15 years developing villages connected with leader-like financing

Suomen kylätoiminta ry (SYTY)Village Action association of Finland

19 regional village associations-> common targets, planning for long periods,

projects

Village Development in the Lahti Region (Päijät-Häme)

• 11 municipalities• 95 villages + recidential neighbourhoods • 70 village associations • 54 village development plans

realised by numerous local projects

• 51 websites• regional village association

and regional village plan

Päijät-Häme Village Association

• Offers support and expertise in development of villages and village actions

• Promoter of co-operation between villages, village actors, municipalities and other parties

VILLAGE PLANNING in every level

There are ca. 2600 registered village associations in Finland, 19 regional village associations and the national Village Action

Association of Finland (SYTY)

• VILLAGE PLAN, which village inhabitants have made includes the village’s needs, aims and measures, forms a part of the Municipal Plan

• REGIONAL VILLAGE PLAN – drawn together from the local village plans forms a part of the regional developing program

• NATIONAL VILLAGE PROGRAM – is a part of the rural policy program

• Villages have become active partners and employers. – Extensive project and other development activities. – Project finance to villages 50 million € / year. – New lines of action and organisations: cooperatives, multi-service

centres etc.

Päijät-Häme Village Association• Implements rural policy to promote vitality of rural areas• Influences local, provincial and national village and resident

activity• Arranges events, village theme days and meetings as well

as training and communication activity • Makes initiatives, proposals and issue statements to local or

regional authorities• Offers village agent services:

- guidance eg. organising village plans, village visits- telephone and e-mail guidance- communications: village bulletin, website, e-mail list- assistance in finding partners and giving information about best practices

• Plans and implements cooperative village development projects; co-operation with Salpaus Further Education regarding provincial village program since 2002

A refreshing and stimulating program with a lot of insight and proposals.

FIVE FUTURE WINDOWS

FIVE FUTURE WINDOWS

1. DREAM – quality housing, meaningful own countryside

2. COMMUNITY – integration, social and mental security, multicultural activities

3. IMPULS – free participation, culture, environment 4. BUSINESS – creating services in villages, social business, village tourism, local food etc.

5. RURAL VOICE, Rural Proofing, Leader-method, new rural scheme

New inhabitants to the villages:eg. Asikkala: changed the strategy of municipality because of village activity Now: buying land in the villages, region planning, selling building sites

New ways to produce local services

eg. Multiservice day in Lusi village school

Elderly people come to the Lusi Village School once a week to have a lunch and to exercise. Services of the local entrepreneurs are also available, such as massaging and hairdressing. The most refreshing events are the joint events with small school children. The activity started in 2007

Annual village promoting event in Lahti harbour in May

Selecting the best village of the year

New challenges and visions:

• The new form of village plans to be a tool for the local democracy as a part of statutory planning

• Village association to be an official actor in municipalities and to authorities

• New model of contract: associations take more responsibility

• Implementing the FIVE FUTURE WINDOWS - strategy

Restructuring of municipalities and services by the year 2015

• Challenges– Financial problems for municipalities– General population is getting older– Concentration in towns, lack of services in the rural

areas• Opportunities

– Inter-municipal cooperation to produce services

The amount of municipalities will be reduced, causing:Changes in democracy: less people will be

elected, creating more need for direct democracy -> Municipal centres are going to be villages

Thank you for your attention

Any questions?