Visual field testing and interpretation

82
VISUAL FIELD TESTING AND INTERPRETATION HIRA NATH DAHAL

Transcript of Visual field testing and interpretation

Page 1: Visual field testing and interpretation

VISUAL FIELD TESTING

AND INTERPRETATION

HIRA NATH DAHAL

Page 2: Visual field testing and interpretation

PRESENTATION LAYOUT• INTRODUCTION ON VISUAL FIELD

• NORMAL LIMITS OF VISUAL FIELD

• SHORT OVERVIEW ON HISTORY OF VF

• TERMINOLOGIES RELATED TO VF

• VISUAL FIELD TESTING METHODS

• KINETIC, STATIC

• INTERPRETATION OF VF REPORTS

Page 3: Visual field testing and interpretation

INTRODUCTION

VISUAL FIELD

• THE VISUAL AREA THAT IS PERCEIVED SIMULTANEOUSLY BY A FIXATING EYE.

Page 4: Visual field testing and interpretation

RETINA VS VISUAL FIELD

Optic disc

Nasal to the fovea – Seen in temporal VF as a Blind spot

Page 5: Visual field testing and interpretation

TRAQUAIRS FIELD OF VISION

Page 6: Visual field testing and interpretation

HILL OF VISION

Page 7: Visual field testing and interpretation

Normal limits of visual field

Page 8: Visual field testing and interpretation

SHORT HISTORY OF VISUAL FIELD• IN B.C 150, PTOLEMY: USED SOME FORM OF PERIMETRIC

DEVICE TO MEASURE EXTEND OF VF

• FIRST CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF VF DEFECT – HIPPOCRATES IN 5TH CENTURY, HEMIANOPIC FIELD DEFECT

• FINALLY IN 1604 KEPLER EXPLAINED THE PRINCIPLE OF SIGHT IN TERM OF AN INVERTED RETINAL IMAGE –

– AN STAGE FOR MODERN INVESTIGATION OF VF

Page 9: Visual field testing and interpretation

HISTORY….• IN 1666, MARIOTTE DISCOVERED

PHYSIOLOGICAL BLIND SPOT

• IN 1801, YOUNG STATED THE NORMAL

EXTEND OF VF OF AN EYE

• VON GRAEFE MAPPED OUT BLIND SPOT,

CENTRAL SCOTOMAS, CONSTRUCTION OF

ISOPTER.

• INTRODUCED VF IN CLINICAL MEDICINE

FOR THE FIRST TIME

• UNTIL 1869, FOERESTER INVENTED ARC

PERIMETER, TILL THEN VF PLOTTED ON

FLAT SURFACE

Thomas Young

Von Graefe

Page 10: Visual field testing and interpretation

HISTORY……• IN 1880, BJERRUM DEVELOPED

TANGENT SCREEN

• IN 1940, MARC AMSLER

INTRODUCED AMSLER GRID

• IN 1939 SLOAN DESCRIBED

STATIC PERIMETRY

• IN 1945 GOLDMAN

PERIMETER

• IN 1960 TUBINGER- MANUAL

TESTING OF BOTH STATIC AND

KINETIC PERIMETER

Jan

nik

Pet

erso

n B

jerr

um

Hen

nin

g R

ønn

e

Dr.

Han

s G

oldm

an

Page 11: Visual field testing and interpretation

FEW TERMINOLOGIES• THRESHOLD: THE WEAKEST TEST STIMULUS THAT IS JUST

VISIBLE IN A PARTICULAR LOCATION UNDER THE SPECIFIC

TESTING CONDITION.

• VARIES ACROSS THE VISUAL FIELD.

• SENSITIVITY: MOST SUBTLE CHARACTERISTICS OF A STIMULUS

THAT IS VISIBLE AT A SPECIFIC POINT IN SPACE.

• FIXATION: THAT PART OF VISUAL FIELD CORRESPONDING TO

FOVEA CENTRALIS.

Page 12: Visual field testing and interpretation

TERMINOLOGIES…• ISOPTER:

• LINE CONNECTING ALL POINTS IN THE VISUAL FIELD WITH THE

SAME THRESHOLD ( FOR A GIVEN TEST SPOT)

• BOUNDARY BETWEEN AREA OF VISIBILITY TO THE AREA OF NON-

VISIBILITY FOR A PARTICULAR STIMULUS

Page 13: Visual field testing and interpretation

TERMINOLOGIES…• SCOTOMA: LOCALIZED DEFECTS\DEPRESSIONS SURROUNDED BY

NORMAL VISUAL FIELD.

• ABSOLUTE: DEFECT THAT PERSISTS WHEN THE MAXIMUM

STIMULUS IS USED E. G BLIND SPOT.

• RELATIVE : DEFECT THAT IS PRESENT TO WEAKER STIMULUS BUT

DISAPPEARS WITH BRIGHTER STIMULUS.

Page 14: Visual field testing and interpretation

LOCATION OF VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS• CENTRAL

• 5 DEGREES OR LESS FROM THE POINT OF FIXATION

• PARACENTRAL

• >5 DEGRESS – 30 DEGREES

• CEACAL, PARACEACAL, PERICEACAL

• CENTROCECAL

• PERIPHERAL

• >30 DEGREES

Page 15: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 16: Visual field testing and interpretation

DESCRIPTIVE COMPONENTS OF VF DEFECTS•MONOCULAR DESCRIPTIONS–DENSITY• ABSOLUTE (NO VISUAL SENSATION) OR RELATIVE (DEPRESSED

VISUAL SENSATION)

–AREA• GENERAL OR LOCAL

–SHAPE• SECTORIAL (HEMIANOPIC) OR NON-SECTORIAL (REGULAR OR IRREGULAR)

–EXTENT• TOTAL OR PARTIAL

–POSITION• RT. OR LT. . TEMPORAL, NASAL, SUPERIOR, INFERIOR

Page 17: Visual field testing and interpretation

DESCRIPTIVE COMPONENTS OF VF DEFECTS

•Binocular description• Laterality•Unilateral or bilateral (homonymous/heteronymous)

•Equalness•Congruous or incongruous

•Additional description

•Awareness•Positive (defect perceived) or negative (defect not perceived)

Page 18: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 19: Visual field testing and interpretation

SIGNIFICANCE OF VISUAL FIELD TESTING

• FIND OUT THE EXTENT OF VF

• TO DIAGNOSE AND DETECT DISEASES AS WELL AS EXTENT OF

DAMAGE CAUSED IN VF BY THE DISEASE

• TO LOCATE POSSIBLE LESION IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER

• TO FIND OUT THE PROGRESSION OF DISEASES

Page 20: Visual field testing and interpretation

VISUAL FIELD TESTING METHODS/TOOLS

• CENTRAL

• AMSLER GRID: 200

• TANGENT (BJERRUM SCREEN): 300

• GOLDMANN

• AUTOMATED (OCTOPUS / HUMPHERY) :300

• PERIPHERAL

• CONFRONTATION

• GOLDMANN

• AUTOMATED 900 PROGRAMME

Page 21: Visual field testing and interpretation

PERIMETRY

• SYSTEMATIC MEASUREMENT OF VF BY THE USE OF A

PERIMETER

• MODERN PERIMETER • CONSIST OF A BOWL POSITIONED AT A FIXED DISTANCE FROM

THE EYE,

• ENABLE THE CONTROLLED PRESENTATION OF STIMULI WITH IN THE BOWL

• ENABLES ASSESSMENT OF THE VISUAL FUNCTION THROUGH OUT THE VISUAL FIELD

• DETECTION & QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGE TO THE VISUAL FIELD

• MONITORING THE CHANGE OVER A TIME

Page 22: Visual field testing and interpretation

PERIMETRY TYPESKinetic Static

• measures extent of visual field by plotting isopters ( locus of retinal points having same sensitivity)

•Stimulus moves from non- seeing to seeing area.

•Result depends upon the experience of the operator.

• e.g, Goldman perimetry, confrontation, Tangent screen, Arc perimetry

• measures the sensitivity of each retinal points.

•The stimulus is stationary but increases in luminance.

• Mostly automatic, very little role of the operator.

•e. g, Automated perimetry, Goldman perimetry

Page 23: Visual field testing and interpretation

GOLDMAN PERIMETRY

• THE MOST WIDELY USED INSTRUMENT FOR MANUAL

PERIMETRY.

• HAS A CALIBRATED BOWL PROJECTION INSTRUMENT

• WITH A BACKGROUND INTENSITY OF 31.5 APOSTILBS (ASB),

• TEST TARGETS: DOTS

• VARYING SIZE AND ILLUMINATION

Page 24: Visual field testing and interpretation

PERIMETRY BOWL•BACKGROUND

LUMINANCE

31.5 ASB

RADIUS OF THE BOWL

30 CM Patient side

Page 25: Visual field testing and interpretation

GOLDMANN TARGETS• THE STIMULI (DOT) USED TO PLOT AN ISOPTER DENOTED

BY

• ROMAN NUMERAL, A NUMBER, AND A LETTER.

• ROMAN NUMERALS = 0 TO V (SIZE)

• NUMBER = 1 TO 5 (LUMINANCE) USE OF FILTER

• ALPHABET = A TO E ( ‘’) USE OF FILTER

V4e , I4e, IV3e

Page 26: Visual field testing and interpretation

GOLDMANN PERIMETRY: ROMAN NUMERAL

• SIZES OF STIMULI [0...V SCALE]

• EACH SIZE INCREMENT EQUALS

• A TWOFOLD INCREASE IN DIAMETER AND A FOURFOLD

INCREASE IN AREA.

Diameter (mm) Area (mm2)

0 0.28 1/16

I 0.56 ¼

II 1.13 1

III 2.26 4

IV 4.51 16

V 9.03 64

Page 27: Visual field testing and interpretation

TARGET ILLUMINATION

• LUMINANCE SETTINGS

• EXPRESSED IN UNITS CALLED APOSTILBS (CANDELA/M2)

• 2 SETS OF FILTERS – 5 EACH • 10 STEPS

• STANDARD VS FINE SETTINGS

• (1...5 AND A...E SCALES)

• 1, 2, 3, 4 SETTINGS REPRESENT 0.5 LOG UNIT CHANGES = 5 DB

• A, B, C, D AND E SETTINGS REPRESENT 0.1 LOG UNIT CHANGES = 1DB

Page 28: Visual field testing and interpretation

TARGET RANGE IN GOLDMANN

• MORE THAN 100 COMBINATIONS OF SIZE AND INTENSITY OF TEST

TARGETS ARE POSSIBLE

• BUT ONLY A FEW ISOPTER ARE NEEDED TO DEFINE THE VISUAL FIELD.

• SIZE “0” GENERALLY IS OMITTED

• BECAUSE RESULTS OF THE PLOTS ARE INCONSISTENT.

• THE FINE-INTENSITY FILTER IS USUALLY SET TO THE LETTER “E”

• WHICH ELIMINATES THE SMALL-INCREMENT LIGHT FILTERS.

• TEST TARGET : DENOTED BY – SIZE + (STD. + FINE) LUMINANCE

• EG: V4E, I4E, II3E

Page 29: Visual field testing and interpretation

SOME INTERESTING FACTS• A CHANGE OF ONE NUMBER OF INTENSITY

– IS ROUGHLY EQUIVALENT TO A CHANGE OF ONE ROMAN

NUMERAL OF SIZE I.E. III4E = IV3E

• ISOPTER PLOTTED WITH TARGETS OF EQUAL SUM OF

–ROMAN NUMERALS (SIZE) & NUMBER (INTENSITY)

• ARE CONSIDERED EQUIVALENT.

–FOR EXAMPLE,

• THE I4E ISOPTER IS ROUGHLY EQUIVALENT TO THE II3E ISOPTER.

• I + 4 = 5, II + 3 = 5

Page 30: Visual field testing and interpretation

STANDARD VF PLOT OF RE

Page 31: Visual field testing and interpretation

REQUIRED EQUIPMENT FOR VF MAPPING

•GOLDMANN BOWL PERIMETER

•LENS HOLDER

• RECORDING PAPER

•COLORED MARKERS

•PATCH FOR MONOCULAR TESTING

Page 32: Visual field testing and interpretation

GOLDMANN PERIMETER

Pantoscopic handle

Horizontal cut

Patient Side (Bowl)

Page 33: Visual field testing and interpretation

GOLDMANN PERIMETER

Patient Side (Bowl)

Fixation target

Chin rest

Head rest

Len Holder

Page 34: Visual field testing and interpretation

GUIDELINE TO PLOT

• FIRST DEMONSTRATE THE PROCEDURE TO PATIENT

• BY STATICALLY PRESENTING LARGE TEST

GENERAL RULES FOR PLOTTING “ISOPTERS”

• AN ISOPTER IS MAPPED FOR THE PARTICULAR STIMULUS SIZE AND INTENSITY

• MOVE FROM NON-SEEING TO SEEING WHILE PRESENTING STIMULUS

• MOVE AT A RATE OF 5 DEGREES PER SECOND INSIDE

• PRESENT KINETICALLY EVERY 15 DEGREES INTERVAL

Page 35: Visual field testing and interpretation

GUIDELINES FOR PLOTTING

• BEGIN IN THE FAR PERIPHERY AND KINETIC PLOT ISOPTER IN ALL

MERIDIANS

• USE A V4E, I-3E , I-2E OR TARGET (DEPENDING UPON AGE

• PLOT THE BLINDSPOT

• ONLY 4 MERIDIANS ARE REQUIRED( MORE IF IRREGULAR OR

LARGE)

• USE THE I-4E FOR THE BLIND SPOT

• WITHIN ISOPTER OF I-2E OR I-3E

Page 36: Visual field testing and interpretation

GUIDELINES•CENTRAL STATIC TEST WITH I-2E

• EXPLORE FOR ANY SCOTOMAS

• KINETIC PLOT WITH I-3E STIMULUS ONLY IN SUSPECTED DEFECT AREA

•STATIC TEST BETWEEN I-3E AND I-2E ISOPTERS

WITH THE I-3E STIMULUS (SCOTOMA SEARCH)

Page 37: Visual field testing and interpretation

GUIDELINES

• SPECIAL CASE PLOTS

• GLAUCOMA SUSPECTS

• PLOT MORE POINTS ALONG THE NASAL EDGE OF THE ISOPTER

• PLOT APPROXIMATELY

• EVERY 3-5 DEGREES,

• 15 DEGREES ABOVE AND BELOW THE HORIZONTAL RAPHE

REPEAT FOR CENTRAL, INTERMEDIATE AND PERIPHERAL PLOTS

• SUSPECTED NEUROLOGICAL LESIONS

• PLOT MORE POINTS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE VERTICAL MERIDIAN

• REPEAT FOR CENTRAL, INTERMEDIATE AND PERIPHERAL PLOTS

Page 38: Visual field testing and interpretation

RECORDING

• ALL RECORDING SHOULD BE DONE ON THE GOLDMANN RECORDING PAPER

• PATIENT NAME,

• DATE,

• RX USED,

• PUPIL SIZE,

• EYE TESTED AND

• PATIENT COOPERATION / FIXATION

• INDICATE THE TARGET SIZES USED IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND BLOCK (COLOR MARKER)

Page 39: Visual field testing and interpretation

COLOR CODING OF ISOPTERS

• I-2E BLUE

• I-3E ORANGE

•I-4E RED

•II-4E GREEN

•III-4E PURPLE

•IV-4E BROWN

•V-4E BLACK

Page 40: Visual field testing and interpretation

EXPECTED FINDINGS FOR NORMAL ISOPTERS • PATIENTS UNDER 50 YEARS OF AGE

I. PERIPHERAL I-4E (SIZE=SAME, BRIGHTER LUMINANCE)

II. INTERMEDIATE I-3E

III. CENTRAL I-2E (SIZE=SAME, DIMMER LUMINANCE)

Page 41: Visual field testing and interpretation

EXPECTED FINDINGS FOR NORMAL ISOPTERS• PATIENTS 50 YEARS OR OLDER

I. PERIPHERAL II-4E (SIZE=LARGER, BRIGHTER LUMINANCE)

II. INTERMEDIATE I-4E

III. CENTRAL I-2E OR I-3E (SIZE=SMALLER, DIMMER LUMINANCE)

Page 42: Visual field testing and interpretation

INTERPRETATION

• THE VISUAL FIELD IS CONSIDERED ABNORMAL IF:

– THE THRESHOLD VALUES ARE SIGNIFICANTLY BRIGHTER (0.5

LOG UNITS OR MORE) THAN THE EXPECTED VALUES

AND / OR

– SCOTOMAS OR DEPRESSIONS ARE PRESENT

Page 43: Visual field testing and interpretation

SOME VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS

Page 44: Visual field testing and interpretation

SOME VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS

Page 45: Visual field testing and interpretation

BITEMPORAL HEMIANOPIARight eye Left eye

Page 46: Visual field testing and interpretation

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY ( STATIC)• MACHINE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE BASIC LINES OF A

GOLDMAN PERIMETER + SOPHISTICATED SOFTWARE

PROGRAMS.

• KEY REASON FOR INCREASED INTEREST IN AUTOMATED

PERIMETRY HAS BEEN DUE TO THE STANDARDIZATION

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY ALLOWS.

Page 47: Visual field testing and interpretation

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY

• VISUAL THRESHOLD IS MEASURED AT A SERIES OF FIXED POINTS IN THE VISUAL FIELD.

• THE BRIGHTNESS OF THE TEST SPOT IS VARIED, BUT NOT ITS LOCATION.

• THRESHOLD IS USUALLY PLOTTED RELATIVE TO NORMAL FIELDS, TO REVEAL DEFECTS

Page 48: Visual field testing and interpretation

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY

Page 49: Visual field testing and interpretation

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY

• HUMPHREY:

• OCTOPUS:

Page 50: Visual field testing and interpretation

THRESHOLD DETERMINATION

Frequency of seeing curve

Page 51: Visual field testing and interpretation

THRESHOLD DETERMINATION

28dB

24 dB

32 dB

30 dB29 dB

0 dB brightest stimulus

Page 52: Visual field testing and interpretation

THRESHOLD DETERMINATION

• AGE MATCHED NORMAL DATA ARE USED TO COMPARE

PATIENT’S DATA

• NORMAL RANGE DETERMINED BY

• SENSITIVITY OF EACH RETINAL POINTS 10,000 INDIVIDUALS

• UPPER 95% AS NORMAL

• LOWER 5% AS ABNORMAL

Page 53: Visual field testing and interpretation

TESTING STRATEGIES

• OCTOPUS

• NORMAL

• DYNAMIC

• TOP ( TENDENCY ORIENTED PERIMETRY)

• HUMPHREY

• SITA (SWEDISH INTERACTIVE THRESHOLD ALGORITHM)

• SITA FAST

• FULL THRESHOLD

Page 54: Visual field testing and interpretation

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OCTOPUS AND HUMPHREY (TEST PARAMETERS)

Page 55: Visual field testing and interpretation

FACTORS AFFECTING AUTOMATED PERIMETRY• BACKGROUND LUMINANCE

• STIMULUS SIZE

• FIXATION CONTROL

• REFRACTIVE ERRORS

• CATARACTS AND OTHER MEDIA OPACITIES

• MIOSIS

• FACIAL STRUCTURE

• FATIGUE

• EXPERIENCE OF A PERIMETER

Page 56: Visual field testing and interpretation

VALIDITY OF THE TEST

• FALSE POSITIVE RESPONSE

• > 20% UNRELIABLE

• FALSE NEGATIVE

• >20% UNRELIABLE

• SHORT TERM FLUCTUATION

• 1-3 DB NORMAL FLUCTUATION

• FIXATION LOSS

• >33% UNRELIABLE

Page 57: Visual field testing and interpretation

CHOOSING AN APPROPRIATE PROGRAM

EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

TEST PROGRAM(G1, G2, 32, M2)

+

TEST STRATEGY (NORMAL, DYNAMIC, TOP)

+

PERIMETRY METHOD( W/W, FLICKER, B/Y, KINETIC)

Page 58: Visual field testing and interpretation

PROGRAMS

G1/G2

• CENTRAL 30 DEGREE

• GLAUCOMA SCREENING

• 59 POINTS

• LOCATIONS MORE CLOSELY WITH TOPOGRAPHY OF RETINA

(IN AREAS OF CONCERN OF GLAUCOMA)

• 2.8 DEG SPACING

Page 59: Visual field testing and interpretation

PROGRAMS 32 ( GENERAL EXAMINATION)= 30-2 IN HUMPHREY

• INTRODUCED WITH EARLY AUTOMATED PERIMETRY

• 76 TEST LOCATIONS

• WIDE SPACING (6 DEGREES) ( NOT APPROPRIATE FOR

GLAUCOMA)

Page 60: Visual field testing and interpretation

PROGRAMS

MACULA PROGRAM(M2)

• CENTRAL AND PARACENTRAL VISUAL DEFECTS IN

NEUROLOGICAL AND MACULAR PROBLEMS

• CENTRAL 10 DEG

• 56 TEST LOCATIONS

• SPACING 2 DEGREES

• 0.7DEG SPACING IN THE MACULA

Page 61: Visual field testing and interpretation

PROGRAMS

LVC (CENTRAL LOW VISION)

• TO TEST HOW MUCH SENSITIVITY IS REMAINED IN THE

CENTRAL FOVEAL AREA.

• 77 LOCATIONS

• 30 DEGREES

• END STAGE GLAUCOMA

Page 62: Visual field testing and interpretation

STRATEGIES

• NORMAL STRATEGY

• STANDARD

• 4-2-1 BRACKETING PROCEDURE

• 10-15 MIN

• EARLY AND SHALLOW DEFECTS

• YOUNGER PATIENTS ( GOOD CONDITION IN ANSWERING THE

QUESTION TILL THE END OF A LONG PROGRAM)

Page 63: Visual field testing and interpretation

STRATEGIES

• DYNAMIC STRATEGY

• ONE THRESHOLD CROSSING

• SMALL STEPS IN REGIONS WITH NORMAL SENSITIVITY AND

LARGE TOWARDS DEPRESSED FIELD

• TEST DURATION REDUCED BY TWO

• ESPECIALLY WHEN FOCAL DEFECTS ARE EXPECTED

Page 64: Visual field testing and interpretation

STRATEGIES• TOP ( TENDENCY ORIENTED PERIMETRY)

• LIGHT SENSITIVITY OF THE RETINAL IS INTERRELATED RATHER

THAN HAVING AN INDIVIDUAL VALUE

• 2 MINUTES

• FOR PATIENTS WITH DEPRESSED FIELDS, FOR CHILDREN, ELDERLY

ONES WHO ARE NOT CAPABLE OF FINISHING A LONGER

EXAMINATION

Page 65: Visual field testing and interpretation

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

Page 66: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 67: Visual field testing and interpretation

DIFFERENT ZONES

Page 68: Visual field testing and interpretation

GREYSCALE

Page 69: Visual field testing and interpretation

VALUE TABLE

Page 70: Visual field testing and interpretation

COMPARISON /CORRECTED COMPARISON(TOTAL AND PATTERN DEVIATION)

Page 71: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 72: Visual field testing and interpretation

PROBABILITY PLOTS

Page 73: Visual field testing and interpretation

CUMULATIVE DEFECT CURVE

Page 74: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 75: Visual field testing and interpretation

GLAUCOMA HEMIFIELD TEST

• 5 SECTORS IN THE UPPER FIELD ARE COMPARED TO FIVE

MIRROR IMAGES IN THE LOWER

• IF VALUE IN TWO SECTORS DIFFER TO AN EXTENT THAT FOUND

IN

• <0.5% OF THE NORMAL POPULATION ( HIGHLY SENSITIVE)

• <1% OF NORMAL POPULATION (OUTSIDE NORMAL LIMIT)

• <3% OF THE NORMAL POPULATION (BODERLINE)

• <5% OF THE NORMAL POPULATION ( CAN BE A NORMAL PLOT)

Page 76: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 77: Visual field testing and interpretation

GLOBAL INDICES OCTOPUS

•MEAN SENSITIVITY (MS)

•MEAN DEVIATION (MD) (–2DB TO +2DB)

• LOSS VARIANCE (LV) (0-6DB)

•CLV(0-4DB)

• SF (1.5DB- 2.5DB)

•RF < 15%

HUMPHREY

• GHT

• MEAN DEVIATION

• PSD

• CPSD

• SF

Page 78: Visual field testing and interpretation

OCTOPUS CRITERIA FOR VISUAL FIELD DEFECT§

Page 79: Visual field testing and interpretation

HFA CRITERIA FOR VF LOSS

• PATTERN DEVIATION PLOT

Page 80: Visual field testing and interpretation
Page 81: Visual field testing and interpretation

RECENT ADVANCES IN AUTOMATED PERIMETRY• GOLDMAN KINETIC MODULE• HIGH-PASS RESOLUTION PERIMETRY - USES THIN RINGS INSTEAD

OF SPOTS• SHORT WAVELENGTH SENSITIVE PERIMETRY - BLUE ON YELLOW

FOR S CONES• FLICKER PERIMETRY - FLICKERING TARGETS INSTEAD OF STATIC

FLASHES• AULHORN'S SNOW FIELD CAMPIMETRY - USES TV “SNOW” AND

POINTING• MOTION PERIMETRY - DETECT MOVING TARGETS INSTEAD OF

FLASHED ONES• RAREBIT PERIMETRY- USES VERY SMALL, BRIGHT SPOTS• PUPIL PERIMETRY - MEASURES PUPIL RESPONSES INSTEAD OF

SUBJECTREPORTS• MULTIFOCAL VEP - MEASURES CORTICAL EVOKED POTENTIALS

INSTEAD OFSUBJECT REPORTS

Page 82: Visual field testing and interpretation

SUMMARY

• PRINCIPLE OF KINETIC AND AUTOMATED PERIMETRY

• APPROPRIATE SELECTION OF VISUAL FIELD TESTING FOR A

PARTICULAR PATIENT

• ACCURATE INTERPRETATION OF VF REPORTS