· Web viewDespite recent and significant increases in off campus housing options, the DOR process...

Iowa State University

DEPARTMENT OF RESIDENCEAND ISU DINING ANNUAL REPORT FY2011

Prepared September 2011

Submitted by:

Dr. Peter EnglinDirector of Residence

and

Nancy LevandowskiDirector of ISU Dining

Iowa State University

DEPARTMENT OF RESIDENCEANDISU DININGANNUAL REPORT FY2011

Table of Contents Page 1

Executive Summary Pages 2-6

Enrollment and Occupancy Page 7

Explanation For Variance In Design, Offered And Program Capacities Page 8

Capacity and Occupancy Page 9

Room and Board Rates Page 10

Peer Group Comparison Page 10

System Distribution of Rooms and Rates Page 11

Room Style Demand Page 12

Meal Plan Buy-In Page 13

Financial Data Page 14

Bond Principal and Interest Due Page 15

Facilities Summary Page 15

Appendix A – Explanation of Changes to Design Capacity Page 16

Appendix B – Explanation of Off-Line Spaces Page 17

Iowa State University Department of Residence and ISU Dining Annual Report FY2011 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Department of Residence (DOR)Despite recent and significant increases in off campus housing options, the DOR process of engaging in strategic and continuous improvements aimed at enhancing the student experience and the residential facilities has grown occupancy. The priority continues to be providing a welcoming and supportive experience for each and every student. This may be best exemplified by the fall move-in process, where over 240 staff and 750 student volunteers make the experience quick and efficient. Given the growth in the freshmen class and continued strong return rates, the DOR has not needed to substantially change its’ formula for success.

Student success, with retention to the University as one metric, continues to improve. DOR’s focus continues to be on providing added value to the student experience for those that live on campus. MapWorks, a freshmen focused, Web-based, self-assessment program is in its fourth year of use and is implemented the third week of each fall semester. This is the optimal time for this survey as it is the point at which students are realizing the differences between their expectations coming in and the realities of being a new freshman. During year one about 70% of the freshman class participated in MapWorks. During this past year the percentage was 85%. The MapWorks results provide students and staff with a comprehensive snapshot of how each individual student is experiencing Iowa State University shortly after starting classes. Currently, the DOR funds over 85% of this $90,000 initiative and partners with staff in the Dean of Students Office and faculty and staff in the Colleges of Human Sciences, Liberal Arts & Sciences, Engineering, Business, Agriculture & Life Sciences, and Design in sharing/using the student data derived from the MapWorks assessment. Students who participate in MapWorks have substantially higher retention rates (88.8%) than students who do not (79.8%). These percentages include accounting for differences in entering characteristics such as high school rank, high school GPA, and ACT score.

Independent analysis by the DOR assessment staff also noted some additional positive outcomes from living on campus. Students living on campus recorded significantly higher GPAs than their off campus peers. On campus freshman achieve a grade point average of 2.61 as compared to 2.26 for their off campus counterparts; sophomores achieve a 2.81 vs. 2.56; juniors a 2.96 vs. 2.76, and seniors a 3.16 vs. 3.04. It is especially telling for freshmen, as students in their first semester at ISU who achieve a 2.00 or better have a 6-year graduation rate of 81% vs. 31% rates for freshman who do not achieve a 2.00 GPA their first semester. With 92.6% of freshman living on campus the experience DOR provides is critical to future success.

Disaggregating National Survey for Student Engagement (NSSE) data also provides good information regarding on campus life. On campus students were more likely to:

have already participated in a learning community; worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements; planned to do a culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project, or thesis); had serious conversations with students who are very different in terms of religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values; attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theater, or other performance; felt the institution does a good job of providing the support to help them succeed academically; felt the institution emphasizes encouraging contact among students from different backgrounds; encouraged attendance at campus events and activities; provided the support they need to help them succeed; provided the support they need to thrive socially; and evaluated their educational experience more positively.

While the forecasted decline in traditional-age, graduating, high school students may possibly challenge both enrollment and occupancy in the next few years, DOR has so far collectively exceeded what the demographics would predict. Occupancy continues to outpace growth in enrollment, indicating that - even with off campus options - students choose to live on campus in extraordinary numbers. This dynamic will need to be monitored as students are also seeing a growth in relatively convenient living options at off campus locations. The opportunity for the DOR is to build upon an experience that already generally exceeds expectations and for on campus housing to remain the preferred location for almost all freshmen and a substantial portion of the sophomore, junior, and senior classes.

ISU DiningStrategic and continuous improvement in facilities and service has been an emphasis for ISU Dining over the past few years. Increased enrollment and occupancy has led to a rise in meal plan participation creating additional revenues that can be reinvested in operations.

Awards and RecognitionDuring spring 2011, ISU Dining hosted the National Association of College and University Food Services (NACUFS) 2011 Midwest Regional Conference. The event brought over 300 food service professionals to the ISU campus to examine the quality, best practices and emerging trends of foodservice on school, college, and university campuses. The NACUFS Midwest Regional President declared the event to be one of the best NACUFS regional conferences ever assembled. The two Co-Chairs of the conference - Jeni Ross, Manager of Union Drive Marketplace and Brian Reichert, Manager of the Memorial Union Food Court - were honored with the Midwest Regional President’s Awards at the NACUFS national conference in July of 2011


ISU Dining was honored for its support of a Learning Community’s food pantry program and for its Share Program, which donates extra/left-over commissary and bakery food items to Youth and Shelter Services. The Special Olympics Gourmet Gala, an event which features all ISU Dining chefs, raised $36,000 in summer 2011 – up $10,000 from the previous year.

CateringISU Dining Catering redesigned the menus and ordering options for the Jack Trice Stadium Sky Suites. Previously, a pre-determined meal was made for all suites each game and delivered prior to the start of the game. The new system, allows suite holders to personally select their game meal from a variety of menu options and have it served at a time during the game they find more convenient.

Residential DiningThe ISU Dining Residential operation continues to focus on improving student perceptions of meal plan value. After a review and revision of meal plans, beginning fall 2011, the number of meal plans has been reduced and all meal plans are now semester style. Semester style plans provide students with a set number of meals to use, at their convenience, throughout the semester. The previously offered weekly plans had a set number of meals that had to be eaten each week or they were lost. While uneaten meals on the new plans will still expire at the end of the semester, the new plans allow students greater flexibility to plan their meals around their lifestyle which creates an increased perception of value in the overall dining program.

In the Towers area, due to the increased occupancy in Wallace-Wilson, the Knapp-Storms Dining Complex (previously a catering only facility) now offers dinner service Monday – Thursday evenings. Current participation levels average 200 meals per night with increases anticipated as the weather grows colder.

With a goal to grow voluntary meal plan participation to over 3,000, beginning fall 2011, each Dining Center will hold two “WOW” events each academic year, creating excitement through special programs with activities and themed meals. ISU Dining has also implemented smaller theme menus and surprise specialty items which allows for more variety and breaks to the four week menu cycle.

Wellness continues to be an important issue for students. ISU Dining has revised menus to offer increased vegetarian, vegan and gluten-free options in all Dining Centers. Students can identify these items and plan their meals using the on-line NetNutrition program as well as nutrition information cards available at the point of service. While the full-time Dietician position is currently vacant, with a search in progress, the services of an intern in dietetics education are available to students. Additional product offerings include Crystal Light, frozen yogurt, sauces “on the side” of proteins, and increased international food flavors.

Retail OperationsThe renovation of Hawthorn Market and Cafe during the summer of 2011 has allowed students to gain access to a 24-hour lounge space and improved flow of the operations for customers and the employees with a plan to speed up service. This renovated location opened on August 25, 2011 and includes the installation of high-end ordering kiosks and a restructured serving line. The opening was later than planned due to construction delays.

With the installation of a large pizza oven, Clyde’s Sports Club was able to convert the pizza portion of the Clyde’s menu to the branded Godfather’s Pizza concept, which had been well received on the east side of campus. Clyde’s is now able to serve pizza-by-the-slice. Clyde’s has also expanded serving hours to meet student desires.

Beginning fall 2011, due to increased occupancy at Wallace-Wilson, the South Side Market has expanded services. Morning hours have been added allowing students the ability to purchase breakfast meal bundles featuring a Pop Cake pancake machine. Extended hours are offered on Saturday and Sundays.

Following continued increases in sales of both grill and Caribou Coffee items, the Hub Grille and Café has added breakfast service this fall.

The meal bundle program, which allows increased flexibility to all meal plan users, has been expanded to six ISU Dining Retail operations. This brings the locations that allow meal bundles to nine, including the three Residential Dining Centers. Meal bundles allow students to utilize a meal swipe to receive an entrée, three sides, and a beverage. Meal bundles provide improved convenience, flexibility, and perceived value to meal plan holders. Approximately 3,000 meal bundles are served daily in the retail locations.

SustainabilityThrough a grant from the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Steward (IDALS), the Farm to ISU program has partnered with ISU Extension to teach Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) to all farmers that sell to ISU Dining. In addition to on-going sustainability efforts, ISU Dining has also begun composting at the Jack Trice Stadium Sky Suites, Club Section and Football catering events for home games.

Training CenterThe Linden Training Center has developed comprehensive onboarding training and continuing education for staff members at all levels. Focuses of the program include skill development in introductory kitchen basics, recipe execution, kitchen safety and knife use, baking, allergen protocols, etc. The Training Center is also the location where the Executive Chef position, once filled, will manage a test kitchen to experiment with new recipes and menu development.


In an effort to improve crisis preparation and response, ISU Dining senior management participated in a table-top emergency exercise. This exercise will be repeated within individual ISU Dining units by mid-October. The hope is that staff will gain a more comprehensive understand of basic safety principles and be able to calmly and effectively respond in a crises.

Enrollment and OccupancyFrom fall 2010 to fall 2011, total University enrollment increased by 1,205 students (4.26%). The breakdown is as follows:

586 student increase (5.6%) in lower division enrollment, (508 freshmen, 78 sophomores) 1,180 student increase (9.7%) in upper division enrollment -561 student increase (-9.2%) in graduate and professional student enrollment

On-campus occupancy saw an overall increase of 573 students (6.1%), for a total of 9,976 residents. The breakdown is as follows: 553 student increase (10.1%) in lower division residence hall occupancy 24 student increase (2.6%) in upper division residence hall occupancy -23 student increase (-39.0%) in graduate student residence hall occupancy 19 student increase (0.6%) in student apartment occupancy

Housing CapacityDuring spring 2011, four single rooms in the residence halls were taken off-line permanently. Two were converted to telecom closets; a temporary staff space on the Wallace-Wilson mezzanine was removed as it is no longer needed for staff and is not suitable for students; and one, a room that wraps around the elevator shaft in Friley Hall, was converted to custodial storage. An additional 13 spaces were lost due to the conversion of some double rooms with small square footage to single rooms. Conversely, three large double rooms were converted to triples. In aggregate, capacity was reduced a total of 14 spaces.

During spring 2011 and summer 2011, the number of continuing student who recontracted to live on-campus for 2011-12 and the number of new incoming freshman began to grow beyond original projections. As the numbers of contracted students continued to increase, additional space needed to be generated in order to offer appropriate housing accommodations.

Care was taken to reduce the number of off-line, unused bed spaces. This resulted in an increase of 159 additional spaces being on-line and available for assignments. All floors in Wilson Hall were brought back on-line and all rooms (with the exception of the CA rooms and two small singles per floor) were converted to doubles resulting in an increase of 266 bed spaces. Prior to the conversion, 32 returning residents were relocated from their single rooms in Wilson to a comparable single room in Wallace.

In reviewing occupancy levels, it was determined that demand for family housing was down in the Schilletter Village area and several apartments designated for families were vacant. Once all families requesting housing were accommodated, the remaining apartments, 22 units were converted to single student use, accommodating 44 students.

In June 2011, it became clear that the changes in capacity and eligibility for Wilson Hall would not be enough to manage the continuing demand for on campus housing. The decision was made to use interim housing – as had been done previously, most recently in 1999-2000. As such, 117 dens in the Richardson Court and Union Drive areas were converted to double rooms, resulting in an increase of 234 bed spaces. Spaces were kept off-line until needed. As of Count Day 2011, 101 of the dens were occupied with a total of 176 residents. Since there are currently only 122 vacancies in permanent spaces, due to cancellations and no shows realized since fall opening, it is anticipated that approximately one third of den residents will remain in interim housing through the fall 2011 semester.

All of the above considerations resulted in a 402 bed increase (4.1%). It is important to note that without making some major programmatic changes, such as converting Wallace Hall from single to double rooms, housing capacity had little room for expansion.

Room Styles & RatesThe table on page 11 outlines the number of available rooms by style and rate.

Choice continues to be very important to today’s students and their families. The DOR offers a number of different room styles and options. Room rates are determined based upon the type of room offered, and physical condition of facility. Prior to FY12, room rates were also based on building location, i.e. Richardson Court or Union Drive, with a premium being placed on those rooms located on the west side of campus. Beginning fall 2011, room rates have been equalized between areas so that equitable room types with the same amenities are the same rate regardless of their location on campus.

Based on input received from the ISU Accounts Receivable (AR) and Financial Aid offices, the default billing in the Schilletter-University Village (SUV) area has been changed from monthly to semester billing. With the increase in traditional aged, single students living in this area, the collection of room fees had become more difficult. Financial aid is generally distributed at the start of each semester and is applied to what is on the student’s Ubill at that time. Any remaining aid is then refunded to the student. With monthly billing, only one


month of rent has been billed to a student at the time financial aid is distributed, so aid intended to cover housing is refunded. AR then must spend extra time each month working to collect payment for apartment rent. By switching to semester billing, the entire cost of the apartment is on the Ubill at the time financial aid is distributed. Residents may still request monthly billing, but it will only be granted if they do not have a history of non-payment with the University.

Peer Group ComparisonsIn this era of increasing diversity in housing and dining availability on campuses nationwide, it is difficult to draw direct conclusions based upon peer group data. Using the aggregate of data, however, ISU on-campus housing remains competitively priced when compared to the land-grant peer group. See tables on page ten.

Room DemandThe table on page 12 shows the breakdown of fall 2011 student requests for specific room types and locations. The demand figures are based only on the student’s FIRST preference for product type and area.

Residence Hall PreferencesThe top three residence hall preferences are:

UD – Double Room – AC (1,043) UD – Double Room – AC, Sub. Free (585) RC – Double Room – AC (533)

The bottom three residence hall preferences are: BH – Suite Double – 21+ (33) WW – Double Room – No AC (39) UD – Double Room – No AC, Sub. Free (51)

It is important to note that, in order to manage unanticipated enrollment increases, the WW – Double Room – No AC was a late addition to the contracting and preferencing process. While all contracted students were notified once this option became available, the majority of students were not presented with this option at the time they contracted.

Friley Hall (1,679) remains the most popular residence hall, followed by Maple (665), Larch/Willow (533) and Eaton (503). With the exception of Larch/Willow, demand in these building continues to exceed capacity.

Linden Hall (163) is the least popular residence hall, followed by Wallace/Wilson (280), and Barton/Lyon/Freeman (366). With the exception of Barton/Lyon/Freeman, capacity in these buildings continues to exceed initial demand.

Requests for co-ed housing exceed requests for single-gender housing at a rate of 16.3 to 1.

Requests for air-conditioned housing exceed requests for non-air-conditioned housing at a rate of 3.1 to 1.

Where both exist, requests for non-substance free housing exceed requests for substance free housing at a rate of 2.6 to 1.

Student Apartment PreferencesOverall requests for Frederiksen Court experienced a 3.6% drop for fall 2011 – the first decline since the buildings were constructed. The largest decline was seen in 2 bedroom shared apartments, which dropped 11.0%. That said, demand for Frederiksen Court continues to exceed capacity.

In Schilletter Village, requests for family housing dropped 28.7%. This drop was fortuitous as unoccupied family units were needed to accommodate graduate students who would otherwise have been assigned to interim housing. Additionally, while University Village requests dropped 8.7% resulting in capacity exceeding initial demand, many students who had requested Frederiksen Court were assigned to this area when Frederiksen Court demand exceeded capacity.

Guest HousingGuest housing requests continue to rise, especially during the spring and summer, when demand exceeds supply. Current guest occupancy sits at 65.7%, 3.2% increase. The process of consolidating all guest units to Schilletter Village was completed summer 2011 and there is now a consistent, 70 furnished units within Schilleter Village. In years with low family occupancy, the DOR may opt to allow unoccupied family units to be offered as unfurnished guest housing.

Meal Plan Buy-InFall 2011 has seen a 3.9% increase in overall meal plans participation – 2.5% in mandatory meal plans and 7.0% in voluntary meal plans. The increase in voluntary meal plans meets the goals previously set by ISU Dining to increase voluntary participation to over 3,000 with 3,002 students living in Frederiksen Court, SUV, Wallace-Wilson and off-campus opting to purchase a meal plan.


Financial DataNet operating revenue during fiscal 2010-2011 was $22,968,461, an increase of $140,886 over fiscal year 2009-2010.

Capital Expenditures/Replacement ValuesDOR and ISU Dining have made the strategic decision to target the majority of their capital dollars into specific facilities based upon current knowledge of future facility utilization. In-year priorities affect implementation of this strategy.


ENROLLMENT and OCCUPANCY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Enrollment Data can be found on the ISU Web Site: http://www.iastate.edu/~registrar/stats/.

Enrollment Comparison

Level Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Change (+ or -)# %

Freshmen 5,524 6,032 508 9.2%Sophomores 4,917 4,995 78 1.6%

Total lower division 10,441 11,027 586 5.6%Total upper division 12,136 13,316 1,180 9.7%

Total undergraduate 1 22,577 24,343 1,766 7.8%Total graduate 2 6,105 5,544 -561 -9.2%Total enrollment 28,682 29,887 1,205 4.2%

Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Residence Halls



Total lower division 5,457 6,010 553 10.1%Total upper division 927 951 24 2.6%

Total undergraduate 1 6,384 6,961 577 9.0%Total graduate 2 59 36 -23 -39.0%Total occupancy 6,443 6,997 554 8.6%

Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Student Apartments


Freshmen 272 256 -16 -5.9%Sophomores 862 750 -112 -13.0%

Total lower division 1,134 1,006 -128 -11.3%Total upper division 1,560 1,725 165 10.6%


Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Residence Halls and Student Apartments



Total lower division 6,591 7,016 425 6.4%Total upper division 2,487 2,676 189 7.6%


Percentage of Enrollment Housed – Residence Halls and Student ApartmentsLevel Fall 2010 Fall 2011 (+ or -)Freshmen 80.2% 80.3% 0.1%Sophomores 43.9% 43.5% -0.5%

Total lower division 63.1% 63.6% 0.5%Total upper division 20.5% 20.1% -0.4%

Total undergraduate 1 40.2% 39.8% -0.4%Total graduate 2 5.3% 5.1% -0.2%Total 32.8% 33.4% 0.6%

1. Undergraduate specials (non-degree) included in upper division count.2. First Professionals and Post Docs included in graduate count.


http://www.iastate.edu/~registrar/stats/

EXPLANATION for VARIANCE in DESIGN, OFFERED and PROGRAM CAPACITY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

FALL 2011 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS FOR DESIGN, OFFERED AND PROGRAM CAPACITYResidence Halls Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program Variance Explanation VarianceBarton 98 96 -2 95 -1 1 CA DAS 3

Birch-Welch-Roberts 487 487 0 476 -11 11 CA DASFreeman 115 115 0 115 0Larch 544 544 0 536 -8 8 CA DASLinden 320 320 0 313 -7 7 CA DASLyon 116 116 0 116 0Maple 496 494 -2 485 -9 1 DAS, 8 CA DASOak-Elm 436 436 0 432 -4 4 CA DASWillow 544 542 -2 534 -8 8 CA DASTotal Richardson Court 3,156 3,150 -6 3,102 -48Eaton 328 326 -2 322 -4 1 DAS, 3 CA DASFriley 1,206 1,204 -2 1,184 -20 1 DAS, 19 CA DASHelser 713 713 0 700 -13 13 CA DASMartin 331 330 -1 330 0Total Union Drive 2,578 2,573 -5 2,536 -37Buchanan 409 409 0 409 0Wallace 4 298 297 -1 297 0Wilson 565 565 0 565 0Total Towers 1,272 1,271 -1 1,271 0Total Residence Halls 7,006 6,994 -12 6,909 -85

Student Apartments Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program Variance Explanation VarianceFrederiksen Court 1,992 1,940 -52 1,940 0Schilletter Village – Single 0 0 0 43 43 44 spaces rented non-family, 1 privateUniversity Village – Single 992 984 -8 868 -116 14 spaces rented as family, 102 privateTotal Single Student 2,984 2,924 -60 2,851 -73Schilletter Village - Family 5 186 177 -9 155 -22 22 units rented non-familyUniversity Village - Family 5 0 0 0 7 7 7 units rented as familyTotal Family 186 177 -9 162 -15Total Student Apartments 3,170 3,101 -69 3,013 -88

Total System Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program VarianceTotal Student Bed Spaces 10,176 10,095 -81 9,922 -173Total Interim Spaces 6 234 176 -58 176 0Total Guest Apartments 5 70 70 0 70 0Total DOR System 10,480 10,341 -139 10,168 -173

1. See Appendix A for an explanation of changes to Design Capacity2. See Appendix B for an explanation of Off-line Space3. DAS indicates that a double room is being used as a single, either as a CA space or for a student with a medical need4. All Wallace rooms typically offered as Super Singles5. All SUV Family and Guest are designed with 2 bed spaces, but are offered as single units (1 bed space).6. Interim housing spaces (converted den spaces) are only brought on-line as needed.


CAPACITY and OCCUPANCY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Capacity indicated is PROGRAM capacity. Program capacity will vary from year to year based upon on-line status and bed space

conversion due to doubles-as-singles and/or triples-as-doubles. Changes to capacity as compared to the previous year are footnoted.

HALL AND APARTMENT OCCUPANCIES AS COMPARED TO PROGRAM CAPACITY

Residence HallsFall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % %Barton 95 93 97.9% 95 94 98.9% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 1.1%Birch-Welch-Roberts 476 472 99.2% 476 468 98.3% 0 0.0% (4) -0.8% -0.8%Freeman 115 114 99.1% 115 115 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0.9%Larch 536 533 99.4% 536 531 99.1% 0 0.0% (2) -0.4% -0.4%Linden 313 308 98.4% 313 309 98.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0.3%Lyon 116 114 98.3% 116 116 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.8% 1.7%Maple 485 479 98.8% 485 482 99.4% 0 0.0% 3 0.6% 0.6%Oak-Elm 431 423 98.1% 432 430 99.5% 1 0.2% 7 1.7% 1.4%Willow 533 530 99.4% 534 529 99.1% 1 0.2% (1) -0.2% -0.4%Total Richardson Court 3,100 3,066 98.9% 3,102 3,074 99.1% 2 0.1% 8 0.3% 0.2%Eaton 323 320 99.1% 322 319 99.1% (1) -0.3% (1) -0.3% 0.0%Friley 1,191 1,185 99.5% 1,184 1,180 99.7% (7) -0.6% (5) -0.4% 0.2%Helser 700 695 99.3% 700 695 99.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%Martin 328 323 98.5% 330 328 99.4% 2 0.6% 5 1.5% 0.9%Total Union Drive 2,542 2,523 99.3% 2,536 2,522 99.4% (6) -0.2% (1) 0.0% 0.2%Total Lower Division 5,642 5,589 99.1% 5,638 5,596 99.3% (4) -0.1% 7 0.1% 0.2%Buchanan 404 398 98.5% 409 401 98.0% 5 1.2% 3 0.8% -0.5%Wallace 298 284 95.3% 297 283 95.3% (1) -0.3% (1) -0.4% 0.0%Wilson 179 172 96.1% 565 541 95.8% 386 215.6% 369 214.5% -0.3%Total Upper Division 881 854 96.9% 1,271 1,225 96.4% 390 44.3% 371 43.4% -0.6%Total Residence Halls 6,523 6,443 98.8% 6,909 6,821 98.7% 386 5.9% 378 5.9% 0.0%

ApartmentsFall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % %Frederiksen Court 1,947 1,924 98.8% 1,940 1,929 99.4% (7) -0.4% 5 0.3% 0.6%Schilletter Village 40 34 85.0% 43 43 100.0% 3 7.5% 9 26.5% 15.0%University Village 937 831 88.7% 868 849 97.8% (69) -7.4% 18 2.2% 9.1%Total Single Student 2,924 2,789 95.4% 2,851 2,821 98.9% (73) -2.5% 32 1.1% 3.6%Schilletter Village 153 152 99.3% 155 151 97.4% 2 1.3% (1) -0.7% -1.9%University Village 19 19 100.0% 7 7 100.0% (12) -63.2% (12) -63.2% 0.0%Total Family 172 171 99.4% 162 158 97.5% (10) -5.8% (13) -7.6% -1.9%Total Apartments 3,096 2,960 95.6% 3,013 2,979 98.9% (83) -2.7% 19 0.6% 3.3%

DOR SystemFall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % %Total Permanent Spaces 9,619 9,403 97.8% 9,922 9,800 98.8% 303 3.2% 397 4.2% 1.0%Total Interim Spaces 0 0 0.0% 176 176 100.0% 176 0.0% 176 0.0% 100.0%Total Student Spaces 9,619 9,403 97.8% 10,098 9,976 98.8% 479 5.0% 573 6.1% 1.0%Total Guest Apartments 80 50 62.5% 70 46 65.7% (10) -12.5% (4) -8.0% 3.2%Total DOR System 9,699 9,453 97.5% 10,168 10,022 98.6% 469 4.8% 569 6.0% 1.1%


ROOM and BOARD RATES

Rates indicated are for the entire academic year – both fall and spring semester. All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

10 Year Comparison Combined Rate for Double Room and Full BoardYear Standard Double: Union Drive - A/C Full Board: Gold Plan Combined Cost2011-2012 1 $4,053 $3,628 $7,6812010-2011 $3,929 $3,591 $7,5202009-2010 $3,796 $3,527 $7,3232008-2009 $3,703 $3,297 $7,0002007-2008 2 $3,561 $3,154 $6,7152006-2007 $3,360 $3,018 $6,3782005-2006 $3,231 $2,902 $6,1332004-2005 $3,168 $2,790 $5,9582003-2004 3 $3,040 $2,700 $5,7402002-2003 $2,822 $2,198 $5,020

1. In 2011-2012, with the formation of new meal plans, ISU Dining will begin reporting the "Gold Plan" rate. Previously, the rate used was "Weekly 17 plus DD$."2. In 2007-2008, to match the rates reported as Cost of Attendance by Financial Aid, DOR began reporting the "Union Drive - A/C" rate. Previously, the rate used was for

"Richardson Court - No-A/C.”3. In 2003-2004, with the formation of new meal plans, ISU Dining began reporting the "Weekly 17 plus Dining Dollar$" rate. Previously, the rate used was for "20

meals/week."

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS

Rates indicated are for the entire academic year – both fall and spring semester. All ISU data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Data for other schools obtained from that

university’s web site. Room Types and Meal Plans offered vary greatly by institution and may fluctuate from year to year. Room and meal plans that most

closely approximate a Standard, Union Drive, Double with A/C and the default Gold Meal Plan have been selected. In cases where ranges are present, rates are based upon buildings, locations and amenities.

Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Combined Rate for Double Room and Full BoardSchool 2010-2011 2011-2012 Plan Name Meals per Week $/Points per SemesterPurdue University 1 2 $7,076 - $14,926 $7,622–$13,860 15 Meal Plan 15 $175 Dining $Ohio State University $10,940 - $12,840 $10,530-$12,045 Scarlet Plus 14 (avg.) $100 Buck IDUniversity of California, Davis 2 $11,774.64 $11,919 Frequent Diner Plan 14 (avg.) $150 Aggie CashUniversity of Illinois, Urbana 1 4 $8,719 - $10,002 $9,768-$10,390 14 Classic Plan 14 OptionalMichigan State University $8,370 $8,754 Platinum Unlimited $300 Spartan CashUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities $7,774 - $7,974 $7,928 14 Meals 14 220 Flex DineIowa State University $7,520 $7,681 Gold Plan 14 (avg.) $200 Dining $North Carolina State University $7,509 $7,570 14 Per Week 14 $100 Board BucksUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison 5 $6,261 - $7,136 $6,515 - $7,426 No requirement. N/A N/AUniversity of Arizona $8,380 - $9,730 $5,360 - $7,450 No requirement. N/A N/ATexas A & M University $6,483 $6,732 250 Plan 16 (avg.) $100 Dining $

Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Standard Suites Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Furnished ApartmentsSchool 2010-2011 2011-2012 School 2010-2011 2011-2012University of Wisconsin, Madison $6,261 - $6,845 $6,515 - $7,123 University of Wisconsin, Madison N/A $5,535 - $9,135Ohio State University $7,160 - $8,560 $6,810 Texas A & M University $5,080 - $8,006 $4,810 - $8,406Iowa State University (Martin/Eaton Halls) $5,457 $5,675 University of Illinois, Urbana $5,985 - $6,660 $7,200 - $8,400Texas A & M University $2,754 - $4,580 $2,892 - $5,514 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities $5,681 - $7,160 $5,567 - $8,169University of Minnesota, Twin Cities $4,366 - $5,919 $4,358 - $5,150 Michigan State University $2,388 - $7,704 $2,506 - $7,704Michigan State University N/A N/A University of Arizona $5,580 - $6,300 $6,520 - $7,658North Carolina State University N/A N/A Ohio State University $8,560 $6,810Purdue University N/A N/A Purdue University N/A $4,500 - $6,615University of Arizona N/A N/A North Carolina State University $5,295 - $5,920 $5,806University of California, Davis 3 N/A N/A Iowa State University (FC 4 person) $3,976 - $4,989 $4,127 - $5,179University of Illinois, Urbana N/A N/A University of California, Davis 3 N/A N/A

1. Housing and Dining rates are not segregated,2. Housing rates not delineated by room type.3. Housing is not university owned.4. Learning Community housing is an extra $145 - $310.5. Learning Community housing is an additional $200.


SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION of ROOMS and RATES

The number of bed spaces listed is indicative of what was OFFERED to students as available and on-line. Actual beds rented may vary due to off-line status or offering of space as double-as-single or triple-as-double (see page eight).

Rooms and Rates, System DistributionResidence Halls 2010-2011 2011-2012Area Traditional Style Rooms Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateRC Single - Linden - Plus Break 5 0.05% $5,222 5 0.05% $5,472RC Single without A/C 132 1.35% $4,936 135 1.31% $5,191RC Double - Linden - Plus Break 294 3.01% $4,088 294 2.84% $4,274RC Double - Maple 446 4.57% $4,393 446 4.31% $4,569RC Double with A/C 1,086 11.14% $3,853 1,086 10.50% $4,053RC Double without A/C 1,082 11.10% $3,806 1,070 10.35% $3,993RC Triple - Linden - Plus Break 21 0.22% $3,953 21 0.20% $4,074RC Triple without A/C 36 0.37% $3,662 45 0.44% $3,793Total Richardson Court 3,102 31.81% 3,102 30.00%TW Super Single - Wallace & Wilson 460 4.72% $4,658 327 3.16% $4,884TW Double - Wilson - - - 535 5.17% $3,993Total Towers 460 4.72% 862 5.17%UD Double with A/C 900 9.23% $3,929 880 8.51% $4,053UD Double without A/C 852 8.74% $3,881 852 8.24% $3,993UD Single with A/C 62 0.64% $5,130 73 0.71% $5,291UD Single without A/C 34 0.35% $5,034 34 0.33% $5,191UD Triple with A/C 66 0.68% $3,822 66 0.64% $3,827UD Triple without A/C 12 0.12% $3,753 12 0.12% $3,793Total Union Drive 1,926 19.75% 1,917 18.54%Total Traditional Style 5,488 56.28% 5,881 56.87%Area Room Type Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateRC Triple – Maple 48 0.49% $4,595 48 0.46% $4,779Total Richardson Court 48 0.49% 48 0.46%BH Single – Buchanan 133 1.36% $5,713 133 1.29% $5,942BH Single – Buchanan 21 or older 24 0.25% $5,713 24 0.23% $5,942BH Double – Buchanan 203 2.08% $4,970 204 1.97% $5,169BH Double – Buchanan 21 or older 48 0.49% $4,970 48 0.46% $5,169Total Towers 408 4.18% 409 3.96%UD Single – Eaton & Martin 17 0.17% $7,027 16 0.15% $7,308UD Double – Eaton & Martin 538 5.52% $5,457 538 5.20% $5,675UD Corner Suite - Martin 25 0.26% $6,353 28 0.27% $6,607UD Lofted Suite - Martin 74 0.76% $7,250 74 0.72% $7,540Total Union Drive 654 6.71% 656 6.34%Total Suite Style 1,110 11.38% 1,113 10.76%

Total Residence Hall Rooms 6,598 67.66% 6,994 67.63%

Area Apartment Type Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateFC 2 Bedroom Shared 608 6.23% $3,976 607 5.87% $4,127FC 2 Bedroom Private 23 0.24% $6,097 24 0.23% $6,329FC 4 Bedroom Private 1,316 13.49% $4,989 1,309 12.66% $5,179Total Frederiksen Court (rates per person) 1,947 19.97% 1,940 18.76% Monthly Rate 2 Semester Rate 2

SV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level 173 15.07% $574 165 14.21% $585 $5,116SV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level – Pet 1 - - - 12 0.39% $612 $5,352UV 1 Bedroom, 1 Level 8 0.70% $495 8 0.69% $505 $4,416UV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level 48 4.18% $532 48 4.13% $543 $4,750UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse 541 47.13% $566 548 47.20% $577 $5,046UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse - Pet 58 0.00% $600 320 27.56% $612 $5,352UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse - Furnished 320 0.00% $600 60 5.17% $612 $5,352Total SUV (rates per unit) 1,148 11.77% 1,161 11.23%Total Student Apartments 3,095 31.74% 3,101 29.99%

DOR System Beds % System Beds % SystemTotal Permanent Spaces 9,693 99.39% 10,095 97.62%Total Interim Spaces 3 0 0.00% 176 1.70%Total Student Bed Spaces 9,693 99.39% Rate 10,271 99.32% RateSUV Furnished Guest Apartments 53 89.83% $1,085 70 100.00% $1,085SUV Unfurnished Guest Apartments 6 10.17% $775 0 0.00% $775Total Guest Apartments 59 0.61% 70 0.68%Total DOR System 9,752 100.00% 10,341 100.00%

1. Pet housing introduced as an option in a limited number of Schilletter family apartments beginning fall 2011.2. Beginning fall 2011, the default billing in all SUV units is by the semester. 2010-2011 rates have been converted for accurate comparison.


3. Interim housing rates are equal to the double room rate for the building in which they are located.


ROOM STYLE DEMAND

Figures include only those preferences listed as a FIRST choice and are based on new and returning student contracts. The number of bed spaces listed is indicative of what was OFFERED to students as available and on-line. Please Note: This table has been revised to be more reflective of the options offered to students.

Room Style Capacity as Compared to Room Style DemandResidence Halls - Traditional Style Buildings Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Demand

VarianceArea Room Type Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -RC Double Room - AC Larch, Willow 1,086 609 -477 1,086 533 -553 -76RC Double Room - Maple Maple 446 391 -55 446 473 27 82RC Double Room - No AC BLF 288 296 8 288 366 78 70RC Double Room - No AC, Plus Break Linden 294 132 -162 294 163 -131 31RC Double Room - No AC, Single Gender BWR , OE 794 362 -432 782 376 -406 14

RC Any Richardson Court - 6 - - 10 - 4

Total Richardson Court 2,908 1,796 -1,112 2,896 1,921 -975 125

TW Double Room - No AC Wilson - - - 560 39 - -TW Super Single - Wallace & Wilson Wallace, Wilson 460 191 -269 302 241 -61 50

Total Towers 460 191 -269 862 280 -582 89

UD Double Room - AC Friley, Helser 724 1,346 622 710 1,043 333 -303UD Double Room - AC, Sub. Free Friley 176 333 157 170 585 415 252UD Double Room - No AC - Friley Friley, Helser 820 198 -622 820 361 -459 163UD Double Room - No AC, Sub. Free Friley 32 28 -4 32 51 19 23

UD Any Union Drive - 7 - - 12 - 5

Total Union Drive 1,752 1,912 160 1,732 2,052 320 140

Total Traditional Style 5,120 3,899 -1,221 5,490 4,253 -1,237 354

Residence Halls - Suite Style Buildings Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Demand VarianceArea Room Type Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -

RC Triple – Maple Maple 48 134 86 48 189 141 55

Total Richardson Court 48 134 86 48 189 141 55

BH Suite Double Buchanan 203 141 -62 205 152 -53 11BH Suite Double – 21 + Buchanan 48 30 -18 48 33 -15 3BH Suite Single Buchanan 133 171 38 132 195 63 24BH Suite Single – 21+ Buchanan 24 53 29 24 54 30 1

Total Buchanan 408 395 -13 409 434 25 39

UD Suite Double Martin 216 398 182 228 455 227 57UD Suite Double - Sub. Free Eaton 322 382 60 326 503 177 121UD Suite Double – Corner 1 Martin 25 7 -18 28 13 -15 6UD Suite Double – Lofted 1 Martin 74 20 -54 74 5 -69 -15

Total Union Drive 637 807 170 656 976 320 169

Total Suite Style 1,093 1,336 243 1,113 1,599 486 263

Total Residence Hall Preferences 2 6,598 5,737 -861 6,994 6,519 -475 782

Student Apartments Buildings Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Demand VarianceArea Frederiksen Court Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -

FC 2 Bedroom Shared FC 608 651 43 528 579 51 -72FC 2 Bedroom Private FC 23 67 44 14 62 48 -5FC 4 Bedroom Shared FC 1,316 1,302 -14 1,398 1,306 -92 4

Total Frederiksen Court 1,947 2,020 73 1,940 1,947 7 -73

SUV Schilletter Village SV 173 181 8 177 129 -48 -52SUV University Village UV 975 869 -106 984 793 -191 -76

Total SUV 1,148 1,050 -98 1,161 922 -239 -128

Total Student Apartment Preferences 3,095 3,070 -25 3,101 2,869 -232 -201

Total Student Bed Spaces 9,693 9,403 10,095 9,976

Non-Type Specific Preferences Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Demand VarianceCapacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -

- Learning Community 1,295 919 -376 1378 875 -503 -44

- No Preference - 179 - - 380 - 201

- Single Room - RC or UD 3 250 472 222 247 643 396 171

- Triple Room - RC or UD 3 135 30 -105 144 24 -120 -6


UD Suite Upgrade - Corner Only 4 Eaton/Martin 24 59 35 28 32 4 -27UD Suite Upgrade - Corner or Lofted 4 Eaton/Martin 99 541 442 102 943 841 402UD Suite Upgrade - Lofted Only 4 Eaton/Martin 74 68 -6 74 209 135 141

1. These are Returning resident preferences.2. These totals also include RC and UD single and triple room counts shown below.3. Single and Triple room Capacity is included in count of Total DOR System4. These are New Student preferences.


MEAL PLAN BUY-IN

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

Mandatory Meal Plans Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 1 - - 115 1.9% - -Cardinal Plan 1 - - 189 3.1% - -Gold Plan 1 2 - - 4,146 67.6% - -Silver Plan 1 - - 742 12.1% - -Bronze Plan 1 - - 944 15.4% - -Cyclone 21 Plus 3 62 1.0% - - - -Cyclone 17 Plus 3 1,844 30.8% - - - -Cyclone 14 Plus 3 1,815 30.3% - - - -Cyclone 10 Plus 3 1,315 22.0% - - - -Cyclone 7 Plus 3 785 13.1% - - - -Semester 225 Plus 3 86 1.4% - - - -Semester 175 Plus 3 51 0.9% - - - -Semester 200 3 4 28 0.5% - - - -Total Mandatory Plans 5,986 5 6,136 150 2.5%

Voluntary Meal Plans Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 1 - - 31 1.0% - -Cardinal Plan 1 - - 41 1.4% - -Gold Plan 1 2 - - 480 16.0% - -Silver Plan 1 - - 219 7.3% - -Bronze Plan 1 - - 510 17.0% - -25 Meal Block Plan 530 18.9% 404 13.5% -126 -23.8%50 Meal Block Plan 578 20.6% 513 17.1% -65 -11.2%75 Meal Block Plan 252 9.0% 257 8.6% 5 2.0%100 Meal Block Plan 572 20.4% 547 18.2% -25 -4.4%Cyclone 21 Plus 3 10 0.4% - - - -Cyclone 17 Plus 3 87 3.1% - - - -Cyclone 14 Plus 3 125 4.5% - - - -Cyclone 10 Plus 3 164 5.8% - - - -Cyclone 7 Plus 3 427 15.2% - - - -Semester 225 Plus 3 26 0.9% - - - -Semester 175 Plus 3 14 0.5% - - - -Semester 200 3 4 20 0.7% - - - -Total Voluntary Plans 2,805 3,002 197 7.0%

All Plans Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 1 - - 146 1.6% - -Cardinal Plan 1 - - 230 2.5% - -Gold Plan 1 2 - - 4,626 50.6% - -Silver Plan 1 - - 961 10.5% - -Bronze Plan 1 - - 1,454 15.9% - -25 Meal Block Plan 530 6.0% 404 4.4% -126 -23.8%50 Meal Block Plan 578 6.6% 513 5.6% -65 -11.2%75 Meal Block Plan 252 2.9% 257 2.8% 5 2.0%100 Meal Block Plan 572 6.5% 547 6.0% -25 -4.4%Cyclone 21 Plus 3 72 0.8% - - - -Cyclone 17 Plus 3 1,931 22.0% - - - -Cyclone 14 Plus 3 1,940 22.1% - - - -Cyclone 10 Plus 3 1,479 16.8% - - - -Cyclone 7 Plus 3 1,212 13.8% - - - -Semester 225 Plus 3 112 1.3% - - - -Semester 175 Plus 3 65 0.7% - - - -Semester 200 3 4 48 0.5% - - - -Total All Plans 8,791 9,138 347 3.9%

1. New plans beginning fall 2011.2. The Gold Plan includes the CA Plan, which for tax reasons does not include Dining Dollar$.3. These plans have been discontinued at the end of FY11.4. The Semester 200 plan did not include Dining Dollar$.5. The FY10 Mandatory Plan total is one less than total students living in meal plan required areas as one student was on waiver, but retained possession of her room.


FINANCIAL DATA

Data is as of June 30 of the fiscal year. Data is unaudited.

Operations FY 2010 FY 2011Revenues $72,795,895 $77,385,073Expenditures for operations $49,968,320 $54,416,611Net operating revenue $22,827,275 $22,968,461% of revenues 31.36% 29.68%Debt service (due July 1) $10,761,339 $10,713,229% of revenues 14.78% 13.84%Net operating ratio (%)

212.13% 214.39%(Net operating revenue to debt services)Net revenue after debt service $12,066,236 $12,255.233% of revenues 16.58% 15.84%Mandatory transfer to reserves $500,000 $500,000% of revenues 0.69% 0.65%Net after debt service and mandatory transfers $11,566,236 $11,755,233Administrative Services Fee payment from surplus 1 $1,559,618 $1,649,618% of expenditures 3.12% 3.03%

Cash and Investment BalancesVoluntary funds FY 2010 FY 2011Revenue fund $3,810 $4,881Operations and maintenance fund $0 $0Improvement fund 2 $14,850,182 $16,238,134Surplus fund $14,207,456 $15,084,487Subtotal—voluntary fund balances $29,061,448 $31,327,502% of gross revenue 39.92% 40.48%

Mandatory funds FY 2010 FY 2011Sinking fund $22,841 $59,607Bond reserve fund 3 $10,764,364 $10,545,176Construction fund $26,108 $0Subtotal—mandatory fund balances2 $10,813,313 $10,604,783

Total cash and investment balances2 $39,874,761 $41,932,285

1. The implementation of a resource management concept has moved ISU from an administrative services fee model to an allocated expense model.2. FY10 Ending improvement fund balance includes carryover of FY09/10 building and capital improvement projects and budgeted project expenditures for FY2011.3. FY10 Bond reserve fund was incorrectly reported on the previous report due to an oversight of the newly created bond account numbers that resulted from

defeasance. This information and the corresponding fields that calculated based on this number have been corrected on this report.4.


BOND PRINCIPAL and INTEREST DUE

Data is as of June 30 of the fiscal year with payments due July 1, 2011.

Series Interest Principal Principal DueFuture Years

2001A 1 $ 895,483 $ 635,000 $ 17,420,0002002 2 $ 607,678 $ 440,000 $ 12,035,0002003 $ 786,351 $ 625,000 $ 17,710,0002003A $ 275,793 $ 405,000 $ 6,880,0002006 $ 615,394 $ 595,000 $ 14,195,0002006A $ 342,431 $ 330,000 $ 7,680,0002007 $ 527,675 $ 475,000 $ 12,050,0002008 $ 314,300 $ 875,000 $ 8,030,0002009 $ 373,223 $ 545,000 $ 9,920,0002010 $ 489,441 $ 600,000 $ 12,465,0002011 3 $ - $ - $ 17,295,0002011A 4 $ - $ - $ 12,565,000Total $5,227,769 $5,525,000 $148,245,000

1. Defeased and replaced by 2011 Issue. Payments begin in FY12.2. Defeased and replaced by 2011A Issue. Payments begin in FY12.3. Replaced 2001A Issue. Payments begin in FY12.4. Replaced 2002 Issue. Payments begin in FY12. Defeasances resulted in a higher principal, but substantially lower interest resulting in an overall savings on $1.1 Million

over the life of the bond.

FACILITIES SUMMARY

FY 2010 FY 2011 ChangeTotal Gross Square Feet 3,253,243 3,253,243 -Total Insured Value $ 467,307,696 $ 467,309,696 -

Building and Capital Improvement Expenditures FY 2010 FY 2011 ChangeTotal Building Improvements $ 900,994 $ 1,603,938 $ 702,944Capital ImprovementsImprovement Funds (205-09-05, 205-09-45) 1 $ 7,034,033 $ 6,783,831 $ (250,202)Revenue Bonds (205-02-00) $ 2,559,310 - $ (2,559,310)College of Business (701-08-73) 2 $ 50,000 - $ (50,000)Total Capital Improvements $ 9,643,343 $ 6,783,832 $ (2,859,512)

Total Building and Capital Improvement Expenditures $10,544,337 $ 8,387,770 $ (2,156,568)

Expenditures per Gross Square Foot FY 2010 FY 2011 ChangeBuilding Expenditures per Gross Square Foot $ 0.28 $ 0.49 $ 0.22Capital Expenditures per Gross Square Foot $ 2.96 $ 2.09 $ (0.88)Total Expenditures per Gross Square Foot 3 $ 3.24 $ 2.58 $ (0.66)

1. FY11 Capital Improvement project carryover to FY12 is $7,698,090. Projects with notable carryover funds include Friley Heat & Smoke Detection (Phase 3 of 4) $453,700, 2010 Flood Repairs $752,200, Friley Heat & Smoke Detection (Phase 4 of 4) $472,000, Helser Sprinkler System $1,029,700, and Willow Hall Fire Suppression, Window Replacements and Façade Repairs $2,140,600.

2. College of Business funding was directly related to the renovation of the Business Café in FY10.3. Expenditures per Gross Square Foot were higher in FY10 due to the East Campus Dining project.


APPENDIX A – EXPLANATION OF CHANGES TO DESIGN CAPACITY

FALL 2011 CHANGES TO DESIGN CAPACITYNH HALL ROOM # of SPACES REASONRC BARTON 458 2 Converted To Room - DenRC BIRCH 1281, 2295, 3295, 4295 8 Converted To Room - DenRC BIRCH 2292, 4296 -2 Converted To SingleRC BIRCH 2275, 2276, 3279 3 Converted To TripleRC ELM 1067, 2081, 3081, 4131 8 Converted To Room - DenRC FREEMAN 154, 209, 417 6 Converted To Room – DenRC LARCH 1331, 2331, 3331, 4331, 5331, 6331, 7331, 8331 16 Converted To Room – DenRC LINDEN 84, 108, 184, 235, 257, 337, 355 14 Converted To Room – DenRC LYON 126, 207, 308 6 Converted To Room - DenRC MAPLE 109, 209, 309, 409, 509, 609, 709, 809 16 Converted To Room – DenRC OAK 1039, 2039, 3039, 4009 8 Converted To Room – DenRC ROBERTS 2215, 3219, 4211 6 Converted To Room – DenRC ROBERTS 2205 -1 Converted To SingleRC WELCH 1240, 2245, 3245, 4245 8 Converted To Room – DenRC WILLOW 1231, 2231, 3231, 4231, 5231, 6231, 7231, 8231 16 Converted To Room - Den

UD FRILEY A166, A8, B104, B125, B148, B54A, B8, B84, C104, C133, C172, C185, C187, C50, C8, C84, D104, D133, D172, D51, D8, D84, E141, E36, E68 50 Converted To Room – Den

UD FRILEY 3419, 3421, 4408, 4409, 4410, 4499, 4508, 4510, 4516, 4517 -10 Converted To SingleUD FRILEY 5526 -1 Removed - Shaft Room

UD HELSER A277, A358, A371, B277, B293, B358, B371, C277, C293, C358, C371, D277, D293, D358, D371, 30 Converted To Room - Den

WW WALLACE 1301, 2301, 3301, 4301, 5301, 6301, 7301, 8301, 9301, 10301 20 Converted To Room - DenWW WALLACE M344 -1 Removed - Mezzanine Room

WW WILSON

1403, 1404, 1407, 1408, 1411, 1412, 1415, 1416, 1419, 1420, 1423, 1424, 1428, 1431, 1432, 1435, 1436, 1439, 1440, 1443, 1444, 1447, 1448, 1451, 1452, 1455, 1456, 2403, 2404, 2407, 2408, 2411, 2412, 2415, 2416, 2419, 2420, 2424, 2427, 2431, 2432, 2435, 2436, 2439, 2440, 2443, 2444, 2447, 2448, 2451, 2452, 2455, 2456, 3403, 3404, 3407, 3408, 3411, 3412, 3415, 3416, 3419, 3420, 3423, 3424, 3428, 3431, 3432, 3435, 3436, 3439, 3440, 3443, 3444, 3447, 3448, 3451, 3452, 3455, 3456, 4403, 4404, 4407, 4408, 4411, 4412, 4415, 4416, 4419, 4420, 4423, 4424, 4427, 4431, 4432, 4435, 4436, 4439, 4440, 4443, 4444, 4447, 4448, 4451, 4452, 4455, 4456, 5403, 5407, 5411, 5412, 5415, 5419, 5432, 5439, 5451, 5455, 6403, 6404, 6407, 6408, 6411, 6412, 6415, 6416, 6419, 6420, 6423, 6424, 6427, 6431, 6432, 6435, 6436, 6439, 6440, 6443, 6444, 6447, 6448, 6451, 6452, 6455, 6456, 7403, 7404, 7407, 7408, 7411, 7412, 7415, 7416, 7419, 7420, 7424, 7428, 7431, 7432, 7435, 7436, 7439, 7440, 7443, 7444, 7447, 7448, 7451, 7452, 7455, 7456, 8403, 8404, 8407, 8408, 8411, 8412, 8415, 8416, 8419, 8420, 8423, 8424, 8427, 8431, 8432, 8435, 8436, 8439, 8440, 8443, 8444, 8447, 8448, 8451, 8452, 8455, 8456, 9403, 9404, 9407, 9408, 9411, 9412, 9415, 9416, 9419, 9420, 9423, 9424, 9428, 9431, 9432, 9435, 9436, 9439, 9440, 9443, 9444, 9447, 9448, 9451, 9452, 9455, 9456, 10403, 10404, 10407, 10408, 10411, 10412, 10415, 10416, 10419, 10420, 10424, 10427, 10431, 10432, 10435, 10436, 10439, 10440, 10443, 10444, 10447, 10448, 10451, 10452, 10455, 10456

250 Converted To Double

WW WILSON 1401, 2401, 3401, 4401, 5401, 6401, 7401, 8401, 9401, 10401 20 Converted To Room – DenWW WILSON 7423, 10423 -2 Removed – Telecom

470


APPENDIX B – EXPLANATION OF OFF-LINE SPACE

FALL 2011 EXPLANATION OF OFF-LINE SPACERESIDENCE HALLS ROOM(S) # OF SPACES REASONBARTON 243 2 Tour RoomMAPLE 223 2 Tour RoomWILLOW 1242 2 Tour Room

TOTAL RICHARDSON COURT 6

EATON 1145 2 Tour RoomFRILEY 2216 2 Tour RoomMARTIN 2238 1 Medical

TOTAL UNION DRIVE 5

WALLACE 1328 1 Tour Room

TOTAL TOWERS 1

TOTAL RESIDENCE HALLS 12

SINGLE STUDENT APTS. APT.(S) # OF SPACES REASON

FREDERIKSEN

7436 1 Athlete Space2134, 2224, 5113, 6125, 7323 5 Facilities Issue3138, 3312, 3418, 4112, 4212, 4318,6118, 6218, 6238, 6318, 7132, 7212, 7318 26 Semi-permanent

Double as Single3418 2 Medical6335, 7328 2 Resident Issue4111 4 Staff Space4117 4 Storage4211, 4213 8 Tour Apt.

TOTAL FREDERIKSEN 52

UNIVERSITY - SINGLE

117C, 150A 3 Facilities Issue158A 2 Resident Issue103D 1 Staff Space 173A 2 Tour Apt.

TOTAL UNIVERSITY 8

SCHILLETTER - FAMILY

11B, 45B, 63D 3 Facilities Issue57B 1 Medical3B 1 Tour Apt.7A, 7B, 7C, 7D 4 Storage

TOTAL FAMILY 9

TOTAL STUDENT APTS. 69

INTERIM SPACES ROOM(S) # OF SPACES REASONBIRCH 1281, 2295 3 Interim SpaceELM 2081, 3081 2 Interim SpaceFREEMAN 209, 417 4 Interim SpaceLARCH 5331, 8331 2 Interim SpaceLINDEN 84, 235 2 Interim SpaceLYON 126, 207, 308 4 Interim SpaceMAPLE 209, 309, 609, 709 5 Interim SpaceOAK 1039, 4009 2 Interim SpaceROBERTS 2215, 3219 4 Interim SpaceWILLOW 3231, 5231, 6231 3 Interim SpaceFRILEY A166, A8, B8, C104, C172, C185, C187, D104, D172 16 Interim SpaceHELSER B277, C277, C358, D277 4 Interim SpaceWILSON 1401, 5401, 7401, 9401, 10401 7 Interim Space

TOTAL INTERIM SPACES 58

GUEST APTS. APT.(S) # OF APTS. REASONSCHILLETTER *** 0 ***

TOTAL GUEST 0


TOTAL DOR SYSTEM 139


· Web viewDespite recent and significant increases in off campus housing options, the DOR process...

Documents

Transcript of · Web viewDespite recent and significant increases in off campus housing options, the DOR process...