VLAF - 19 July 2012 Eleanore Fritze Senior lawyer, Mental Health & Disability Advocacy, Civil...
-
Upload
logan-alexander -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of VLAF - 19 July 2012 Eleanore Fritze Senior lawyer, Mental Health & Disability Advocacy, Civil...
VLAF - 19 July 2012
Eleanore FritzeSenior lawyer, Mental Health & Disability Advocacy, Civil Justice
Overview of VLRC guardianship review: New principles and alternatives to guardianship
• New purpose and principles• Disability, capacity and incapacity• Continuum of decision-making arrangements
• Supported decision-making• Co-decision-making
• Documenting wishes about the future
Overview
‘The purpose of this Act is to protect and promote the dignity and human rights of people with impaired decision-making ability.
To this end, the Act establishes mechanisms to:
(a) Support and assist people to make, participate in, or implement decisions that affect their lives
(b) Appoint and guide substitute decision-makers
(c) Ensure the ongoing appropriateness of support and substitute decision-making arrangements
(d) Safeguard against the abuse, neglect and exploitation of people with impaired decision-making ability’
A new purpose
Express presumption of capacity
People with impaired decision-making ability:
(a) Have human dignity which must be respected
(b) Have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms
(c) Should be provided with necessary support
(d) Have wishes and preferences
(e) Are entitled to take reasonable risks and make choices others may disagree with…
New general principles
f) Should be able to participate in life on an equal basis
g) Should be able to communicate in a way that allows them to understand and be understood
h) Have the right to live in safety and security, with protection from abuse, neglect and exploitation
i) Should have supportive relationships respected
j) Should have their cultural and linguistic circumstances respected
• Any limitations on decision-making rights must be ‘justified, reasonable and proportionate’
New general principles – cont.
• A person lacks capacity if they are unable to make a decision because of a disability• Causal connection retained
• Non-exhaustive definition of disability, including ‘intellectual impairment, autism spectrum disorder, mental disorder, brain injury, physical disability or dementia’
Disability and incapacity
• Presumption of capacity
• Capacity and incapacity both defined - able/unable to:• understand the information relevant to the
decision and the effect of the decision • retain that information • use or weigh that information, and/or • communicate the decision in some way
Capacity and incapacity
• Capacity is decision-specific and time-specific• Capacity is support-dependent• Capacity should be properly assessed and should not
be based on assumptions• Capacity should be assessed in an appropriate
environment
Capacity assessment principles
• Autonomous decision-making• Informal decision-making support• Supported decision-making
• Person receives support to help them make a decision
• Co-decision-making• Person makes a decision jointly with another
person• Substitute decision-making
• Somebody else makes a decision on the person’s behalf
Continuum of decision-making arrangements
• Possible powers:• Access or assist the person to access information• Discuss the information so that the person can
understand and will be assisted to make a decision
• Communicate or assist the person to communicate decisions to other people
• Advocate for implementation of the person’s decision
• NOT able to make decisions on behalf of the supported person or exercise authority without the person’s knowledge or consent
• Responsibilities and safeguards
Supported decision-making arrangements
• How is a supporter appointed?• Person with capacity may make a ‘supported
decision-making appointment’ (must be written and registered)
• VCAT may make a ‘supported decision-making order’ if the person ‘freely and voluntarily consents’, there is a need and it would promote the person’s personal and social wellbeing
• Scope of authority, and any conditions or limitations on power, should be specified
• Identity of supporter is important
Supported decision-making arrangements cont.
• Possible powers:• Access or assist the person to access information• Discuss the information so that the person can
understand and will be assisted to make a decision• Make decisions jointly with the person• All things necessary to give effect to joint decisions
• NOT able to make decisions on behalf of the person or exercise their authority without the person’s knowledge or consent
• Responsibilities and safeguards• Disagreements
Co-decision-making arrangements
• VCAT appointment only, where:• Decision-making capacity impaired and unlikely
the person has capacity to make the decisions alone
• They would have capacity to make joint decisions• Need for the appointment• ‘Free and voluntary consent’• Needs could not be met through informal
arrangements or a supporter• Promotion of personal and social wellbeing
• Scope of authority, and any conditions or limitations on power, should be specified
• Identity of co-decision-maker
Co-decision-making arrangements cont.
• People should be encouraged and permitted to plan for the future to promote autonomy
How?• Appoint an ‘enduring personal guardian’ or ‘enduring
financial administrator’• Can specify limits on powers• Can provide instructions for decision-making
• Make a stand-alone ‘instructional directive’
• Binding instructions about health matters• Non-binding advisory instructions in other
personal, lifestyle and financial matters
Documenting wishes about the future