VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJÃO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

208

Transcript of VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJÃO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    1/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    2/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    3/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    4/208

    ISBN: 978-1-905254-30-9

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    5/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    6/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    7/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    8/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    9/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    10/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    11/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    12/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    13/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    14/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    15/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    16/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    17/208

    1 2

    1

    AMO : Assurance Maladie Obligatoire, French for mandatory health insurance

    2RAMED : Rgime dAssistance Medicale, French for medical assistance scheme.

    3 ANAM : Agence Nationale de lAssurance Maladie, French for national agency of medical insurance.

    4 CNOPS: Caisse Nationale des Organismes de Prvoyance Sociale, French for national fund of social providence organisations.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    18/208

    5 CNSS: Caisse Nationale de Scurit Sociale, French for national fund for social security

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    19/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    20/208

    6

    6

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    21/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    22/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    23/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    24/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    25/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    26/208

    7 8

    7

    8

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    27/208

    9

    9

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    28/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    29/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    30/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    31/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    32/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    33/208

    10

    10

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    34/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    35/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    36/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    37/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    38/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    39/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    40/208

    There is growing and widespread interest in understanding the practices and processes of Free and

    Open Source software (FOSS) development, and how software development networks and commu-

    nities are mobilized, organised, and managed. Although Open Source projects have been the sub-

    ject of extensive study, the way these projects are coordinated and managed is still poorly under-

    stood. This is particularly true of Open Source software development networks which are spread

    across different cultures, time zones, and social and political environments. There seems to be no

    widely accepted model or framework that defines how FOSS is developed in practice. This is in

    stark contrast to the world of proprietary software engineering where a number of universally ac-

    cepted models exist. FOSS development communities do not seem to readily adopt or practice

    modern software engineering processes. This paper outlines my proposed research involving the

    Health Information Systems Programme (HISP) Open Source software development network. I

    propose to examine the unique problems and challenges it faces, and I intend to explore how the

    HISP software development network has evolved since its inception, including how the network is

    mobilized, controlled, and organised across the various countries in which it operates. This will

    include an examination of how the different socio-economic, socio-technical, and political factorsexisting in each of the countries affects the management of the network. The main aim of this re-

    search is to identify and assess the distinctiveness of the HISP approach in organising their soft-

    ware development network as a means to facilitate the development of software and the delivery of

    ICT-enabled public health infrastructure. In particular, I am interested in identifying the strengths

    and weaknesses of this mode of organising in comparison with more conventional approaches to

    delivering aid. Specifically, these include questions concerning how successful innovation prac-

    tices in a given location might be replicated in different cultural/political settings, and how the

    work of the expanding, globally distributed team of software developers might be successfully co-

    ordinated.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    41/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    42/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    43/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    44/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    45/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    46/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    47/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    48/208

    This paper presents new media artistic experiences as a way to explore the design of technology

    for complex interaction settings, such as an intensive care unit in a hospital. I propose it as an al-

    ternative to laboratory experiments, when real-world interventions are not possible. I propound

    that users will solve an interaction problem that I pose through the new media arts application

    for their own expressive purposes and that researchers can analyse and collate the results to un-

    derstand the solution space. I substantiate the methodological arguments with an example - a study

    using the bodyPaint application to address a design issue based on physicality that we discovered

    when assessing the merits of an electronic patient record system.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    49/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    50/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    51/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    52/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    53/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    54/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    55/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    56/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    57/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    58/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    59/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    60/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    61/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    62/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    63/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    64/208

    The complex and multicultural environment of the hospital institution requires the collaboration of

    a variety of health and administrative professionals in order to ensure and enhance the quality of

    clinical outcomes (Krogstad et al. 2004, Knaus et al. 1986), the efficient delivery of healthcare

    (Ogbimi and Adebamowo 2006), the containment of the associated costs (Hojat et al. 2001) as wellas the smooth and unobstructed operation of the organisation and the realisation of its goals

    (Krogstad et al. 2004). Importantly, information and communication technologies (ICT), an inte-

    gral part of todays healthcare organisations, aim to support the new multidisciplinary paradigm

    of healthcare provision (Sicotte et al. 1998).

    However, clinical information systems have not been fully integrated into health systems around

    the world. Using as a case study the implementation of a clinical information system for patient

    registration and tracking in a busy emergency department, this paper aims to illustrate and disucss

    some key ontollogical challenges by the deployment of a critical sociological approach to the ex-

    amination. Such systems will most likely modify and/or replace, work tasks, information flows,

    visibilities as well as relations among professionals (Dykstra 2002). Social, economic and political

    interests will empower the attempt by these groups to gain control over access and to affect the

    shape, use and functioning of the system (Berg 2001).

    On the other hand, critical sociology is still struggling to close the gap between theory and prac-

    tice (Alvesson and Willmott 1992, Alvesson and Deetz 2000). Especially in critical information sys-

    tems research, in its determination to reveal the political, social, historical and cultural conditions

    that affect or even drive technological mediated organisational changes has somehow left rela-

    tively untouched the materiality of the artifacts (Monteiro 2000, Orlikowski and Iacono 2001).

    Therefore, it has been extensively argued that one way to overcome this insensitivity around the

    size and the value of these technologies, is by expanding its definition as to incorporate other, more

    empirically oriented frameworks of inquiry (Alvesson and Deetz 2000, Brooke 2002, Doolin and

    Lowe 2002).

    It is argued that a perspective based on actor-network theory (ANT) (Latour 1987) could provide

    the researcher with a more fruitful methodological approach (Walsham 1997) for the symmetrical

    examination of human and non-human actors (Latour 1992, Callon 1986) in order to increase theinvestigative value of the missing masses (Latour 1992) that are often ignored or treated merely

    as tools of oppression, domination or control (Doolin and Lowe 2002). Notably, by concentrating

    on the translation (Callon 1986) that takes part during the implementation of a clinical techno-

    logical solution the researcher is, then, able to track, analyse and critique, in more detail, the

    problematisation for the proposed solution, the devices and strategies that were used to enroll the

    actors, the practices of the representatives as well as any issues of resistance and how they are be-

    ing handled by the network around the proposed technology.

    The paper concludes by expanding the discussion around the possibility of reformulating the criti-

    cal research project, in its empirical inquiry, as to place a strong emphasis on the increased inter-

    twining of social and technical agencies. On the other hand, it is also argued that it is time for ANT

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    65/208

    to focus more on the products of technology, particularly of ICT (i.e. accumulation of information),and how they come to redefine memberships and actor-networks through updated translations.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    66/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    67/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    68/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    69/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    70/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    71/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    72/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    73/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    74/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    75/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    76/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    77/208

    This paper is an overview of my current research position. In it I make the claim that the substitu-

    tion of bodies and the materiality of the electronic artefact are overlooked in telemedicine. I then

    propose an approach to addressing this problem.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    78/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    79/208

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    80/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    81/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    82/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    83/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    84/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    85/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    86/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    87/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    88/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    89/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    90/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    91/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    92/208

    2

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    93/208

    3

    3

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    94/208

    4

    45

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    95/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    96/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    97/208

    7

    8

    6789

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    98/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    99/208

    10

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    100/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    101/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    102/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    103/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    104/208

    By comparing actor-network theory (ANT) and Schatzkis practice-orders bundles (POB), this pa-

    per argues that the two approaches can learn from each other in order to improve our understand-

    ing of IT artefacts in organisations. Both ANT and POB can be seen as a post-structuralist ap-proach since they deny the existence of disembodied structures, and defend a more fluid and decen-

    tred view of social life. They are also a post-humanist approach because through the notion of

    orders (arrangements of human and non-human entities) and networks they pay due attention

    to the role of materiality and non-human agency in the social. The philosopher Theodore Schatzki

    proposes that the social transpires from meshes of bundles of practices and orders.Relating

    Schatzki back to the study of IT in organisations, it is argued that IT artefacts are non-human enti-

    ties that are part of the orders of many contemporary organisations. From his follows that IT arte-

    facts should be conceptualised as a component of organisational orders that together with prac-

    tices form the contexture from where the organisational life transpires. Since IT artefacts are parts

    of orders they impact on organisational life in two ways: as source of meaning; and through pre-

    configuraton of actions mechanisms that also have parallels in ANT. When it comes to the points

    in which ANT and POB cross-swords, it is possible to argue that they have the potential to help

    each other. On the one hand ANTs longer history and clearer empirical focus can provide to BOP

    a starting point for its introduction in the IS field. On the other hand, ANTs principles of symmetry

    between humans and non-humans, will to power and consequence conceptualisation of social prac-

    tices leads to limitative accounts. Drawing on Schatzki this paper argues that the notion of teleoaf-

    fective structures and the fucus on social practices that goes beyond network building and mainte-

    nance has the potential to lead to better practice-based, materially aware descriptions of the role

    of IT in organisation.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    105/208

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    106/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    107/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    108/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    109/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    110/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    111/208

    2

    2

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    112/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    113/208

    3

    4

    3

    4

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    114/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    115/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    116/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    117/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    118/208

    The paper presents a longitudinal case study which analyses interactions constituting software

    production provides a rich description of the content and conduct of programming or software

    code work by focusing on aspects of its collective performance. The objective is to better appreci-

    ate the character of both methodological and emergent aspects of this form of knowledge work and

    its relationship to management and production processes. Labour Process Theory provides a start-

    ing point (grounding assumptions) for a research design which is intended to be attuned to aspects

    of software labour processes and to analyse the micro-detail of software production. The case de-

    picts the software labour process as multifaceted, complex and (at times) contradictory. We reflect

    upon the possibilities for a comprehensive theoretical analysis of this form of knowledge work.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    119/208

    5

    6

    5

    6

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    120/208

    7

    8

    9

    7

    8

    9

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    121/208

    10

    10

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    122/208

    11

    11

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    123/208

    12

    12

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    124/208

    13 14

    13

    14

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    125/208

    15

    15

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    126/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    127/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    128/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    129/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    130/208

    16

    17

    1617

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    131/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    132/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    133/208

    18

    19

    18

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    134/208

    Email from Quality Manager to development team. (Wed 10/11/2004 11:34)

    Subject: Code Review process and template

    Hi all

    We had an improvement action from earlier this year regarding the code review process;

    that it didnt appear to be used frequently, that there appeared to be long delays be-tween code reviews.

    The evidence continues to support this perception and Id like to figure out if there

    is an underlying problem (or not), is this as expected or should code reviews takeplace more frequently.?

    Are 1 or 2 code reviews per project sufficient?

    Is the process too light-weight to be taken seriously or too-heavy weight to be doneregularly?

    Do code reviews take a variety of forms not all documented by the process, if soshould we document what were doing?

    What is the best way of evidencing (informating) these other forms of code review

    (suggestions please)?

    As you probably know I am referring to QSDP006.Code Review Process.doc andQSDT011.Code Review Report.dot.

    Any thoughts? Ill be gathering feedback over the next while.

    Regards, Mr Orange

    19

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    135/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    136/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    137/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    138/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    139/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    140/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    141/208

    This article presents the results of a study conducted in order to understand under what circum-stances the process of social construction of information systems (IS) in the banking sector in Bra-

    zil takes place. It presents an analysis of the implementation, use and procedures for improvement

    of three systems, used in two of the country's largest banks. We started from the premise that tech-

    nology is a socially constructed phenomenon, with a structure of use that is formed by its practical

    application. The data were collected through 46 semi-structured interviews, direct observation and

    documental analyses. A structuralist protocol has been used to interpret and analyze the data. This

    analysis revealed a process of social construction that generated four types of use of IS: full use,

    partial use, combination and adaptation. The characteristics and outcomes of each will be ex-

    plained in this article. The assimilation of systems has been influenced by the confluence of indi-

    vidual and organizational objectives and the type of training applied. This assimilation seems to

    follow a structure of conformity and conformism to what has been implemented by the organiza-

    tion.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    142/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    143/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    144/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    145/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    146/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    147/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    148/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    149/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    150/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    151/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    152/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    153/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    154/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    155/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    156/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    157/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    158/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    159/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    160/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    161/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    162/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    163/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    164/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    165/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    166/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    167/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    168/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    169/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    170/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    171/208

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    172/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    173/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    174/208

    2

    2

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    175/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    176/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    177/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    178/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    179/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    180/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    181/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    182/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    183/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    184/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    185/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    186/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    187/208

    3

    3

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    188/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    189/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    190/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    191/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    192/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    193/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    194/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    195/208

    When it comes to offshore outsourcing, for more than two decades, the corporate philosophy hasbeen to "produce where it is cheapest and sell where it fetches the best price" (Bajpai et al. 2004,

    p.6). However, although the traditional determinants of the location decision for the corporate off-

    shore outsourcing in the Information Technology (IT) industry have not disappeared over time,

    their influence has decreased. For example, nowadays the market size as one of the most important

    traditional determinant for investing abroad has lower significance, while others, new determi-

    nants became more important. The differences in costs in various locations, quality of the IT infra-

    structure, business conditions, high-skilled labour force, the quality of experience and knowledge

    of the IT companies when investing abroad, the search for continued quality etc., are gaining

    greater importance. Therefore, the competitiveness and the market growth are more in-line with

    the corporate philosophy of the modern IT companies, nowadays. This implies that investors mo-

    tives continuously change and so markets too should seek new modes for attracting foreign invest-

    ments. In this paper a conceptual framework has been developed using the theoretical underpin-

    nings of Dunnings Eclectic Paradigm so as to provide an additional understanding among schol-

    ars and practitioners about what are the main drivers the corporate offshore outsourcing in the IT

    industry. The conclusion provides discussion and suggests that the Dunnings theory offers valu-

    able insights for both academia and practice to develop more comprehensive approach about the

    offshore outsourcing location decision in the IT industry.

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    196/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    197/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    198/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    199/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    200/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    201/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    202/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    203/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    204/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    205/208

    Aleksi Aaltonen 173Allen Higgins 106

    Anita Popovska 183

    Cecily Morrison 36

    Elaine Tavares 129

    Humberto Gumeta 13

    Isam Faik 2

    Michael Zisuh Ngoasong 77Paraskevas Vezyridis 52

    Peadar Scola 65

    PJ Wall 28

    Raoni Guerra Lucas Rajo 92

    Simeon Vidolov 159

    Stefan Schellhammer 146

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    206/208

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    207/208

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 VIDOLOV_SCOLAI_RAJO_08 Heterogeneities, multiplicities and complexities

    208/208