Vigilance related issues in procurement of works
-
Upload
dr-k-m-soni -
Category
Engineering
-
view
267 -
download
3
Transcript of Vigilance related issues in procurement of works
VIGILANCE RELATED ISSUES IN PROCUREMENT OF WORKS
DR K M SONI, CHIEF ENGINEER, WZ-I, CPWD, MUMBAI
APPOINTMENT OF CONSULTANTS-avoid conflict of interest
CONFLICT BETWEEN CONSULTANCY AND PROCUREMENT
CONFLICT BETWEEN CONSULTANCY AND CONTROLS/CONSULTANCY
CONFLICT BETWEEN CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER’S STAFF
ONLY ONE PROPOSAL IN INDIVIDUAL’S CAPACITY OR JT VENTURE
RECOVERIES FROM observations of CTE/QA OBSERVATIONSTO BE MADE AS PER CONTRACTTO BE MADE BY ENGINEER IN
CHARGE WITHOUT QUOATING THIRD PARTY i.e. CTE OR QA TEAM
BANK GUARANTEEFROM SCHEDULED BANKOF REQUIRED AMOUNTOF REQUIRED PERIODVALIDITY EXTENSION AFTER ITS EXPIRY
VERIFICATION TO AVOID FORGE DOCUMENT
INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION DIRECTLY FROM THE BANK
MOBILIZATION ADVANCEBG OF 110% ADVANCE TO
RECOVER INTEREST IF ANY.NORMALLY SHOULD NOT BE
PAID IN LESS THAN TWO INSTALMENTS.
INTEREST FREE BUT IF THE CONTRACT IS TERMINATED DUE TO DEFAULT OF THE CONTRACT, INTEREST RATE TO BE MENTIONED
TRANSPARENCY IN TENDERING SYSTEM OF COMPLEX NATURE
INVITE EOIFINALISE TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATIONSTHEN CALL TECHNO
COMMERCIAL BIDS
MIX DESIGNMINIMUM CEMENT CONTENTMAXIMUM WATER CEMENT RATIOMINIMUM GRADE OF CONCRETEVALUE OF STANDARD DEVIATION TO
BE CHECKEDFOR ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MEAN OF
A GROUP OF 4 NON OVERLAPPING CONSECUTIVE TEST RESULTS
SAMPLES HAVING +/- 15% VARIATIONS OF AVERGARE THREE SPECIMENS NOT BEING DECLARED INVALID
POST TENDER NEGOTIATIONSTHERE SHOULD BE NO POST TENDER
NEGOTIATIONS OTHER THAN WITH L-1 THAT TOO EXCEPT IN CERTAIN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES
POST TENDER NEGOTIATION COULD OFTEN BE A SOURCE OF CORRUPTION
NO POST NEGOTIATION WITH OTHER THAN THE L-1
RECORD CIRCUMSTANCES OF ACCEPTING SINGLE BID (CONSIDER RATE JUSTIFICATION ALSO)
E - GOVERNANCENOT NECESSARY TO BE
SECUREDTO BE CERTIFIED FROM THE
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
PURCHASE PREFERENCE POLICY
DPE GUIDELINES 21.11.2007/18.07.2005 STAND TERMINATED WEF 31.3.2008.
TENDERING SYSTEMFAIR, TRANSPARENT AND
OPENSECURED
DELAY IN FINALISATION OF TENDERSEXTENSION OF VALIDITY TO
BE VIEWED SERIOUSLYTO BE RARE WITH VALID
REASONS
DELAYS IN MAKING PAYMENTSREVIEW BY CVOs
PQ CRITERIASHOULD NOT BE
DISCRIMINATORYSHOULD BE CLEARLY
SPECIFIEDSHOULD NOT BE TOO
STRINGENT
MANUAL NITsA SOURCE OF COMPLAINT
DURING E TENDERING SYSTEM
USED FOR SPECIALISED WORK
PRESS NOTICE SHOULD BE THROUGH WEB
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF AWARD OF WORKSTRANSPARENTCONSISTENTWITH JUSTIFIED COST
DECISIONSSELF SPEAKINGWRITTEN
VIGILANCE ANGLE TO BE EXAMINED IN CASE OF IF ABNORMAL PROCUREMENTS
IF WORK AWARDED ON HIGH RATES
IF AWARD IS DELAYEDDISCRETIONS ARE FREQUENTLY RESORTED TO
FAVOURS ARE FOUNDBIASED AWARDS ETC.
THANKS