VERICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

Verification and certification report form for CDM project activities

(Version 01.0)

VERICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

Title of the project activity Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant

Reference number of the project activity 7250

Version number of the verification and

certification report 02

Completion date of the verification and

certification report 27/09/2017

Monitoring period number and duration

of this monitoring period

02nd

periodic verification,

Monitoring Period: 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (including both dates)

Version number of monitoring report to

which this report applies Version 1.0, dated 20/07/2017

Crediting period of the project activity

corresponding to this monitoring period Renewable crediting period; 20/06/2013 to 19/06/2020 (first and last day included)

Project participant(s) 1. Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

2. Swiss Carbon Assets Ltd.

Host Party Vietnam

Sectoral scope(s), selected

methodology(ies), and where applicable,

selected standardized baseline(s)

Sectoral Scope1: Energy industries (Renewable - / non-renewable sources)

Methodology: ACM0002 ver. 13.0.0 - “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources”

Standardized baseline: N/A

Estimated GHG emission reductions or

net anthropogenic GHG removals for this

monitoring period in the registered PDD 235,536 tCO2e

Certified GHG emission reductions or net

anthropogenic GHG removals for this

monitoring period 119,120 tCO2e

Name of DOE KBS Certification Services Private Limited (KBS)

Name, position and signature of the

approver of the verification and

certification report

Mr. Kaushal Goyal

Managing Director

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

SECTION A. Executive summary

>> The project’s purpose is to utilize the wind resources in Bac Lieu province to produce and supply electricity to the national grid under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) signed with the Electricity Corporation of Vietnam (EVN). Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant includes the construction of a near-shore wind power farm on the area of 540ha along the East Dam (De Dong) of Bac Lieu city, Bac Lieu province, Vietnam with total capacity of 99.2 MW. The project involves the installation of 62 wind turbines at capacity of 1.6 MW each in two phases. The first phase includes the installation of 10 wind turbines with combined capacity of 16 MW and Phase 2 includes the installation of the remaining 52 turbines with combined capacity of 83.2 MW. The commissioning of all the WTGs of the project activity corresponding to the project full capacity i.e. 99.2 MW has been completed on 29/09/2016 with the commissioning of the last turbine G61 on 29/09/2016. The project is owned by M/s. Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd. and commissioned on 20/06/2013 (earliest commissioning date among WTGs) as verified from the commissioning certificate /05/. As per registered PDD/18/, the generated electricity is sold to national grid (EVN) for the entire project lifetime, bound by PPA/08/. For the current monitoring period, the generated electricity is sold to EVN as evidenced from electricity bills/protocol/10/ and the electricity sale invoice/11/. Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant is located in Bac Lieu city, Bac Lieu province, Vietnam. The turbines are installed along the East Dam of Bac Lieu city within the following coordinates:

- 9o 14’ 38” Eastern longitude: 105° 44' 45" - 105° 49' 41"

KBS has been commissioned by “Swiss Carbon Assets Ltd.” to perform an independent verification of its registered CDM project, “Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant”, UNFCCC ref. no. 7250 for the reported GHG emission reductions for the given 2

nd monitoring period 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (both dates included). The

CDM projects must undergo independent third party verification and certification of emission reductions as the basis for issuance of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). The objectives of this verification exercise are, by review of objective evidence, to establish that:

The project activity has been implemented and operated as per the registered PDD and that all physical features (technology, project equipment, and monitoring and metering equipment) of the project are in place;

Monitoring report and other supporting documents are complete;

The actual monitoring systems & procedures and monitoring report conforms with the requirements of the registered monitoring plan and the approved monitoring methodology;

The data is recorded and stored as per the monitoring methodology and registered monitoring plan.

The scope of the verification is the independent and objective review and ex post determination of the monitored reductions in GHG emission by the project activity. The verification is based on review of monitoring report, supporting information and

a) The registered PDD, including the monitoring plan and the corresponding validation opinion(s); b) Previous verification reports, deviation requests, requests for revision of monitoring plan (if

applicable); c) Monitoring report for the monitoring period under verification including CER calculations sheets and

all supporting documents; d) The applied monitoring methodology; e) Relevant decisions, clarifications and guidance from the CMP and the CDM Executive Board; f) All information and references relevant to the project activity’s resulting in emission reductions g) The project is assessed against the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol, the CDM Modalities and

Procedures and related rules and guidance.

KBS Certification Services Pvt. Ltd. confirms that the monitoring system is in place and the emission reductions are calculated without material misstatements.

Based on the information seen and evaluated we confirm that the implementation of the project has resulted in 119,120 tCO2e (round down) emission reductions during period 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (Including both the days).

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

SECTION B. Verification team, technical reviewer and approver

B.1. Verification team member

No. Role

Typ

e o

f re

so

urc

e

Last name First name Affiliation (e.g. name of

central or other office of DOE or

outsourced entity)

Involvement in

Desk r

evie

w

On

-sit

e in

sp

ecti

on

Inte

rvie

w(s

)

Veri

ficati

on

fin

din

gs

1. Team Leader, Technical Expert (TA 1.2)

IR Sharma Chetan Swaroop

Central Office

2. Local Expert EI Van Trung Pham Central Office

B.2. Technical reviewer and approver of the verification and certification report

No. Role Type of

resource

Last name First name Affiliation (e.g. name of

central or other office of DOE or

outsourced entity)

1. Technical reviewer IR Kandari Sanjay Central Office

2. Manager (Technical & Certification)

IR Kandari Sanjay

Central Office

3. Authorizer IR Goyal Kaushal Central Office

SECTION C. Application of materiality

C.1. Consideration of materiality in planning the verification

No. Risk that could lead to

material errors, omissions

or misstatements

Assessment of the risk Response to the risk in the

verification plan and/or

sampling plan Risk

level

Justification

1. The data monitoring is done through electronic meters and errors can be perceived during the information transfer from the source to the emission reduction sheet.

High There are total 3 monitoring parameters i.e. EGy, export, EGy,import and EGfacility,y.

However two monitoring parameters i.e. EGy, export and EGy,import are monitored through the electronic meters and the third parameter i.e. EGfacility,y is a calculated parameter. These parameters are used for calculation of baseline emissions.

The complete dataset for the project activity was checked and it can be confirmed that the values are consistent with their sources.

C.2. Consideration of materiality in conducting the verification

>> The prescribed thresholds for materiality, as per §361 of VVS V9.

Prescribed range of ERs/annum

500,000+ 300,000+ to 500,000

300,000 SSC Pas MSC Pas

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

Prescribed Threshold 0.5% 1.0% 2.0% 5.0% 10.0%

The identified/selected materiality threshold for the project activity under current monitoring period is 2% as

project activity is a large scale project activity.

MR Version (Draft) MR Version (Final)

Emission reductions/annum 119,120 tCO2 119,120 tCO2

Identified Threshold 2% 2%

There is no material change between the hosted MR /01/, final MR/02/ and both are same. There is no change in the emission reduction during this verification activity. Since all the data is reported monthly, verification team has checked the 100% values of monthly data. All ex-ante parameters were directly cross-checked from the registered PDD /18/. There was no gap identified in the values of ex-ante parameters. The impact of errors observed during verification for each monitoring parameter on the emission reduction calculation is provided below:

Parameter Population size

Sample size Type of error identified

Impact on ERs

Extrapolated for population size (Qty and %)

Within Threshold

EGy, export 15 15 No error identified Not applicable. The whole data was checked.

Yes

EGy,import 15 15 No error identified Not applicable. The whole data was checked.

Yes

The complete dataset for the project activity was checked and it can be confirmed that the values are consistent with their sources. The assessment team confirms that the reported emission reductions are free from material errors, omissions or misstatements.

SECTION D. Means of verification

D.1. Desk review

>> A desk review is undertaken, involving but not limited to, • A review of the data and information presented to verify their completeness; • A review of the monitoring plan and monitoring methodology, paying particular attention to the frequency of measurements, the quality of metering equipment including calibration requirements, and the quality assurance and quality control procedures; • An evaluation of data management and the quality assurance and quality control system in the context of their influence on the generation and reporting of emission reductions. The list of documents reviewed is included in the section ‘Appendix 3’ of this report.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

D.2. On-site inspection

Duration of on-site inspection: 17/08/2017

No. Activity performed on-site Site location Date Team member

1. Implementation and Operation of the CDM project activity based on registered Monitoring Plan and physical features of the project activity as per registered PDD

Bac Lieu city, Bac Lieu province, Vietnam

17/08/2017 Mr. Chetan Swaroop Sharma (Team Leader, Technical Expert (TA 1.2)) Mr. Pham Van Trung (Local Expert)

2. Information flows for generating, aggregating and reporting the monitoring parameters

3. Competency of the operating personnel, monitoring personnel and calibrating agencies

4. Data collection procedures

5. Calibration performance and monitoring practices followed for monitoring equipment’s used in the project activity

6. Quality Control and Quality Assurance procedures against the registered monitoring plan

7. Calculation and assumptions made in determining the GHG data and emission reductions

8. Compliance with CDM criterion and relevant guidance with respect to monitoring plan

9. Level of accuracy (Materiality) of the monitoring activity

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

D.3. Interviews

No. Interviewee Date Subject Team member

Last name First name Affiliation

1. Hong Loan Nguyen Project Manager, VNEEC

17/08/2017 General aspects of the project, Changes since validation, Quality management system, Monitoring data management, Data analysis, Implementation of the monitoring plan, GHG emission reduction calculation, Involved personnel and responsibilities, Training and practice of the operational personnel, Monitoring data management,

Maintenance

Mr. Chetan Swaroop Sharma (Team Leader, Technical Expert (TA 1.2)) Mr. Pham Van Trung (Local Expert)

2. Quang Loc Duong Vice General Director, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

3. Phu Hong Nguyen Director, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

4. Thi Kieu Tien

Phan Head of general affairs, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

5. Minh Kiet Truong Head of turbines division, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

6. Trung Hieu Pham Accountant, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

7. Trung Kien Nguyen Plant Manager, Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.

17/08/2017

8. Hong Ngoan

Vo Affected resident, Vinh Thach Dong commune

17/08/2017

9. Truong Han

Le President of Vinh Thach Dong commune

17/08/2017

D.4. Sampling approach

>> No Sampling Approach is used during verification.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

D.5. Clarification requests, corrective action requests and forward action requests raised

Areas of verification findings No. of CL No. of CAR No. of FAR

Compliance of the monitoring report with the monitoring report form

00 00 00

Compliance of the project implementation with the registered PDD

00 01 00

Post-registration changes 00 00 00

Compliance of the monitoring plan with the monitoring methodology including applicable tool and standardized baseline

00 00 00

Compliance of monitoring activities with the registered monitoring plan

00 00 00

Compliance with the calibration frequency requirements for measuring instruments

00 00 00

Assessment of data and calculation of emission reductions or net removals

00 00 00

Others (please specify) 00 00 00

Total 00 01 00

SECTION E. Verification findings

E.1. Compliance of the monitoring report with the monitoring report form

Means of verification Verification team checked the monitoring report/02/ with “Instructions for filling out the monitoring report form” mentioned as attachment to Monitoring report form (version 05.1).

Findings No finding has been raised.

Conclusion In accordance with §381 of VVS, V9 /19/, verification team confirms that final monitoring report /02/ is completed using the latest valid version of the applicable monitoring report form /20/.

E.2. Remaining forward action requests from validation and/or previous verification

>> The current verification is for the 2

nd monitoring period of the project activity. All raised CARs and CLs were

successfully closed during Validation and 1st Verification. There is no pending FAR from validation and 1

st

verification.

E.3. Compliance of the project implementation with the registered project design

document

Means of verification The project’s purpose is to utilize the wind resources in Bac Lieu province to produce and supply electricity to the national grid under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) signed with the Electricity Corporation of Vietnam (EVN). Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant includes the construction of a near-shore wind power farm on the area of 540ha along the East Dam (De Dong) of Bac Lieu city, Bac Lieu province, Vietnam with total capacity of 99.2 MW. The project involves the installation of 62 wind turbines at capacity of 1.6 MW each in two phases. The first phase includes the installation of 10 wind turbines with combined capacity of 16 MW and Phase 2 includes the installation of the remaining 52 turbines with combined capacity of 83.2 MW. The commissioning of all the WTGs of the project activity corresponding to the project full capacity i.e. 99.2 MW has been completed on 29/09/2016 with the commissioning of the last turbine G61 on 29/09/2016 as verified from the commissioning certificate /05/. Verification team has checked the commissioning of all the WTGs of the project activity as per the documents /05/, /06/ and found consistent with the MR /02/. The project is owned by M/s. Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd. and operational since 20/06/2013 (the date of first WTG commissioned) and verified from commissioning certificate /05/ and the generated electricity is sold to Vietnam national Electricity Grid (EVN) as conformed through the review of electricity bills/protocol and sale invoice copies.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

As per registered PDD/18/, the generated electricity is sold to national grid (EVN) for the entire project lifetime, bound by PPA/08/. For the current monitoring period, the generated electricity is sold to EVN as evidenced from electricity bills/protocol/10/ and the electricity sale invoice/11/. Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant is located in Bac Lieu city, Bac Lieu province, Vietnam. The turbines are installed along the East Dam of Bac Lieu city within the following coordinates:

- 9o 14’ 38” - 105° 49' 41"

Based on visual inspection, interview and document review, the verification team confirms that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity including technology, data collection systems and storage systems have been implemented in accordance with the registered PDD /18/ for the project activity. The team has conducted a site visit on 17/08/2017 to confirm the implementation and operation of the project activity and found that all the WTGs have been installed and operating as per the registered PDD /18/. The technical specification of the project activity is verified from the site visit and the supporting documents /13/. The important specifications are mentioned below:

Main parameter Unit Value

1. Turbine

Type GE 1.6xle

Number of installed turbines: + Phase I + Phase II

set 10 52

Rated power kW/set 1600

Rotor diameter m 82.5

Swept area m2 5346

Tower height m 80/100

Cut-in wind speed m/s 3.5

Cut-out wind speed m/s 25

Survival wind speed m/s 50.1

2. Generator

Type three phases, asynchronous

Voltage V 690

Frequency Hz 50

Rated speed rpm 1915

The verification team, based on the site visit and document review, was able to conclude that the project activity has been commissioned and the implemented project activity’s physical features viz MW capacity, make, model and its operation are as per the registered PDD/18/.

All the WTGs of the project activity are connected to the sub-station through two lines. There is a pair of Main and check energy meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the sub-station. ‘131 Main’ and ‘131 Check’ meters for one line and ‘132 Main’ and ‘132 Check’ meters for another line. These meters are specific only to the project activity WTGs. The electricity supplied by the project activity to grid is continuous measurement by a pair of bi-directional main and check meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the substation and monthly recorded jointly by EVN staff and a representative of PP. There are two secondary back up main meters ‘171’ and ‘172’ for the two individual lines which are not used for the billing purpose. The accuracy class of the Main and Check energy meters is 0.2s and 0.5s

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

respectively as verified during the site visit which is in compliance with the registered PDD /18/. There is no event or situation occurred during this monitoring period which has impacted the applicability of methodology/16/. The allocation of the responsibilities is followed as described in the registered PDD /18/. Routines for the archiving of data are defined and documented. Calculations, laid down in the monitoring report are in line with registered PDD /18/. GE is a wind turbine manufacturer and O&M contractor and they have the necessary competence to carry out the relevant tasks with sufficient accuracy. Interviews (refer section D.3 of this report) were carried out with the plant personals during the site visit to verify the actual monitoring system practiced by PP. It was found that the plant personals are well aware of their roles & responsibilities. The actual monitoring system presently practiced complies with the monitoring plan provided in the registered PDD/18/ and the monitoring methodology/16/. All the data have been measured as specified in the registered PDD /18/. The monitored data are archived partly in physical (hard copy) and partly in electronic form. The archived data will be kept for the whole crediting period and 2 years after the crediting period.

Findings CAR-01 has been raised in this respect and successfully closed. Please refer Appendix-4 of this report for more details.

Conclusion The verification team confirms that: a) The project activity is implemented as per the registered PDD/18/. b) The actual operation of the proposed CDM project activity is in line to the

registered PDD/18/. c) It has reviewed the registered PDD /18/ including the monitoring plan, the

applied monitoring methodology, relevant decisions from the CMP and the CDM EB and found that the Final MR /02/ for this monitoring period is in line with all the above mentioned documents.

E.4. Post-registration changes

E.4.1. Temporary deviations from the registered monitoring plan, monitoring methodology

or standardized baseline

>> There is no temporary deviation to be submitted with this request for issuance. Therefore, this section is not applicable.

E.4.2. Corrections

>> There is no correction to be submitted with this request for issuance. Therefore, this section is not applicable.

E.4.3. Changes to the start date of the crediting period

>> The start date of crediting period in the registered PDD is 01/01/2013 is changed to 20/06/2013 (The date of first turbine’s operation) which is already approved by EB.

E.4.4. Inclusion of a monitoring plan to a registered project activity

>> There is no inclusion of a monitoring plan to the registered project activity that was not included at registration. Hence, this section is not applicable.

E.4.5. Permanent changes from registered monitoring plan, monitoring methodology or

standardized baseline

>> There is no permanent changes to be submitted with this request for issuance. Therefore, this section is not applicable.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

E.4.6. Changes to the project design of a registered project activity

>> There is no changes to the project design to be submitted with this request for issuance. Therefore, this section is not applicable.

E.4.7. Types of changes specific to afforestation and reforestation project activities

>>NA

E.5. Compliance of monitoring plan with the monitoring methodology including

applicable tool and standardized baseline

Means of verification The verification team was able to confirm that the monitoring plan contained in registered PDD/18/ and MR/02/ is in accordance with the approved large scale methodology applied for the project activity i.e. “ACM0002 ver. 13 - Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources ”/16/.


Conclusion In the opinion of the verification team the monitoring plan of the registered PDD /18/ complies with the monitoring requirement of the applied approved large scale methodology “ACM0002 ver. 13 - Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources ”/16/ in the context of the project activity.

E.6. Compliance of monitoring activities with the registered monitoring plan

E.6.1. Data and parameters fixed ex ante or at renewal of crediting period

Means of verification

Ex-ante Parameter: EFgrid,OM,y, tCO2/MWh (Operating margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”.)

Value(s) applied): 0.6095 tCO2e/MWh Source: Registered PDD /18/

Source and Verification of the source:

It is fixed for the entire crediting period as per the registered PDD/18/. The value of the combined margin factor has been correctly taken as per the registered PDD /18/ and Hence accepted by the verification team.

Ex-ante Parameter: EFgrid,BM,y, tCO2/MWh (Build margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”)




https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/view?ref=ACM0002

https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/view?ref=ACM0002

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

Ex-ante Parameter: EFgrid,CM,y, tCO2/MWh (Combined margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”.)





Conclusion The verification team confirms that the value used for grid emission factor for calculation of emission reduction is consistent with registered PDD/18/ and correctly applied in MR /02/ and emission reduction spread sheet /04/ and justified.

E.6.2. Data and parameters monitored

Means of verification Verification team confirms through on-site verification and from the document review, the actual monitoring system complies with the monitoring plan mentioned in the registered validated PDD/18/. According to the monitoring plan in the registered PDD, there are 3 monitoring parameters required to be monitored. During the verification, all relevant monitoring parameters of the registered monitoring plan /18/ have been verified with regard to the appropriateness of the verification method; the correctness of the values applied for ER calculation, the accuracy and applied QA/QC measures. All monitoring parameters have been measured / determined without material misstatements and are in line with all applicable standards and relevant requirements. Complete set of data for the specified monitoring period (01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017) was available. The same is confirmed through verification of electricity export and import data /10/.

Monitoring parameter 01:

Monitoring Parameter

Requirement

Assessment/ Observation by the DOE

Data / Parameter: (as in monitoring plan of PDD):

EGy,Export (Electricity supplied by the proposed project to the national grid)

Value(s) of monitored parameter:

Period EGy, export

(MWh) From To

01/04/2016 30/04/2016 5,766.4

01/05/2016 31/05/2016 5,542.7

01/06/2016 30/06/2016 5,390

01/07/2016 31/07/2016 7,054.4

01/08/2016 31/08/2016 18,547.398

01/09/2016 30/09/2016 12,840.75

01/10/2016 31/10/2016 10,196.829

01/11/2016 30/11/2016 12,781.603

01/12/2016 31/12/2016 18,466.421

Sub-total (01/04/2016-

31/12/2016)

96,586.50

01/01/2017 31/01/2017 35,376.656

01/02/2017 28/02/2017 24,668.139

01/03/2017 31/03/2017 21,130.887

01/04/2017 30/04/2017 13,895.057

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

1/05/2017 31/05/2017 4,944.888

01/06/2017 30/06/2017 11,142.459

Sub-total (01/01/2017 to

30/06/2017)

111,158.09

TOTAL 207,744.587

Measuring frequency/Time Interval:

The electricity supplied by the project activity to grid is continuous measurement by a pair of bi-directional main and check meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the substation and monthly recorded jointly by EVN staff and a representative of PP.

Reporting frequency: Monthly recording jointly by EVN staff and a representative of PP

Is measuring and reporting frequency in accordance with the monitoring plan and monitoring methodology? (Yes / No)

Yes

Type of monitoring equipment:

All the WTGs of the project activity are connected to the sub-station thought two lines. There is a pair of Main and check energy meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the sub-station. ‘131 Main’ and ‘131 Check’ meters for one line and ‘132 Main’ and ‘132 Check’ meters for another line. Summation of these two main meter readings account for value of

EGy,Export. These meters are specific only to the project activity WTGs. There are two secondary back up main meters ‘171’ and ‘172’ for the two individual lines which are not used for the billing purpose.

Is accuracy of the monitoring equipment as stated in the PDD?

The accuracy class of the Main and Check energy meters is 0.2s and 0.5s respectively as verified during the site visit which is in compliance with the registered PDD /18/.

Calibration frequency /interval:

At least once every two year. Calibration frequency is in compliance with the registered PDD /18/.

Is the calibration interval in line with the monitoring plan of the PDD?

Yes

Company performing the calibration:

The Calibration of all the meters have been done by the government authorities as verified from the calibration certificates /07/ and hence accepted.

Did calibration confirm proper functioning of monitoring equipment? (Yes / No):

Yes, the calibration certificates /07/ are verified and found that the error in calibration test is less than respective accuracy class i.e. 0.2s and 0.5s for main and check meter respectively.

Is (are) calibration(s) valid for the whole reporting period?

Yes. Refer section E.7 of this report for calibration details.

If applicable, has the reported data been cross-checked with other available data?

The verification team has verified all the electricity bills/protocols /10/ for this monitoring period and confirms that the same values are applied in the ER calculation sheet /04/. Further the values have been cross-checked from the invoices /11/ and found consistent.

How were the values in the monitoring report verified?

The verification team has verified all the electricity bills/protocols /10/ for this monitoring

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

period and confirms that the same values are applied in the ER calculation sheet /04/.

Does the data management (from monitoring equipment to emission reduction calculation) ensure correct transfer of data and reporting of emission reductions and are necessary QA/QC processes in place?

Yes

In case only partial data are available because activity levels or non-activity parameters have not been monitored in accordance with the registered monitoring plan, has the most conservative assumption theoretically possible been applied or has a request for deviation been approved?

NA



Requirement



EGy,import (Electricity imported from the grid by the proposed project)


Period EGy, import

(MWh) From To

01/04/2016 30/04/2016 24.4

01/05/2016 31/05/2016 44.6

01/06/2016 30/06/2016 53.8

01/07/2016 31/07/2016 55.7

01/08/2016 31/08/2016 17.21

01/09/2016 30/09/2016 18.689

01/10/2016 31/10/2016 42.559

01/11/2016 30/11/2016 53.189

01/12/2016 31/12/2016 42.071

Sub-total (01/04/2016-

31/12/2016)

352.22

01/01/2017 31/01/2017 27.473

01/02/2017 28/02/2017 21.926

01/03/2017 31/03/2017 33.26

01/04/2017 30/04/2017 50.684

1/05/2017 31/05/2017 99.076

01/06/2017 30/06/2017 29.452


30/06/2017)

261.87

TOTAL 614.089

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27


The electricity imported by the project activity from the grid is continuous measurement by a pair of bi-directional main and check meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the substation and monthly recorded jointly by EVN staff and a representative of PP.

Reporting frequency: Monthly recording jointly by EVN staff and a representative of PP


Yes


All the WTGs of the project activity are connected to the sub-station thought two lines. There is a pair of Main and check energy meters (billing meters) at each of the two lines at the sub-station. ‘131 Main’ and ‘131 Check’ meters for one line and ‘132 Main’ and ‘132 Check’ meters for another line. Summation of these two main meter readings account for value of

EGy,import. These meters are specific only to the project activity WTGs. There are two secondary back up main meters ‘171’ and ‘172’ for the two individual lines which are not used for the billing purpose.


The accuracy class of the Main and Check energy meters is 0.2s and 0.5s respectively as verified during the site visit which is in compliance with the registered PDD /18/.


At least once every two year. Calibration frequency is in compliance with the registered PDD /18/.


Yes


The Calibration of all the meters have been done by the government authorities as verified from the calibration certificates /07/ and hence accepted.


Yes, the calibration certificates /07/ are verified and found that the error in calibration test is less than respective accuracy class i.e. 0.2s and 0.5s for main and check meter respectively.


Yes. Refer section E.7 of this report for calibration details.


The verification team has verified all the electricity bills/protocols /10/ for this monitoring period and confirms that the same values are applied in the ER calculation sheet /04/. Further the values have been cross-checked from the invoices /11/ and found consistent.


The verification team has verified all the electricity bills/protocols /10/ for this monitoring period and confirms that the same values are applied in the ER calculation sheet /04/.

Does the data management (from monitoring equipment to emission reduction calculation) ensure correct

Yes

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

transfer of data and reporting of emission reductions and are necessary QA/QC processes in place?


NA



Requirement



EGfacility,y (Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant/unit to the grid in year y)


Period EGfacility,y

(MWh) From To

01/04/2016 30/04/2016 5,742.000

01/05/2016 31/05/2016 5,498.100

01/06/2016 30/06/2016 5,336.200

01/07/2016 31/07/2016 6,998.700

01/08/2016 31/08/2016 18,530.188

01/09/2016 30/09/2016 12,822.061

01/10/2016 31/10/2016 10,154.270

01/11/2016 30/11/2016 12,728.414

01/12/2016 31/12/2016 18,424.350

Sub-total (01/04/2016-

31/12/2016)

96,234.28

01/01/2017 31/01/2017 35,349.183

01/02/2017 28/02/2017 24,646.213

01/03/2017 31/03/2017 21,097.627

01/04/2017 30/04/2017 13,844.373

1/05/2017 31/05/2017 4,845.812

01/06/2017 30/06/2017 11,113.007


30/06/2017)

110,896.22

TOTAL 207,130.498


Monthly calculated from EGy,Export and EGy,import which are continuous measured and monthly recorded. Net electricity delivered to the grid is calculated as follows:

EGfacility,y = EGy,Export - EGy,import

The calculation is provided in the emission reduction calculation sheet /04/. The ER sheet is verified and found that the calculation of

EGfacility,y is correct.

Reporting frequency: Monthly calculated

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27


Yes


NA (It is a calculated value)














NA


The calculation is provided in the emission reduction calculation sheet /04/. The ER sheet is verified and found that the calculation of

EGfacility,y is correct.

Does the data management (from monitoring equipment to emission reduction calculation) ensure correct transfer of data and reporting of emission reductions and are necessary QA/QC processes in place?

Yes


NA


Conclusion The assessment team concludes that the monitoring of the project activity is being carried out in accordance with the registered PDD monitoring plan /18/ and meets the requirements of the applied monitoring methodology /16/. The adequacy and compliance of the registered monitoring plan /18/ in the MR can be concluded to be conforming. The flow of the information from the point of generation up to reporting has been reviewed and found to be correct and appropriate meeting the requirements of the applied methodology.

E.6.3. Implementation of sampling plan

Means of verification No sampling plan applied for the project activity. Therefore, this section is not applicable.

Findings -

Conclusion Not applicable.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

E.7. Compliance with the calibration frequency requirements for measuring instruments

Means of

verification

There are three monitoring parameters

1. EGfacility,y 2. EGy,Export 3. EGy,import

Out of these monitoring parameters, two are monitored i.e. (EGy,Export and EGy,import) and

the monitoring parameter EGfacility,y is calculated. The calibration details of the monitoring

equipments corresponding to both the monitoring parameters i.e. (Goutput and Cy) is given in the below table.

Monitoring

Equipment:

Main Meter 132 (CTC-132)

Backup Meter 132 (CTDP-132)

Meter 171 (CT-171)

Meter 172 (CT-172)

Main Meter 131 (CTC-131)

Backup Meter 131 (CTDP-131)

Function: Measuring energy export to grid and import from grid

Monitored

parameter:

EGy,Export and

EGy,import

EGy,Export and

EGy,import (only when main meter Main meter fails)

Not used for billing purpose and only a back –up meter.

EGy,Export and

EGy,import

EGy,Export and

EGy,import (only when main meter Main meter fails)

Type: Elster Energy meter

Elster Energy meter

Elster Energy meter

Elster Energy meter

Elster Energy meter

Elster Energy meter

Serial

number:

11090571 12163049 10150054 08124470 14159606 15023392

Accuracy: 0.2s 0.5s 0.2s 0.2s 0.2s 0.5s

Frequency

of

calibration:

At least once in every two years

Previous

calibration

date:

23/04/2015 22/12/2015

Name of

the certifier

Electric Power Trading Company (EVNEPTC) & EVNSPCETC

Southern Electrical Testing Company (EVNSPCETC2)

Previous

calibration

date:

22/04/2016 22/04/2016

Name of

the certifier

EVNEPTC & Southern Power Corporation (EVNSPC) & EVNSPCETC

EVNEPTC & EVNSPC & EVNSPCETC

Last

calibration

date:

23-24/03/2017 23-24/03/2017

Name of

the certifier

EVNEPTC & EVNSPC & EVNSPCETC EVNEPTC & EVNSPC & EVNSPCETC

Calibration frequency: Once in two year as per registered PDD monitoring plan /18/. The Calibration performance was checked from the calibration reports /07/ and found that the meters were within the respective accuracy level as verified from the calibration results.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

The calibration validity of the energy meters/07/ during this monitoring period were verified from the corresponding calibration certificates/07/. No delay in calibration was observed. The monitoring equipment’s have been installed in the project activity according to registered monitoring plan /18/.


Conclusion Verification team confirms that the calibration frequency is in line with the monitoring plan mentioned in the Registered PDD /18/.

E.8. Assessment of data and calculation of emission reductions or net removals

E.8.1. Calculation of baseline GHG emissions or baseline net GHG removals by sinks

Means of verification The calculation, applied formulae and the method for calculation of baseline emissions are in accordance with the registered PDD /18/ and are in line with the requirements of the applied methodology (ACM0002 Version 13.0.0 /16/). The formulae and the methods referred in the MR /02/ and the emission reduction calculation spread sheet/04/ for estimation of emission reduction complies with the corresponding formulae and methods in the registered PDD /18/. The ex-ante and validated fixed value of grid emission factor i.e. The combined margin of the emission factor, (0.5751 tCO2e/MWh, registered PDD /18/) is taken into account for the calculation of baseline emissions. The verification team has checked all the monthly electricity bills/protocol/10/ applicable for the WTGs and invoices/11/ applicable for the monitoring period and found all the parameters are monitored and recorded as per the monitoring plan in the registered PDD/18/. The verification team has crosschecked the CER sheet/04/ and monitoring report data with the monthly electricity bills/protocol/10/ applicable for the WTGs and invoices/11/ and found all the input values are matching. As per registered PDD /18/, the baseline emissions of the project is calculated from

net electricity supplied to grid (EGfacility,y) and combined margin emission factor of grid (EF) as follows:

Where EGfacility,y (EGPJ,y) = EGy, export – EGy,import

EGy, export = Electricity exported by the proposed project to the national grid.

EGy,import = Electricity imported from the grid by the proposed project

The electricity export and import values are verified from /10/ and found that the value considered for the ER calculation is correct. Also the Electricity exported and imported to grid are cross verified from the monthly invoices /11/. The calculation is provided in the emission reduction calculation sheet. The ER sheet is verified and found that the calculation of EGPJ,y is correct.

Parameter Description Value for this Monitoring period

EGy, export Electricity exported by the proposed project to the national grid.

207,744.587 MWh

EGy,import Electricity imported from the grid by the proposed project

614.089 MWh

EGPJ,y Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant/unit to the grid in year y

207,130.498 MWh

EFgrid,CM,y Combined margin CO2 emission factor for 0.5751 tCO2/MWh

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”

BEy Baseline emissions in year y (tCO2e/y) 119,120 tCO2

Hence baseline emission for this monitoring period is 119,120 tCO2e (Rounded down)


Conclusion Verification team concludes that the calculation provided in the monitoring report /02/ and emission reduction spread sheet /04/ are complete and reflect all the requirements of the registered monitoring plan/18/ and: a) All the monitored data pertaining to baseline calculation as required by the registered monitoring plan was available to PP, the same has been verified by the verification team. b) All the formula used for the baseline, was in line to the registered monitored plan /18/. c) The ex-ante emission factors correctly sourced from the registered PDD /18/ and was found to be appropriate and justified.

E.8.2. Calculation of project GHG emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks

Means of verification As per registered PDD /18/ and applied methodology /16/, project emission has been considered as zero. Hence the project emission is zero (PEy =0).


Conclusion Hence the project emission is zero (PEy =0).

E.8.3. Calculation of leakage GHG emissions

Means of verification Not applicable in accordance with applied methodology /16/ and registered PDD /18/.

Findings N/A

Conclusion N/A

E.8.4. Summary of calculation of GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG

removals by sinks

Means of verification As per registered PDD/18/, the emission reductions ERy by the project activity during the monitoring period is equal to the baseline emission less project emission and leakage emission.

ERy = BEy – PEy – Ly Since project emission and lekage are zero ERy = BEy = 119,120 tCO2 The calculation provided in the ER sheet and MR was assessed appropriate by the verification team. The verification team confirms that a complete set of data for this monitoring period is available to verify the emission reduction calculation, and the same was found in accordance with the registered PDD/18/. No lack of evidence and missing data were detected during this monitoring period. All values as per the monitoring plan were crosschecked by the verification team against basic monitored data and the calculations were found to be correct. The verification team confirms that the emission reductions are real and measurable.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

No reporting risks have been identified for the data reported. All the monitored data are archived in electronic and paper form. The data will be kept for the whole crediting period and 2 years after the last crediting period thereby meeting the requirement of the PDD. The verification team has checked and confirms that all the meters are calibrated. Thus conclude no material risks in the claimed emission reduction for the applied period


Conclusion Verification team concludes that the calculation provided in the monitoring report /02/, and emission reduction spread sheet/04/ are complete and reflect all the requirements of the monitoring plan/18/ and:

a) All the monitored data as required by the registered monitoring plan /18/ was available to PP, the same has been verified by the verification team.

b) Formula used for the baseline was in line to the registered monitored plan/18/.

c) The ex-ante emission factors correctly sourced from the registered PDD /18/ and was found to be appropriate and justified.

E.8.5. Comparison of actual GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals

by sinks with estimates in registered PDD

Means of verification The MR includes a comparison of the calculated actual emission reductions with the ex-ante calculated values in the registered PDD /18/.

Estimated Emission

Reduction as per

Registered/Approved PDD:

235,536 tCO2e /18/

Actual Emission

Reduction for the

Monitoring Period

119,120 tCO2e/02/

In summary, verification team confirms that the actual emission reduction is lower than the estimate of the registered PDD /18/ for the current monitoring period.


Conclusion In summary, verification team confirms that the actual emission reduction is lower than the estimate of the registered PDD /18/ for the current monitoring period. Verification team confirms that the comparison for the estimated and actual emission reduction for this monitoring period is correctly calculated and reported.

E.8.6. Remarks on difference from estimated value in registered PDD

Means of verification The actual emission reductions are lower than the estimated emission reductions based on the registered PDD /18/.


Conclusion The ERs achieved during the monitoring period are lower by 49.43% than the ERs estimated in the registered PDD /18/. There are multiple reason for the lower emission reduction for this monitoring period as discussed with PP and found OK: 1. The plant started operation in the order of turbine by turbine. Therefore, the installed capacity is only gradually reached. 2. Further as per the discussion with the PP, electricity generation was lower during the monitoring period due to lower wind etc. which is not under the control of PP. Hence the same is accepted. Therefore, the relatively lower performance of the project activity is not considered to be as a result of any change from the activity as described in the registered PDD/18/. The situation is considered as reasonable by the verification team.

E.8.7. Actual GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks

during the first commitment period and the period from 1 January 2013 onwards

Means of verification The complete monitoring period falls after 01 January 2013 and therefore the total ERs during the monitoring period i.e. 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 pertains to the 2

nd

commitment period. Total 119,120 tCO2e CERs verified during this monitoring

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

period i.e. 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (including both the days).

Findings Nil

Conclusion Total 119,120 tCO2e CERs verified pertains to the period from 1 January 2013 onwards.

SECTION F. Internal quality control

>> The draft verification report prepared by team leader is reviewed by an independent technical reviewer (having competence of relevant technical area himself/herself or through an independent technical area expert) to confirm the internal procedures established by KBS are duly followed and the verification report/opinion is reached in an objective manner and complies with the applicable CDM requirements. The independent technical reviewer may approve or reject the draft verification report. The findings may be identified even at this stage, which needs to be satisfactorily resolved, before the request for issuance is submitted to UNFCCC. The final decision is taken by the Manager Technical and Certification. The technical reviewer and Manager T&C can be same person. The final decision is authorized by Managing Director, KBS once the report is approved by the Manager T&C.

SECTION G. Verification opinion

>> The verification team confirms that the evidence is of sufficient quantity, appropriate quality and reliable. The reported values, notation, units and sources in the monitoring report for all the monitoring parameters have been cross checked with the emission reduction sheet and monitoring report. During the course of verification and on site visit, the data submitted by PP was cross verified with the values mentioned in the emission reduction sheet

and monitoring report. The procedure for data monitoring, recording, transfer and

compilation was also verified and found in compliance with the monitoring plan as mentioned in the registered PDD /18/. Evidences (Documents/interview/site visit) referred for verification of individual monitoring parameter and fixed parameters are defined in section E.6 above. It is confirmed by the assessment team that the reported emission reductions have been conservatively calculated. A list of referred documents for verification is also included in Appendix 3 of this report. Based on the information seen and evaluated we confirm that the implementation of the project has resulted in 119,120 tCO2e emission reductions during period from 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (Including both the days).

SECTION H. Certification statement

>> KBS Certification Services Pvt. Ltd. has been contracted by “Swiss Carbon Assets Ltd.” to undertake independent verification and certification for the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions reported from the “Bac Lieu Province Wind Power Plant”, UNFCCC Ref. No. 7250 for the monitoring period 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 in the Monitoring Report Version 1.0 (first version) dated 20/07/2017 /01/.

The verification is based on the registered PDD /18/ and the monitoring report for this project. Our verification approach was based on the requirements as defined under the Kyoto Protocol, Marrakech accord, as well as those defined by the CDM Executive Board.

The management of the “Cong Ly Construction - Trading - Tourism Co., Ltd.” is responsible for the preparation of the GHG emissions data and the reported GHG emissions reductions on the basis set out within the project Final Monitoring Report, version 1.0 dated 20/07/2017/02/. The calculation and determination of GHG emission reductions from the project is the responsibility of the management of the Swiss Carbon Assets Ltd. The development and maintenance of records and reporting procedures are in accordance with the Monitoring Report Version 1.0 dated 20/07/2017/02/.

It is our responsibility to express an independent GHG verification opinion on the GHG emissions and on the calculation of GHG emission reductions from the project for the period 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 based on the reported emission reductions in the Final Monitoring Report Version 1.0 dated 20/07/2017 for the same period.

Based on an understanding of the risks associated with reporting GHG emissions data and the controls in place to mitigate these, KBS planned and performed our work to obtain the information and explanations that we considered necessary to provide sufficient evidence for us to give reasonable assurance that this reported amount of GHG emission reductions for the period is fairly stated.

KBS confirms the following;

Reporting period: From 01/04/2016 to 30/06/2017 (Including both the days)

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

Verified and certified emission in the above reporting period: Amount Unit

Baseline emissions (BE) 119,120 tCO2e Project emissions (PE) 0 tCO2e

Leakage emissions (LE) 0 tCO2e Total CERs (01/01/2015 to 28/02/2017) 119,120 tCO2e

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

Appendix 1. Abbreviations

Abbreviations Full texts

BE Baseline Emission

CAR Corrective Action Request

CDM Clean Development Mechanism

CDM EB CDM Executive Board

CDM PCP Clean Development Mechanism Project Cycle Procedure

CDM PS Clean Development Mechanism Project Standard

CDM VVS CDM Validation and Verification Standard

CER Certified Emission Reduction(s)

CL Clarification request

CO2 Carbon dioxide

CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent

CP Commitment Period

DOE Designated Operational Entity

EB Executive Board

EF Emission factor

ER Emission Reduction

EVN Electricity Corporation of Vietnam

FAR Forward Action Request

GHG Greenhouse Gas(es)

JMR Joint Meter Readings

Kw kilo Watt

KWh kilo Watt hour

MP Monitoring Plan

MR Monitoring Report

MW Mega Watt

MWh Mega Watt hour

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PDD Project Design Document

PP Project Participant

PPA Power Purchase Agreement

UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

VEPTC Vietnam Electricity Power Trading Company

VVS Validation And Verification Standard

WTG Wind Turbo Generator

Appendix 2. Competence of team members and technical

reviewers

Personnel Name: Chetan Swaroop Sharma

Qualified to work as:

Team Leader Technical Expert

Validator/Verifier Financial Expert

Technical Reviewer Local Expert (India)

Area(s) of Technical Expertise

Sectoral Scope Technical Area

Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)

TA 1.1: Thermal energy generation from fossil fuels and biomass including thermal electricity from solar

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

TA 1.2: Energy generation from renewable energy sources

Energy Demand TA 3.1. Energy demand

Waste handling and disposal

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater TA 13.2. Manure

Approved by (Manager C & T) Sanjay Kandari

Approval date: 01/05/2017

Personnel Name: Mr. Pham Van Trung




Technical Reviewer Local Expert (Vietnam)



Not applicable Not applicable

Approved by (Manager C & T) Sanjay Kandari


Personnel Name: Sanjay Kandari




Technical Reviewer Local Expert (India)



Energy Industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)

TA 1.1: Thermal energy generation from fossil fuels and biomass including thermal electricity from solar

Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)

TA 1.2: Energy generation from renewable energy sources

Energy demand TA 3.1. Energy Demand

Waste Handling and Disposal TA 13.1 Waste Handling and Disposal TA 13.2 Manure

Approved by (Manager C & T) Akhilesh Joshi


Appendix 3. Documents reviewed or referenced

No. Author Title References to

the document

Provider

1. Project participant

Webhosted monitoring report Version 1.0, dated 20/07/2017 (published)

Project participant


Final Monitoring report Version 1.0, dated 20/07/2017 (final)

1

Project participant


Draft ER calculation sheet Corresponding to hosted MR

Project participant

1 The hosted MR /01/ and final MR /02/ are materially same and there is no difference between them.

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

version 1.0


Final ER calculation sheet Corresponding to final MR version 1.2

Project participant

5. Project participant, Huy Hoang Heavy Transport and Logistics & GE Vietnam Co Ltd

Commissioning certificates of the project WTGs - Project participant

6. Vietnam Electricity Power Trading Company

Conformation on date of commissioning by VEPTC letter dated 16/09/2013 and 04/11/2016.

- Project participant

7. Third party Calibration Reports of Energy meters corresponding to this monitoring period


8. Project participant & Vietnam Electricity Corporation

PPA Power Purchase agreement with Vietnam Electricity Corporation dated 27/08/2012

27/08/2012 Project participant

9. Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam

Power operation license from Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam


10. Electricity Corporation of Vietnam

Electricity bills/protocols (Joint balance sheet) corresponding to the monitoring period



Monthly electricity invoices corresponding to the monitoring period



Year end management review reports for the year 2016


13. GE Energy

Manufacturer specifications of WTGs implemented under the project activity



Photographic evidence taken during site visit - Project

participant


Training records - Project

participant

16. UNFCCC Approved monitoring methodology: ACM0002 ver. 13 - Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources

- UNFCCC

17. UNFCCC Guidelines for Application of materiality in verifications version 2.0

- Publicly Available

18. UNFCCC/PP

Registered Documents (https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/BVQI1347365592.64/view): 1. Registered PDD- Version 04, Dated 21/08/2012 2. Validation Report prepared by BUREAU

VERITAS CERTIFICATION- Revision 02, Dated 30/08/2012

- UNFCCC

https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/BVQI1347365592.64/view

https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/BVQI1347365592.64/view

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

19. UNFCCC UNFCCC Validation and Verification Standard, version 09 Clean Development Mechanism Project Standard, version, 09 Clean Development Mechanism Project Cycle Procedure, version 09

UNFCCC

20. UNFCCC CDM-MR-FORM - Monitoring report form version 5.1: https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/PDDs_Forms/index.html

- UNFCCC

21. web Websites referred: http://www.itouchmap.com/latlong.html (Latitude-Longitude location finder)

- web

Appendix 4. Clarification requests, corrective action requests

and forward action requests

Table 1. Remaining FAR from validation and/or previous verification

No FAR from previous verification

FAR ID xx Section no. Date: DD/MM/YYYY

Description of FAR

Project participant response Date: DD/MM/YYYY

Documentation provided by project participant

DOE assessment Date: DD/MM/YYYY

Table 2. CL from this verification

No CL from this verification

CL ID xx Section no. Date: DD/MM/YYYY

Description of CL




Table 3. CAR from this verification

CAR ID 01 Section no. E.3 Date: 23/08/2017

Description of CAR

From the review of the “Turbine completion certificate” /05/, verification team has found that the commercial operation date for Turbine G52 is 01/08/2016 however the same is mentioned as 31/07/2016 in the MR.

Project participant response Date: 05/09/2017

https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/PDDs_Forms/index.html

https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/PDDs_Forms/index.html

http://www.itouchmap.com/latlong.html

CDM-VCR-FORM

Version 01.0 of 27

According to the “Turbine completion certificate”, the turbine mechanical completion date is 27/07/2016 while the turbine completion certificate was however signed on 01/08/2016 after “the Field Commissioning and Acceptance Test and the Unit Reliability Run have been successfully completed and the Turbine is producing electricity with established SCADA connectivity”. The commercial operation date is however not based on such “Turbine completion certificate”. It is based on the agreement between EVN and the Project Owner which severs as the basis for electricity invoicing. According to official document No. 3462/EPTC-P5 of EVN dated 04 November 2016 on agreement of the Commercial operation date of the turbines of Bac Lieu Wind Power Plant Phase 2 (52 turbines), the commercial operation date of Turbine 52 is 31/07/2016.


1. Turbine completion certificate of Turbine G52 2. Start date of operation of Turbine G52

DOE assessment Date: 18/09/2017

Verification team has checked the PP response and found OK. Further Verification team has checked the document “official document No. 3462/EPTC-P5 of EVN dated 04 November 2016” /06/ and found the stated commercial operation date of G52 as 31/07/2017 which is consistent with the MR /02/. Hence this CAR is closed.

Table 4. FAR from this verification

No FAR raised during this verification.

FAR ID xx Section No. Date: DD/MM/YYYY

Description of FAR




- - - - -

Document information

Version Date Description

01.0 23 March 2015 Initial publication.

Decision Class: Regulatory Document Type: Form Business Function: Issuance Keywords: project activities, verifying and certifying

VERICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

Documents

Transcript of VERICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT