.P. V. ConstructionCom pany ......................................................... 616

Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and LegalFictions ........................................................... 367

Governmental Immunity and the Duty to Warn: Thompson v. Countyof A lam eda ....................................................... 551

Nonneutrality Prohibited: Graham v. Scissor-Tail ..................... 1156"Own Recognizance" under California Code of Civil Procedure Section

526(a): Van Atta v. Scott .......................................... 614Punitive Damages and the Drunken Driver ............................ 117Sale of Stock in Privately Owned Business Under Corporate Securities

Law Section 25104: Fox v. Ehrumantraut .......................... 617

TAXATION

How to Accomplish a Successful Tax Free Pension Plan Rollover ...... 933The New Starker: A Nonsimultaneous Exchange Expands Section

1031/Collateral Estoppel Clarification .............................. 223

TORTS

California Expands Tort Liability Under the Novel "Market Share"Theory: Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories ............................ 1011

Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and LegalFictions ........................................................... 367

Fireman's Rule Extended to Police Officers: Hubbard v. Boelt .......... 1186F.T.C. Regulation of Endorsements in Advertising: In the Consumer's

B ehalf? ........................................................... 695Governmental Immunity and the Duty to Warn: Thompson v. County

of A lam eda ....................................................... 551Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital: Negligent Infliction of

Em otional Distress ................................................ 813Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Molien v. Kaiser Foundation

H ospital .......................................................... 534Police Shootings-Administrative Law as a Method of Control Over

Police: Peterson v. City of Long Beach ............................ 419Punitive Damages and the Drunken Driver ............................ 117Truman v. Thomas: The Rise of Informed Refusal ..................... 1067

WILLS

Oral Will Contracts and the Statute of Frauds in California, 1896-1980:A Summary and Evaluation ....................................... 41

1197

CASE INDEX

AAbbie Uriguen Olds Buick, Inc. v. U.S.F.I. Co ............................. 152, 391Achenson v. Shafter ....................................................... 389Ackerman-Chilingworth v. Pacific Electric Contractors Ass'n ............ 104, 113Adams v. Associated Press ................................................ 173Adams v. Texas ............ .... ................................ 513Adams, Ray, & Rosenberg v. Win. Morris Agency ........................... 84Adams v. W illiams .......................................... 655, 664, 665, 666, 684Adam son v. California ..................................................... 220Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. U.S .......................................... 102Adephi University ........................................... 481, 483, 485, 490, 498Adkins v. Children's Hospital ............................................. 842Aftarnase v. Economy Baler Co .......................................... 798, 800Agins v. City of Tiburon ..................................... 836, 840, 844, 852, 853Agins v. City of Tiburon .................................... 835, 836, 840, 841, 845,

846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854Aguilar v. Texas ........................................ 519, 520, 521, 522, 524, 527Ajax Realty Corp. v. J.F. Zook, Inc ....................................... 796, 809Alaska S.S. Co. v. United States ........................................... 643Alderson v. Commissioner .......................................... 226, 247, 248Alderson v. Houston ...................................................... 64Alexander v. Commissioner ............................................. 232, 233Alexander v. Superior Court .............................................. 519Allen Bradley Co. v. Electrical Workers Local 3 ............................ 347Allen Bradley Co. v. IBEW Local 3 ................................ 79, 81, 84, 108Allgeyer v. Louisiana ...................................................... 843Almeida-Sanchez v. U.S ................................................. 667, 685Alocco v. Fouche .......................................................... 52Alsteen v. Gehl ........................................................... 828Altemose Const. Co. v. Building & Const. Trades Council ............ 104, 105, 109Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization .... 578Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea Co ............................ 84, 85, 87,

88, 95, 99, 101, 108, 111, 347, 348Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co ........................... 540, 541, 549, 819American Can Co. v. Dart Industries ...................................... 209American Column & Lumber Co. v. United States ........................ 989, 991American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Werfel ................................ 152American Friends Service Committee v. Procunier ............... 580, 582, 583, 586American Fruit Growers Inc. v. Brdogex Co ................................ 763American Insurance Co. v. Saulnier ....................................... 152American League Baseball Club of Chicago v. Chase ................ 315, 329, 330American League of Professional Ball Clubs ............................... 334American Surety Co. v. Gold .............................................. 152Anderson v. Dalton ....................................................... 123Anderson v. Knox ......................................................... 127Anderson v. M art ......................................................... 617Anderson v. Phillips ...................................................... 578Antonello v. San Diego .................................................... 533Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader .................................... 80, 83, 86, 105, 111Apodaca v. Oregon ........................................................ 210Argersinger v. Hamlin ..................................................... 456Armistead v. State Personnel Bd ................................. 441, 447, 448, 449Armstrong v. United States ................................................ 836Arnold v. State ex rel. Burton ............................................. 152Arshal v. United States .................................................... 764

1198

[Vol. 8: 1189, 19811 Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Associated Press v. United States ....................................... 978, 997Association Canado-Americaine ........................................... 476Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety Comm'n ................ 191, 199, 204, 205Augustine v. Hinnen ...................................................... 389Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co ................................................. 618Ayala v. Farmer's Mut. Auto Ins. Co ................................. 119, 134, 135Azvedo v. Indus. Accident Comm'n ........................................ 595Azvedo v. Obel ............................................................ 595

B

Bach v. McDonnel Douglas, Inc ...................................... 778, 788, 805Bailey v. Sm ith ......................................................... 126, 127Baker v. Bolton ........................................................... 393Baker v. Bouchard ........................................................ 52Baker v. M arcus ........................................................ 119, 139Baker v. W arner .......................................................... 177Baldwin v. State .......................................................... 563Ballard v. United States ................................................... 220Ballew v. Georgia ......................................................... 511Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman ................................. 189Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. McBride ......................................... 818Barabas v. Prudential Lines ............................................... 114Bare v. Bare ............................................................ 568, 570Barber v. Blue ............................................................ 577Barr v. M atteo ............................................................ 435Barth v. B.F. Goodrich Tire Co ............................................. 389Batalla v. State ......................................................... 820, 829Beacon Theatres v. Westover ................................ 200, 201, 202, 203, 207Beal v. Doe ............................................................. 859, 865Bean v. Winding River Camp Ground ..................................... 793Beard v. M elvin ........................................................... 45Beauchemes v. Synanan Foundation, Inc ................................... 559Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Eday Fabric Sales Corp ............................ 189, 217Becker v. Borough of Schuykill Haven ..................................... 818Becker v. S.P.U. Construction Co .......................................... 617Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journey Man Stone Cutter's Ass'n ............... 82Bee v. Sm ity ........................................................... 58, 59, 67Beggs v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp ...................................... 389Beidler v. United States ................................................... 747Bell v. W ym an ............................................................ 49, 60Bellevance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co ..................................... 200Bellotti v. Bsird ......................................................... 859, 889Benn v. Linden Crave Co .................................................. 788Bennett v. Forrest ........................................................ 52Benton v. M aryland ....................................................... 452Berden v. Berden ......................................................... 58, 67Berger v. New York ....................................................... 452Berman v. Parker ................................................... 843, 848, 850Bernstein v. Universal Pictures, Inc .................................. 190, 194, 206,

207, 208, 213

Berry v. Chaplin .......................................................... 606Bertero v. Nat. Gen. Corp .................................................. 148Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB ............................................. 499Biggs v. Commissioner .................................................... 246

1199

Bird Provisions Co. v. Owens Country Sausage, Inc ........................ 751Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotic Agents ........................... 469Bixby v. Dunlop .......................................................... 123B.K. Sweeney Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co ........................... 800Blam e v. Connor .......................................................... 60Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital Center ............................... 603Blessington v. Autry ...................................................... 817Board of Social Welfare v. Los Angeles County .................. 581, 582, 583, 586Boddie v. Connecticut ..................................................... 891Boden v. Del-Mar Garage, Inc .............................................. 817Bonner v. Bank of America ................................................ 61, 73Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine R. Co ....................................... 123Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp .................................. 378Borer v. American Airlines, Inc ............................................ 551Bosley v. Andrews ........................................................ 819Baum ann v. Kosiam ...................................................... 49Bowm an v. W illiam s ...................................................... 818Braband v. Beech Aircraft Corp ............................................ 805Brake v. H arper ......................................................... 119, 139Branzburg v. Hayes ........................................ 158, 169, 171, 172, 177,

178, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187Brandenburg v. New York Tel. & Tel. Co ................................... 22Brewer v. Homestake Prod. Co ............................................ 130Brewer v. Simpson .................................................. 54, 56, 57, 65Brewer v. W illiams .................................................. 456, 459, 461,

465, 468, 469, 470Bridge Corp. of America v. American Contract Bridge League, Inc .......... 325Brookhart v. Janis ........................................................ 461Brow n v. Illinois ........................................................ 671, 672Brown v. Indianapolis Board of Realtors ................................ 972, 1008Brown v. Superior Court ............................................... 56, 57, 74Brown v. Texas ............................................ 655, 672, 673, 678, 682Brown v. Western Cas. & Surety Co ...................................... 152, 392Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior Court ............................ 4, 9, 10, 11, 16, 27Buckley v. Valeo ........................................................ 631, 870Buford v. State of California ............................................. 556, 567Bumper v. North Carolina ................................................. 678Bunneli v. Superior Court ................................................. 532Burton v. M unicipal Court ................................................ 533Buttner v. American Bell Tel. Co .......................................... 596Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc ......................... 199

CCafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union v. McElroy ......................... 779Cain v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co ...................................... 150Califano v. Jobst .......................................................... 891Califano v. M cRae ......................................................... 865Camara v. M unicipal Ct .................................................. 659, 665Cameron v. Crocker Citizens National Bank ............................... 55Cameron Septic Tank Co. v. Village of Saratoga Springs ................... 758Campbell Estates, Inc. v. Bates ............................................ 388Capital Motor Lines v. Loring ............................................. 152Carey v. Lima, Salmon, & Tully Mortuary ................................. 816Carmack v. Chemical New York Trust Co .................................. 779Carnley v. Cochran ....................................................... 461Carroll v. U .S .............................................................. 684Carroway v. Johnson .................................................... 152, 392Carsten v. Psychological Examining Committee ................ 578, 579, 580, 582,

586, 587, 588, 590

1200

[Vol. 8: 1189, 19811 Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Cement Manufacturers Protective Association v. United States ............. 993Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service ......................... 640Chambers v. M aroney ..................................................... 684Chatterton v. Eu .......................................................... 576Chicago B. & O.R. Co. v. Chicago .......................................... 836Chicago Bd. of Trade v. U.S ...................................... 102, 343, 344, 998Chicago M. & St. P.R. Co. v. Minnesota .................................... 843Chrisafogeorgis v. Brandenberg ........................................... 878Chitwood v. Stoner ...................................................... 119, 132Christal v. Police Comm 'n ................................................. 588Christy Bros. Circus v. Turnage ........................................... 817Cicenia v. Lagay .......................................................... 455Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe ........................... 643City of Culver City v. State Board of Equalization ......................... 63City of Kenosha v. Bruno ................................................. 290City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court ................... 607, 608, 609Clay v. Sun Insur. Office Ltd ............................................... 795Ciein v. State ............................................................. 173Clement v. United Cerebral Palsy of Southeastern Wisc., Inc ............... 789Clench v. Tom ley ....................................................... 194, 195Cleveland, C.G. & St. L. Ry. v. Stewart ..................................... 819Clothing and Textile Workers v. J.P. Stevens & Co ......................... 111Cloud v. Market Street Ry. Co ............................................. 607Cockrell v. State .......................................................... 126Cohen. v. Beneficial Loan Corp ............................................. 203Cohen v. California ....................................................... 534Colautti v. Franklin ....................................................... 859Colegrove v. Battin ........................................................ 210Coleman v. Alabama ........................................ 453, 456, 457, 464, 469Colligan v. Fera ........................................................... 119Commerce Tankers Corp. v. National Maritime Union ...................... 113Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Avery Portable Lighting Co ................... 763Commercial Union Insurance v. Reichard .................................. 152Commissioner v. Sunnen ............................................ 231, 232, 233Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. Headers ................................... 152Commonwealth v. Illinois Central Railroad .......................... 401, 402, 403Concord Gen. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hills ...................................... 152, 392Connel Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 100 ...... 79, 80,

85, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 99, 110, 111, 114,115

Consolidated Express, Inc. v. N.Y. Shipping Ass'n ............... 82, 92, 93, 94, 95,96, 97, 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 113, 115,

116Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc ................................. 104Cook v. Cook ............................................................. 71C ook v. E llis .............................................................. 388Cook v. M aier ............................................................. 541Cooke v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County ........................... 609Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners .................................... 585Cooper v. Nat. R.R. Passenger Corp ........................................ 118Cooperative Ref. Assn. v. Young ........................................... 127Corbelt v. Chandler ....................................................... 319Corneli University .................................................. 476, 477, 491Cornelison v. Chaney ............................................... 2, 11, 16, 19,

20, 25, 28, 32, 34, 38

1201

Coronado Coal Co. v. UMW ............................................... 83Cosegrove v. Beym er ...................................................... 819Cotton v. Fisherces Products Co ........................................... 127Coulter v. Superior Court ................................................. 118County of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court ................................ 554Country Tweeds v. FTC ................................................. 712, 717Cowen v. New York Stock Exch ......................................... 343, 344Craig v. Boren ............................................................ 890Craig v. Cox .............................................................. 435Crail v. Blakely ........................................................ 60, 62, 68Crisci v. Security Ins. Co ................................................ 150, 539Cromwell v. County of Sacramento ........................................ 229Crooker v. California .................................................... 455, 457Cross v. Del Webb's Hotels Int'l, Inc ....................................... 788Crull v. Gleb ........................................................ 152, 155, 392Curtis v. Loether ........................................................ 200, 204Curtis Publishing Co. v. T.B. Birdsong ................................... 800, 807C.W. Post Center of Long Island University ..................... 477, 478, 479, 480,

481, 483, 485, 486, 492, 498

D

D ahl v. Prince ............................................................ 130Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wallgren ....................... 152Dairy Queen Inc. v. Wood ............................... 201, 202, 203, 206, 207, 217Dale v. City of Mountain View ............................................ 846Daley v. LaCroix .......................................................... 820Dam sky v. Zavatt ......................................................... 199Dandridge v. W illiams ................................................... 882, 884D'Argona v. County of Los Angeles ........................................ 597D avis v. Gordon ........................................................... 119Davis v. Mississippi ............................................. 656, 663, 664, 671Davis v. Sim pson ......................................................... 878D ay v. Green ............................................................. 65Day v. W orth ............................................................. 122D.C. Federation of Civic Associations v. Volpe ............................. 644Deauville v. H all .......................................................... 599Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp .............................. 761, 769, 771Deesen v. Professional Golfers' Ass'n ...................................... 325Delaware v. Prouse ............................................. 669, 670, 673, 684De Los Santos v. Superior Court of Los Angeles ......................... 604, 609,

610, 611, 613, 614Demattos v. M cGovern .................................................... 52, 66Dennis v. Pitner ..................................................... 758, 766, 768Denver Rockets v. All-Pro Management, Inc ................................ 343D.I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior Court .................................... 608Diamond v. Chakrabarty ................................................... 747,

760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769,770, 771, 772, 774, 775, 776, 777

Diaz v. Quitoriano ...................................................... 582, 584Dick v. Lederle Antitoxin Laboratories .................................... 756Dillenbeck v. City of Los Angeles ................... 419, 420, 421, 432, 433, 434, 447Dillon v. Legg .............................................. 541, 542, 543, 547, 548,

550, 551, 819, 820, 822, 829, 831, 832Dimick v. Schiedt ............................................... 189, 192, 196, 199Dodge v. Ford M otor Co ................................................... 370Doe v. Wohlgemoth .............................................. 865Doggett v. Elec. Corp. of American Combustion Control Div ................ 794Domestic & Foreign Pet. Co. v. Long ....................................... 618Door v. United States ..................................................... 177

1202

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981J Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Dorado v. Knudsen Corp .................................................. 598Dorn v. W ilm arth .................... .................................... 144D orris v. M iller ........................................................... 130Dougherty v. Rosenburg ................................................... 45Douglas v. E. & J. Gallo W inery ............................................ 598Dove v. Low den ........................................................... 561Draper v. United States ................................................... 522Driver's Local 695 v. NLRB ................................................ 92Druol v. Bant ......................................... ................ 721Dufour v. Pereira ......................................................... 46Duignan v. A.H. Robins Co ................................................ 806Dunaway v. New York ...................................... 670, 671, 672, 673, 676Duncan v. Louisiana .................................................... 220, 256Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Hollingsworth ................................. 784Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering ..................................... 82, 347Duprey v. D'Angona ....................................................... 601Duprey v. Shane .................................................... 596, 598, 601Dye v. Chicago & Alton RR Co ............................................. 826

EEbaugh v. Raskin ......................................................... 142Eckis v. Sea W orld Corp ................................................... 599Egan v. Mutual of Omaha ................................................. 150Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Papar Co ........................ 756E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Train .................................... 643Eldridge v. City of Palo Alto ............................................... 844Ellis v. W orkm an ......................................................... 581EPA v. National Crushed Stone Ass'n ..................................... 644Erie Railroad v. Tompkins ................................................. 797Erlanger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc ............................ 796, 809Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville .......................................... 533Escobedo v. Illinois ................................ 166, 452, 456, 457, 459, 464, 468Esmond v. Liscio... ............................................. 152Espinosa v. Beverly Hospital ............................................ 540, 818Estate of Cooper .......................................................... 70, 71Estate of Crawford ........................................................ 64Estate of Cross ........................................................... 72Estate of H ealy ........................................................... 49Estate of Hincheon ....................................................... 72Estate of Rolls ............................................................ 46, 60EWAP, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles ......................................... 534Ex Porte Lawrence ....................................................... 173

FFallon v. American Trust Co ............................................... 56, 57Falzone v. Busch .......................................................... 818Faretta v. California ....................................................... 469Farm er v. State ........................................................... 561Fashion Originations Guild v. FTC .................................. 102, 342, 343Faxton v. Faxton .......................................................... 47Fay v. Parker ............................................................. 121Feather v. UM V .............................................. 97, 103, 107, 108, 109Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of the

Professional Baseball Clubs ..................................... 317, 318, 319,

1203

320, 321, 322, 324, 325, 328Federal Maritime Commission v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien .... 646Ferrara v. Galluchio ...................................................... 820-825Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. U.S ........................................ 205Fields v. Eu ............................................................... 577Fields v. Volkswagen of American, Inc ..................................... 779First Nat'l Bank v. Bellotti ................................................ 379Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior Court ..................................... 4Fitzgerald v. United States Lines .......................................... 219Flast v. Cohen ............................................................ 69Fleitman v. W elsbach Co .................................................. 200Fletcher v. Western Nat'l Life Ins. Co ...................................... 388Flood v. Kuhn ......................................... 323, 324, 325, 326, 328, 329,

330, 331, 332, 333, 335, 336, 340, 353, 355, 356Florida Southern College .................................................. 491Focht v. Rabada ..................................................... 119, 135, 136Forbes v. Forbes ...................... ................................. 567, 568Forbes v. Los Angeles ..................................................... 52Ford v. Ford ............................................................ 569, 574Ford M otor Co . ........................................................... 479Fordham University ....................................................... 481Fortescue v. Hannah ...................................................... 47Fowle v. Lawrason ........................................................ 195Fox v. Ehrm antraut ....................................................... 618Franks v. Delaware ................................................. 520, 522, 523Friedm an v. Jordan ....................................................... 389Friedm an v. Sealy, Inc ..................................................... 737Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors .............................. 578Fritts v. Charles ........................................................... 581FTC v. A.P.W . Paper Co ................................................... 712FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co ............................................... 642FTC v. G ratz .............................................................. 701FTC v. Guignon ........................................................... 633FTC v. R.F. Keppel & Bros ....................................... 702, 703, 710, 740FTC v. Raladam ................................................. 701, 702, 710, 711FTC v. Standard Education Society ...................................... 709, 710FTC v. W insted Hosiery Co ................................................ 701Fuentes v. Tucker ......................................................... 533Fuller v. San Fernando Valley Mun. Water Dist .................. 582, 583, 586, 587Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co ........................ 758, 760, 765, 766

GGallow ay v. U.S ......................................................... 205, 218Gardella v. Chandler ............................................ 315, 318, 330, 356Garland v. Torre .................................................... 170, 171, 173Garrett v. Ruth Originals Corp ............................................. 801Gasoline Products Co. v. Chaplin Refining Co .............................. 205Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America ..................... 339G.D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Ct ........................................... 143G enay v. Norris ........................................................... 122General Casualty Co. of America v. Woodby ............................... 152General Elec. Co. v. DeForest Radio Co .................................... 758General Elec. Co. v. Gilbert ............................................... 643General Tire Co. and Rubber Co. v. Fisk Rubber Corp ...................... 752Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc .............................. 168, 173, 174, 175, 177, 179,

180, 181, 186, 172, 178, 184Gesslein v. Britton .............................................. 119, 140, 141, 144Gibson v. Gibson .......................................................... 77Giddings v. Zellan ...................................................... 119, 132

1204

[Vol. 8:1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Gideon v. W ainright ..................................................... 452, 456Gilbert v. California ....................................................... 457Gitlow v. New York ....................................................... 168Glasser v. United States ................................................... 461Glen Falls Indem. Co. v. Atlantic Building Corp ............................ 392Glos v. Brooklyn Terminal ................................................ 63Goilm ere v. Battison ...................................................... 47Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar ....................................... 977, 979, 983Goldstein v. Hoffman ..................................................... 56Gombos v. Ashe ................................................ 141, 142, 144, 146Good Hope Indus., Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co .................................. 789Gottschalk v. Benson ................................................... 758, 762Grace v. M acArthur ....................................................... 783Graham v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co ......................................... 406Graham v. John Deere .................................. 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 768Granite States Volkswagen, Inc. v. District Court .......... ............. 783, 802Graves v. New York ex rel O'Keefe ...................................... 326, 327Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp ................ 784, 807, 810Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co ..................................................... 150Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. Roch ............................................. 814Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equip. Corp ......................... 748Green v. Shoemaker & Co ................................................. 829Greenman v. Yuba Power Prods., Inc .................................... 387, 798Grillo v. Board of Realtors of Plainfield Area ............................... 1007Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co ............................. 368, 370, 371, 372, 373, 409Griswold v. Connecticut ................................................... 871Grosjean v. American Press Co ............................................ 379Grosslight v. Superior Court .................................... 609, 610, 612, 614Group Life Health Ins. v. Royal Drug Co ................................. 100, 112Grudt v. City of Los Angeles ............................ 420, 421, 432, 433, 434, 447Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Union Solvents Corp ............... 757, 758, 579, 769Guardianship of Hayden .................................................. 50Guardianship of W alters .................................................. 613Gudarov v. Hadjieff ....................................................... 617Guernsey v. Rich Plan .................................................... 737Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co .......................................... 982Gulf States Utilities Co. v. FPC ............................................ 646Gupton v. Gupton ......................................................... 48

HHamilton v. Alabama ..................................... 452, 453, 455, 456, 457, 464Hamling v. United States .................................................. 210Hanna v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co ..................... 152Hannah v. Larche ......................................................... 785Hanson v. Denckla ........................................ 16, 26, 780, 789, 793, 806Hardin v. Sanders ......................................................... 878Harland v. State of California ............................................. 556Harned v. E-Z Finance Co ................................................. 819Harrell v. Am es ..................................................... 119, 135, 144H arris v. Balk ............................................................ 12, 784H arris v. Larter ........................................................... 52, 58Harris v. M cRae................................................. 857, 864, 868, 872Haywood v. National Basketball Ass'n ................................... 322, 325Hearne v. Dow-Badische Chem. Co ........................................ 793

1205

Helvering v. Hallock ...................................................... 326Henderson v. Superior Court ......................................... 9, 29, 33, 37Henry Ford Trade School ................................................. 476Herbert v. Lando ........................................... 159, 168, 176, 177, 178,

179, 180, 183, 187Herrick v. Evening Express Publishing Co ............................... 816, 825Herring v. New York ...................................................... 469H ess v. Pawloski ........................................................ 783, 784HFH, Ltd. v. Superior Court ............................................... 844Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. Bergland ......................................... 628Hicks v. M cCandlish ...................................................... 127H ill v. California .......................................................... 656H ill v. K im ball ............................................................ 818Hinish v. Merer & Frank Co ................................................ 818H.J. Heinz Co. v. NLRB ................................................... 335Hodges v. United States ................................................... 330Hoffa v. United States ..................................................... 462Hoffm an v. Rogers ........................................................ 598Hogan v. M cDaniel ........................................................ 878Hollman v. W arren .............................................. 582, 584, 586, 587Hollywood State Bank v. W ilde ............................................ 618Holloway v. Bristol-Meyers Corporation ................................... 737H olz v. Super. Ct .......................................................... 836Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC ............................................. 632H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. DuMond ......................................... 800Honeywell Inc. v. Metz Apparatewerke .................................... 220Hopper v. United States ................................................... 829Hom e v. Commissioner ................................................... 240Hotchkiss v. Greenwood ................................................. 749, 750Househill Company v. Neilson ........................................... 754, 755Hovey v. Superior Court of Alameda County .................... 505, 506, 507, 508,

510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517H uckle v. M oney .......................................................... 122Humphrey v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n ......................... 93Humphrey's Executor v. United States .................................... 632H unter v. A llen ........................................................... 54H unt v. Crum boch ........................................................ 87H urley v. Kincaid ......................................................... 844Huron Cement Co. v. Detroit ............................................ 328, 329Hutson v. Fehr Bros., Inc ............................................ 791, 801, 817H utchinson v. Dickie ...................................................... 561Hyde Properties v. McCoy ................................................. 206

1ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business Machine Corp .....

.................................. 190, 206, 208, 215, 216Illinois Central R. Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n .......................... 327Illinois Institute of Technology ............................................ 476Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod .......................................... 656Illinois State Journal-Register, Inc. v. N.L.R.B .............................. 479Independent Meat Packers Ass'n v. Butz .................................. 627Infeld v. Sullivan .......................................................... 119Ingram v. Petit .............................................. 119, 131, 136, 137, 138In re Ampiciliin Antitrust Investigation .................................... 610In re Anzeberger ........................................................ 772, 773In re Bergy (Bergy I) ................................... 745, 746, 750, 759, 760, 770In re Bergy (Bergy II) ................................. 744, 745, 747, 750, 752, 754,

759, 760, 761, 762, 764, 765, 766, 768, 769, 772,773, 776

1206

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

In re Boise Cascade Securities Litigation .................... 190, 206, 207, 214, 216In re Bullard Contracting Corp ............................................ 113In re Chakrabarty ......................................................... 745In re Cooga Mooga and Charles E. Boone ........................... 699, 712, 713,

716, 718, 719, 740In re Corotto .............................................................. 613In re Craige ............................................................... 753In re Estate of Neilson .................................................. 567, 568In re Estate of Richardson ................................................ 60In re Estate of David R. Stiles ............................................. 290In re Goodfado's Appeal .................................................. 170In re G runow ............................................................. 173In re M ancy ............................................................ 759, 770In re Marriage of Aufmuth ......................................... 568, 569, 570,

571, 572, 573, 574, 576In re M arriage of Bjornstead .............................................. 569In re Marriage of Jafeman ............................... 567, 568, 570, 571, 574, 575In re Marriage of Lucas ............................ 569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 576In re M arriage of M ix ................................................... 569, 570In re Marriage of Moore ............................................. 565, 570, 571,

572, 573, 574, 575, 576In re M arriage of W arren .................................................. 567In re M athis .............................................................. 609In re Montgomery Real Estate Antitrust Litigation ......................... 1005In re M urchison ........................................................... 220In re N avarro ............................................................. 608In re Pappas .............................................................. 158In re Podesto ............................................................. 615In re Taylor ............................................................... 170In re Terry W ........................................................... 609, 610In re Underwood .......................................................... 615In re United States Financial Securities Litigation ......................... 190,

206, 207, 213, 214, 216, 217In re Y urko ............................................................... 532Intercontinental Container Transp. Corp. v. NY ............................ 93, 94International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Daniel .......................... 643International Clec. Co. v. N.S.T. Metal Prod. Co ............................ 130International Longshoreman's Ass'n v. NLRB ...................... 93, 95, 103, 107International Salt Co. v. United States ................................... 342, 343International Shoe Co. v. Washington ............................. 5, 6, 12, 15, 17,

779, 780, 783, 784, 786, 790Invch v. K night ........................................................... 538

a

Jacob v. New York .................................................. 199Jarkieh v. Badagiacoo ..................................................... 70Jenkinson v. Murrow Bros. Seed Co ....................................... 807J.H. Baird Publishing Co. v. Commissioner ................................ 241Jirschik v. Farmers & Mercn. Nat'l Bank ................................... 42Johns-Manville v. Contra Costa Superior Court ............................ 592,

597, 598, 600, 602Johnsen v. Hubbell ....................................................... 47Johnson v. State ........................................................ 521, 530Johnson v. California ............................................ 552, 553, 556, 557,

1207

560, 561, 563, 564Johnson v. Zerbst ............................. ..................... 453, 455, 461Johnson v. Robinson ...................................................... 879Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGarth ......................... 220Jolley v. Puregro Co ..................................................... 388, 389Jones Enterprises, Inc. v. Atlas Servs. Corp .............................. 798, 806Joslyn v. People ........................................................... 173

KKailieha v. H ayes ....................................................... 794, 796Kaiser Aetna v. U.S .......................................... 841, 842, 845, 850, 851Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n

............................................. 337, 338Kapp v. National Football League ........................................ 349Kassianon v. Raissis ..................................................... 42K atchen v. Landy ......................................................... 205Katz v. United States ..................................................... 452K elly v. Gregory .......................................................... 878K endall v. W insor ......................................................... 768Kenny v. W ong Len ....................................................... 817Kentucky Finance Corp. v. Paramount Auto Exchange Corp ................ 379Kentucky Traction & Term. Co. v. Roman's Guardian ...................... 817Kessler v. Lauretz ..................................................... 44, 67, 70K irby v. Illinois ......................................................... 457, 469K ilm er v. H icks ........................................................... 878Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. Co ........................ 195, 202Klassa v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co ......................................... 824Klein v. Nassan County Medical Center ................................... 864K lopfer v. N .C ............................................................. 452Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc ........................ 105, 106, 342, 343Knoff v. City and County of San Francisco ................................. 582K ofka v. Rosicky .......................................................... 48Kollin v. Shaff ......................................................... 393Korninklijke L.M. v. Superior Court ........................... 3, 4, 7, 8, 28, 35, 39Kortan v. Alkire .................................... 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 433, 434K ovaks v. Cooper ......................................................... 534Kawalski v. Chandler ..................................................... 319K rause v. Ohio ............................................................ 290Kulko v. California Superior Court ...................................... 787, 791

L

La Buy v. Howes Leather Co .............................................. 202Laird v. Nationwide Insurance Co .......................................... 152Lam berg v. Callahan ...................................................... 56Lam born v. W atson ....................................................... 76Landscape Specialities Inc. v. Laborers Int'l Union ......................... 113Landum v. Livingston ..................................................... 125Lanza v. New York ........................................................ 463Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building Trade Council.

.......................................................... 80, 83, 96, 97, 98, 99,100, 101, 103, 110, 111, 112, 115

Laury v. State ............................................................. 681Law v. D artt .............................................................. 596Lazar v. Lazar's Estate .................................................... 73Lazenby v. Univrsal Underwriters Insurance Co .................. 152, 154, 155, 391Leong v. Takasaki ......................................................... 828Leroy Gordon Cooper .............................. 713, 714, 715, 716, 718, 725, 732LeRoy v. Tathum ....................................................... 754, 756

1208

(Vol. 8: 1189, 1981J Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Lindholm v. Galvin ........................................................ 609Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School District ............................ 434Lochner v. New York ...................................................... 842Loeblich v. Gam ier ....................................................... 123Loew e v. Law lor .......................................................... 80, 81Logan v. W einhold ........................................................ 47Long Beach Police Officers Assn v. City of Long Beach .......... 426, 427, 430, 444Lorillard v. Pons .......................................................... 204Leu v. Leu ................................................................ 788Long v. Mishicot Modern Dairy, Inc ........................................ 806Louis K. Zigget Co. v. Lee ................................................. 380Lovell v. Griffi n ........................................................... 169L.S. Ayres & Co. v. Hicks .................................................. 561Luckwickl v. Guerin ....................................................... 52, 56Ludlea v. Memory Magnetics Int'l ......................................... 617Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co ......................................... 479Luria v. United States ..................................................... 200Luther v. Shaw ........................................................... 121Lyons v. Zale Jewelry Co .................................................. 815

M

Mackey v. National Football League ..................................... 106, 111,348, 349, 355

Mackey Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America ................. 757M adison v. W igal ......................................................... 119, 132Magulivlo v. Superior Court ............................................. 595, 598Maher v. Roe ............................................... 857, 859, 865, 866, 889M alloy v. H ogan ........................................................... 452M anford v. Coats .......................................................... 45M angus v. M iller .......................................................... 393M ahnke v. M oore ......................................................... 818Mann v. Frank Hrubetz and Co., Inc ..................................... 796, 802M ann v. State of California ................................................ 556M anson v. M anson ......................................................... 49, 77Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. United States ................ 992M app v. Ohio ................................................... 452, 520, 523, 528M arbury v. M adison ..................................................... 640, 770Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Palsson ......................... 981, 999Maring-Crawford Motor Co. v. Smith ...................................... 125Martin-Trigona v. National Association of Realtors ......................... 1008Martin v. National League Baseball Club .................................. 319M artin v. M iqueu ......................................................... 532Martin v. United Security Service, Inc...................................... 393M artinez v. California ..................................................... 557Martino v. Concord Community Hosp. Dist ................................. 603M arvin v. M arvin .......................................................... 29Maryland Casualty Co. v. Baker ........................................... 152Mashunkashey v. Mashunkashey .......................................... 818Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Morgia .......................... 885, 890, 891Massiah v. United States ................................... 451, 452, 453, 455, 456,

457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 463, 465, 466, 467, 468,469, 470, 471

M atter of Fischel .......................................................... 607Mauroudis v. Superior Court .............................................. 562

1209

McAuliffe v. Mayor of New Bedford ....................................... 588McCardle v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co ................................ 819M cCarthy v. Frost ......................................................... 554McCorkle v. City of Los Angeles ......................................... 554, 555M cCray v. Illinois ......................................................... 520McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit Dist ........................... 579,

581, 582, 584McDowell v. County of Alameda ......................................... 556, 563McGee v. International Life Insurance Co .................................. 16, 26,

780, 785, 789, 791McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc ........................ 969, 982,

983, 985, 1003, 1009, 1010M cM ahan v. Bergeson ..................................................... 830M cM anis v. Bendlage ..................................................... 64McRae v. Mathews .......................................... 863, 864, 867, 878, 880Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R.R ............................................... 200Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County .................................. 876, 883Mercantile Trust Co. of Baltimore v. Commissioner ....................... 248Mercer-Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n .......................... 593Merck & Co. v. Chase Chem. Co ........................................... 758Merlo v. Standard Life & Acc. Ins. Co ...................................... 148Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers and Cosmetologists,

International Union ................................................... 981Metropolitan Exhibition Club v. Ewing .................................... 315Metropolitan Exhibition Club v. Ward ..................................... 315Messersmith v. American Fidelity Co ...................................... 153Meyer v. Graphic Arts Int'l Union ......................................... 595Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo ................. 167, 173, 174, 175, 177, 181M ichigan v. DeFillippo .................................................... 656M iddendorf v. Henry ...................................................... 469M idland Broadcasting ..................................................... 335M iller v. Blanton ........................................................ 119, 133M iller v. California ........................................................ 470Miller v. Eisenhower Medical Center ...................................... 603M illiken v. M eyer ....................................................... 783, 784M ills v. Alabam a .......................................................... 167Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, Inc ........................................ 757M ing v. Superior Court .................................................... 521Miranda v. Arizona ................................. 452, 456, 459, 463, 671, 681, 685M itchell v. Harm ony ...................................................... 218Mitchell v. Rochester Rv ............................................. 816, 817, 828M itchell v. W .T. Grant Co .................................................. 809Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital .......... 535, 537, 541, 542, 543, 547, 548, 550,

813, 820, 821, 822, 824, 826, 827, 831, 832Moor v. County of Alameda ............................................... 290Monnell v. Department of Social Services of New York .................... 290M onroe v. Pape ........................................................... 290Montana v. United States ....................................... 235, 236, 237, 254M oraco v. LoGreco ..................................................... 52, 53, 64M orrell v. LaLonde ........................................................ 152M orris v. Drubin .......................................................... 129Morris v. Superior Court .................................... 523, 524, 525, 526, 528M orrison v. Land .......................................................... 64M orton v. Ruiz ............................................................ 643M orton v. Stack ........................................................... 817M oss v. Bluem m .......................................................... 63Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington ....................................... 199M ullaney v. W ilbur ........................................................ 879Murphy v. Alpha Realty, Inc ............................................... 1004M urdock v. Swanson ...................................................... 45

1210

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Murphy v. Murray .......................................... 424, 425, 426, 437, 438Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist .................................... 554, 557, 563M yers v. United States .................................................. 631, 632Mytinger & Casselberry ................................................... 712

N

N.A.A.C.P. v. Button ...................................................... 534N alle v. Oyster ............................................................ 177Nance v. Cook ........ .......................................... 127National Conference of Catholic Bishop v. Bell ............................ 878National Dynamics Corp ................................................. 712, 718National Equip. Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent .................................. 783National League and American League of Professional Baseball Clubs v.

Major League Baseball Players Ass'n ........................ 337, 388, 339, 340National League of Cities v. Usery ......................................... 869National League of Professional Baseball Clubs v. Federal Baseball Club of

Baltim ore, Inc ....................................................... 318, 324National Renderers Ass'n v. EPA .......................................... 627National Soc'y Professional Eng'rs v. U.S ................ 102, 103, 104, 107, 109, 978National Woodwork Mfrs. v. NLRB ........................................ 92Neal v. Farmers Ins. Exchange ................ 143Nectow v. City of Cambridge ... ................... 836, 838, 841, 842, 843, 849Neighborhood Legal Services ............................................ 486, 489New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Jones .................................... 152N euvill ................................................................... 696Newm an v. Alabam a ...................................................... 290New York Central & Hudson River R. Co. v. United States ............... 379, 401New York Times Co. v. Connor ............................................ 798New York Times v. Sullivan ..................................... 173, 174, 176, 181New York Times v. United States ....................................... 171, 172New York University ...................................................... 481Nicholson v. American Fire & Casualty Ins. Co ............................. 152Nickerson v. Hodges ...................................................... 814Niederman v. Brodsky .................................................. 818, 829Niemiec v. Seattle Rainier Baseball Club, Inc .............................. 319Nitka v. W estern Union Tel. Co ............................................ 816NLRB v. Bell Aerospace ........................................ 479, 484, 486, 487,

488, 489, 490, 495, 497NLRB v. Brown ........................................................... 642NLRB v. Fullerton Pub. Co ................................................ 488NLRB v. Hearst Publications .............................................. 642NLRB v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n ........................ 196, 199, 205NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp ................................ 196, 199, 205NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co ......................................... 478NLRB v. Seven-Up Bottling Co ............................................ 642NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co ........................................... 335NLRB v. Yeshiva University ............................ 473, 481, 483, 484, 485, 486,

487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496,497, 498, 499

Noe v. Travelers Ins. Co ................................................... 599Northam Warran Corporation v. FTC ........................ 710, 711, 714, 715, 721Northeastern University ................................................... 481Northern Pac. R. Co. v. U.S ................................................ 102Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. McNulty ................. 152, 153, 154, 391

1211

Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States ......................... 643Notten v. Mensing ............................................ 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 65

0O'Brien v. Appling ........................................................ 129O 'Brien v. Skinner ........................................................ 890Odham v. Sherm an ....................................................... 878Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Welfare Finance Co ...................... 152, 392Ohio v. Wyandotte Chems. Corp ........................................... 801Okrina v. Midwestern Corp ................................................ 828Olearchick v. American Steel Foundaries .................................. 200Oliver v. American Motors Corp ......................................... 783, 802Olsen v. Nebraska ......................................................... 843Oregon v. M athiason ...................................................... 671O'Reilly v. M orse ................................................ 753, 755, 756, 766O sborn v. H oyt ............................................................ 56Owens v. M cNally ......................................................... 48, 76Owens v. Superior Court ............................................ 530, 531, 532

P

Pacific Legal Foundation v. DOT .......................................... 644Palace Laundry Dry Cleaning Corp ........................................ 490Palm er v. City of Euclid ................................................... 664Palm er v. Phillips ......................................................... 42Parker v. Bowron ......................................................... 581Parker v. Flook ......................................... 746, 760, 761, 762, 767, 769Parklane Hosier Co. v. Shore ............................................ 204, 205Parsell v. Stryker ......................................................... 47Parsons v. Bedford ...................................................... 191, 200Patterson v. New York .................................................... 616Paul v. Virginia ........................................................... 379Payne v. Arkansas ...................................................... 455, 459Payne v. D aley ............................................................ 119Pearsall v. H enry ......................................................... 44Pellegrini v. Sachs and Sons .............................................. 783Penn. Central Transp. Co. v. N.Y. City ................................... 836, 837,

841, 842, 844, 845, 850, 851, 852Pennoyer v. Neff ........................................................ 783, 784Pennsylvania v. Mimms ................................................... 669Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon ............................................ 836, 837,

841, 842, 845, 850Pennsylvania Thresherman & Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v.

Thornton ............................................................ 152, 392People v. Arthurs ......................................................... 661People v. Barger ................................................ 523, 525, 526, 528People v. Beagle .......................................................... 532People v. Black ........................................................... 532People v. Burch ........................................................... 531People v. Colver .......................................................... 76People v. Conway ......................................................... 531People v. Cook .......................................... 518, 523, 525, 526, 527, 528People v. Davenport ..................................................... 532, 618People v. Davis ........................................................... 465People v. DeBour ......................................................... 683People v. Di Biasi ......................................................... 465People v. Dom enico ....................................................... 532People v. Dam as .......................................................... 521People v. Earl ............................................................. 657

1212

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

People v. Eliasco Services, Inc ........................................... 403, 404People v. Faulker ......................................................... 532People v. Flores ........................................................... 531People v. Forrester ........................................................ 532People v. Gallinger ........................................................ 532People v. Garrow ......................................................... 532People v. Gilbert .......................................................... 508People v. Gross ........................................................... 532People v. Guzm an ......................................................... 681People v. H all ........................................................... 532, 533People v. Ham ilton ........................................................ 522People v. H arrison ........................................................ 531People v. Hoffm an ........................................................ 661People v. H oshor .......................................................... 618People v. Howard (1978) .................................................. 655People v. Howard (1979) ................................ ................. 655People v. Howard (1980) ................................ 653, 654, 655, 656, 680, 685People v. Hudging ........................................................ 532People v. Hudson Valley Const. Co ........................................ 397People v. H ughes ......................................................... 514People v. Israel ........................................................... 532People v. Jackson ......................................................... 532People v. Karm el ......................................................... 465People v. Kurland ...................................... 518, 519, 520, 522, 523, 524,

525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530People v. Lanphear ....................................................... 509People v. Lee ............................................................. 609People v. M aler ........................................................... 532People v. M anis ........................................................... 681People v. M artinelli ....................................................... 531People v. M cLellan ........................................................ 532People v. McFarlan ....................................................... 532People v. M eyer ........................................................... 465People v. M orrison ........................................................ 532People v. Neusom ............................................... 523, 525, 526, 528People v. Olivas ........................................................... 615People v. Peter ............................................................ 531People v. Piper ............................................................ 532People v. Price ............................................................ 465People v. Projection Room Theater ........................................ 534People v. Ram ey .......................................................... 527People v. Ram irez ......................................................... 615People v. Riser .......................................................... 507, 508People v. Robinson ........................................................ 465People v. Rochester Railway and Freight Co ......................... 401, 403, 404People v. Rodriguez ....................................................... 46 5People v. Schulle ....................................................... 521, 527People v. Schunke ........................................................ 532People v. Schwartz ........................................................ 681People v. Scom a .......................................................... 521People v. Sm ith ......................................................... 508, 527People v. Steele ........................................................... 618People v. Swanson ........................................................ 46 5People v. Syde ............................................................ 618People v. Valasquez ..................................................... 506, 510

1213

People v. Varnum ......................................................... 509People v. W allace ......................................................... 465People v. W aterman ..................................................... 459, 465People v. W atson ......................................................... 533People v. W ebb ........................................................... 525People v. W heatly Glaze ............................................ 533, 534, 535People ex rel. Mooney v. Sheiff ............................................ 173Perkins v. Benquet Consol. Mining Co ..................................... 6, 7,

22, 28, 35, 39, 786Pernell v. Southall Realty ........................................... 200, 204, 216Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Ports Corp ....................... 97Perrine v. Municipal Court ................................................ 534Peters v. New York ......................................... 660, 661, 663, 666, 684Peterson v. City of Long Beach ............................. 419, 420, 421, 422, 424,

426, 427, 428, 430, 432, 433, 434, 438, 439, 442,443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450

Philadelphia World Hockey Club, Inc. v. Philadelphia Hockey Club ...... 348, 349Philco v. United States .................................................. 232, 233Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp ..................................... 788,

793, 795, 797, 810Pierce v. Society of Sisters ................................................ 871Pillsbury Co. v. FTC ...................................................... 632Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists ........................... 604Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth ....................... 859Plunkett v. Hamilton ...................................................... 173Poelker v. Doe .......... ................................................. 859Pointer v. Texas .......................................................... 452Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosely ......................................... 534Pollack v. H am m .......................................................... 577Pollack v. W illiam s ........................................................ 330Pollard v. Lyon ........................................................... 177Pons v. Lorilland .......................................................... 204Porporato v. Devincenzi ................................................... 42Portor v. Del. Lack. & W.R.R. Co ......................................... 817, 826Portland Baseball Club, Inc. v. Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc ................ 322Post v. Rodriguez ......................................................... 123Potter v. Bland ............................................................ 68Potter v. City Council of Port Hueneme ................................... 581Powell v. Alabama ...................................... 453, 454, 455, 457, 463, 464Pow ell v. Texas ........................................................... 134Pratt v. Duck ........................................................... 119, 132Price v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co ................................... 152, 154, 391Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co ............................ 206, 207Pryor v. Municipal Court .................................................. 534Public Util. Comm'n v. Pollack ............................................ 174Pugh v. Locke ............................................................. 290

QQuattrone v. Superior Court ............................................ 36, 37, 38

R

Radial Lip Machine, Inc. v. International Carbide Corp ................... 208, 209Radovich v. National Football League .................................... 321, 325Railroad Co. v. Stout ...................................................... 212Ramex v. General Petroleum Co ........................................... 597Ramrnos v. County of Madura ............................................. 563Ramsey v. United Mine Workers .......................................... 87Ratcliffe v. Pederson ...................................................... 23, 24

1214

[Vol. 8:1189, 19811 Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission ..... 182, 643Red Wing Carriers, Inc. v. Tomlinson ............................ 242, 248, 249, 250Redke v. Silvertrust .................................................... 60, 65, 68Reed v. M oore ............................................................ 541Reed v. Rhodes ........................................................... 290Reid v. Georgia ..................................................... 678, 679, 680Reilly v. Phil Tolkan Pontiac, Inc .................................... 788, 794, 810Renteria v. County of Orange ............................................. 599Reynolds v. W illis ......................................................... 152Reynolds Metals Co. v. Lampert ........................................... 412Rhode Island v. Innis ............................................... 459, 463, 468Richards v. Washington Terminal Co ....................................... 838Richland v. Crandall ...................................................... 203Richmond Power & Light v. F.E.R.C ........................................ 644Riley v. Bear Creek Planning Comm ....................................... 61,64Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works v. Medart ............................. 752Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. Aiken ............................................ 752Rizzo v. G oode ............................................................ 440RJ. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. F.T.C ......................................... 712Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n .................................... 349Robertson v. Willis ............................................... 568Robinson v. California ................................................... 134, 166Robinson v. W ilson ....................................................... 606Rodrigues v. Bethlehem Steel Corp ........................................ 536,

542, 546, 547, 551, 563Rodrigues v. State .......................................... 537, 820, 821, 827, 831Roe v. N orton ............................................................. 864Roe v. W ade ............................................... 857, 859, 866, 870, 874,

878, 887, 888, 890Rogers v. Bellei ........................................................... 837Rogers v. Schotterback ................................................ 49, 56, 70Rolls v. Allen ............................................................. 54, 56Rookes v. Barnard ........................................................ 122Rosner v. Eden Township Hosp. Dist ..................................... 603, 604Ross v. Bernhardt ...................................... 189, 192, 196, 203, 204, 205,

206, 207, 208, 209, 210Ross v. Clark ........................................................... 119, 132Ross v. M ifftt ............................................................. 469Roteo v. Izuel ............................................................. 45Rowland v. Christiad ...................................................... 558Rundell v. M cDonald ...................................................... 42Rush v. Savchuk ............................................ 11, 12, 17, 18, 784, 788Russell v. Agai ............................................................ 49Russell v. Dennison ....................................................... 122Ruther v. Tyra .......................................................... 119, 132Rutherford v. Commissioner ............................................... 242

SSaala v. M cFarland ........................................................ 599Sabich v. Outboard Marine Corp ........................................... 389SAIA v. New York ........................................................ 534Salerno v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs ................ 322Salerno v. Kuhn .......................................................... 322San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez .................. 883, 885, 890

1215

Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States ........................ 632Santiesteban v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co ................................ 127Satterfield v. Rebsamen Ford, Inc .......................................... 389Savage v. Boles ........................................................... 815Schaadt v. Mutual Life Ins. Co ............................................. 44, 50Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States .................................. 83Schmidt v. Central Hardware Co ........................................... 388Schneckloth v. Bustamonte ......................................... 673, 677, 683SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp .................................................. 214Scooper Dooper, Inc. v. Kraftco Corp ....................................... 114Scott v. Donald ........................................................... 123Scott v. Instant Parking, Inc ............................................... 152Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Jones ............................................. 119Sebastian v. W ood ........................................................ 119Seider v. Roth ............................................................ 12Seiman v. Southern Pac. Transp. Co ....................................... 143Serrano v. Priest ........................................................ 578, 846Shaffer v. Heitner ............................................... 11, 12, 16, 17, 18,

783, 784, 797, 802Shapiro v. Thompson ............................................ 874, 881, 882, 891Shapiro v. United States .................................................. 643Shell Dev. Co. v. W atson .................................................. 763Shepard v. Brown ......................................................... 196Sherbert v. Verner .................................................. 875, 876, 877Shive v. Barrow ........................................................ 46, 52, 66Shore v. Parklane Hosiery Co.............................................. 204Sibley v. Superior Court .................................................. 38Sibron v. New York ........................................ 655, 658, 660, 661, 662,

663, 664, 666, 672, 674, 684Sida of Hawaii, Inc ........................................................ 492Sieder v. Roth ............................................................ 788Sinatory Negotiating Comm. v. International Union of Operating Eng'rs. ... 113Silberg v. California Life Ins. Co ......................................... 143, 398Sim ler v. Conner ........................................................ 199, 203Skelton v. Superior Court ................................................. 528Skidmore v. Swift & Co .................................................... 641Sloane v. So. Cal. Ry. Co ........................................ 537, 539, 543, 544Sm ith v. California ........................................................ 395Smith v. Chapm an ...................................................... 132, 137Smith v. Dunaway .............................................. 130Smith v. Glemmons ....................................................... 126Smith v. Pro-Football, Inc ........................................ 105, 343, 348, 349Sm ith v. Sm ith ............................................................ 42, 73Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp ................................... 788Sosna v. Iow a ............................................................. 891South-East Coal Co. v. Consolidated Coal Co ............................... 104Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. v. Daniel .......................... 152Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ............................................ 328Southland Broadcasting Co. v. Tracy .................................... 119, 132Spade v. Lynn & B. RR .................................................... 816Spano v. New York ............................................. 455, 459, 462, 468Sparf v. U.S ............................................................... 218Sparks v. Lauritzen ....................................................... 54Spector Motor Service Co. v. Walsh ....................................... 319Spinelli v. United States ............................................ 520, 522, 524Spokane Eye Clinic, Inc. v. Superior Court ................................ 34, 37Sprogis v. Butler .......................................................... 537Squillacote v. Racine Bldg. & Const. Trades Council ........................ 115Stacy v. Portland Pub. Co .................................................. 125Stahmer v. Schley .................................................. 62, 69, 70, 73

1216

[Vol. 8:1189, 19811 Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States ........................... 342Standard Oil Co. v. United States .................................... 80, 102, 988Starker v. United States [Starker] ................................... 224, 233, 236,

237, 238, 239, 242, 243, 249, 250, 252, 254Starker v. United States [Starker I] ..................... 226, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237Starker v. United States [Starker II] .................... 226, 233, 234, 235, 236, 248State v. Buchanan ........................................................ 170State Dept. of Corrections v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Bd ........ 594State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. St. Joseph's Hospital .......................... 127State v. Ford M otor Co .................................................... 369State v. H aslett Co ........................................................ 44State v. Ice & Fuel Co ...................................................... 397State v. K nops ............................................................ 170State v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co ....................................... 402, 403, 404State v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc ............................................ 323,

327, 328, 329, 331State v. Pacific Powder Co ................................................. 399Stanton v. Panish ....................................................... 576, 577State v. Patterson ......................................................... 681State v. Payne ............................................................ 256State v. Prouse ............................................................ 669State Rubbish Collector's Ass'n v. Siliznoff ................................ 539,

547, 548, 815State v. Superior Court of Sacramento County ............................. 606State v. Turax .............................................................. 397State v. W illard ........................................................... 397Stewart v. Sm ith .......................................................... 50St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Barry .............................. 105, 106, 107Strauder v. W est Virginia ................................................. 511Strauss v. Buckley ........................................................ 141Suburban Beverage, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co .............................. 100Sugar Institute, Inc. v. United States ...................................... 993Sunday School Bd. of the Southern Baptist Convention .................... 476Sunn Classic Pictures, Inc. v. Budco, Inc ................................... 802Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. FPC ...................................... 642Sutter Community Hospitals of Sacramento ............................... 486,

487, 488, 489Svajcara v. W hitman .................................................... 119, 131Swafford v. Arakian ....................................................... 801

TTarasoff v. Regents of Univ. of Cal ....................................... 552, 555,

556, 557, 558, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564Taschner v. City Council of Laguna Beach ............................... 580, 582Taylor v. Louisiana ........................................................ 511Taylor v. M itzel ........................................................... 554Taylor v. Sup. Ct. of Los Angeles County ................... 117, 119, 120, 132, 142,

143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152Tedesco v. Maryland Cas. Co ............................................ 123, 152Telegram Newspaper Co. v. Commonwealth ............................... 396Television Film Producers Ass'n ........................................... 335Terry v. Ohio ............................................... 655, 656, 657, 658, 659,

660, 665, 666, 667, 671, 672, 673, 674, 676, 677,681, 682, 684, 685

1217

Teska v. Atlantic Nat'l Ins. Co ............................................. 152Texas v. W hite ............................................................ 870The Trustees of Columbia University ................................ 474, 475, 476Theodor v. Superior Court of Orange County ........................ 518, 522, 523,

525, 526, 527, 528, 656Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. .............................................. 220Thomas A. Edison, Inc. v. Shotkin ......................................... 737Thom pson v. Boyd ........................................................ 57Thompson v. County of Alameda ...................... ..... 552, 553, 555, 556, 558,

560, 561, 562, 563, 564Tights Inc. v. Stanley ...................................................... 206Thompson v. Haight ....................................................... 749Tilghmann v. Proctor .................................................... 755, 756Tilley v. Keller Truck and Implement Corp ................................ 783Time, Inc. v. Firestone .......................................... 174, 175, 180, 183Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States ........................... 103Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States .............................. 342, 343Tinker v. Des Moines School Dist ......................................... 534Titus v. Superior Court .................................................... 36Tobin v. Grossm an ........................................................ 829Toole v. Richardson-Merrel, Inc ........................................... 372Toolson v. New York Yankees ....................................... 319, 320, 321,

322, 324, 325, 332Torres v. State ............................................................ 816Townsend v. Tallant ....................................................... 613Trammel v. United States ............................................... 610, 614Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison ..................................... 879Transportation Line v. Hope ............................................... 218Tricoli v. Centalanza ...................................................... 380Tusculum College ......................................................... 481Tyee Constr. Co. v. Dulien Steel Prod., Inc ................................ 789Tyson v. W hitaker & Son, Inc. ............................................ 794

UUM WA v. Pennigton .................................................... 79, 81, 85UMW v. Corondo Coal Co. ................................................ 83Unemployment Commission v. Aragon .................................... 642Union Electric Co. v. EPA ................................................. 644United Gas Public Service Co. v. Texas .................................... 221United Mineworkers of America v. Pennington ........................... 347, 348United States v. Ash .................................... 453, 454, 455, 457, 464, 469United States v. Barnard .................................................. 670United States v. Brignoni-Ponce ............................. 667, 668, 669, 670, 678United States v. Brown .................................................... 681United States v. Caldwell ................................................. 158United States v. Carmichael ............................................... 520United States v. Carter .................................................... 397United States v. Causby ................................................... 838United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co. ............................. 841, 842United States v. Container Corp. of America ............................... 990United States v. Cortez .................................................. 682, 683United States v. Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Digoras ............................. 129United States v. Dotterweich .............................................. 397United States v. Elmore ................................................... 681United States v. General Motors Corp ................................... 102, 838United States v. Harris .................................................. 520, 521United States v. Hearst ................................................... 461United States v. Henry .................... 451, 452, 453, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,

462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471

1218

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

U nited States v. Hill ...................................................... 680United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp ........................................ 406United States v. Hodge and Zweig ......................................... 608United States v. Hutcheson ............................................... 347United States v. I.B.M ..................................................... 290United States v. International Boxing Club .............................. 320, 325United States v. John J. Fulton ........................................... 717United States v. Johnson .................................................. 830United States v. Kahn ..................................................... 176United States v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co .................................. 838United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co ........................... 396, 397, 398United States v. Martinez-Fuerte (1975) .................................... 668United States v. Martinez-Fuerte (1976) ............................. 668, 669, 670United States v. Mendenhall ........................................ 664, 672, 674,

675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680United States v. National Football League ................................. 323United States v. National Association of Real Estate Boards ............. 976, 978,

981, 982, 1003, 1006United States v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc ................... 642United States v. Nixon .................................................... 637United States v. Vowell ................................................... 642United States v. Ortiz .................................................... 669United States v. Park ..................................................... 397United States v. Pipkins ................................................... 610United States v. Reading Railroad ......................................... 218United States v. Realty Multi-list Inc ....................................... 1000United States v. Robinson ................................................. 680United States v. Shubert ................................................ 320, 325United States v. Sifuentes ................................................. 668United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co .............................. 102, 342, 343United States v. Speron ................................................... 670United States v. Southwestern Underwriters Ass'n ......................... 326United States v. Topco Assoc .............................................. 102United States v. Van Schaick ............................................ 398, 399United States v. Wade .................................. 452, 453, 454, 456, 457, 464United States v. Women's Sportswear Mfrs. Ass'n ......................... 355United States v. W onson .................................................. 192United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Janich ..................... 152United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg. Co ...................... 339United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp ......... 339United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior and Gulf Navigation ............ 339Universal Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Tenery .............................. 152University of M iami ....................................................... 481Unrult v. Truck Insurance Exchange .................................... 598, 602Uppgren v. Executive Aviation Servs. Inc ................................ 802, 805Utility Serv. Eng'r, Inc. v. Colorado Bldg. Trades Council ................... 114

V

Vallas v. City of Chula Vista ........................................ 425, 425, 434Van Atta v. Scott .......................................................... 615Vandyne v. Vreeland ...................................................... 47Vano v. W estern Airlines ................................................ 539, 540VerHagen v. Gibbons ..................................................... 825Verkennes v. Corniea ..................................................... 878

1219

Victorian Rvs. Comm'rs v. Coultas ......................................... 538Vieux v. Vieux .................................................. 567, 568, 570, 574Village of Belle Terre v. Borass ............................................ 842Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co ...................................... 837,

841, 842, 843, 847, 849, 853Vinicky v. Midland Mut. Casualty Ins. Co .................................. 824Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. FMC ............................... 642Von Theodorovich v. Franz Josef Beneficial Ass'n .......................... 698

W

W alczak v. H ealy .......................................................... 119Walker v. Calloway ..................................................... 66W alker v. Sheldon ........................................................ 388W all v. Leck .............................................................. 754W allace v. Coca-Cola ....................................... 820, 821, 822, 823, 824,

825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833W alpole v. Orford ......................................................... 46W ard v. W est Jersey & S. R.R .............................................. 819W arner-Lambert Co. v. FTC ............................................... 706W ashington v. Texas ...................................................... 452W ashington Post Co. v. Chaloner .......................................... 177Washington State Bowling Properties Ass'n v. Pacific Lanes, Inc ........ 325, 343Watson v. Employers Liab. Assurance Corp ................................ 788W aube v. W arrington .................................................... 818, 819W ebb v. Claverdon ........................................................ 194W edderburn v. Pickering .................................................. 194W elch Co. v. New Hampshire .............................................. 327W endt v. County of Osceola, Iowa ......................................... 789W est v. Stainback ........................ ................................. 73W est Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish ........................................... 843Western Union Tel. Co. v. Cleveland ....................................... 816W estern Union Tel. Co. v. Lane ............................................ 816W heeland v. Rodgers ................................................ 567, 568, 575Whitcomb v. County of Yolo ......................................... 554, 559, 562W hite v. M aryland .................................................. 452, 455, 457W hite v. Nicholls .......................................................... 177W hite M otor Co. v. U.S .................................................... 102W hiteley v. W orden ....................................................... 520W iggington's Adm'r v. Rickert ........................................... 119, 132Wilfong v. Omaha & Council Bluffs St. R. Co ............................... 123W illiam s v. Florida ........................................................ 210W illiams v. Standard Oil Co ................................................ 842W ikes v. Sm ith ............................................................ 570W illis v. Santa Ana Hosp. Ass'n ........................................... 603W ilson v. Lund ............................................................ 829W interbottom v. W right ................................................. 387, 548Wise v. Daniel .................................................. 123Witherspoon v. Illinois .............................. 506, 508, 509, 510, 511,

512, 513, 515, 516, 517W ithrow v. Larkin ......................................................... 220W olf v. Donahue .......................................................... 61W olff v. General Cas. Co ................................................... 152W olff v. McDonnell ...................................................... 220, 469W olfson v. Smyer ......................................................... 48, 50Wollam v. City of Palm Springs ........................................... 534W ood v. United States .................................................... 616W ood v. W rigley .......................................................... 42World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodsen .............................. 779, 780,

781, 782, 786, 794, 796, 798, 807

1220

[Vol. 8: 1189, 1981] Volume VIII IndexPEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW

W right v. FM C Corp ....................................................... 596Wyatt v. Tahoe Forest Hosp. Dist .......................................... 603W ym an v. Jam es .......................................................... 877

X, Y, ZYandle v. PRG Industries, Inc ............................................. 378Ybarra v. Illinois .......................................................... 674Yee v. New York, New Haven, and Hartford R.R. Co ........................ 561Yesel v. W atson ........................................................... 152Yoder Bros. v. Cal.-Fla. Plant Corp ......................................... 772Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer .................................. 631Zablocki v. Redhail ...................................................... 878, 890Zelliver v. W assm an ................................................... 42, 52, 64Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc .............................. 112Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co .............. 194, 209, 219Zetinsky v. Chem ics ...................................................... 817Zurcher v. Stanford Daily ...................................... 158, 159, 165, 168,

175, 176, 177, 178, 180, 181, 187

1221