Vehicle Design and Visibility

26
1 Vehicle Design and Visibility Robert McDonald, IAG Research Centre

description

Vehicle Design and Visibility

Transcript of Vehicle Design and Visibility

Page 1: Vehicle Design and Visibility

1

Vehicle Design and Visibility

Robert McDonald,IAG Research Centre

Page 2: Vehicle Design and Visibility

2

IAG Research Centre

Page 3: Vehicle Design and Visibility

3

Rear Visibility Index – Origins

• Media and government interest

around driveway deaths of children

• Anecdotal information that it was a

4WD (SUV) problem

• Investigation requested by our 3rd

party injury insurer

Page 4: Vehicle Design and Visibility

4

Rear Visibility Index –

Testing Procedure

• Established criteria based on reputable studies

• Test object Height – 600mm (2yr old shoulder ht.)

• Commercial laser device at eye level

• Uses “H” point machine

• Average height driver

• Top selling vehicles

Page 5: Vehicle Design and Visibility

5

Rear Visibility Index – Star Rating System

• Combination of visible area

and horizontal distance

• Takes into account additional

parking aids

Page 6: Vehicle Design and Visibility

6

Test Results

1 Renault Clio Sport (3 Door Hatch) 3.97 4

2 Suzuki Ignis (3 Door Hatch) 4.96 4

3 Audi TT Roadster 5.80 3.5

4 Toyota Echo (3 Door Hatch) 5.80 3.5

5 MG-TF Convertible 6.02 3.5

6 Kia Sportage 6.08 3.5

7 Ford Focus (Hatch - CL) 6.12 3.5

8 Jaguar XJ8 - (Sedan) 6.20 3.5

9 Hyundai Getz (3 Door Hatch) 7.01 3.5

10 Mercedes Benz SL500 7.04 3.5

11 Holden Cruze (5 Door) 7.81 3.5

12 Nissan Pulsar (5 Door Hatch) 8.00 3.5

13 Subaru Forester 8.64 3

14 Peugeot 307 (5 Door Hatch) 9.18 3

15 Mazda 323 Astina 9.54 3

16 Volvo V70 XC 9.65 3

17 Toyota Corolla (Hatch) 10.08 3

18 Toyota Landcruiser (100 Series) 10.64 3

19 VW Polo (3 Door Hatch) 10.80 2.5

20 Nissan X-Trail 10.94 2.5

21 Toyota Hiace 11.13 2.5

22 Ford Falcon Wagon 11.61 2.5

23 Holden Rodeo (4X2 Crew Cab) 11.64 2.5

24 Hyundai Santa Fe 12.74 2.5

25 Holden Astra (5 Door Hatch) 13.20 2.5

26 VW Caravelle (1991) 13.56 2.5

27 Hyundai Terracan 13.94 2.5

28 Toyota Hilux (4X2 Cab Chassis) 14.11 2.5

29 Ford Transit Van 12.40 2

30 Daewoo Tacuma 12.50 2

31 Hyundai Trajet 13.06 2

32 Range Rover 13.96 2

33 Honda CR-V (Previous Model) 14.17 2

34 Ford Falcon (Sedan) 14.25 2

35 Toyota Landcruiser (80 Series) 15.06 2

Rank VehicleInvisible area m2 (up

to distance of 15m)

Star Rating

(out of 5)

36 Toyota Camry (2000) 15.44 2

37 Mitsubsihi Magna (Sedan) 17.52 2

38 Nissan Pulsar (Sedan) 15.65 1.5

39 VW Caravelle (2002) 15.96 1.5

40 Toyota Camry (2002 - No Spoiler) 16.10 1.5

41 Subaru Liberty RX (Sedan) 16.70 1.5

42 Mazda Premacy 17.08 1.5

43 VW Golf (5 Door Hatch) 17.12 1.5

44 Ford Focus (Sedan - Ghia) 18.16 1.5

45 Mercedes C-Class (Sedan) 19.03 1.5

46 Holden Commodore VY (Sedan) 21.17 1.5

47 Toyota Camry (2002 - With Spoiler) 21.33 1.5

48 Toyota Tarago 18.09 1

49 BMW 320i Wagon 18.11 1

50 Hyundai Accent (3 Door Hatch) 18.77 1

51 Toyota RAV4 (3 Door) 18.78 1

52 Nissan Patrol 20.11 1

53 Toyota Avensis 20.65 1

54 Kia Carnival 20.69 1

55 Holden Commodore (VS ute) 20.77 1

56 Mazda 6 (Sedan) 21.54 1

57 VW Passat 21.60 1

58 Hyundai Elantra (5 Door Hatch) 22.92 0.5

59 Honda CR-V (Current Model) 23.51 0.5

60 BMW 325ti (3 Door Coupe) 23.87 0.5

61 Holden Commodore (VX Wagon) 25.05 0.5

62 Mitsubishi Pajero 25.44 0.5

63 Mazda MPV 26.37 0.5

64 Holden Commodore (VX Sedan) 27.00 0

65 Toyota Prado 27.00 0

Page 7: Vehicle Design and Visibility

7

Rear Visibility Index– Released to media in 2002

Page 8: Vehicle Design and Visibility

8

Results – news media

Page 9: Vehicle Design and Visibility

9

NSW Motor Accident Authority Education Campaign

• MAA Document

• Targeted at families and

new parents

Page 10: Vehicle Design and Visibility

10

Insurance Website

• www.nrma.com.au/reversing

Page 11: Vehicle Design and Visibility

11

Parking Sensors

• Many OE sensors too susceptible to side image which results in false alarms

• Aftermarket sensors offer variable placement and some are adjustable

• Usefulness only to prevent parking damage to vehicle

Page 12: Vehicle Design and Visibility

12

Reversing Cameras

• Wide angle cameras mounted in rear of

vehicle (above rear bumper) are effective in

most situations in reducing rear blind spots

• Screens should be mounted as high as

possible and mirror reversed

Page 13: Vehicle Design and Visibility

13

Aftermarket cameras and parking sensors

• Cost of both aftermarket parking sensors ($100)

and reversing cameras ($200) has fallen

dramatically

Page 14: Vehicle Design and Visibility

14

Reversing Camera Status

• 23% now have camera standard

• 11% now optional

•c

Page 15: Vehicle Design and Visibility

15

Results - car manufacturer marketing

Page 16: Vehicle Design and Visibility

16

Rearward Visibility Issues Vehicle design

Page 17: Vehicle Design and Visibility

17

Forward Visibility

• Modern cars pillars are significantly

stronger for crash safety.

• Major blind spot in many cars

Page 18: Vehicle Design and Visibility

18

Forward Visibility Index – Testing Criteria

• Same parameters as Rear Visibility

• Test object Height – 600mm

• Average height driver

• Top selling vehicles

Page 19: Vehicle Design and Visibility

19

Forward Visibility Index

• Combination of visible area and horizontal distance

Page 20: Vehicle Design and Visibility

20

Forward Visibility

Page 21: Vehicle Design and Visibility

21

Forward Visibility

Page 22: Vehicle Design and Visibility

22

• Percentage of 360 degree view blocked calculated

• Range of Results – 19% - 39%

•c

360o Visibility

Page 23: Vehicle Design and Visibility

23

ANCAP HAS BEEN CONDUCTINGPEDESTRIAN PROTECTION TESTSSINCE 2000

Page 24: Vehicle Design and Visibility

24

• High – tech reversing cameras

• Guidelines and side cameras added

The Future?

Page 25: Vehicle Design and Visibility

25

The Future?

• Modern AEB systems can detect people

•c

Page 26: Vehicle Design and Visibility

26

Summary

• Modern vehicle design is going to

continue to interfere with visibility

• All modern vehicles have visibility issues

• Technology may offer partial solutions

• Building standards could help

• Driver behaviour modification

• Vehicle marketing/ buyer awareness