Vienna, 21 June 2001 Digital Heritage Support Actions Concertation Event – Session 2 Legal...
15
Vienna, 21 June 2001 Digital Heritage Support Actions Concertation Event – Session 2 Legal Issues/Socio-economic Frame/Business Models/Technology Transfer
-
Upload
simon-martin -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Vienna, 21 June 2001 Digital Heritage Support Actions Concertation Event – Session 2 Legal...
Vienna, 21 June 2001
Digital Heritage Support Actions
Concertation Event – Session 2Legal Issues/Socio-economic Frame/Business Models/Technology Transfer
Some issues (1)
The 6FP is a “globalising” and “large footprint” scenario
CH preservation is a highlight but in a very sectoral and vertical way
Risk of going back to the “application of IT” attitude
Some issues (2)
The 6FP has three main deployment tools:
Networks of Excellence Focus on Research Activities and infrastructures
Integrated Projects Focus on Research objectives and results
Coordination with National Research (Art. 169) Towards the localisation of research (GLOCAL dimension)
Less likely for CH preservation to become the lead theme of a large Integrated Project
Need for a broader understanding of CH
RTD
New toolsand services
CH InstitutionsCH Institutions
CH InstitutionsCH Institutions
CH InstitutionsCH Institutions
CH InstitutionsCH Institutions
CH InstitutionsCH Institutions
Internet economy
Large-scale European and world markets
Research Industrial companies
Universities and otherresearch centres
Exploitation
ResourcesResources
Market-fed development
Market-fed development
Feedback
Trials
Trials
TrialsTrials Trials Trials
AM
AM
AM
USER/CONSUMER REFERENTIAL MODEL
Some issues (3)
A new role in the making: from a “glue” around groups of smaller projects, towards a role as “links” between larger and more comprehensive Integrated Projects
A repositioning is needed where SAs acquire a sharper and more targeted service role
This role should go much further than simply evaluation and benchmarking, for instance shaping the broader understanding of CH we were referring to before
Some issues (4)
There is a new link in 6FP between ERA research and regional activities under the Structural Funds
Structural activities are one order of magnitude more relevant than the ERA (10 vs. 100 BEURO)
There is chronological coincidence (2002 is when the Operational Programmes really start)
There is the need for a huge effort in Technology Transfer that should be helped by the SAs
Some issues (5)
The new programming for both the ERA and the Funds stresses ex-ante analysis and ex-post evaluation
Legal implications of digital heritage, S-E models, business models, technology transfer are key ingredients and enablers of these exercises
SAs can play a key role of study, analysis and creation of strategic knowledge
Today’s AMs and the above issues (1)
Deliver stimulating scenarios to support the ex-ante knowledge for the ERA
Basis for the rise of more integrated and sustainable models for cultural activities in the new IS
A bridge between the ERA and structural activities
Helping shape coherent and valuable scenarios for a deployable culture economy
Testimonial Projects: LIBECON, EVAN, RADICAL, …
Today’s AMs and the above issues (2)
Dissemination activities, creation of a “cultural framework”, supporting SMEs and start-ups
Coordination and support; marketing of the projects; promotion towards markets, investors, structural activities; promoting take-ups as a tool for technology transfer
Providing a dynamic “glue” for projects to help them attain critical mass, dissemination and exploitation
Testimonial Projects: TRIS, EVAN, …
Today’s AMs and the above issues (3)
An important highlight on the integration of artistic and creative processes
Stress on scientific, medical and linguistic issues
Recognition of the importance of the media industry
Stressing the social resonance and dimension of CH activities as a key player of the Information Society
Testimonial Projects: CLEF, RADICAL, BIONET, …
Today’s AMs and the above issues (4)
Triggering an healthy content industry
Translating research into valuable and sustainable industrial activities
Distribution Towards the regional dimension of CH
Providing convenient and regulated access to core content media
Testimonial Projects: EMII-DCF, RADICAL, MULTIPRO, …
What’s partly missing (1)
In both research and structural activities innovation may be ineffective if the human factor is not receptive
Before we go further consolidation of the results attained so far
Training measures preparing the human factor in the cultural sector for innovation
What’s partly missing (2)
How to get ready for the new dimensions and timing of the Integrated Projects?
How do we react to the risk of a comeback of a “guinea pig” approach to CH?
Pilot projects catering for the new scenarios (in particular integrated projects)
What’s partly missing (3)
Need to see CH as a synergy of high arts, material culture, tourism and environmental assets
The new culture of identity will find in tourism its main socio-economic enabler in the age of access and individual experience
Pilot SAs could pave the way for new Integrated Projects in this direction
Putting clear focus of a broader, more integrated understanding of Cultural Heritage in the “age of access”
